Anti Muslim Hysteria in the School. Parents Prefer Ignorance to Learning

[Correll]

What the **** is wrong with you left wing morons? Has the butthurt you suffer from affected your ability to read?

so....you cannot show me that those things have not been taught but rather you name call. Low IQ, eh?

No. The left wants to ban Christian teaching but allows Islam. Is that too tough for you?

You can repeat horseshit as many times as you want, but it is still nothing but warmed over horseshit

Immigrants doing jobs that Americans won't do, and adding to our cultural diversity.

Michigan Doctor Charged With Performing Female Genital Mutilation On Girls

And Trump is mutilating females in his own way

Trump Signs Anti-Planned Parenthood Bill As Anti-Choice Activists Look On | Right Wing Watch

Naturally, Religious Right activists were thrilled by the measure targeting Planned Parenthood, apparently unconcerned about the fact that it will block low-income patients’ access to health care. Trump even invited top right-wing activists to the Oval Office to watch him sign the legislation.

Videos | The Huffington Post

If you could ban Trump and Trump supporters from immigrating to this nation, thus containing and restricting the growth of their political power and them being a part of your future cultural fusion, would you do it?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I used to think you're a fool.....

....now, my opinion of you is far lower.

1. "Alt Right" is a made up term to infuse you fools with your marching orders.

2. Liberalism is the oppression that demands all bow to big government....and if one refuses to bake a cake to the liking of the tyrants, you'll be put our of business,and...the first amendment notwithstanding, be slapped with a gag order.

Soooo....how do I end this and make you comfy? With a 'sieg heil'?



Why aren't you wearing your brown shirt in the avi?

Thanks for replying to that. I didn't know where to begin to reply to such nonsense.

And thank you for that post.

Even at a glance one can see that an avi putting two concepts that are syncretic, shows that the poster is uneducated, and, in fact, a moron.

One can hardly be patriotic, an adherent to the America of the Founders, and be a progressive....as these are individuals who refuse to honor or adhere to the Constitution.

...as in this by an early Progressive, Teddy Roosevelt:
Theodore Roosevelt had little regard for the limits the Constitution imposed on the presidency. In the United Mine Workers strike in 1902, Roosevelt threatened to order the army to run the coal mines.

Well known is TR's outburst, when told the Constitution did not permit the confiscation of private property: "To hell with the Constitution when the people want coal!"

Less well known is that at one point TR summoned General John M. Schofield, instructing him: "I bid you pay no heed to any other authority, no heed to a writ from a judge, or anything else except my commands." (p. 138) "33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask," by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.

King Theodore the First, I guess.

Contrary to popular belief, the U.S Founding Fathers were tougher on Corporations than the U.S has been in more recent times.

I for one happen to support regulating business heavily in threatening them for hiring Illegals, and outsourcing jobs, as this erodes American livelihood.

But, this article proves the U.S Founding Fathers were for more regulations, than present America.

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations | Addicting Info | The Knowledge You Crave

Back in the days of the Founding Fathers, corporations could only exist for 20-30 years and could only deal in one commodety.
After the nation’s founding, corporations were granted charters by the state as they are today. Unlike today, however, corporations were only permitted to exist 20 or 30 years and could only deal in one commodity, could not hold stock in other companies, and their property holdings were limited to what they needed to accomplish their business goals. And perhaps the most important facet of all this is that most states in the early days of the nation had laws on the books that made any political contribution by corporations a criminal offense. When you think about it, the regulations imposed on corporations in the early days of America were far harsher than they are now.

You should read the article with a more critical eye.
1. It makes the same point about corporations several times
2. It claims to be about the Founding Fathers, yet they are not the most quoted
3. The source is Leftwing, meaning anti-capitalism, which gives pause to any seeking the truth.

Oh...and yes, King John did save Europe.

As a Polish American, I'm quite well versed in the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy.

This includes 10's of thousands of Poles killed for resisting the Soviet regime, and this goes on into the 1980's when Polish priest Popieluszko was killed.

However, on the whole it was more Nationalistic, and Socially right wing, than modern Capitalist Poland.

Gays were not allowed to have parades in Soviet Poland, there were almost no immigrants, everyone drove a Polish car, the economy was not controlled largely by foreigners, and Jews were barred from holding positions of power.

These are things that have actually become quite more Liberal in modern Capitalist Poland, as opposed to Soviet Poland.

What sort of fool would simply mention this....and shrug it off....

"...the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy."


I'd be more than thrilled to discuss the iniquities of Liberals, Socialists, etc. in contemporary America....

....but far.....FAR....more interested and prepared to remind all of the source of our modern political and economic problems.....Marx, Hegel, Stalin and Roosevelt.


Clearly, you lack the ability to prioritize.

Stick with King John at the gates of Vienna.

 

[PoliticalChic]

[.
2. Liberalism is the oppression that demands all bow to big government....and if one refuses to bake a cake to the liking of the tyrants, you'll be put our of business,and...the first amendment notwithstanding, be slapped with a gag order.

Soooo....how do I end this and make you comfy? With a 'sieg heil'?

I'm rather Fascist in my beliefs, and I believe that Capitalism sells out to so called Cultural Marxism, as they profit off of importing illegal immigrants for cheap labor, selling Gays wedding apparel, selling Abortions by Hospital Capitalists, selling Liberalism, and degeneracy in Hollywood, and the media.

I think Fascism gets a unfair rap, sure I'm anti-Nazi for their crimes.

However Fascists were by no means the most prolific mass murderers.
As I outlined below in the below thread.

Fascism killed less than Capitalism, Communism, or Monarchy, but takes more heat for it.

"I think Fascism gets a unfair rap,"

You couldn't be more wrong.
You could try...but you wouldn't succeed.

I'm an American by choice, and the comparing the Founders with your nonsense is fairly simple:

a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


or


b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


There is no difference in desired outcome for society between Fascism, Nazism, Communism, Liberalism, Socialism or Progressivism.

The results of collectivist regimes is covered here:

"The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression"
by Jean-Louis Panné (Author), Andrzej Paczkowski (Author), Karel Bartosek (Author), Jean-Louis Margolin (Author), Nicolas Werth (Author), Stéphane Courtois (Author)


Wise up.

This study supports that as much as 30 million have been killed by the Capitalist USA since WW2.

That's actually about how many the Nazi Fascists killed.

