.
Another State’s COVID-19 Policy Struck Down By the USSC
Thursday’s ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court sided with a church that defied California’s pandemic-related policy, which bans indoor religious services. The High Court upheld the church’s challenge as being unconstitutional religious discrimination.
Governor Gavin Newsom obviously expected the court’s ruling, the decision followed a similar action by the justices on Nov. 25 that backed Christian and Jewish houses of worship that challenged New York state restrictions in coronavirus hot spots.
If the God-fearing-folk across America are so eager to risk their lives attending these super-spreader events, so they can get a dose of that old-time-religion there should be no restricting their gambling with their lives and the lives of their children.
The COVID-19 pandemic is proving itself to be an excellent tool for weeding-out the inferior-minded members of the population here in the United States. Unfortunately, a certain percentage of deaths among superior-minded individuals is inevitable.
However, the RWNJs’ ongoing fight against common sense restrictions to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus, coupled with the immeasurable help they are receiving from the SCOTUS, will put the vast majority of COVID deaths into this group of the inferior-minded, and extremely white citizenry.
So, there is a pleasant up-side to the RWNJs’ determination to eagerly spread COVID-19 among themselves, while believing their god will protect them. Statistics have yet to bear out their ill conceived assumption. (But, the RWNJs deny all facts that don’t please them.)
So, Christian conservatives, attend church, don’t wear face masks, and fill the buildings to SRO. Do it for your party, and do it for your country. The United States is facing an overpopulation problem, and your efforts to spread and contract COVID-19 can go a long way in solving this issue.
.
Another State’s COVID-19 Policy Struck Down By the USSC
Thursday’s ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court sided with a church that defied California’s pandemic-related policy, which bans indoor religious services. The High Court upheld the church’s challenge as being unconstitutional religious discrimination.
Governor Gavin Newsom obviously expected the court’s ruling, the decision followed a similar action by the justices on Nov. 25 that backed Christian and Jewish houses of worship that challenged New York state restrictions in coronavirus hot spots.
If the God-fearing-folk across America are so eager to risk their lives attending these super-spreader events, so they can get a dose of that old-time-religion there should be no restricting their gambling with their lives and the lives of their children.
The COVID-19 pandemic is proving itself to be an excellent tool for weeding-out the inferior-minded members of the population here in the United States. Unfortunately, a certain percentage of deaths among superior-minded individuals is inevitable.
However, the RWNJs’ ongoing fight against common sense restrictions to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus, coupled with the immeasurable help they are receiving from the SCOTUS, will put the vast majority of COVID deaths into this group of the inferior-minded, and extremely white citizenry.
So, there is a pleasant up-side to the RWNJs’ determination to eagerly spread COVID-19 among themselves, while believing their god will protect them. Statistics have yet to bear out their ill conceived assumption. (But, the RWNJs deny all facts that don’t please them.)
So, Christian conservatives, attend church, don’t wear face masks, and fill the buildings to SRO. Do it for your party, and do it for your country. The United States is facing an overpopulation problem, and your efforts to spread and contract COVID-19 can go a long way in solving this issue.
U.S. Supreme Court sides with challenge to California's COVID-19 religious service curbs
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a blow to California Governor Gavin Newsom's pandemic-related ban on indoor religious services, siding with a church that defied the policy and challenged it as unconstitutional religious discrimination. The decision followed a similar action by the...
www.yahoo.com
.
Last edited: