AnotherDem ShowsDisdain for Constitution: "I think the Constitution is wrong" w/Video

[teapartysamurai]

If the Constitution is never wrong,

why do people like the OP want

1. an amendment to ban all abortion, i.e. the life amendment, and/or

2. a marriage amendment to define marriage as only between a man and a woman?

If the Constitution is never wrong,

why did it take an amendment to end slavery? to give women the right to vote?

...or...perhaps the OP believes that the Constitution wasn't wrong, originally, and therefore such amendments were in fact themselves wrong.

Here we go again. If the Constitution contradicts a liberal, then the Constitution is wrong.

I love it!

Okay Carbiner you win. The Constitution is wrong. There! You happy.

NOW WHAT PART OF IT DO YOU WANT TO AMEND TO STOP THE CITIZENS UNITED DECISION???????????

I CAN'T WAIT FOR YOU TO ANSWER THAT ONE!

Give a liberal enough rope, he'll hang himself with it.

 

[teapartysamurai]

You're expecting the OP to be able to follow a coherent thought from one end to the other. In this case, it's a recipe for disappointment.

Which means she can't refute a damn thing, but she wants to feel like he/she did.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Supreme Court once said that "separate but equal" was constitutional! Did that make it so?

The Supreme Court once said Dredd Scott was Constitutional. Did that make it so?

You libs sure don't think so on Bush v. Gore!

There is a big difference between attacking a USSC decision AND attacking the Constitution as being wrong.

But I don't expect YOU to see that difference. Found the words "separate but equal yet?

:

If the Constitution is never wrong, why has it ever needed to be amended?

You heard it here first peoples.

Liberals are let slipping what they really think.

Give them enough time, I knew they would!

Can't you answer the question.

I say, yes, the Constitution was wrong when it didn't protect the right of women to vote.

What's your opinion?

 

[NYcarbineer]

If the Constitution is never wrong,

why do people like the OP want

1. an amendment to ban all abortion, i.e. the life amendment, and/or

2. a marriage amendment to define marriage as only between a man and a woman?

If the Constitution is never wrong,

why did it take an amendment to end slavery? to give women the right to vote?

...or...perhaps the OP believes that the Constitution wasn't wrong, originally, and therefore such amendments were in fact themselves wrong.

Here we go again. If the Constitution contradicts a liberal, then the Constitution is wrong.

I love it!

Okay Carbiner you win. The Constitution is wrong. There! You happy.

NOW WHAT PART OF IT DO YOU WANT TO AMEND TO STOP THE CITIZENS UNITED DECISION???????????

I CAN'T WAIT FOR YOU TO ANSWER THAT ONE!

YOU want to put a Life amendment into the Constitution to stop abortions, therefore, YOU think the Constitution is WRONG on abortion.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If the Constitution is never wrong,

why do people like the OP want

1. an amendment to ban all abortion, i.e. the life amendment, and/or

2. a marriage amendment to define marriage as only between a man and a woman?

If the Constitution is never wrong,

why did it take an amendment to end slavery? to give women the right to vote?

...or...perhaps the OP believes that the Constitution wasn't wrong, originally, and therefore such amendments were in fact themselves wrong.

Here we go again. If the Constitution contradicts a liberal, then the Constitution is wrong.

:

Those example don't contradict me, they contradict you. You think those amendments are needed, therefore you think the Constitution is currently WRONG on those issues.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Money given to a candidate expresses my views and support for him. Money is free expression in politics.

That's an extrapolation with no basis in the Constitution..or in the very definition of speech. And, it's a logical fallacy.

And considering many corporate entities are using messages as a smoke screen for their true agenda..its a very dangerous fallacy.

Sucks to be you that the USSC disagrees.

l:

Sucks for you that the USSC disagrees with you on abortion, doesn't it.

boohoo.

 

[teapartysamurai]

If the Constitution is never wrong, why has it ever needed to be amended?

You heard it here first peoples.

Liberals are let slipping what they really think.

Give them enough time, I knew they would!

Can't you answer the question.

I say, yes, the Constitution was wrong when it didn't protect the right of women to vote.

What's your opinion?

I told you Carbiner, you're right, the Constitution is wrong.

Now how do you want to change it in the Citizens United Case?

I'm waiting!

 

[teapartysamurai]

If the Constitution is never wrong,

why do people like the OP want

1. an amendment to ban all abortion, i.e. the life amendment, and/or

2. a marriage amendment to define marriage as only between a man and a woman?

If the Constitution is never wrong,

why did it take an amendment to end slavery? to give women the right to vote?

...or...perhaps the OP believes that the Constitution wasn't wrong, originally, and therefore such amendments were in fact themselves wrong.

Here we go again. If the Constitution contradicts a liberal, then the Constitution is wrong.

I love it!

Okay Carbiner you win. The Constitution is wrong. There! You happy.

NOW WHAT PART OF IT DO YOU WANT TO AMEND TO STOP THE CITIZENS UNITED DECISION???????????

I CAN'T WAIT FOR YOU TO ANSWER THAT ONE!

YOU want to put a Life amendment into the Constitution to stop abortions, therefore, YOU think the Constitution is WRONG on abortion.

Where does it say there is a right to abortion?

And what would you change in the Constitution on the Citizens United Case?

I find it funny you don't want to answer either!

 

[The Infidel]

That's an extrapolation with no basis in the Constitution..or in the very definition of speech. And, it's a logical fallacy.

And considering many corporate entities are using messages as a smoke screen for their true agenda..its a very dangerous fallacy.