Study: US regime has killed 20-30 million people since WW2

So, how would that make the Capitalist USA so morally superior over Nazi Germany?

This is not a 'study' any more than you are an intellect.


Social evolution has taken one step forward, and two steps back.

Capitalism is the former, and Marxism, Leftism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism all represent the latter.


Leftist talking points come off you like a dog shedding mud....

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

[.
2. Liberalism is the oppression that demands all bow to big government....and if one refuses to bake a cake to the liking of the tyrants, you'll be put our of business,and...the first amendment notwithstanding, be slapped with a gag order.

Soooo....how do I end this and make you comfy? With a 'sieg heil'?

I'm rather Fascist in my beliefs, and I believe that Capitalism sells out to so called Cultural Marxism, as they profit off of importing illegal immigrants for cheap labor, selling Gays wedding apparel, selling Abortions by Hospital Capitalists, selling Liberalism, and degeneracy in Hollywood, and the media.

I think Fascism gets a unfair rap, sure I'm anti-Nazi for their crimes.

However Fascists were by no means the most prolific mass murderers.
As I outlined below in the below thread.

Fascism killed less than Capitalism, Communism, or Monarchy, but takes more heat for it.

"I think Fascism gets a unfair rap,"

You couldn't be more wrong.
You could try...but you wouldn't succeed.

I'm an American by choice, and the comparing the Founders with your nonsense is fairly simple:

a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


or


b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


There is no difference in desired outcome for society between Fascism, Nazism, Communism, Liberalism, Socialism or Progressivism.

The results of collectivist regimes is covered here:

"The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression"
by Jean-Louis Panné (Author), Andrzej Paczkowski (Author), Karel Bartosek (Author), Jean-Louis Margolin (Author), Nicolas Werth (Author), Stéphane Courtois (Author)


Wise up.

This study supports that as much as 30 million have been killed by the Capitalist USA since WW2.

That's actually about how many the Nazi Fascists killed.

Study: US regime has killed 20-30 million people since WW2

So, how would that make the Capitalist USA so morally superior over Nazi Germany?

This is not a 'study' any more than you are an intellect.


Social evolution has taken one step forward, and two steps back.

Capitalism is the former, and Marxism, Leftism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism all represent the latter.


Leftist talking points come off you like a dog shedding mud....

,
The Fascists got it right, and Republicans have got it wrong.

In order to have a Socially Conservative environment you have to manage your economy.

Otherwise it ends up like you have here, with over 10 million illegals here to benefit the Capitalists for cheap labor, Capitalists selling you Porn, Capitalists selling Gay wedding apparel, Hospital Capitalists selling abortions, Hollywood, and media selling Liberal degeneracy.

It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

But, many Americans who are Social Conservatives still look for Capitalism for the answer, which I find hilarious.

 

[bodecea]

Still waiting for proof that Christianity isn't taught in history classes.

I learned in class about the Atlantic Slave Trade, but not the Arab Slave Trade.

I learned in class about the Nazis killing 6 million Jews, but not about the Muslims of India killing up to 100's of millions.

The big question, is "How come?"

Did you learn about the later Roman Empire? The Middle Ages? The Rennaissance? The Reformation? All christian-centric.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Thanks for replying to that. I didn't know where to begin to reply to such nonsense.

And thank you for that post.

Even at a glance one can see that an avi putting two concepts that are syncretic, shows that the poster is uneducated, and, in fact, a moron.

One can hardly be patriotic, an adherent to the America of the Founders, and be a progressive....as these are individuals who refuse to honor or adhere to the Constitution.

...as in this by an early Progressive, Teddy Roosevelt:
Theodore Roosevelt had little regard for the limits the Constitution imposed on the presidency. In the United Mine Workers strike in 1902, Roosevelt threatened to order the army to run the coal mines.

Well known is TR's outburst, when told the Constitution did not permit the confiscation of private property: "To hell with the Constitution when the people want coal!"

Less well known is that at one point TR summoned General John M. Schofield, instructing him: "I bid you pay no heed to any other authority, no heed to a writ from a judge, or anything else except my commands." (p. 138) "33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask," by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.

King Theodore the First, I guess.

Contrary to popular belief, the U.S Founding Fathers were tougher on Corporations than the U.S has been in more recent times.

I for one happen to support regulating business heavily in threatening them for hiring Illegals, and outsourcing jobs, as this erodes American livelihood.

But, this article proves the U.S Founding Fathers were for more regulations, than present America.

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations | Addicting Info | The Knowledge You Crave

Back in the days of the Founding Fathers, corporations could only exist for 20-30 years and could only deal in one commodety.
After the nation’s founding, corporations were granted charters by the state as they are today. Unlike today, however, corporations were only permitted to exist 20 or 30 years and could only deal in one commodity, could not hold stock in other companies, and their property holdings were limited to what they needed to accomplish their business goals. And perhaps the most important facet of all this is that most states in the early days of the nation had laws on the books that made any political contribution by corporations a criminal offense. When you think about it, the regulations imposed on corporations in the early days of America were far harsher than they are now.

You should read the article with a more critical eye.
1. It makes the same point about corporations several times
2. It claims to be about the Founding Fathers, yet they are not the most quoted
3. The source is Leftwing, meaning anti-capitalism, which gives pause to any seeking the truth.

Oh...and yes, King John did save Europe.

As a Polish American, I'm quite well versed in the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy.

This includes 10's of thousands of Poles killed for resisting the Soviet regime, and this goes on into the 1980's when Polish priest Popieluszko was killed.

However, on the whole it was more Nationalistic, and Socially right wing, than modern Capitalist Poland.

Gays were not allowed to have parades in Soviet Poland, there were almost no immigrants, everyone drove a Polish car, the economy was not controlled largely by foreigners, and Jews were barred from holding positions of power.

These are things that have actually become quite more Liberal in modern Capitalist Poland, as opposed to Soviet Poland.

What sort of fool would simply mention this....and shrug it off....

"...the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy."


I'd be more than thrilled to discuss the iniquities of Liberals, Socialists, etc. in contemporary America....

....but far.....FAR....more interested and prepared to remind all of the source of our modern political and economic problems.....Marx, Hegel, Stalin and Roosevelt.


Clearly, you lack the ability to prioritize.

Stick with King John at the gates of Vienna.

Communism is an inferior system, but so is Capitalism.

