Anti-Muslim Rhetoric needs Agressive Action

[Stephanie]

Loretta Lynch Vows to Prosecute Those Who Use 'Anti-Muslim' Speech That 'Edges Toward Violence'


The day after a horrific shooting spree by a "radicalized" Muslim man and his partner in San Bernardino, California, Attorney General Loretta Lynch pledged to a group of Muslim activists that she would take aggressive action against anyone who used "anti-Muslim rhetoric" that "edges toward violence."

Speaking to the audience at the Muslim Advocate's 10th anniversary dinner Thursday, Lynch said her "greatest fear" is the "incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric" in America and vowed to prosecute any guilty of what she deemed violence-inspiring speech.

Assuring the pro-Muslim group that "we stand with you," Lynch said she would use her Justice Department to protect Muslims from "violence" and discrimination.

Claiming that violence against Muslims is on the rise and citing France's clamp down on potentially radicalized mosques, Lynch suggested the Constitution does not protect "actions predicated on violent talk" and pledged to prosecute those responsible for such actions.

“When we talk about the First amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American," said Lynch. "They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted."

"My message not just to the Muslim community but to all Americans is ‘We cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on,'" said Lynch.

It is painfully clear that, like her predecessor Eric Holder, Lynch is far more concerned with promoting the social justice agenda than protecting the Constitutional rights of American citizens. What exactly is speech that "edges toward violence"? What exactly are "actions predicated on violent talk"? In the end, it is whatever she decides it to mean.


We've just had yet another terror attack here in the US, is "anti-Muslim rhetoric" really the most pressing problem the Justice Department ought to focus on?

The Left has no clue of the violence they are promoting. They have no understanding of human nature whatsoever.

I think they do know. and I hope this wakes up the American people to JUST WHO this administration which includes Hillary just who they ARE IN BED WITH AND BEING FUNDED BY. They aren't looking out for us folks

 

[Katzndogz]

Lynch has given a very pointed warning to anyone that might see something suspicious. They either shut up like the Farooq neighbor did, or face prosecution.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Ignorance is Strength

A fictional axiom whose origin was assigned fittingly by Orwell to the forces of Socialism, and as your brother Vladimir Lenin once said "The goal of socialism is communism."

People like you, callous conservatives

I am no more a conservative than were Washington, Madison or Jefferson.

Not every American supported the methods used to move our nation west

True, but move it did. Not every American supported our stake against Nazism either. Recall Joseph Kennedy off the top. Regardless, such is the march of history, no different here than anywhere else. But, since this country is now fully occupied and under a long-standing Constitution, permitting history to march here once again, as the Democrats are inviting, is not acceptable.

 

[peach174]

We've just had yet another terror attack here in the US, is "anti-Muslim rhetoric" really the most pressing problem the Justice Department ought to focus on?

If it plays into the hands of ISIS, YES.

No it doesn't.... ISIS and the Jihadists don't give a shit. Their goal is the destruction of America, that goal isn't going to change.

This PC bullshit is going to be our undoing.

It already has in California, when the neighbors were afraid to report about them.

 

[freemind]

Loretta Lynch Vows to Prosecute Those Who Use 'Anti-Muslim' Speech That 'Edges Toward Violence'


The day after a horrific shooting spree by a "radicalized" Muslim man and his partner in San Bernardino, California, Attorney General Loretta Lynch pledged to a group of Muslim activists that she would take aggressive action against anyone who used "anti-Muslim rhetoric" that "edges toward violence."

Speaking to the audience at the Muslim Advocate's 10th anniversary dinner Thursday, Lynch said her "greatest fear" is the "incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric" in America and vowed to prosecute any guilty of what she deemed violence-inspiring speech.

Assuring the pro-Muslim group that "we stand with you," Lynch said she would use her Justice Department to protect Muslims from "violence" and discrimination.

Claiming that violence against Muslims is on the rise and citing France's clamp down on potentially radicalized mosques, Lynch suggested the Constitution does not protect "actions predicated on violent talk" and pledged to prosecute those responsible for such actions.

“When we talk about the First amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American," said Lynch. "They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted."

"My message not just to the Muslim community but to all Americans is ‘We cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on,'" said Lynch.

It is painfully clear that, like her predecessor Eric Holder, Lynch is far more concerned with promoting the social justice agenda than protecting the Constitutional rights of American citizens. What exactly is speech that "edges toward violence"? What exactly are "actions predicated on violent talk"? In the end, it is whatever she decides it to mean.


We've just had yet another terror attack here in the US, is "anti-Muslim rhetoric" really the most pressing problem the Justice Department ought to focus on?

Anti-muslim speech needs to be turned into anti-muslim action.

 

[Stephanie]

the first order of action against hateful speech would be to REMOVE that woman form office. and then we move onto Obama.

my gawd wake up people. they are threatening you for you right to Freedom of speech