Anti-Crime Executive Orders

I don't like flag burning, but it is legal per SCOTUS.

Any inccel cuck want to deny that?
I know that this is what everyone is repeating....and I held this as the first thought as well....
However, it's practically a new SCOTUS from the last time it was reviewed and only narrowly became protected speech when reviewed last time.

Might not go the way people think. Including myself.
 
GLTY....
You will still spend the year before getting sprung by the SCOTUS.

It was SCOTUS that ruled Flag Burning is protected speech dip shit.

When the Supreme Court Ruled to Aallow American flag Burning.​


 
Here is 1.5 minute on the DC cleanup. Youre welcome in advance. One of IM2 and Superbadbrutha chicks. Feel free to copy to a thread. Be a hero you dumb Stain. You lose.

 
It was SCOTUS that ruled Flag Burning is protected speech dip shit.

When the Supreme Court Ruled to Aallow American flag Burning.​


Again...

Look at the date of that ruling
It might not stand and be overturned. Just depends largely on the court. This is a different SCOTUS.

Trump likely knows and was told....accusing Trump of being stupid is unwise at best. The man may be a lot of negative things....but stupid is not one of them.

It's either bait or a sea change.

Death penalty has been overturned .
Roe v Wade got overturned....

Whose to say this one won't be too.
 
I'm strongly against flag burning as well. I can't see that holding up to your Constitution and it will experience a Constitutional challenge at some point.

I wouldn't burn N Korea or Irans flag, there are just some lines we shouldn't cross.
A flag is a representative of the government. You want to protest that government, you can do many things. Burning a flag is a symbolic attack.

It's also a constitutional right.

Within the rather lax rule on freedom of speech compared to other countries (like the UK and Germany, which have popped up recently), there's no way anyone would get away with this.

That Trump has made an executive order banning flag burning, shows just how little he cares about the US Constitution.
 
GLTY....
You will still spend the year before getting sprung by the SCOTUS.

And what is the point? Has he done this just so that people who oppose him will start burning flags, so he can then turn around and say they're anti-American? Or worse, terrorists?

Is there a plan to all of this, a plan to silence the opposition that isn't about stopping them flag burning, but encouraging them?
 
Again...

Look at the date of that ruling
It might not stand and be overturned. Just depends largely on the court. This is a different SCOTUS.

Trump likely knows and was told....accusing Trump of being stupid is unwise at best. The man may be a lot of negative things....but stupid is not one of them.

It's either bait or a sea change.

Death penalty has been overturned .
Roe v Wade got overturned....

Whose to say this one won't be too.

Yeah, let's have SCOTUS enabling Trump's dictatorial interview.
 
I'm strongly against flag burning as well. I can't see that holding up to your Constitution and it will experience a Constitutional challenge at some point.

I wouldn't burn N Korea or Irans flag, there are just some lines we shouldn't cross.
The UNITED STATES Supreme Court has ruled that flag burning is protected under freedom of expression.
 
So apparently Trump signed a few executive orders today.

American flag burning is an automatic 1 year in jail, no parole, reprieve, or reduced sentencing. .
Federalization of DC
More troops in more cities.
No more cashless bail anymore anywhere....gonna be too expensive to continue the practice.
A whole bunch of orders today all focused on crime.


Trump knows he is limited in those orders .. he's brilliantly throwing balls outside the strike zone and laughing as Dems swing wildly ! how dare he make our cities safe ! how dare he condemns burning the flag ! how dare he try to stop releasing violent repeat offenders back onto the streets with no bail ! Trump knows how cant force states to comply .. he knows that cities like Chicago aren't federal Districts like DC .. what he's really doing is forcing Dems to defend their opposition to his proposals ! brilliant !
 
That flag burning shit will get shot down like a pheasant in South Dakota in October.

Dumb righty virtue signalling.
or ... forcing Dems to scream about the right to burn the flag and have crime in the streets ! brilliant strategy from the POTUS !
 
Burn the ******* flag, freedom of speech asshole.
and the response posted above is exactly why Trump signed executive orders he knows will probably be shut down by the courts ! lol ! you're playing right into his hands ! and I assume you and your comrades are against violent repeat offenders having to post bail also eh ? or do you agree with Trump on that issue and believe that they shouldn't be let out onto the streets immediately after committing violent crime without even posting bail ?
 
Last edited:
I don't like when people burn the American flag, but what is even more despicable is anti-freedom authoritarians who trample all over the Bill of Rights.

Why am I not surprised though that Donald "Take the guns first, go through due process second" Trump did that? He has shown time and time again that he doesn't understand liberty or the constitution. :(

As long as the flag being burned is someone's own property and not someone else's flag, of course it shouldn't be against the law in a supposedly free country. This isn't North Korea.


should people be able to set their property on fire on city streets ?
 
15th post
Within the rather lax rule on freedom of speech compared to other countries (like the UK and Germany, which have popped up recently), there's no way anyone would get away with this.

That Trump has made an executive order banning flag burning, shows just how little he cares about the US Constitution.

He's simply correcting a misunderstanding of the English language on the part of the SCOTUS.

Even a blindfolded ten year old knows that money is not speech. Speech is the stuff that comes out of your mouth, money is the stuff that comes out of your wallet.

Same for arson. It's not speech, it's lighting a dangerous fire in a public place. It threatens buildings and children. There is no constitutional protection for arson.

I mean, come on, BLM loots designer clothing stores during a riot 'cause they're pissed at "the man", and you're gonna call that free speech?

Nuh-uh. It's looting. Thievery. Stealing of private assets. Not to mention vandalism and destruction of private property on the way in.

They can protest without arson and without looting.
 
should people be able to set their property on fire on city streets ?

As long as it doesn't burn down someone else's property, I don't care if someone wants to make a political statement by burning any flag. I may not like it or agree with it, but this is supposed to be a free country. The authoritarian RINOs who want to outlaw everything they don't like would probably feel much more at home in North Korea. Stop cheering for turning the US into an authoritarian militarized police state. :mad:
 
or ... forcing Dems to scream about the right to burn the flag and have crime in the streets ! brilliant strategy from the POTUS !

Oh, brother. You must not get out much. On x, and other online platforms MOST conservatives I've seen are against this EO... and certainly libertarians are.

Why must you look at EVERYTHING through that extremely binary "left" vs "right" lens?
 
Back
Top Bottom