Communism leads to lack of economic growth, but remains a little Socially Conservative.

Capitalism leads to somewhat strong economic growth, but remains very Socially Liberal.

Fascism leads to the strongest economic growth, and remains the most Socially Conservative.

Fascism is actually what Republicans should be supporting, but many are too duped to know better.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Still waiting for proof that Christianity isn't taught in history classes.

I learned in class about the Atlantic Slave Trade, but not the Arab Slave Trade.

I learned in class about the Nazis killing 6 million Jews, but not about the Muslims of India killing up to 100's of millions.

The big question, is "How come?"

Did you learn about the later Roman Empire? The Middle Ages? The Rennaissance? The Reformation? All christian-centric.

How come we learn about imperial Christian crimes in school, but not imperial Muslim crimes in school?

 

[PoliticalChic]

[.
2. Liberalism is the oppression that demands all bow to big government....and if one refuses to bake a cake to the liking of the tyrants, you'll be put our of business,and...the first amendment notwithstanding, be slapped with a gag order.

Soooo....how do I end this and make you comfy? With a 'sieg heil'?

I'm rather Fascist in my beliefs, and I believe that Capitalism sells out to so called Cultural Marxism, as they profit off of importing illegal immigrants for cheap labor, selling Gays wedding apparel, selling Abortions by Hospital Capitalists, selling Liberalism, and degeneracy in Hollywood, and the media.

I think Fascism gets a unfair rap, sure I'm anti-Nazi for their crimes.

However Fascists were by no means the most prolific mass murderers.
As I outlined below in the below thread.

Fascism killed less than Capitalism, Communism, or Monarchy, but takes more heat for it.

"I think Fascism gets a unfair rap,"

You couldn't be more wrong.
You could try...but you wouldn't succeed.

I'm an American by choice, and the comparing the Founders with your nonsense is fairly simple:

a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


or


b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


There is no difference in desired outcome for society between Fascism, Nazism, Communism, Liberalism, Socialism or Progressivism.

The results of collectivist regimes is covered here:

"The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression"
by Jean-Louis Panné (Author), Andrzej Paczkowski (Author), Karel Bartosek (Author), Jean-Louis Margolin (Author), Nicolas Werth (Author), Stéphane Courtois (Author)


Wise up.

This study supports that as much as 30 million have been killed by the Capitalist USA since WW2.

That's actually about how many the Nazi Fascists killed.

Study: US regime has killed 20-30 million people since WW2

So, how would that make the Capitalist USA so morally superior over Nazi Germany?

This is not a 'study' any more than you are an intellect.


Social evolution has taken one step forward, and two steps back.

Capitalism is the former, and Marxism, Leftism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism all represent the latter.


Leftist talking points come off you like a dog shedding mud....

,
The Fascists got it right, and Republicans have got it wrong.

In order to have a Socially Conservative environment you have to manage your economy.

Otherwise it ends up like you have here, with over 10 million illegals here to benefit the Capitalists for cheap labor, Capitalists selling you Porn, Capitalists selling Gay wedding apparel, Hospital Capitalists selling abortions, Hollywood, and media selling Liberal degeneracy.

It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

But, many Americans who are Social Conservatives still look for Capitalism for the answer, which I find hilarious.

I fondly wish for you to get what you desire, as it conforms with Karma, and get to live under a communist/fascist/Nazi regime......

....just not here.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And thank you for that post.

Even at a glance one can see that an avi putting two concepts that are syncretic, shows that the poster is uneducated, and, in fact, a moron.

One can hardly be patriotic, an adherent to the America of the Founders, and be a progressive....as these are individuals who refuse to honor or adhere to the Constitution.

...as in this by an early Progressive, Teddy Roosevelt:
Theodore Roosevelt had little regard for the limits the Constitution imposed on the presidency. In the United Mine Workers strike in 1902, Roosevelt threatened to order the army to run the coal mines.

Well known is TR's outburst, when told the Constitution did not permit the confiscation of private property: "To hell with the Constitution when the people want coal!"

Less well known is that at one point TR summoned General John M. Schofield, instructing him: "I bid you pay no heed to any other authority, no heed to a writ from a judge, or anything else except my commands." (p. 138) "33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask," by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.

King Theodore the First, I guess.

Contrary to popular belief, the U.S Founding Fathers were tougher on Corporations than the U.S has been in more recent times.

I for one happen to support regulating business heavily in threatening them for hiring Illegals, and outsourcing jobs, as this erodes American livelihood.

But, this article proves the U.S Founding Fathers were for more regulations, than present America.

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations | Addicting Info | The Knowledge You Crave

Back in the days of the Founding Fathers, corporations could only exist for 20-30 years and could only deal in one commodety.
After the nation’s founding, corporations were granted charters by the state as they are today. Unlike today, however, corporations were only permitted to exist 20 or 30 years and could only deal in one commodity, could not hold stock in other companies, and their property holdings were limited to what they needed to accomplish their business goals. And perhaps the most important facet of all this is that most states in the early days of the nation had laws on the books that made any political contribution by corporations a criminal offense. When you think about it, the regulations imposed on corporations in the early days of America were far harsher than they are now.

You should read the article with a more critical eye.
1. It makes the same point about corporations several times
2. It claims to be about the Founding Fathers, yet they are not the most quoted
3. The source is Leftwing, meaning anti-capitalism, which gives pause to any seeking the truth.

Oh...and yes, King John did save Europe.

As a Polish American, I'm quite well versed in the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy.

This includes 10's of thousands of Poles killed for resisting the Soviet regime, and this goes on into the 1980's when Polish priest Popieluszko was killed.

However, on the whole it was more Nationalistic, and Socially right wing, than modern Capitalist Poland.

Gays were not allowed to have parades in Soviet Poland, there were almost no immigrants, everyone drove a Polish car, the economy was not controlled largely by foreigners, and Jews were barred from holding positions of power.

These are things that have actually become quite more Liberal in modern Capitalist Poland, as opposed to Soviet Poland.

What sort of fool would simply mention this....and shrug it off....

"...the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy."


I'd be more than thrilled to discuss the iniquities of Liberals, Socialists, etc. in contemporary America....

....but far.....FAR....more interested and prepared to remind all of the source of our modern political and economic problems.....Marx, Hegel, Stalin and Roosevelt.


