Anonymous: Video of Bill Clinton with 13 year old on Epstein's Orgy Island

[Faun]

It's your claim he went there. You're beyond insane to think the burden to prove you right falls upon others.

You obviously can't prove your hallucinations. Not that anyone doubted that door a second.

Prove that flight logs cannot be changed or manipulated because you are basing your case that he DIDN'T go based on flight logs.

It's your claim they were manipulated. It's not my job to prove you wrong because you can't prove yourself right.

But you are claiming that based on flight logs, Bill "drop trou" is exonerated simply on that alone.


Report: Bill Clinton Flew on Jeffrey Epstein's Jet Without Secret Service Detail - Breitbart

Too bad you can't comprehend your own links....

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

"U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton"


Wonder why that is???? (snicker)

Given your defective conspiracist brain, I can guess why you wonder about that.

Meanwhile, you still have no proof Clinton ever visited that island and even your own link left to the article stating...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

Your own link!

 

[Dale Smith]

Prove that flight logs cannot be changed or manipulated because you are basing your case that he DIDN'T go based on flight logs.

It's your claim they were manipulated. It's not my job to prove you wrong because you can't prove yourself right.

But you are claiming that based on flight logs, Bill "drop trou" is exonerated simply on that alone.


Report: Bill Clinton Flew on Jeffrey Epstein's Jet Without Secret Service Detail - Breitbart

Too bad you can't comprehend your own links....

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

"U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton"


Wonder why that is???? (snicker)

Given your defective conspiracist brain, I can guess why you wonder about that.

Meanwhile, you still have no proof Clinton ever visited that island and even your own link left to the article stating...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

Your own link!

"In response to a separate FOIA request from FoxNews.com, the U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton.

A Clinton spokesperson did not return emails requesting comment about the former president’s relationship and travels with Epstein. The Clinton Library said it had no relevant information and does not keep track of Clinton’s travel records.


Sargent Shultz from Hogan's Heroes comes immediately to mind. (snicker)...."I see NOTHING!!!....NOTHING!!!"


(snicker)

 

[Faun]

It's your claim they were manipulated. It's not my job to prove you wrong because you can't prove yourself right.

But you are claiming that based on flight logs, Bill "drop trou" is exonerated simply on that alone.


Report: Bill Clinton Flew on Jeffrey Epstein's Jet Without Secret Service Detail - Breitbart

Too bad you can't comprehend your own links....

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

"U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton"


Wonder why that is???? (snicker)

Given your defective conspiracist brain, I can guess why you wonder about that.

Meanwhile, you still have no proof Clinton ever visited that island and even your own link left to the article stating...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

Your own link!

"In response to a separate FOIA request from FoxNews.com, the U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton.

A Clinton spokesperson did not return emails requesting comment about the former president’s relationship and travels with Epstein. The Clinton Library said it had no relevant information and does not keep track of Clinton’s travel records.


Sargent Shultz from Hogan's Heroes comes immediately to mind. (snicker)...."I see NOTHING!!!....NOTHING!!!"


(snicker)

Let me know when you find something tangible. Suggestions and innuendo aren't working for you.

Neither are your own links...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

 

[Dale Smith]

But you are claiming that based on flight logs, Bill "drop trou" is exonerated simply on that alone.


Report: Bill Clinton Flew on Jeffrey Epstein's Jet Without Secret Service Detail - Breitbart

Too bad you can't comprehend your own links....

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

"U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton"


Wonder why that is???? (snicker)

Given your defective conspiracist brain, I can guess why you wonder about that.

Meanwhile, you still have no proof Clinton ever visited that island and even your own link left to the article stating...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

Your own link!

"In response to a separate FOIA request from FoxNews.com, the U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton.

A Clinton spokesperson did not return emails requesting comment about the former president’s relationship and travels with Epstein. The Clinton Library said it had no relevant information and does not keep track of Clinton’s travel records.


Sargent Shultz from Hogan's Heroes comes immediately to mind. (snicker)...."I see NOTHING!!!....NOTHING!!!"


(snicker)

Let me know when you find something tangible. Suggestions and innuendo aren't working for you.

Neither are your own links...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

But we all know that flight logs cannot be changed before or after the fact, no? (snicker)

 

[Faun]

Too bad you can't comprehend your own links....

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

"U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton"


Wonder why that is???? (snicker)

Given your defective conspiracist brain, I can guess why you wonder about that.

