Another Debate Audience Recites Pledge when Moderator says "no!"

[RadiomanATL]

j. Wearing Army uniforms is prohibited in the following situations:
(1) In connection with the furtherance of any political or commercial interests, or when engaged in off-duty civilian
employment.
(2) When participating in public speeches, interviews, picket lines, marches, rallies, or public demonstrations, except
as authorized by competent authority.
(3) When attending any meeting or event that is a function of, or is sponsored by, an extremist organization.

http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r670_1.pdf

 

[RadiomanATL]

Of course you would agree with an ignorant claim. When it suits your agenda.

I suggest you research the difference between a claim and a fact. Unless you wish to further embarrass yourself.

My guess is that you will choose the latter.

Why doesn't your dumbass post the evidence that unilaterally bars an active duty soldier from attentding a political debate in uniform?

I did.

You lose.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Of course you would agree with an ignorant claim. When it suits your agenda.

I suggest you research the difference between a claim and a fact. Unless you wish to further embarrass yourself.

My guess is that you will choose the latter.

Why doesn't your dumbass post the evidence that unilaterally bars an active duty soldier from attentding a political debate in uniform?

So now you want me to research the UCMJ to prove that you are a fool?

 

[CurveLight]

j. Wearing Army uniforms is prohibited in the following situations:
(1) In connection with the furtherance of any political or commercial interests, or when engaged in off-duty civilian
employment.
(2) When participating in public speeches, interviews, picket lines, marches, rallies, or public demonstrations, except
as authorized by competent authority.
(3) When attending any meeting or event that is a function of, or is sponsored by, an extremist organization.

http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r670_1.pdf

Good killy rags you are ******* stoopid. I asked for evidence that unilaterally bars active duty military from wearing a uniform to a political debate. You provided simply Army regs and even that proves you wrong.

Re: 1. Simply being in the audience does not amount to "furtherance of a political interest."

Re: 2 Notice where it says authorization is possible?

Re: 3 not applicable.

One more time einstein....provide evidence of active duty military being unilaterally prohibited from wearing the uniform to attend a political debate.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Wearing Army uniforms is prohibited in the following situations:

* In connection with the furtherance of any political or commercial interest, or when engaged in off duty civilian employment.
* When participating in public speeches, interviews, picket lines, marches, rallies, or public demonstrations, except as authorized by competent authority.
* When attending any meeting or event that is a function of, or is sponsored by, an extremist organization.
* When wearing the uniform would bring discredit upon the Army.
* When specifically prohibited by Army regulations.

When The Wear Of The Army Uniform Is Required Or Prohibited (ArmyStudyGuide.com)

 

[RadiomanATL]

Re: 1. Simply being in the audience does not amount to "furtherance of a political interest."

Yes, it does.

You lose. Again.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Of course Bentdick ran away already......

Such a ******* coward, fool, and proven liar.

 

[CurveLight]

I suggest you research the difference between a claim and a fact. Unless you wish to further embarrass yourself.

My guess is that you will choose the latter.

Why doesn't your dumbass post the evidence that unilaterally bars an active duty soldier from attentding a political debate in uniform?

So now you want me to research the UCMJ to prove that you are a fool?

You just admitted you don't know the Regs. Im guessing you are too ******* dumb to understand how. Im glad to see you remain in Coward mode. Only cowards whine about backing up their own claims.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Why doesn't your dumbass post the evidence that unilaterally bars an active duty soldier from attentding a political debate in uniform?

So now you want me to research the UCMJ to prove that you are a fool?

You just admitted you don't know the Regs. Im guessing you are too ******* dumb to understand how. Im glad to see you remain in Coward mode. Only cowards whine about backing up their own claims.

Ah we see the coward, Rep turned off and invisible sign in....Gotta love it....

You have been proven wrong dumb ass. now just bow out and go away. And no I do not know every Military regulation off the top of my head. Not even a JAG lawyer would know that. How stupid are you?

 

[CurveLight]

Re: 1. Simply being in the audience does not amount to "furtherance of a political interest."

Yes, it does.

You lose. Again.

Hahaha...of course you edited out the evidence that proves you wrong. Even though you are obviously wrong about #1, let's temporarily say you are correct just to help further prove your dishonesty.

