- Mar 31, 2009
- 106,250
- 89,424
- 3,605
You have to wonder what parents and Dr would agree to this
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong, shitass. I don’t vote or support either party.Lol, you do as your told. A democrat.
Wrong, shitass. I don’t vote or support either party.
Wrong, shitass. I don’t vote or support either party.
Like I give a shit what you believe.Nobody believes you
What bigoted view? That teens having their breast chop off during an experimental surgery is something only a pathological monster would do?You could try. What you can't do is get the medical community to back your bigoted points of view.
Nah you're fun to mess withLike I give a shit what you believe.
Go away.n
I'm arguing that children are too young to truly grasp the long-term consequences of what they want to do. No one would excuse a 13-year-old getting tattoos covering their body by saying, "Well, they didn't decide to do it on their own, they made the decision with their parents", and applaud them for doing so. I'm saying that body altering surgery should wait until they are able to make that decision for themselves, as adults, and when they know how their adult body actually feels to them.They aren't making these decisions on their own they are making them with their parents and guardians. Is your argument that parents and children shouldn't be allowed to make their own healthcare decisions?
You know they're losing the argument when they trot that old thing out.What bigoted view? That teens having their breast chop off during an experimental surgery is something only a pathological monster would do?
Yes. Exactly.What bigoted view? That teens having their breast chop off during an experimental surgery is something only a pathological monster would do?
Go away, mewling quim.Nah you're fun to mess with
Simply silly
Go away, mewling quim.
So you support pathological monsters.Yes. Exactly.
Which is why no one is allowing our arguing for giving children full autonomy. I asked you a very simple question. Should parents, their children and their doctors be allowed to make their own healthcare decisions? Yes or no?I'm arguing that children are too young to truly grasp the long-term consequences of what they want to do.
Tattoos aren't healthcare decisions.No one would excuse a 13-year-old getting tattoos covering their body by saying, "Well, they didn't decide to do it on their own, they made the decision with their parents", and applaud them for doing so. I'm saying that body altering surgery should wait until they are able to make that decision for themselves, as adults, and when they know how their adult body actually feels to them.
Which is not criminal, its civil.
Depends on how the law suit shakes out. Hospitals and care providers get sued all the time."Civil" should be enough. If we can make the civil consequences for engaging in this kind of atrocity severe enough, doctors will quit committing this abomination. In the cases being litigated in California, Kaiser Permanente is being civilly crucified for their malpractice in mutilating someone who really wasn't a Tranny at all.
Until they get a test for the condition, they'd would be foolish to continue with this.
ReportedNah, because mommy said you could doesn't mean it will
Not with experimental treatments that 80% of those who claim the affliction outgrowWhich is why no one is allowing our arguing for giving children full autonomy. I asked you a very simple question. Should parents, their children and their doctors be allowed to make their own healthcare decisions? Yes or no?
Tattoos aren't healthcare decisions.
Before puberty. Health interventions aren't given to the prepubescent.Not with experimental treatments that 80% outgrow