Meanwhile, you still have no proof Clinton ever visited that island and even your own link left to the article stating...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

Your own link!

"In response to a separate FOIA request from FoxNews.com, the U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton.

A Clinton spokesperson did not return emails requesting comment about the former president’s relationship and travels with Epstein. The Clinton Library said it had no relevant information and does not keep track of Clinton’s travel records.


Sargent Shultz from Hogan's Heroes comes immediately to mind. (snicker)...."I see NOTHING!!!....NOTHING!!!"


(snicker)

Let me know when you find something tangible. Suggestions and innuendo aren't working for you.

Neither are your own links...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

But we all know that flight logs cannot be changed before or after the fact, no? (snicker)

Unbelievably, I need to repeat myself... suggestions and innuendo do not prove anything other than your ability to rely on suggestions and innuendo since reality is not on your side.

And again.... I found this from your own link

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

 

[Dale Smith]

"U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton"


Wonder why that is???? (snicker)

Given your defective conspiracist brain, I can guess why you wonder about that.

Meanwhile, you still have no proof Clinton ever visited that island and even your own link left to the article stating...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

Your own link!

"In response to a separate FOIA request from FoxNews.com, the U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton.

A Clinton spokesperson did not return emails requesting comment about the former president’s relationship and travels with Epstein. The Clinton Library said it had no relevant information and does not keep track of Clinton’s travel records.


Sargent Shultz from Hogan's Heroes comes immediately to mind. (snicker)...."I see NOTHING!!!....NOTHING!!!"


(snicker)

Let me know when you find something tangible. Suggestions and innuendo aren't working for you.

Neither are your own links...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

But we all know that flight logs cannot be changed before or after the fact, no? (snicker)

Unbelievably, I need to repeat myself... suggestions and innuendo do not prove anything other than your ability to rely on suggestions and innuendo since reality is not on your side.

And again.... I found this from your own link

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

And we all know that logs can't be changed or manipulated because they are etched in stone....because after all, you proved that...oh wait, you didn't. (rolls eyes)

Epstein and Bill "drop trou" were thicker than thieves. Bill "drop trou" flew MANY times on his plane with young girls. Arkansas DPS officers that did security for him had to procure phone numbers and then hold vigil while he banged some chick...willing or not. You SERIOUSLY believe that given the company that he kept and the pimp ways of Epstein that Bill "drop trou" didn't get it on the action? How fucking naive are you? Trump may have been involved as well...because after all, the elites are not like us "little people"...the law doesn't apply to them and if you think otherwise? Look at the joke of a sentence Epstein got....sure didn't hear Bill "drop trou" distance himself or speak out against the un-fucking believably light sentence Jeff Pedo got because he had the goods on the elites. The protesters in Oregon are looking at 50 years plus....... and they assaulted no one....get the picture, dumb fuck?

 

[Faun]

Given your defective conspiracist brain, I can guess why you wonder about that.

Meanwhile, you still have no proof Clinton ever visited that island and even your own link left to the article stating...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

Your own link!

"In response to a separate FOIA request from FoxNews.com, the U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton.

A Clinton spokesperson did not return emails requesting comment about the former president’s relationship and travels with Epstein. The Clinton Library said it had no relevant information and does not keep track of Clinton’s travel records.


Sargent Shultz from Hogan's Heroes comes immediately to mind. (snicker)...."I see NOTHING!!!....NOTHING!!!"


(snicker)

Let me know when you find something tangible. Suggestions and innuendo aren't working for you.

Neither are your own links...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

But we all know that flight logs cannot be changed before or after the fact, no? (snicker)

Unbelievably, I need to repeat myself... suggestions and innuendo do not prove anything other than your ability to rely on suggestions and innuendo since reality is not on your side.

And again.... I found this from your own link

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

And we all know that logs can't be changed or manipulated because they are etched in stone....because after all, you proved that...oh wait, you didn't. (rolls eyes)

Epstein and Bill "drop trou" were thicker than thieves. Bill "drop trou" flew MANY times on his plane with young girls. Arkansas DPS officers that did security for him had to procure phone numbers and then hold vigil while he banged some chick...willing or not. You SERIOUSLY believe that given the company that he kept and the pimp ways of Epstein that Bill "drop trou" didn't get it on the action? How fucking naive are you? Trump may have been involved as well...because after all, the elites are not like us "little people"...the law doesn't apply to them and if you think otherwise? Look at the joke of a sentence Epstein got....sure didn't hear Bill "drop trou" distance himself or speak out against the un-fucking believably light sentence Jeff Pedo got because he had the goods on the elites. The protesters in Oregon are looking at 50 years plus....... and they assaulted no one....get the picture, dumb fuck?

