Anti-Trump Protester Punched, Kicked At Tucson Rally

[mudwhistle]

Nope.
Trump rented the place he holds his rallies, so any protesters, violent or otherwise, are an unwelcome intrusion of the event. They can be charged. If they're fighting they can be locked up.

Yes, but if his supporters feel they "have" to assault the protesters, rather than allowing the cops to handle it as civilized human beings would do, THEY can and will be locked up, as well.

I'm sure they will. But kicking these fuckers asses has a special satisfaction attached to it.

Spoken like someone who should be ashamed of what he's become.

A rational American who loves his country?
Guilty as charged.

A blithering kneejerk lunatic who thinks "I'm angry" justifies putting his brain on autopilot and endangering the country he claims to love in service of his national temper tantrum.

You sold out to libthink. I'm embarrassed for you every time you post.

Save it.

You have your own embarrassing behavior to worry about.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Your right to travel doesn't override the law requiring you not to hit pedestrians with your car, even when they're in the road where they shouldn't be. I have a right to travel to work in the morning, but that doesn't allow me to mow down jaywalkers.

A jaywalker doesn't have the objective to block you from traveling. A protester blocking the roadway does.

You still don't get to run them over with your car, George.

Yet you think they have a right to block my way?

Learn the difference between "doesn't have a right to block the road" and "so I have a right to kill him".

Or just get some meds for the incipient psychopathy, Charles Manson. Whatever works.

Learn that someone exercising their rights doesn't mean they can violate mine in the process.

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

 

[Conservative65]

A jaywalker doesn't have the objective to block you from traveling. A protester blocking the roadway does.

You still don't get to run them over with your car, George.

Yet you think they have a right to block my way?

Learn the difference between "doesn't have a right to block the road" and "so I have a right to kill him".

Or just get some meds for the incipient psychopathy, Charles Manson. Whatever works.

Learn that someone exercising their rights doesn't mean they can violate mine in the process.

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

 

[Seawytch]

You still don't get to run them over with your car, George.

Yet you think they have a right to block my way?

Learn the difference between "doesn't have a right to block the road" and "so I have a right to kill him".

Or just get some meds for the incipient psychopathy, Charles Manson. Whatever works.

Learn that someone exercising their rights doesn't mean they can violate mine in the process.

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

 

[Conservative65]

Yet you think they have a right to block my way?

Learn the difference between "doesn't have a right to block the road" and "so I have a right to kill him".

Or just get some meds for the incipient psychopathy, Charles Manson. Whatever works.

Learn that someone exercising their rights doesn't mean they can violate mine in the process.

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

My State's law extend the castle doctrine to vehicles. What my State's law say is that if I, not you, believe my life is being threatened or their is potential harm to me, I have the right to use deadly force.

Do you believe a protestor has the right to lie down in front of my car and purposely block me because he/she is pissed about something?

 

[Seawytch]

Learn the difference between "doesn't have a right to block the road" and "so I have a right to kill him".

Or just get some meds for the incipient psychopathy, Charles Manson. Whatever works.

Learn that someone exercising their rights doesn't mean they can violate mine in the process.

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

My State's law extend the castle doctrine to vehicles. What my State's law say is that if I, not you, believe my life is being threatened or their is potential harm to me, I have the right to use deadly force.

You aren't being threatened with harm by a protester blocking a road by lying down on it.


Try answering the question. Do you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car?

Do you believe a protestor has the right to lie down in front of my car and purposely block me because he/she is pissed about something?

They have a right to protest. If they are breaking a law by doing so, the police can take them away...not run them over.

 

[Conservative65]

Learn that someone exercising their rights doesn't mean they can violate mine in the process.

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

My State's law extend the castle doctrine to vehicles. What my State's law say is that if I, not you, believe my life is being threatened or their is potential harm to me, I have the right to use deadly force.

You aren't being threatened with harm by a protester blocking a road by lying down on it.


Try answering the question. Do you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car?

Do you believe a protestor has the right to lie down in front of my car and purposely block me because he/she is pissed about something?

They have a right to protest. If they are breaking a law by doing so, the police can take them away...not run them over.

According to my State's laws, YOU don't get to make that determination for me. I do.

I answered the question and you don't like it.

You mean the police you Liberal haters prefer to have shot by thugs instead of letting them do their job?

Sad to see you think their ability to do something is more important than whatever they may be keeping me from doing.

Maybe one of those protestors will lie down in front of the ambulance of a loved one or the fire truck if your house is on fire. We can only hope it's yours when it happens.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[Seawytch]

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

My State's law extend the castle doctrine to vehicles. What my State's law say is that if I, not you, believe my life is being threatened or their is potential harm to me, I have the right to use deadly force.

