I agree that the Constitution is not perfect. The founders recognized such the day the document was signed. Sallow made a very poor post.
And we still debate the same arguments they went round about today, just with different details. Did you ever stop to think about whether the inherent tensions in the system are deliberate or simply reflective of the compromises that were forced in order to get a working system at all? Either way maybe it doesn't matter....but I do think the debate, and the willingness to opine that something in the document or system it created is "wrong", is important to keep the whole thing in balance.
Nothing wrong with honest debate about the subject matter. The problems come from those charged with upholding, defending, and protecting the Constitution; "We The People."
The problem IMO is ignorance - and a refusal to engage in civil debate. There are two, actually more than two, legitimate ways to view the COTUS and have been since before it was created. That tension and the ebb and flow between the factions is a big part of why the system it created has lasted so long and with such stability.