Amazingly, you still offer nothing but suggestions and innuedo.... The cornerstone of you conspiracy nuts.

You realize employing your idiotic suggestions and innuendo as though it proves you're not insane, one could do the same to claim Trump assassinated JFK. After all, your logic is if it's possible, then it must be true.

 

[WheelieAddict]

So what have we all learned from this? Nothing tinydancer posts on this forum should ever be taken seriously.

 

[Dale Smith]

"In response to a separate FOIA request from FoxNews.com, the U.S. Secret Service said it has no records showing agents were ever on the island with Clinton.

A Clinton spokesperson did not return emails requesting comment about the former president’s relationship and travels with Epstein. The Clinton Library said it had no relevant information and does not keep track of Clinton’s travel records.


Sargent Shultz from Hogan's Heroes comes immediately to mind. (snicker)...."I see NOTHING!!!....NOTHING!!!"


(snicker)

Let me know when you find something tangible. Suggestions and innuendo aren't working for you.

Neither are your own links...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

But we all know that flight logs cannot be changed before or after the fact, no? (snicker)

Unbelievably, I need to repeat myself... suggestions and innuendo do not prove anything other than your ability to rely on suggestions and innuendo since reality is not on your side.

And again.... I found this from your own link

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

And we all know that logs can't be changed or manipulated because they are etched in stone....because after all, you proved that...oh wait, you didn't. (rolls eyes)

Epstein and Bill "drop trou" were thicker than thieves. Bill "drop trou" flew MANY times on his plane with young girls. Arkansas DPS officers that did security for him had to procure phone numbers and then hold vigil while he banged some chick...willing or not. You SERIOUSLY believe that given the company that he kept and the pimp ways of Epstein that Bill "drop trou" didn't get it on the action? How fucking naive are you? Trump may have been involved as well...because after all, the elites are not like us "little people"...the law doesn't apply to them and if you think otherwise? Look at the joke of a sentence Epstein got....sure didn't hear Bill "drop trou" distance himself or speak out against the un-fucking believably light sentence Jeff Pedo got because he had the goods on the elites. The protesters in Oregon are looking at 50 years plus....... and they assaulted no one....get the picture, dumb fuck?

Amazingly, you still offer nothing but suggestions and innuedo.... The cornerstone of you conspiracy nuts.

You realize employing your idiotic suggestions and innuendo as though it proves you're not insane, one could do the same to claim Trump assassinated JFK. After all, your logic is if it's possible, then it must be true.

Are there ties to Trump being in Dallas On November 22nd, 1963? No, there isn't....but we do know that :


A: Bill "drop trou" is a sexual predator.

B: He doesn't care about the time, place or whether the ones he set his sites on are willing or not when the need to "drop trou" strikes him.

C: He is awfully chummy with someone that is just as perverted as he is that has been to his abode.

D: He has a willing worshipful throng that will give him the benefit of a doubt regardless of the evidence presented.

E: Bill "drop trou" is part of the protected class of elites thus untouchable.

How can I spell it out for you any better and in a way that will actually make you think? If a real video tape was produced (and in living color)...you would insist that it was photo-shopped and manipulated. You are blinded to reality because the thought of having your world view turned upside down is too terrifying for you to fathom. Reality is going to hit you soon enough....spare me a thought when it happens. (snicker)

 

[Dale Smith]

So what have we all learned from this? Nothing tinydancer posts on this forum should ever be taken seriously.

TD was simply stating what has been all over the web concerning Bill's propensity to "drop trou" and how the Mossad was holding the video because cameras were set up all over Epstein's palatial manor. Teh powers that be have shut down Julian Assange so why would you think that they wouldn't suppress a video of Bill "drop trou" mounting a 13 year old and for that matter, why would you even care if it was true or not????? After all, for liberals like yourself? Sex is just a natural thing and something to be celebrated...so "liberating" and if it's some 60 plus year old socialist POS like Bill "drop trou" that is giving a 13 year old her initiation into sex? That girl should be grateful for the experience and no worse for the wear....because that is how pervert leftards "roll"......

 

[WheelieAddict]

So what have we all learned from this? Nothing tinydancer posts on this forum should ever be taken seriously.