Sucks to be you that the USSC disagrees.

l:

Sucks for you that the USSC disagrees with you on abortion, doesn't it.

boohoo.

Why do you like killing babies?

Your horrible!

 

[teapartysamurai]

If the Constitution is never wrong,

why do people like the OP want

1. an amendment to ban all abortion, i.e. the life amendment, and/or

2. a marriage amendment to define marriage as only between a man and a woman?

If the Constitution is never wrong,

why did it take an amendment to end slavery? to give women the right to vote?

...or...perhaps the OP believes that the Constitution wasn't wrong, originally, and therefore such amendments were in fact themselves wrong.

Here we go again. If the Constitution contradicts a liberal, then the Constitution is wrong.

:

Those example don't contradict me, they contradict you. You think those amendments are needed, therefore you think the Constitution is currently WRONG on those issues.

But the Constitution allows amendments!

Now what do you want to change on the Constitution on the Citizens United Case?

 

[jillian]

I think we see the stupidity here.

yes...*we* do.... yours.

Hypocritical and dumb as hell.

yes. you are.

why do you laugh at the end of every post? it makes you sound like you need meds.

 

[California Girl]

Apparently, all that open honesty was too much for CG. She left. AW!!!!!!!!

Funny how you get all confident because someone disappears for a couple of hours. You are aware how fucking hysterically stupid makes you look, right?

 

[teapartysamurai]

That's an extrapolation with no basis in the Constitution..or in the very definition of speech. And, it's a logical fallacy.

And considering many corporate entities are using messages as a smoke screen for their true agenda..its a very dangerous fallacy.

Sucks to be you that the USSC disagrees.

l:

Sucks for you that the USSC disagrees with you on abortion, doesn't it.

boohoo.

I'm still waiting for you to show me where in the Constitution it allows abortion?

 

[teapartysamurai]

I think we see the stupidity here.

yes...*we* do.... yours.

Hypocritical and dumb as hell.

yes. you are.

why do you laugh at the end of every post? it makes you sound like you need meds.

And Jillian with her sharp and steel debating skills graces us with her presence. Oh no, what will we do.

We better run conservatives. We have no chance of winning now!!!!!!

Why do I have so many smilies at the end? Dealing with posters like YOU!

I can't help but laugh!

 

[teapartysamurai]

Apparently, all that open honesty was too much for CG. She left. AW!!!!!!!!

Funny how you get all confident because someone disappears for a couple of hours. You are aware how fucking hysterically stupid makes you look, right?

I think we see who's stupid, when the most you could add to the debate was the "open honesty" that it's okay to express the Constitution is wrong, but any "open honesty" criticizing that is just more "open honesty" than you can stand.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Sucks to be you that the USSC disagrees.

l:

Sucks for you that the USSC disagrees with you on abortion, doesn't it.

boohoo.

Why do you like killing babies?

Your horrible!

I find it hilarious that liberals want to argue that the USSC is the last word on the Constitution when it comes to abortion, BUT NOT WHEN IT COMES to Bush v. Gore, or the Citizens United case.

Like Animal Farm, some USSC decisions are more equal than others.

 

[jillian]

I think we see the stupidity here.

yes...*we* do.... yours.



yes. you are.

why do you laugh at the end of every post? it makes you sound like you need meds.

And Jillian with her sharp and steel debating skills graces us with her presence. Oh no, what will we do.

We better run conservatives. We have no chance of winning now!!!!!!

Why do I have so many smilies at the end? Dealing with posters like YOU!

I can't help but laugh!

i keep telling you, hon... i don't 'debate' idiots like you. i laugh at you.

you know, that whole 'you can't teach a pig to talk thing'.

if cali and i agree about someone unequivocally, i figure that says it all.

 

[teapartysamurai]

yes...*we* do.... yours.



yes. you are.



why do you laugh at the end of every post? it makes you sound like you need meds.

And Jillian with her sharp and steel debating skills graces us with her presence. Oh no, what will we do.

We better run conservatives. We have no chance of winning now!!!!!!

Why do I have so many smilies at the end? Dealing with posters like YOU!

I can't help but laugh!

i keep telling you, hon... i don't 'debate' idiots like you. i laugh at you.

you know, that whole 'you can't teach a pig to talk thing'.

if cali and i agree about someone unequivocally, i figure that says it all.

Well that's another way of saying you couldn't debate me, if you tried.

But that's okay. At least you're honest enough to admit your limitiations.

So, you admit, you are a low grade troll. How refreshingly honest. Oh too bad! You already neg repped me. You can't do it now!

 

[The Infidel]

Sucks for you that the USSC disagrees with you on abortion, doesn't it.

boohoo.

Why do you like killing babies?

Your horrible!

I find it hilarious that liberals want to argue that the USSC is the last word on the Constitution when it comes to abortion, BUT NOT WHEN IT COMES to Bush v. Gore, or the Citizens United case.

Like Animal Farm, some USSC decisions are more equal than others.

Oh... you didnt get the memo?

Judges know what is best for you and I

 

[jillian]

Well that's another way of saying you couldn't debate me, if you tried.

But that's okay. At least you're honest enough to admit your limitiations.

So, you admit, you are a low grade troll. How refreshingly honest. Oh too bad! You already neg repped me. You can't do it now!

poor delusional freak.

the only troll in this post is you.

and you aren't worth my time because you're really, truly, beyond mind-numbingly stupid.

perhaps that simple fact is beyond your comprehension.