Number 2 clearly states authorization may be given. If authorization is allowed then there is no unilateral Reg or Law that prohibits active duty soldiers from wearing the uniform to a political debate. You got ***** slapped again but your response will prove you don't care about the facts.

 

[shintao]

I did? You mean you have proof that the former President and VP are war criminals? What court were they tried in?

If I slit your throat and throw your dead carcass out on the highway, I guess that means (According to your loony logic) I am a upright standing citizen of my neighborhood and a pillar of my community. I got to ask, where did you go to get your ******* deteriorated brain twisted up like that? Is that something the Marines did to you? Go get some free counseling, and be sure to get compensated for it.

What in the world are you talking about? Are we even on the same planet here? And please, I am retired from the US Army, Gunny would be a Marine of the same rank.

Well, we can't blame it on the Army, so there is some other cause. You do realize both Bush & Cheney admitted their roles as ording the use of war crimes, don't you? Or do you think those public confessions were had through torture and duress? Nah, it wasn't that was it? So it is back to same question, do you believe in Liberty & Justice for All??

 

[RadiomanATL]

Re: 1. Simply being in the audience does not amount to "furtherance of a political interest."

Yes, it does.

You lose. Again.

Hahaha...of course you edited out the evidence that proves you wrong. Even though you are obviously wrong about #1, let's temporarily say you are correct just to help further prove your dishonesty.

Number 2 clearly states authorization may be given. If authorization is allowed then there is no unilateral Reg or Law that prohibits active duty soldiers from wearing the uniform to a political debate. You got ***** slapped again but your response will prove you don't care about the facts.

2 is a separate reg concerning the wearing of a uniform.

All that is required is that #1 be true. It is. Therefore you lose.

Again.

 

[CurveLight]

So now you want me to research the UCMJ to prove that you are a fool?

You just admitted you don't know the Regs. Im guessing you are too ******* dumb to understand how. Im glad to see you remain in Coward mode. Only cowards whine about backing up their own claims.

Ah we see the coward, Rep turned off and invisible sign in....Gotta love it....

You have been proven wrong dumb ass. now just bow out and go away. And no I do not know every Military regulation off the top of my head. Not even a JAG lawyer would know that. How stupid are you?

I never said you or anyone should know all the refs dunbfuck. The fact you had to research your claim is inherent proof you don't know the facts. See, when you state a position you should do it after you researched. Basics 101 you ******* coward.

 

[SFC Ollie]

If I slit your throat and throw your dead carcass out on the highway, I guess that means (According to your loony logic) I am a upright standing citizen of my neighborhood and a pillar of my community. I got to ask, where did you go to get your ******* deteriorated brain twisted up like that? Is that something the Marines did to you? Go get some free counseling, and be sure to get compensated for it.

What in the world are you talking about? Are we even on the same planet here? And please, I am retired from the US Army, Gunny would be a Marine of the same rank.

Well, we can't blame it on the Army, so there is some other cause. You do realize both Bush & Cheney admitted their roles as ording the use of war crimes, don't you? Or do you think those public confessions were had through torture and duress? Nah, it wasn't that was it? So it is back to same question, do you believe in Liberty & Justice for All??

Yes I believe in Liberty & Justice for All.

What does your wet dreams about Bush and Cheney have to do with it?

 

[shintao]

Wearing Army uniforms is prohibited in the following situations:

* In connection with the furtherance of any political or commercial interest, or when engaged in off duty civilian employment.
* When participating in public speeches, interviews, picket lines, marches, rallies, or public demonstrations, except as authorized by competent authority.
* When attending any meeting or event that is a function of, or is sponsored by, an extremist organization.
* When wearing the uniform would bring discredit upon the Army.
* When specifically prohibited by Army regulations.

When The Wear Of The Army Uniform Is Required Or Prohibited (ArmyStudyGuide.com)

Years back after Desert Storm, I had a young troop stationed back east who got fired up over POW/MIAs, and was having discussions on base about it. The CO came down on him, and said that was a NO-NO for base, or off base activity for an enlisted man. Darn shame.

 

[CurveLight]

Yes, it does.

You lose. Again.

Hahaha...of course you edited out the evidence that proves you wrong. Even though you are obviously wrong about #1, let's temporarily say you are correct just to help further prove your dishonesty.

