Another Trump impeachment bombshell: Plot to oust acting AG and force Georgia state lawmakers to overturn its presidential election results

[kaz]

I’m still waiting for any evidence of Hillary Clinton’s crimes you keep calling Hillary a criminal but you’ve never produced shred of evidence that she actually committed a crime.
The evidence of Mrs. Clinton's crimes is public and she has claimed she accepted responsibility for her actions re: Benghazi which most thinking folks consider criminal negligence in the performance of her duties as SoS and which directly resulted in the murder of an American ambassador and others. There was also the little matter of her massive security breaches made with her computer that even Obama's head of FBI publicly admitted was criminal but refused to prosecute. Trump has been found legally not guilty in courts of law. Hillary has not.

So, you're arguing that we shouldn't hold Trump responsible for what he may or may not have done, unless he has been found guilty of it in a court of law,
-- but ---
We should condemn Hillary Clinton for what she may or may not have done, even though she hasn't been found guilty of any of it in a court of law.

Do you see the double standard you are applying here?

So, you're arguing that we shouldn't hold Democrats responsible for election fraud, unless they been found guilty of it in a court of law,
-- but ---

We should condemn Trump for what he may or may not have done, even though he hasn't been found guilty of any of it in a court of law.

Do you see the double standard you are applying here?

Nice try, but no. Flipping it around to demand that every Democrat prove that they didn't do something is logically impossible. If I accuse you of punching me in the face, the DA has to prove that you punched me in the face; they can't declare everyone here guilty until a court proves that no forum poster ever punched me in the face—especially if they've already leveled charges 60 times in courts all across the country, to no avail.

But I'll clarify. Most things that people do don't make it to court. Nixon was never found criminally guilty of ordering the Watergate breaking, nor was Clinton for getting a knob shine under the Resolute Desk, but do you think they did them? There is a point at which a reasonable person can infer that yeah, they probably did that, but sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "If it wasn't proven in court, he didn't do it!" is close-minded, at best.

It's exactly the same, stupid fuck. With election fraud, you say it has to be proven in a court or shut up. But with Trump you make wild accusations.

What you're arguing is the typical Democrat argument that you aren't subject to your own standards. The very definition of a double standard

Hillary has never admitted any of the things that you claim. James Comey did not say she broke the law with her server, he said she did not break the law.

Comey was, in fact, very clear that no laws were broken.

Trump has been found guilty on multiple occasions. He’s been barred from being a trustee for any charity because of his abuse of his family charity including using it to make it legal donations to politicians.

Trump settled the fraud trial for $25 million. Even Trump says if you settle something it’s an admission of guilt. Trump has paid fines and settled in multiple cases involving crimes including the federal racial discrimination cases brought in the rate late 70s.

Not to mention that your whole concept of having to prove that you didn’t commit a crime that you haven’t been charged with, is that utterly ridiculous.

But you’re still telling yourself that Hillary is the criminal here.

Try reading my post again, George, our official site Chinese disinformation officer. I didn't say anything about Hillary. This explains your grades, doesn't it?

 

[kaz]

It's exactly the same, stupid fuck. With election fraud, you say it has to be proven in a court or shut up. But with Trump you make wild accusations.

What you're arguing is the typical Democrat argument that you aren't subject to your own standards. The very definition of a double standard

Trump claimed election fraud in 2016.. He claimed 3-5 million illegals voted.

And that claim has never been disproved, has it? I think he was probably correct.

Before the election Trump kept stating that if he lost to Biden the Election was rigged. This has been a theme in Trump's life for more than 40 years. He has always claimed the system was rigged against him and that he's treated unfairly.

Look what he has done tothe country with his lies and accusations.

"Before the election Trump kept stating that if he lost to Biden the Election was rigged"

Trump called that one, huh? What a total fraud election stolen by the fascist Democrats

 

[surada]

More Fake News bullshit. And, has nothing to do with the latest impeachment hoax.

"The unassuming lawyer who worked on the plan, Jeffrey Clark, had been devising ways to cast doubt on the election results and to bolster Mr. Trump’s continuing legal battles and the pressure on Georgia politicians. Because Mr. Rosen had refused the president’s entreaties to carry out those plans, Mr. Trump was about to decide whether to fire Mr. Rosen and replace him with Mr. Clark."