Clearly, you lack the ability to prioritize.

Stick with King John at the gates of Vienna.

Communism is an inferior system, but so is Capitalism.

Communism leads to lack of economic growth, but remains a little Socially Conservative.

Capitalism leads to somewhat strong economic growth, but remains very Socially Liberal.

Fascism leads to the strongest economic growth, and remains the most Socially Conservative.

Fascism is actually what Republicans should be supporting, but many are too duped to know better.

You're a moron.

1. Modern history presents us with two divergent models of economic arrangement: socialism, and capitalism. One of these appears preoccupied with the common good, and social betterment, the other with profits and production.


2. In its modern beginnings, socialism was optimistic and well intentioned, without the overlay of its contemporary varieties that tend to bemoan prosperity, romanticize poverty, and promote a view that place individual rights are a secondary concern. This is to say that the earliest socialists sought the fullest possible flourishing of humanity, “the common good.”


3. A half-century before Karl Marx published the Communist Manifesto, there was Gracchus Babeuf’s Plebeian Manifesto, which was later renamed the Manifesto of the Equals. Babeuf’s early (1796) work has been described as socialist, anarchist, and communist, and has had an enormous impact. He wrote: “The French Revolution was nothing but a precursor of another revolution, on which will be bigger, more solemn, and which will be the last…We reach for something more sublime and more just: the common good or the community of goods! Nor more individual property in land: the land belongs to no one. We demand, we want, the common enjoyment of the fruits of the land: the fruits belong to all.” Here, then, are the major themes of socialist theory. It takes very little interpolation to find that opponents profit at the expense of the environment, and conditions of inequality in society.


4. For Babeur, socialism would distribute prosperity across the entire population, as it would “[have] us eat four good meals a day, [dress} us most elegantly, and also [provide] those of us who are fathers of families with charming houses worth a thousand louis each.”


5. Oscar Wilde: “Under socialism…there will be no people living in fetid dens and fetid rags, and bringing up unhealthy, hunger pinched children in the midst of impossible and absolutely repulsive surroundings…Each member of society will share in the general prosperity and happiness of the society…”


6. Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes.
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006



BTW.....did I mention that you're a moron?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Still waiting for proof that Christianity isn't taught in history classes.

I learned in class about the Atlantic Slave Trade, but not the Arab Slave Trade.

I learned in class about the Nazis killing 6 million Jews, but not about the Muslims of India killing up to 100's of millions.

The big question, is "How come?"

Did you learn about the later Roman Empire? The Middle Ages? The Rennaissance? The Reformation? All christian-centric.

How come we learn about imperial Christian crimes in school, but not imperial Muslim crimes in school?

"How come we learn about imperial Christian crimes in school..."

Here's why:

There is no God:
"This concept is an essential element of Marxism. As Lenin stated: "Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism, of the theory and practice of Scientific Socialism." If God exists and is in supreme command of the universe, He possesses discretionary power, and His actions cannot always be calculated accurately in advance. The whole edifice of Marxism collapses.

When Marx and the Communists deny the existence of God, they simultaneously deny the authority of the Ten Commandments, the existence of absolute standards of right and wrong, of good and evil; and man is left on the playing fields of the universe without a referee, without a book of rules. The winning side in any conflict can decide on what rules of conduct to apply. Morality is the creation of the victor."
The Schwarz Report | Essays

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I'm rather Fascist in my beliefs, and I believe that Capitalism sells out to so called Cultural Marxism, as they profit off of importing illegal immigrants for cheap labor, selling Gays wedding apparel, selling Abortions by Hospital Capitalists, selling Liberalism, and degeneracy in Hollywood, and the media.

I think Fascism gets a unfair rap, sure I'm anti-Nazi for their crimes.

However Fascists were by no means the most prolific mass murderers.
As I outlined below in the below thread.

Fascism killed less than Capitalism, Communism, or Monarchy, but takes more heat for it.

"I think Fascism gets a unfair rap,"

You couldn't be more wrong.
You could try...but you wouldn't succeed.

I'm an American by choice, and the comparing the Founders with your nonsense is fairly simple:

a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


or


b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


There is no difference in desired outcome for society between Fascism, Nazism, Communism, Liberalism, Socialism or Progressivism.

The results of collectivist regimes is covered here:

"The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression"
by Jean-Louis Panné (Author), Andrzej Paczkowski (Author), Karel Bartosek (Author), Jean-Louis Margolin (Author), Nicolas Werth (Author), Stéphane Courtois (Author)


Wise up.

This study supports that as much as 30 million have been killed by the Capitalist USA since WW2.

That's actually about how many the Nazi Fascists killed.

Study: US regime has killed 20-30 million people since WW2

So, how would that make the Capitalist USA so morally superior over Nazi Germany?

This is not a 'study' any more than you are an intellect.


Social evolution has taken one step forward, and two steps back.

Capitalism is the former, and Marxism, Leftism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism all represent the latter.


Leftist talking points come off you like a dog shedding mud....

,
The Fascists got it right, and Republicans have got it wrong.

In order to have a Socially Conservative environment you have to manage your economy.

Otherwise it ends up like you have here, with over 10 million illegals here to benefit the Capitalists for cheap labor, Capitalists selling you Porn, Capitalists selling Gay wedding apparel, Hospital Capitalists selling abortions, Hollywood, and media selling Liberal degeneracy.

It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

But, many Americans who are Social Conservatives still look for Capitalism for the answer, which I find hilarious.

I fondly wish for you to get what you desire, as it conforms with Karma, and get to live under a communist/fascist/Nazi regime......

....just not here.

I'm not a Communist, though.
I'm a Fascist supporter.

Communism is bad, but so is Capitalism.

Communist regimes never had millions of third-World riff raff flood into their countries to permanently alter the heritage of our nations.

Although Communism oppressed, and stagnated the economy.

Both Communists, and Capitalists killed more than the Fascists, though.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Contrary to popular belief, the U.S Founding Fathers were tougher on Corporations than the U.S has been in more recent times.

I for one happen to support regulating business heavily in threatening them for hiring Illegals, and outsourcing jobs, as this erodes American livelihood.

But, this article proves the U.S Founding Fathers were for more regulations, than present America.

