The when the woman wants the baby the Birth Fairy shows up to make it human.
Idiot!
No, when the woman wants a baby, she allows a tissue mass to live in her body for nine months.
When she doesn't, it's that problem she takes care of next Tuesday.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The when the woman wants the baby the Birth Fairy shows up to make it human.
Idiot!
Bullshit Herr Mengele, you science denying pile of shit.
Roe V. Wade was a political act by unelected dictators, is has NOTHING to do with science. FOLLOW THE SCIENCE. The Maoist democrats HATE science.
The are innocent human beingsFetuses still aren't people.
Jews are not people either!! They are vermin
I wasn't aware Jews were taking up residence in German bodies. If they were, then no one would really complain about expelling them.
Bullshit Herr Mengele, you science denying pile of shit.
That's not an 8 week fetus, and it still isn't viable. Fetus porn gets you nowhere with me.
You can't argue that it's not a person on the basis of it being alive, or being human, or that it does not have it's own DNA.
And the proof of that hypocrisy, is that in any other context, you would not support that claim. If for example, a person killed the fetus of an endangered animal, like a Panda, or Tiger or Rhino, you would want them tried.
But the moment you justify murder with the excuse that it is not a 'person', you justify slavery, and genocide. The "it is not a person" excuse is exactly how the Nazis and Slavers supported their actions.
You deny science and fact because you are evil and the facts expose it. If we do a DNA test will it come back "mass?" Nope, it's human. If we do an in vitro blood test will it test canine? Nope, human AND distinct from the mother.
Actually, you can argue that it's not human because it wouldn't survive separated from it's body. Therefore it's no more a person than a tonsil or an appendix.
And I know they probably wouldn't be. But that's a case where the species is in danger, not invididuals.
Um, no. The problem is, the Nazis and Slavers didn't have people living in their bodies. The problem with your argument isn't just the dubious assertions that a kidney-bean sized fetus is a person, but that it has MORE rights than the woman it is inside.
And if we pull it out of the woman's uterus, it will die. Not human.
You can't argue that it's not a person on the basis of it being alive, or being human, or that it does not have it's own DNA.
Actually, you can argue that it's not human because it wouldn't survive separated from it's body. Therefore it's no more a person than a tonsil or an appendix.
And the proof of that hypocrisy, is that in any other context, you would not support that claim. If for example, a person killed the fetus of an endangered animal, like a Panda, or Tiger or Rhino, you would want them tried.
And I know they probably wouldn't be. But that's a case where the species is in danger, not invididuals.
But the moment you justify murder with the excuse that it is not a 'person', you justify slavery, and genocide. The "it is not a person" excuse is exactly how the Nazis and Slavers supported their actions.
Um, no. The problem is, the Nazis and Slavers didn't have people living in their bodies. The problem with your argument isn't just the dubious assertions that a kidney-bean sized fetus is a person, but that it has MORE rights than the woman it is inside.
Unfortunately, yes they are "people." What do you think they are? Giraffes? Flatworms? Gladiolas?
Unviable tissue masses the size of a Kidney Bean.