You aren't being threatened with harm by a protester blocking a road by lying down on it.


Try answering the question. Do you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car?

Do you believe a protestor has the right to lie down in front of my car and purposely block me because he/she is pissed about something?

They have a right to protest. If they are breaking a law by doing so, the police can take them away...not run them over.

According to my State's laws, YOU don't get to make that determination for me. I do.

I answered the question and you don't like it.

You mean the police you Liberal haters prefer to have shot by thugs instead of letting them do their job?

Sad to see you think their ability to do something is more important than whatever they may be keeping me from doing.

Maybe one of those protestors will lie down in front of the ambulance of a loved one or the fire truck if your house is on fire. We can only hope it's yours when it happens.

No matter what you believe in your heart of hearts, no state law allows you to run over someone laying in the street.

Keep believing it does all you want to...in prison.

 

[Cecilie1200]

You still don't get to run them over with your car, George.

Yet you think they have a right to block my way?

Learn the difference between "doesn't have a right to block the road" and "so I have a right to kill him".

Or just get some meds for the incipient psychopathy, Charles Manson. Whatever works.

Learn that someone exercising their rights doesn't mean they can violate mine in the process.

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

Who the **** am I? Clearly, someone with at least 50 IQ points over you, not to mention a functioning bullshit detector.

By all means, Clarence Darrow, you go on with your bad, informed, uber-mature self and exercise your perceived right to mow protesters down with your car because they DARED to "violate your right" to drive to a Trump rally as quickly as you wanted to, such that you deemed it a "threat" requiring deadly force, and you try that argument in court. I won't miss the protester at all, and I will laugh my ass off for the rest of your misbegotten, Neanderthal trash life while you sit in prison, screaming, "He violated my rights! He was in the road and I couldn't drive! I had a right to kill him for the threat of being where I wanted to go!"

You don't have to like THAT, and frankly, I hope you hate it.

But we both know you won't do jack except for run your gums and mouth empty attempts to sound tough and manly from the safety of your Internet connection. Your machismo is an imitation of your testosterone-challenged hero, Donny: a big ******* empty show, that evaporates into squealing like a little girl and clutching at his Secret Service agents the first time someone actually gets near him.

My cat has more sack than you and Donny put together, AFTER I had him fixed. Hey, how yellow do you think Donny's shorts were after that incident? Or were they brown?

Ted Cruz is right about Donny, and you too. Sniveling loudmouthed cowards.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Yet you think they have a right to block my way?

Learn the difference between "doesn't have a right to block the road" and "so I have a right to kill him".

Or just get some meds for the incipient psychopathy, Charles Manson. Whatever works.

Learn that someone exercising their rights doesn't mean they can violate mine in the process.

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

Of course he doesn't. He just really believes that if he makes a lot of empty threats, it'll make him sound like a tough manly-man like his Messiah, Donny Boy.

What he doesn't realize is that, since Donald Trump is every bit the empty codpiece he is, his behavior is literally accomplishing exactly that.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Learn the difference between "doesn't have a right to block the road" and "so I have a right to kill him".

Or just get some meds for the incipient psychopathy, Charles Manson. Whatever works.

Learn that someone exercising their rights doesn't mean they can violate mine in the process.

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

My State's law extend the castle doctrine to vehicles. What my State's law say is that if I, not you, believe my life is being threatened or their is potential harm to me, I have the right to use deadly force.

Do you believe a protestor has the right to lie down in front of my car and purposely block me because he/she is pissed about something?

I realize that you think you're going to die if you don't get to see Donny Boy RIGHT NOW, but you realize that that's hyperbole, and you're not ACTUALLY going to die from it, right? You're in more danger from a mercy killing from someone mistaking you for being in a vegetative state. Waiting for the cops to clear the roadway isn't actually a threat to your life, more's the pity.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Learn that someone exercising their rights doesn't mean they can violate mine in the process.

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

My State's law extend the castle doctrine to vehicles. What my State's law say is that if I, not you, believe my life is being threatened or their is potential harm to me, I have the right to use deadly force.

You aren't being threatened with harm by a protester blocking a road by lying down on it.


Try answering the question. Do you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car?

Do you believe a protestor has the right to lie down in front of my car and purposely block me because he/she is pissed about something?

They have a right to protest. If they are breaking a law by doing so, the police can take them away...not run them over.

Do you realize how sad it is that you and I have roundly reviled each other for years on this board, and now we're having to look to each other for someone still vaguely in touch with reality? I guess Donny Boy really IS a uniter.

Maybe when the detritus of Donny Trump and his Bedlam Brigade are cleared away, the few sane people still standing on both sides can contemplate a return to a gentlemanly agreement to disagree. Not holding my breath, but it would be nice if we could hold onto the example of THESE frothing lunatics for a little while, at least.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

My State's law extend the castle doctrine to vehicles. What my State's law say is that if I, not you, believe my life is being threatened or their is potential harm to me, I have the right to use deadly force.

You aren't being threatened with harm by a protester blocking a road by lying down on it.


Try answering the question. Do you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car?

Do you believe a protestor has the right to lie down in front of my car and purposely block me because he/she is pissed about something?

They have a right to protest. If they are breaking a law by doing so, the police can take them away...not run them over.

According to my State's laws, YOU don't get to make that determination for me. I do.

I answered the question and you don't like it.

You mean the police you Liberal haters prefer to have shot by thugs instead of letting them do their job?

Sad to see you think their ability to do something is more important than whatever they may be keeping me from doing.

Maybe one of those protestors will lie down in front of the ambulance of a loved one or the fire truck if your house is on fire. We can only hope it's yours when it happens.

Yeah, whatever, Tough Guy. Get your happy, bullshitting ass out there and put your court case where your mouth is and show us how you have the "right" to run people over because you felt "threatened" by the deadly dangerous need to use your brake pedal. Oh noes!

 

[Cecilie1200]

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

My State's law extend the castle doctrine to vehicles. What my State's law say is that if I, not you, believe my life is being threatened or their is potential harm to me, I have the right to use deadly force.

You aren't being threatened with harm by a protester blocking a road by lying down on it.


Try answering the question. Do you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car?

Do you believe a protestor has the right to lie down in front of my car and purposely block me because he/she is pissed about something?

They have a right to protest. If they are breaking a law by doing so, the police can take them away...not run them over.

According to my State's laws, YOU don't get to make that determination for me. I do.

I answered the question and you don't like it.

You mean the police you Liberal haters prefer to have shot by thugs instead of letting them do their job?

Sad to see you think their ability to do something is more important than whatever they may be keeping me from doing.

Maybe one of those protestors will lie down in front of the ambulance of a loved one or the fire truck if your house is on fire. We can only hope it's yours when it happens.

No matter what you believe in your heart of hearts, no state law allows you to run over someone laying in the street.

Keep believing it does all you want to...in prison.

He'd be the cellblock ***** inside an hour . . . yet another thing he has in common with ***** Trump.

 

[Conservative65]

Yet you think they have a right to block my way?

Learn the difference between "doesn't have a right to block the road" and "so I have a right to kill him".

Or just get some meds for the incipient psychopathy, Charles Manson. Whatever works.

Learn that someone exercising their rights doesn't mean they can violate mine in the process.

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

Who the **** am I? Clearly, someone with at least 50 IQ points over you, not to mention a functioning bullshit detector.

By all means, Clarence Darrow, you go on with your bad, informed, uber-mature self and exercise your perceived right to mow protesters down with your car because they DARED to "violate your right" to drive to a Trump rally as quickly as you wanted to, such that you deemed it a "threat" requiring deadly force, and you try that argument in court. I won't miss the protester at all, and I will laugh my ass off for the rest of your misbegotten, Neanderthal trash life while you sit in prison, screaming, "He violated my rights! He was in the road and I couldn't drive! I had a right to kill him for the threat of being where I wanted to go!"

You don't have to like THAT, and frankly, I hope you hate it.

But we both know you won't do jack except for run your gums and mouth empty attempts to sound tough and manly from the safety of your Internet connection. Your machismo is an imitation of your testosterone-challenged hero, Donny: a big ******* empty show, that evaporates into squealing like a little girl and clutching at his Secret Service agents the first time someone actually gets near him.

My cat has more sack than you and Donny put together, AFTER I had him fixed. Hey, how yellow do you think Donny's shorts were after that incident? Or were they brown?

Ted Cruz is right about Donny, and you too. Sniveling loudmouthed cowards.

Your dumbass can't count to 50.

We both know you won't go into the street and do what you say you have the right to do. You'll talk big but you won't put yourself where you put your mouth.

The only ***** bigger than you is your cat.

 

[Conservative65]

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

My State's law extend the castle doctrine to vehicles. What my State's law say is that if I, not you, believe my life is being threatened or their is potential harm to me, I have the right to use deadly force.

You aren't being threatened with harm by a protester blocking a road by lying down on it.


Try answering the question. Do you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car?

Do you believe a protestor has the right to lie down in front of my car and purposely block me because he/she is pissed about something?

They have a right to protest. If they are breaking a law by doing so, the police can take them away...not run them over.

According to my State's laws, YOU don't get to make that determination for me. I do.

I answered the question and you don't like it.

You mean the police you Liberal haters prefer to have shot by thugs instead of letting them do their job?