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations | Addicting Info | The Knowledge You Crave

Back in the days of the Founding Fathers, corporations could only exist for 20-30 years and could only deal in one commodety.
After the nation’s founding, corporations were granted charters by the state as they are today. Unlike today, however, corporations were only permitted to exist 20 or 30 years and could only deal in one commodity, could not hold stock in other companies, and their property holdings were limited to what they needed to accomplish their business goals. And perhaps the most important facet of all this is that most states in the early days of the nation had laws on the books that made any political contribution by corporations a criminal offense. When you think about it, the regulations imposed on corporations in the early days of America were far harsher than they are now.

You should read the article with a more critical eye.
1. It makes the same point about corporations several times
2. It claims to be about the Founding Fathers, yet they are not the most quoted
3. The source is Leftwing, meaning anti-capitalism, which gives pause to any seeking the truth.

Oh...and yes, King John did save Europe.

As a Polish American, I'm quite well versed in the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy.

This includes 10's of thousands of Poles killed for resisting the Soviet regime, and this goes on into the 1980's when Polish priest Popieluszko was killed.

However, on the whole it was more Nationalistic, and Socially right wing, than modern Capitalist Poland.

Gays were not allowed to have parades in Soviet Poland, there were almost no immigrants, everyone drove a Polish car, the economy was not controlled largely by foreigners, and Jews were barred from holding positions of power.

These are things that have actually become quite more Liberal in modern Capitalist Poland, as opposed to Soviet Poland.

What sort of fool would simply mention this....and shrug it off....

"...the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy."


I'd be more than thrilled to discuss the iniquities of Liberals, Socialists, etc. in contemporary America....

....but far.....FAR....more interested and prepared to remind all of the source of our modern political and economic problems.....Marx, Hegel, Stalin and Roosevelt.


Clearly, you lack the ability to prioritize.

Stick with King John at the gates of Vienna.

Communism is an inferior system, but so is Capitalism.

Communism leads to lack of economic growth, but remains a little Socially Conservative.

Capitalism leads to somewhat strong economic growth, but remains very Socially Liberal.

Fascism leads to the strongest economic growth, and remains the most Socially Conservative.

Fascism is actually what Republicans should be supporting, but many are too duped to know better.

You're a moron.

1. Modern history presents us with two divergent models of economic arrangement: socialism, and capitalism. One of these appears preoccupied with the common good, and social betterment, the other with profits and production.


2. In its modern beginnings, socialism was optimistic and well intentioned, without the overlay of its contemporary varieties that tend to bemoan prosperity, romanticize poverty, and promote a view that place individual rights are a secondary concern. This is to say that the earliest socialists sought the fullest possible flourishing of humanity, “the common good.”


3. A half-century before Karl Marx published the Communist Manifesto, there was Gracchus Babeuf’s Plebeian Manifesto, which was later renamed the Manifesto of the Equals. Babeuf’s early (1796) work has been described as socialist, anarchist, and communist, and has had an enormous impact. He wrote: “The French Revolution was nothing but a precursor of another revolution, on which will be bigger, more solemn, and which will be the last…We reach for something more sublime and more just: the common good or the community of goods! Nor more individual property in land: the land belongs to no one. We demand, we want, the common enjoyment of the fruits of the land: the fruits belong to all.” Here, then, are the major themes of socialist theory. It takes very little interpolation to find that opponents profit at the expense of the environment, and conditions of inequality in society.


4. For Babeur, socialism would distribute prosperity across the entire population, as it would “[have] us eat four good meals a day, [dress} us most elegantly, and also [provide] those of us who are fathers of families with charming houses worth a thousand louis each.”


5. Oscar Wilde: “Under socialism…there will be no people living in fetid dens and fetid rags, and bringing up unhealthy, hunger pinched children in the midst of impossible and absolutely repulsive surroundings…Each member of society will share in the general prosperity and happiness of the society…”


6. Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes.
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006



BTW.....did I mention that you're a moron?

I'm not talking Communism, though. (Obviously Communism is the worst when it comes to economic growth)

I'm talking Fascism.

Franco used many Fascist elements to create the fastest economic growth in 20th century Europe.

Spanish miracle - Wikipedia

Nazi Germany achieved faster economic growth than Capitalist Britain in the 1930's.

Yet, it must be I who is the moron?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"I think Fascism gets a unfair rap,"

You couldn't be more wrong.
You could try...but you wouldn't succeed.

I'm an American by choice, and the comparing the Founders with your nonsense is fairly simple:

a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


or


b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


There is no difference in desired outcome for society between Fascism, Nazism, Communism, Liberalism, Socialism or Progressivism.

The results of collectivist regimes is covered here:

"The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression"
by Jean-Louis Panné (Author), Andrzej Paczkowski (Author), Karel Bartosek (Author), Jean-Louis Margolin (Author), Nicolas Werth (Author), Stéphane Courtois (Author)


Wise up.

This study supports that as much as 30 million have been killed by the Capitalist USA since WW2.

That's actually about how many the Nazi Fascists killed.

Study: US regime has killed 20-30 million people since WW2

So, how would that make the Capitalist USA so morally superior over Nazi Germany?

This is not a 'study' any more than you are an intellect.


Social evolution has taken one step forward, and two steps back.

Capitalism is the former, and Marxism, Leftism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism all represent the latter.


Leftist talking points come off you like a dog shedding mud....

,
The Fascists got it right, and Republicans have got it wrong.

In order to have a Socially Conservative environment you have to manage your economy.

Otherwise it ends up like you have here, with over 10 million illegals here to benefit the Capitalists for cheap labor, Capitalists selling you Porn, Capitalists selling Gay wedding apparel, Hospital Capitalists selling abortions, Hollywood, and media selling Liberal degeneracy.

It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

But, many Americans who are Social Conservatives still look for Capitalism for the answer, which I find hilarious.

I fondly wish for you to get what you desire, as it conforms with Karma, and get to live under a communist/fascist/Nazi regime......

....just not here.

I'm not a Communist, though.
I'm a Fascist supporter.

Communism is bad, but so is Capitalism.

Communist regimes never had millions of third-World rift raff flood into their countries to permanently alter the heritage of our nations.

Although Communism oppressed, and stagnated the economy.

Both Communists, and Capitalists killed more than the Fascists, though.

"I'm not a Communist, though.
I'm a Fascist supporter."

Communists, Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Socialists......distinctions without differences.


