rylah
Gold Member
- Jun 10, 2015
- 22,910
- 4,863
- 290
- Thread starter
- #101
You're really that naive to think they actually want a state-they would have it prior to '67.
Do You think they'll suddenly change their ways and prefer to govern themselves,
rather than blame the inadequacy of their representatives on Israel?
Well if he's thinking with his head he won't let the establishment of a "state"
that put Israels destruction (rather than the well being of their citizens) before everything.
The real question is:
Is there a solid basis to argue that "balestinians" will ever respect a peace offering
as the did with Rabbin, Olmert, Barak who offered them much more than they demand today,
or even Sharon who evicted jews from homes and gave balestinians a flower industy
which they instead destroyed and began another war?
Do you believe it helps your argument childishly making reference to particular tonal characteristics of a language?
Europeans went to Palestine subjugate the inhabitants and colonize it with Jews. They successfully expelled a large number of Christians and Muslims from Palestine and now rule over the Christians and Muslims of Palestine that they were unable to expel, and their descendants. Do you think that the Christians and Muslims should be happy about this?Do you think they have a right to be hostile? How would you feel if you had been violated as a people as they have?
There is no longer an option for a Palestinian state so why even worry about "respecting" a peace offering?
1. My reference to linguistic characteristics and the mere history of the Hebrew/Torah language was
to clarify to an uneducated person of his misunderstanding, as a speaker of that language.
You people are so sure in Your mislead education about Jews makes my clarification a valid thing.
How You deal with those contradictions is up to You.
2. I don't care for how "mistreated" those christians and muslims felt since they
collborated with Adolf Hitler. Your church clerics shamed Your church by saluting a pagan worshipper,
giving him green light to massacre millions.
It's my people who were violated in one of the biggest genocides ever...and it happened less than
100 years ago. Muslims are obliged to hate Jews while christians celebrated Holocaust
and still blame Jews for yeshu's death.
Do Jews have a right to be hostile?
Not against people who had nothing to do with the genocide which occurred in Europe and was implemented by Christians. The Christians and Muslims of Palestine did not collaborate with Hitler. A leader desperately trying to save his people from colonization and dispossession has every right to seek help from the enemies of the world's foremost colonial power imposing colonization and dispossession on his people.
Seeking help in annihilation of the JEWS?
Another perspective is to be cold minded and analyze both sides.
You never take into account the Jewish right for this land tha's accepted by christians and muslims in their scriptures.
And You don't take into account that arabs actually sold those lands.
Now what about the numerous massacres that Mufti organized in the 19 century (I already showed You)
hunting those Sefardi jews, where could they go?
It all depends on Your goals here, did You come to seek knowledge and understanding
or to push Your one-sided view?