Sad to see you think their ability to do something is more important than whatever they may be keeping me from doing.

Maybe one of those protestors will lie down in front of the ambulance of a loved one or the fire truck if your house is on fire. We can only hope it's yours when it happens.

Yeah, whatever, Tough Guy. Get your happy, bullshitting ass out there and put your court case where your mouth is and show us how you have the "right" to run people over because you felt "threatened" by the deadly dangerous need to use your brake pedal. Oh noes!

I HOPE one of your family members is in the ambulance or has the house on fire and these protesters get in the way of it. We'll see how you feel about their ability to disrupts such things should it happen.

 

[Conservative65]

Learn the difference between "doesn't have a right to block the road" and "so I have a right to kill him".

Or just get some meds for the incipient psychopathy, Charles Manson. Whatever works.

Learn that someone exercising their rights doesn't mean they can violate mine in the process.

Learn that "violated my rights!" isn't a capital crime. And maybe grow the **** up and gain a little bit of adult perspective. I expect my first-grader to react to frustration and annoyance with an emotional nuclear bomb. I expect putative grown-ups to understand that, "Ehrmagerd, I can't drive where I want to RIGHT NOW! SOMEONE MUST DIE BECAUSE I HAVE A RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPEDED!" is ******* ridiculous and psychotic.

Take a couple of deep breaths and listen to yourself. You're actually trying to argue in favor of, "Someone has annoyed me, so I should be able to kill them." This to you is a serious, rational viewpoint, because "RIGHTS!" And then you wonder why people keep saying Trumpettes are crazy and undeserving of respect.

At some point, you Trump whackjobs need to take some counsel from Ghandi: "Nobody can hurt me without my permission." Yeah, protesters are trying to annoy and incite you. Why are YOU choosing to let them succeed?

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

Of course he doesn't. He just really believes that if he makes a lot of empty threats, it'll make him sound like a tough manly-man like his Messiah, Donny Boy.

What he doesn't realize is that, since Donald Trump is every bit the empty codpiece he is, his behavior is literally accomplishing exactly that.

Yet I haven't seen you get out in the street and do what you say you can do. When are you going to do anything but run your mouth you little *****?

 

[Conservative65]

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

My State's law extend the castle doctrine to vehicles. What my State's law say is that if I, not you, believe my life is being threatened or their is potential harm to me, I have the right to use deadly force.

You aren't being threatened with harm by a protester blocking a road by lying down on it.


Try answering the question. Do you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car?

Do you believe a protestor has the right to lie down in front of my car and purposely block me because he/she is pissed about something?

They have a right to protest. If they are breaking a law by doing so, the police can take them away...not run them over.

According to my State's laws, YOU don't get to make that determination for me. I do.

I answered the question and you don't like it.

You mean the police you Liberal haters prefer to have shot by thugs instead of letting them do their job?

Sad to see you think their ability to do something is more important than whatever they may be keeping me from doing.

Maybe one of those protestors will lie down in front of the ambulance of a loved one or the fire truck if your house is on fire. We can only hope it's yours when it happens.

No matter what you believe in your heart of hearts, no state law allows you to run over someone laying in the street.

Keep believing it does all you want to...in prison.

He'd be the cellblock ***** inside an hour . . . yet another thing he has in common with ***** Trump.

Sounds like to me you already are someone's *****. Bend over and take it.

 

[Conservative65]

Who the **** are you to think you can lecture me about what I should and shouldn't do or what towelhead I should listen to?

Learn that my State's say that the castle doctrine extends my vehicle and if I, not you or anyone else, deem that there is a threat, I can use deadly force. You don't have to like it but it is the law.

And you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car? Do you really and truly believe that?

My State's law extend the castle doctrine to vehicles. What my State's law say is that if I, not you, believe my life is being threatened or their is potential harm to me, I have the right to use deadly force.

You aren't being threatened with harm by a protester blocking a road by lying down on it.


Try answering the question. Do you actually believe that your state law would allow you to run over a protester laying down in front of your car?

Do you believe a protestor has the right to lie down in front of my car and purposely block me because he/she is pissed about something?

They have a right to protest. If they are breaking a law by doing so, the police can take them away...not run them over.

According to my State's laws, YOU don't get to make that determination for me. I do.

I answered the question and you don't like it.

You mean the police you Liberal haters prefer to have shot by thugs instead of letting them do their job?

Sad to see you think their ability to do something is more important than whatever they may be keeping me from doing.

Maybe one of those protestors will lie down in front of the ambulance of a loved one or the fire truck if your house is on fire. We can only hope it's yours when it happens.

No matter what you believe in your heart of hearts, no state law allows you to run over someone laying in the street.

Keep believing it does all you want to...in prison.

Keep being Cecile's *****.