Stalin supported Mussolini, you dunce.
"In 1913, while still editor of Avanti!, he began to publish and edit his own journal,Utopia, a forum for controversial discussion among leftwing socialists. ...Two of those who collaborated with Mussolini on Utopia would go on to help found the Italian Communist Party and one to help found the German Communist Party.(3)Others, with Mussolini, would found the Fascist movement.

The youngest prime minister in Italian history,.... Mussolini was showered with accolades from sundry quarters.... Stalin supplied Mussolini with the plans of the May Day parades in Red Square, to help him polish up his Fascist pageants....He conquered Ethiopia, made a Pact of Steel with Germany, introduced anti-Jewish measures in 1938,came into the war as Hitler's very junior partner,..."
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele


So....here we see Mussolini, Hitler, and Stalin....good ol' pals.
FDR was a wanna-be in that clique...


Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Modern Liberalism, Progressivism, or Socialism....peas in a pod.


QED....Any who would deny that every one of these is, at its core, the same, is clearly uneducated, uninformed, or a bald-faced liar.



"I'm not a Communist, though.
I'm a Fascist supporter."
Add this to your resume: 'I'm an imbecile.'

 

[PoliticalChic]

"I think Fascism gets a unfair rap,"

You couldn't be more wrong.
You could try...but you wouldn't succeed.

I'm an American by choice, and the comparing the Founders with your nonsense is fairly simple:

a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


or


b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


There is no difference in desired outcome for society between Fascism, Nazism, Communism, Liberalism, Socialism or Progressivism.

The results of collectivist regimes is covered here:

"The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression"
by Jean-Louis Panné (Author), Andrzej Paczkowski (Author), Karel Bartosek (Author), Jean-Louis Margolin (Author), Nicolas Werth (Author), Stéphane Courtois (Author)


Wise up.

This study supports that as much as 30 million have been killed by the Capitalist USA since WW2.

That's actually about how many the Nazi Fascists killed.

Study: US regime has killed 20-30 million people since WW2

So, how would that make the Capitalist USA so morally superior over Nazi Germany?

This is not a 'study' any more than you are an intellect.


Social evolution has taken one step forward, and two steps back.

Capitalism is the former, and Marxism, Leftism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism all represent the latter.


Leftist talking points come off you like a dog shedding mud....

,
The Fascists got it right, and Republicans have got it wrong.

In order to have a Socially Conservative environment you have to manage your economy.

Otherwise it ends up like you have here, with over 10 million illegals here to benefit the Capitalists for cheap labor, Capitalists selling you Porn, Capitalists selling Gay wedding apparel, Hospital Capitalists selling abortions, Hollywood, and media selling Liberal degeneracy.

It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

But, many Americans who are Social Conservatives still look for Capitalism for the answer, which I find hilarious.

I fondly wish for you to get what you desire, as it conforms with Karma, and get to live under a communist/fascist/Nazi regime......

....just not here.

I'm not a Communist, though.
I'm a Fascist supporter.

Communism is bad, but so is Capitalism.

Communist regimes never had millions of third-World riff raff flood into their countries to permanently alter the heritage of our nations.

Although Communism oppressed, and stagnated the economy.

Both Communists, and Capitalists killed more than the Fascists, though.

You're a fool and a liar.

I see no future for you other than selling Star Trek memorabilia on the internet.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You should read the article with a more critical eye.
1. It makes the same point about corporations several times
2. It claims to be about the Founding Fathers, yet they are not the most quoted
3. The source is Leftwing, meaning anti-capitalism, which gives pause to any seeking the truth.

Oh...and yes, King John did save Europe.

As a Polish American, I'm quite well versed in the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy.

This includes 10's of thousands of Poles killed for resisting the Soviet regime, and this goes on into the 1980's when Polish priest Popieluszko was killed.

However, on the whole it was more Nationalistic, and Socially right wing, than modern Capitalist Poland.

Gays were not allowed to have parades in Soviet Poland, there were almost no immigrants, everyone drove a Polish car, the economy was not controlled largely by foreigners, and Jews were barred from holding positions of power.

These are things that have actually become quite more Liberal in modern Capitalist Poland, as opposed to Soviet Poland.

What sort of fool would simply mention this....and shrug it off....

"...the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy."


I'd be more than thrilled to discuss the iniquities of Liberals, Socialists, etc. in contemporary America....

....but far.....FAR....more interested and prepared to remind all of the source of our modern political and economic problems.....Marx, Hegel, Stalin and Roosevelt.


Clearly, you lack the ability to prioritize.

Stick with King John at the gates of Vienna.

Communism is an inferior system, but so is Capitalism.

Communism leads to lack of economic growth, but remains a little Socially Conservative.

Capitalism leads to somewhat strong economic growth, but remains very Socially Liberal.

Fascism leads to the strongest economic growth, and remains the most Socially Conservative.

Fascism is actually what Republicans should be supporting, but many are too duped to know better.

You're a moron.

1. Modern history presents us with two divergent models of economic arrangement: socialism, and capitalism. One of these appears preoccupied with the common good, and social betterment, the other with profits and production.


2. In its modern beginnings, socialism was optimistic and well intentioned, without the overlay of its contemporary varieties that tend to bemoan prosperity, romanticize poverty, and promote a view that place individual rights are a secondary concern. This is to say that the earliest socialists sought the fullest possible flourishing of humanity, “the common good.”


3. A half-century before Karl Marx published the Communist Manifesto, there was Gracchus Babeuf’s Plebeian Manifesto, which was later renamed the Manifesto of the Equals. Babeuf’s early (1796) work has been described as socialist, anarchist, and communist, and has had an enormous impact. He wrote: “The French Revolution was nothing but a precursor of another revolution, on which will be bigger, more solemn, and which will be the last…We reach for something more sublime and more just: the common good or the community of goods! Nor more individual property in land: the land belongs to no one. We demand, we want, the common enjoyment of the fruits of the land: the fruits belong to all.” Here, then, are the major themes of socialist theory. It takes very little interpolation to find that opponents profit at the expense of the environment, and conditions of inequality in society.


4. For Babeur, socialism would distribute prosperity across the entire population, as it would “[have] us eat four good meals a day, [dress} us most elegantly, and also [provide] those of us who are fathers of families with charming houses worth a thousand louis each.”