Number 2 clearly states authorization may be given. If authorization is allowed then there is no unilateral Reg or Law that prohibits active duty soldiers from wearing the uniform to a political debate. You got ***** slapped again but your response will prove you don't care about the facts.

2 is a separate reg concerning the wearing of a uniform.

All that is required is that #1 be true. It is. Therefore you lose.

Again.

Like I said, your response would prove you don't care about the facts. Number one is in regards to a specific political interest, which is definitely not applicable to a debate dumbass. If it's a debate and the soldier is in the audience how could you determine which side of the debate the soldier has taken? You can't but you'll continue ignoring the facts.

 

[shintao]

What in the world are you talking about? Are we even on the same planet here? And please, I am retired from the US Army, Gunny would be a Marine of the same rank.

Well, we can't blame it on the Army, so there is some other cause. You do realize both Bush & Cheney admitted their roles as ording the use of war crimes, don't you? Or do you think those public confessions were had through torture and duress? Nah, it wasn't that was it? So it is back to same question, do you believe in Liberty & Justice for All??

Yes I believe in Liberty & Justice for All.

What does your wet dreams about Bush and Cheney have to do with it?

Have you been licking my shorts again? As for B/C, it has to do with first recognizing a war crime when you see it, and understanding an admission of a crime makes you guilty. That is why smart criminals plead not guilty. B/C publically plead guilty to War Crimes. See how that works now? If I pubically admitted I slit your throat I would be guilty of murder. Not that I would do that to you per say.

You do realize war crimes were committed, yes?? That when you rape, torture or murder a POW, it is a war crime?? That we have tried people and sentenced them to death for water boarding, for example, not that is the only crime B/C authorized or were in charge of.

 

[RadiomanATL]

Hahaha...of course you edited out the evidence that proves you wrong. Even though you are obviously wrong about #1, let's temporarily say you are correct just to help further prove your dishonesty.

Number 2 clearly states authorization may be given. If authorization is allowed then there is no unilateral Reg or Law that prohibits active duty soldiers from wearing the uniform to a political debate. You got ***** slapped again but your response will prove you don't care about the facts.

2 is a separate reg concerning the wearing of a uniform.

All that is required is that #1 be true. It is. Therefore you lose.

Again.

Like I said, your response would prove you don't care about the facts. Number one is in regards to a specific political interest, which is definitely not applicable to a debate dumbass. If it's a debate and the soldier is in the audience how could you determine which side of the debate the soldier has taken? You can't but you'll continue ignoring the facts.

#1 is furthering a political interest.

You lose. Again.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Well, we can't blame it on the Army, so there is some other cause. You do realize both Bush & Cheney admitted their roles as ording the use of war crimes, don't you? Or do you think those public confessions were had through torture and duress? Nah, it wasn't that was it? So it is back to same question, do you believe in Liberty & Justice for All??

Yes I believe in Liberty & Justice for All.

What does your wet dreams about Bush and Cheney have to do with it?

Have you been licking my shorts again? As for B/C, it has to do with first recognizing a war crime when you see it, and understanding an admission of a crime makes you guilty. That is why smart criminals plead not guilty. B/C publically plead guilty to War Crimes. See how that works now? If I pubically admitted I slit your throat I would be guilty of murder. Not that I would do that to you per say.

You do realize war crimes were committed, yes?? That when you rape, torture or murder a POW, it is a war crime?? That we have tried people and sentenced them to death for water boarding, for example, not that is the only crime B/C authorized or were in charge of.

This shit again? This has been beat to death but if you really want to try again start another thread......

 

[thereisnospoon]

I did? You mean you have proof that the former President and VP are war criminals? What court were they tried in?

If I slit your throat and throw your dead carcass out on the highway, I guess that means (According to your loony logic) I am a upright standing citizen of my neighborhood and a pillar of my community. I got to ask, where did you go to get your ******* deteriorated brain twisted up like that? Is that something the Marines did to you? Go get some free counseling, and be sure to get compensated for it.

What in the world are you talking about? Are we even on the same planet here? And please, I am retired from the US Army, Gunny would be a Marine of the same rank.

This curve guy is in a world of shit.