TD was simply stating what has been all over the web concerning Bill's propensity to "drop trou" and how the Mossad was holding the video because cameras were set up all over Epstein's palatial manor. Teh powers that be have shut down Julian Assange so why would you think that they wouldn't suppress a video of Bill "drop trou" mounting a 13 year old and for that matter, why would you even care if it was true or not????? After all, for liberals like yourself? Sex is just a natural thing and something to be celebrated...so "liberating" and if it's some 60 plus year old socialist POS like Bill "drop trou" that is giving a 13 year old her initiation into sex? That girl should be grateful for the experience and no worse for the wear....because that is how pervert leftards "roll"......

 

[Faun]

So what have we all learned from this? Nothing tinydancer posts on this forum should ever be taken seriously.

Yeah, but that's not new information.

 

[Faun]

Let me know when you find something tangible. Suggestions and innuendo aren't working for you.

Neither are your own links...

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

But we all know that flight logs cannot be changed before or after the fact, no? (snicker)

Unbelievably, I need to repeat myself... suggestions and innuendo do not prove anything other than your ability to rely on suggestions and innuendo since reality is not on your side.

And again.... I found this from your own link

but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane.​

And we all know that logs can't be changed or manipulated because they are etched in stone....because after all, you proved that...oh wait, you didn't. (rolls eyes)

Epstein and Bill "drop trou" were thicker than thieves. Bill "drop trou" flew MANY times on his plane with young girls. Arkansas DPS officers that did security for him had to procure phone numbers and then hold vigil while he banged some chick...willing or not. You SERIOUSLY believe that given the company that he kept and the pimp ways of Epstein that Bill "drop trou" didn't get it on the action? How fucking naive are you? Trump may have been involved as well...because after all, the elites are not like us "little people"...the law doesn't apply to them and if you think otherwise? Look at the joke of a sentence Epstein got....sure didn't hear Bill "drop trou" distance himself or speak out against the un-fucking believably light sentence Jeff Pedo got because he had the goods on the elites. The protesters in Oregon are looking at 50 years plus....... and they assaulted no one....get the picture, dumb fuck?

Amazingly, you still offer nothing but suggestions and innuedo.... The cornerstone of you conspiracy nuts.

You realize employing your idiotic suggestions and innuendo as though it proves you're not insane, one could do the same to claim Trump assassinated JFK. After all, your logic is if it's possible, then it must be true.

Are there ties to Trump being in Dallas On November 22nd, 1963? No, there isn't....but we do know that :


A: Bill "drop trou" is a sexual predator.

B: He doesn't care about the time, place or whether the ones he set his sites on are willing or not when the need to "drop trou" strikes him.

C: He is awfully chummy with someone that is just as perverted as he is that has been to his abode.

D: He has a willing worshipful throng that will give him the benefit of a doubt regardless of the evidence presented.

E: Bill "drop trou" is part of the protected class of elites thus untouchable.

How can I spell it out for you any better and in a way that will actually make you think? If a real video tape was produced (and in living color)...you would insist that it was photo-shopped and manipulated. You are blinded to reality because the thought of having your world view turned upside down is too terrifying for you to fathom. Reality is going to hit you soon enough....spare me a thought when it happens. (snicker)View attachment 94315

Not that you're aware of but it's possible and you can't prove he wasn't involved -- that's your logic, as bizarre as it sounds.

 

[Faun]

So what have we all learned from this? Nothing tinydancer posts on this forum should ever be taken seriously.

TD was simply stating what has been all over the web concerning Bill's propensity to "drop trou" and how the Mossad was holding the video because cameras were set up all over Epstein's palatial manor. Teh powers that be have shut down Julian Assange so why would you think that they wouldn't suppress a video of Bill "drop trou" mounting a 13 year old and for that matter, why would you even care if it was true or not????? After all, for liberals like yourself? Sex is just a natural thing and something to be celebrated...so "liberating" and if it's some 60 plus year old socialist POS like Bill "drop trou" that is giving a 13 year old her initiation into sex? That girl should be grateful for the experience and no worse for the wear....because that is how pervert leftards "roll"......

It was not all over the web. A couple of fringe websites talked about a video on YouTube, purported to be by Anonymous, making the claim of the video.

At any rate, the only one among them actually accused of raping a 13 year old is Crazy Donald.

 

[phoenyx]

So what have we all learned from this? Nothing tinydancer posts on this forum should ever be taken seriously.