5. Oscar Wilde: “Under socialism…there will be no people living in fetid dens and fetid rags, and bringing up unhealthy, hunger pinched children in the midst of impossible and absolutely repulsive surroundings…Each member of society will share in the general prosperity and happiness of the society…”


6. Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes.
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006



BTW.....did I mention that you're a moron?

I'm not talking Communism, though. (Obviously Communism is the worst when it comes to economic growth)

I'm talking Fascism.

Franco used many Fascist elements to create the fastest economic growth in 20th century Europe.

Spanish miracle - Wikipedia

Nazi Germany achieved faster economic growth than Capitalist Britain in the 1930's.

Yet, it must be I who is the moron?

"Yet, it must be I who is the moron?"

Without a doubt.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Thanks for replying to that. I didn't know where to begin to reply to such nonsense.

And thank you for that post.

Even at a glance one can see that an avi putting two concepts that are syncretic, shows that the poster is uneducated, and, in fact, a moron.

One can hardly be patriotic, an adherent to the America of the Founders, and be a progressive....as these are individuals who refuse to honor or adhere to the Constitution.

...as in this by an early Progressive, Teddy Roosevelt:
Theodore Roosevelt had little regard for the limits the Constitution imposed on the presidency. In the United Mine Workers strike in 1902, Roosevelt threatened to order the army to run the coal mines.

Well known is TR's outburst, when told the Constitution did not permit the confiscation of private property: "To hell with the Constitution when the people want coal!"

Less well known is that at one point TR summoned General John M. Schofield, instructing him: "I bid you pay no heed to any other authority, no heed to a writ from a judge, or anything else except my commands." (p. 138) "33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask," by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.

King Theodore the First, I guess.

Contrary to popular belief, the U.S Founding Fathers were tougher on Corporations than the U.S has been in more recent times.

I for one happen to support regulating business heavily in threatening them for hiring Illegals, and outsourcing jobs, as this erodes American livelihood.

But, this article proves the U.S Founding Fathers were for more regulations, than present America.

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations | Addicting Info | The Knowledge You Crave

Back in the days of the Founding Fathers, corporations could only exist for 20-30 years and could only deal in one commodety.
After the nation’s founding, corporations were granted charters by the state as they are today. Unlike today, however, corporations were only permitted to exist 20 or 30 years and could only deal in one commodity, could not hold stock in other companies, and their property holdings were limited to what they needed to accomplish their business goals. And perhaps the most important facet of all this is that most states in the early days of the nation had laws on the books that made any political contribution by corporations a criminal offense. When you think about it, the regulations imposed on corporations in the early days of America were far harsher than they are now.

You should read the article with a more critical eye.
1. It makes the same point about corporations several times
2. It claims to be about the Founding Fathers, yet they are not the most quoted
3. The source is Leftwing, meaning anti-capitalism, which gives pause to any seeking the truth.

Oh...and yes, King John did save Europe.

As a Polish American, I'm quite well versed in the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy.

This includes 10's of thousands of Poles killed for resisting the Soviet regime, and this goes on into the 1980's when Polish priest Popieluszko was killed.

However, on the whole it was more Nationalistic, and Socially right wing, than modern Capitalist Poland.

Gays were not allowed to have parades in Soviet Poland, there were almost no immigrants, everyone drove a Polish car, the economy was not controlled largely by foreigners, and Jews were barred from holding positions of power.

These are things that have actually become quite more Liberal in modern Capitalist Poland, as opposed to Soviet Poland.

....but far.....FAR....more interested and prepared to remind all of the source of our modern political and economic problems.....Marx, Hegel, Stalin and Roosevelt..

While I'm against Franklin D. Roosevelt's regime for the Dresden firebombing, support for Soviets in Lend-lease, and the Soviet takeover of Central Europe in Yalta Conference.

Franklin D. Roosevelt was Fascist like too as he micro-managed the economy within a Capitalist framework.

But, he achieved the fastest economic growth in 20th century U.S.A.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

As a Polish American, I'm quite well versed in the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy.

This includes 10's of thousands of Poles killed for resisting the Soviet regime, and this goes on into the 1980's when Polish priest Popieluszko was killed.

However, on the whole it was more Nationalistic, and Socially right wing, than modern Capitalist Poland.

Gays were not allowed to have parades in Soviet Poland, there were almost no immigrants, everyone drove a Polish car, the economy was not controlled largely by foreigners, and Jews were barred from holding positions of power.

These are things that have actually become quite more Liberal in modern Capitalist Poland, as opposed to Soviet Poland.

What sort of fool would simply mention this....and shrug it off....

"...the Soviet era, in many ways it was bad, of course, there was lack of freedom, oppression, anti-religion, and a stagnant economy."


I'd be more than thrilled to discuss the iniquities of Liberals, Socialists, etc. in contemporary America....

....but far.....FAR....more interested and prepared to remind all of the source of our modern political and economic problems.....Marx, Hegel, Stalin and Roosevelt.


Clearly, you lack the ability to prioritize.

Stick with King John at the gates of Vienna.

Communism is an inferior system, but so is Capitalism.

Communism leads to lack of economic growth, but remains a little Socially Conservative.

Capitalism leads to somewhat strong economic growth, but remains very Socially Liberal.

Fascism leads to the strongest economic growth, and remains the most Socially Conservative.

Fascism is actually what Republicans should be supporting, but many are too duped to know better.

You're a moron.

1. Modern history presents us with two divergent models of economic arrangement: socialism, and capitalism. One of these appears preoccupied with the common good, and social betterment, the other with profits and production.


2. In its modern beginnings, socialism was optimistic and well intentioned, without the overlay of its contemporary varieties that tend to bemoan prosperity, romanticize poverty, and promote a view that place individual rights are a secondary concern. This is to say that the earliest socialists sought the fullest possible flourishing of humanity, “the common good.”


3. A half-century before Karl Marx published the Communist Manifesto, there was Gracchus Babeuf’s Plebeian Manifesto, which was later renamed the Manifesto of the Equals. Babeuf’s early (1796) work has been described as socialist, anarchist, and communist, and has had an enormous impact. He wrote: “The French Revolution was nothing but a precursor of another revolution, on which will be bigger, more solemn, and which will be the last…We reach for something more sublime and more just: the common good or the community of goods! Nor more individual property in land: the land belongs to no one. We demand, we want, the common enjoyment of the fruits of the land: the fruits belong to all.” Here, then, are the major themes of socialist theory. It takes very little interpolation to find that opponents profit at the expense of the environment, and conditions of inequality in society.