 

[surada]

It's exactly the same, stupid fuck. With election fraud, you say it has to be proven in a court or shut up. But with Trump you make wild accusations.

What you're arguing is the typical Democrat argument that you aren't subject to your own standards. The very definition of a double standard

Trump claimed election fraud in 2016.. He claimed 3-5 million illegals voted.

And that claim has never been disproved, has it? I think he was probably correct.

Before the election Trump kept stating that if he lost to Biden the Election was rigged. This has been a theme in Trump's life for more than 40 years. He has always claimed the system was rigged against him and that he's treated unfairly.

Look what he has done tothe country with his lies and accusations.

"Before the election Trump kept stating that if he lost to Biden the Election was rigged"

Trump called that one, huh? What a total fraud election stolen by the fascist Democrats

Honey, Trump has been gaming the system his whole life.. He's like any welfare queen looking for a loophole.

When you come up with proof of fraud, get back to me.. Until then you're just another dumb sucker.

 

[kaz]

It's exactly the same, stupid fuck. With election fraud, you say it has to be proven in a court or shut up. But with Trump you make wild accusations.

What you're arguing is the typical Democrat argument that you aren't subject to your own standards. The very definition of a double standard

Trump claimed election fraud in 2016.. He claimed 3-5 million illegals voted.

And that claim has never been disproved, has it? I think he was probably correct.

Before the election Trump kept stating that if he lost to Biden the Election was rigged. This has been a theme in Trump's life for more than 40 years. He has always claimed the system was rigged against him and that he's treated unfairly.

Look what he has done tothe country with his lies and accusations.

"Before the election Trump kept stating that if he lost to Biden the Election was rigged"

Trump called that one, huh? What a total fraud election stolen by the fascist Democrats

Honey, Trump has been gaming the system his whole life.. He's like any welfare queen looking for a loophole.

When you come up with proof of fraud, get back to me.. Until then you're just another dumb sucker.

You're just making up more of your hate shit.

What does "gaming the system" even mean in terms of difference between him and any other successful person? You obviously don't know. Find a good man who can support you since you obviously can't do it yourself. Oh, and don't take telemarking calls. Seriously. You believe whatever Democrats tell you to think, you are clearly unable to do it yourself

 

[justoffal]

Trump and Justice Dept. Lawyer Said to Have Plotted to Oust Acting Attorney General

Trying to find another avenue to push his baseless election claims, Donald Trump considered installing a loyalist, and had the men make their cases to him.

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department’s top leaders listened in stunned silence this month: One of their peers, they were told, had devised a plan with President Donald J. Trump to oust Jeffrey A. Rosen as acting attorney general and wield the department’s power to force Georgia state lawmakers to overturn its presidential election results.

The unassuming lawyer who worked on the plan, Jeffrey Clark, had been devising ways to cast doubt on the election results and to bolster Mr. Trump’s continuing legal battles and the pressure on Georgia politicians. Because Mr. Rosen had refused the president’s entreaties to carry out those plans, Mr. Trump was about to decide whether to fire Mr. Rosen and replace him with Mr. Clark.

The department officials, convened on a conference call, then asked each other: What will you do if Mr. Rosen is dismissed?

The answer was unanimous. They would resign.

Much more from The New York Times...

Trump and Justice Dept. Lawyer Said to Have Plotted to Oust Acting Attorney General (Published 2021)

Trying to find another avenue to push his baseless election claims, Donald Trump considered installing a loyalist.

www.nytimes.com

This certainly adds more weight against Trump in his Senate impeachment trial. What do you think?

I think you forgot to add the Russian prostitutes

 

[Leo123]

What I think is that if you believe an American President can be charged with what someone thinks he might have considered you are in serious need of help.

Yes, the Democrats couldn't find any criminal activity on Trump's part so now they will try to charge him with what THEY think he is thinking!! Talk about fear and desperation.

 

[Flash]

The biggest bombshell was the Democrats stealing the 2020 Presidential and Senatorial elections with the scam of fraudulent mail in and harvest ballots in Democrat controlled swing districts.

 

[Rambunctious]

They fear us...and they should....