4. For Babeur, socialism would distribute prosperity across the entire population, as it would “[have] us eat four good meals a day, [dress} us most elegantly, and also [provide] those of us who are fathers of families with charming houses worth a thousand louis each.”


5. Oscar Wilde: “Under socialism…there will be no people living in fetid dens and fetid rags, and bringing up unhealthy, hunger pinched children in the midst of impossible and absolutely repulsive surroundings…Each member of society will share in the general prosperity and happiness of the society…”


6. Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes.
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006



BTW.....did I mention that you're a moron?

I'm not talking Communism, though. (Obviously Communism is the worst when it comes to economic growth)

I'm talking Fascism.

Franco used many Fascist elements to create the fastest economic growth in 20th century Europe.

Spanish miracle - Wikipedia

Nazi Germany achieved faster economic growth than Capitalist Britain in the 1930's.

Yet, it must be I who is the moron?

"Yet, it must be I who is the moron?"

Without a doubt.

So, why did Franco a Fascist leaning guy achieve the fastest economic growth in 20th century Europe, rather than any Capitalist guy?

Oh, it's so moronic to mention such facts.

Hilarious.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

This study supports that as much as 30 million have been killed by the Capitalist USA since WW2.

That's actually about how many the Nazi Fascists killed.

Study: US regime has killed 20-30 million people since WW2

So, how would that make the Capitalist USA so morally superior over Nazi Germany?

This is not a 'study' any more than you are an intellect.


Social evolution has taken one step forward, and two steps back.

Capitalism is the former, and Marxism, Leftism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism all represent the latter.


Leftist talking points come off you like a dog shedding mud....

,
The Fascists got it right, and Republicans have got it wrong.

In order to have a Socially Conservative environment you have to manage your economy.

Otherwise it ends up like you have here, with over 10 million illegals here to benefit the Capitalists for cheap labor, Capitalists selling you Porn, Capitalists selling Gay wedding apparel, Hospital Capitalists selling abortions, Hollywood, and media selling Liberal degeneracy.

It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

But, many Americans who are Social Conservatives still look for Capitalism for the answer, which I find hilarious.

I fondly wish for you to get what you desire, as it conforms with Karma, and get to live under a communist/fascist/Nazi regime......

....just not here.

I'm not a Communist, though.
I'm a Fascist supporter.

Communism is bad, but so is Capitalism.

Communist regimes never had millions of third-World riff raff flood into their countries to permanently alter the heritage of our nations.

Although Communism oppressed, and stagnated the economy.

Both Communists, and Capitalists killed more than the Fascists, though.

You're a fool and a liar.

I see no future for you other than selling Star Trek memorabilia on the internet.

Oh yeah, Capitalism is working out so great for the U.S.A, with 10 million illegal immigrants, massive amounts of jobs outsourced, and a flopping real hourly, and real weekly wage in general since the 1970's.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

This study supports that as much as 30 million have been killed by the Capitalist USA since WW2.

That's actually about how many the Nazi Fascists killed.

Study: US regime has killed 20-30 million people since WW2

So, how would that make the Capitalist USA so morally superior over Nazi Germany?

This is not a 'study' any more than you are an intellect.


Social evolution has taken one step forward, and two steps back.

Capitalism is the former, and Marxism, Leftism, Modern Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism all represent the latter.


Leftist talking points come off you like a dog shedding mud....

,
The Fascists got it right, and Republicans have got it wrong.

In order to have a Socially Conservative environment you have to manage your economy.

Otherwise it ends up like you have here, with over 10 million illegals here to benefit the Capitalists for cheap labor, Capitalists selling you Porn, Capitalists selling Gay wedding apparel, Hospital Capitalists selling abortions, Hollywood, and media selling Liberal degeneracy.

It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

But, many Americans who are Social Conservatives still look for Capitalism for the answer, which I find hilarious.

I fondly wish for you to get what you desire, as it conforms with Karma, and get to live under a communist/fascist/Nazi regime......

....just not here.

I'm not a Communist, though.
I'm a Fascist supporter.

Communism is bad, but so is Capitalism.

Communist regimes never had millions of third-World rift raff flood into their countries to permanently alter the heritage of our nations.

Although Communism oppressed, and stagnated the economy.

Both Communists, and Capitalists killed more than the Fascists, though.

"I'm not a Communist, though.
I'm a Fascist supporter."

Communists, Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Socialists......distinctions without differences.


Stalin supported Mussolini, you dunce.
"In 1913, while still editor of Avanti!, he began to publish and edit his own journal,Utopia, a forum for controversial discussion among leftwing socialists. ...Two of those who collaborated with Mussolini on Utopia would go on to help found the Italian Communist Party and one to help found the German Communist Party.(3)Others, with Mussolini, would found the Fascist movement.

The youngest prime minister in Italian history,.... Mussolini was showered with accolades from sundry quarters.... Stalin supplied Mussolini with the plans of the May Day parades in Red Square, to help him polish up his Fascist pageants....He conquered Ethiopia, made a Pact of Steel with Germany, introduced anti-Jewish measures in 1938,came into the war as Hitler's very junior partner,..."
The Mystery of Fascism by David Ramsay Steele


So....here we see Mussolini, Hitler, and Stalin....good ol' pals.
FDR was a wanna-be in that clique...


Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Modern Liberalism, Progressivism, or Socialism....peas in a pod.


QED....Any who would deny that every one of these is, at its core, the same, is clearly uneducated, uninformed, or a bald-faced liar.



"I'm not a Communist, though.
I'm a Fascist supporter."
Add this to your resume: 'I'm an imbecile.'

Churchill supported Stalin, in Lend-lease aid, and the Soviet expansion into Central-Europe in Yalta Conference, and Potsdam Conference.

I suppose that makes Churchill a Communist, except it doesn't he was a Capitalist.

Oh, and BTW, there was a famine in India during Churchill's regime in the 1940's in India, where 3 million Indians starved to death.

What did Churchill do to help India?

I suppose it's okay when Capitalism leads to dire situations, though.

 

[Aries]

Still waiting for proof that Christianity isn't taught in history classes.

Most well rounded history classes touch on religions as part of exploring cultures. If you are talking about a time and place where christianity dominated, the basics of that religion should be reviewed to better understand that society.