TD was simply stating what has been all over the web concerning Bill's propensity to "drop trou" and how the Mossad was holding the video because cameras were set up all over Epstein's palatial manor. Teh powers that be have shut down Julian Assange so why would you think that they wouldn't suppress a video of Bill "drop trou" mounting a 13 year old and for that matter, why would you even care if it was true or not????? After all, for liberals like yourself? Sex is just a natural thing and something to be celebrated...so "liberating" and if it's some 60 plus year old socialist POS like Bill "drop trou" that is giving a 13 year old her initiation into sex? That girl should be grateful for the experience and no worse for the wear....because that is how pervert leftards "roll"......

It was not all over the web. A couple of fringe websites talked about a video on YouTube, purported to be by Anonymous, making the claim of the video.

At any rate, the only one among them actually accused of raping a 13 year old is Crazy Donald.

No, Bill Clinton is clearly being accused of the same. That being said, Bill Clinton has no upcoming court date with his [then] 13 year old accuser, unlike Donald Trump. Also unlike this alleged video of Bill raping a 13 year old that will come out "soon", Donald Trump has a date set for his trial with his accuser: December 16, 2016:
Lawsuit accusing Trump of raping girl, 13, gets December hearing

Don't get me wrong, I like Anonymous as an organization, but due to its very nature, it's pretty hard to know the quality of their sources as they are, unsurprisingly, generally anonymous. The evidence that Donald raped a 13 year old is a hell of a lot more damning then the evidence that Bill Clinton did the same.

 

[Faun]

So what have we all learned from this? Nothing tinydancer posts on this forum should ever be taken seriously.

TD was simply stating what has been all over the web concerning Bill's propensity to "drop trou" and how the Mossad was holding the video because cameras were set up all over Epstein's palatial manor. Teh powers that be have shut down Julian Assange so why would you think that they wouldn't suppress a video of Bill "drop trou" mounting a 13 year old and for that matter, why would you even care if it was true or not????? After all, for liberals like yourself? Sex is just a natural thing and something to be celebrated...so "liberating" and if it's some 60 plus year old socialist POS like Bill "drop trou" that is giving a 13 year old her initiation into sex? That girl should be grateful for the experience and no worse for the wear....because that is how pervert leftards "roll"......

It was not all over the web. A couple of fringe websites talked about a video on YouTube, purported to be by Anonymous, making the claim of the video.

At any rate, the only one among them actually accused of raping a 13 year old is Crazy Donald.

No, Bill Clinton is clearly being accused of the same. That being said, Bill Clinton has no upcoming court date with his [then] 13 year old accuser, unlike Donald Trump. Also unlike this alleged video of Bill raping a 13 year old that will come out "soon", Donald Trump has a date set for his trial with his accuser: December 16, 2016:
Lawsuit accusing Trump of raping girl, 13, gets December hearing

Don't get me wrong, I like Anonymous as an organization, but due to its very nature, it's pretty hard to know the quality of their sources as they are, unsurprisingly, generally anonymous. The evidence that Donald raped a 13 year old is a hell of a lot more damning then the evidence that Bill Clinton did the same.

There is no video coming out soon. It was a hoax. As it stands, Trump is the only one accused of raping a 13 year old.

 

[phoenyx]

So what have we all learned from this? Nothing tinydancer posts on this forum should ever be taken seriously.

TD was simply stating what has been all over the web concerning Bill's propensity to "drop trou" and how the Mossad was holding the video because cameras were set up all over Epstein's palatial manor. Teh powers that be have shut down Julian Assange so why would you think that they wouldn't suppress a video of Bill "drop trou" mounting a 13 year old and for that matter, why would you even care if it was true or not????? After all, for liberals like yourself? Sex is just a natural thing and something to be celebrated...so "liberating" and if it's some 60 plus year old socialist POS like Bill "drop trou" that is giving a 13 year old her initiation into sex? That girl should be grateful for the experience and no worse for the wear....because that is how pervert leftards "roll"......

It was not all over the web. A couple of fringe websites talked about a video on YouTube, purported to be by Anonymous, making the claim of the video.

At any rate, the only one among them actually accused of raping a 13 year old is Crazy Donald.

No, Bill Clinton is clearly being accused of the same. That being said, Bill Clinton has no upcoming court date with his [then] 13 year old accuser, unlike Donald Trump. Also unlike this alleged video of Bill raping a 13 year old that will come out "soon", Donald Trump has a date set for his trial with his accuser: December 16, 2016:
Lawsuit accusing Trump of raping girl, 13, gets December hearing

Don't get me wrong, I like Anonymous as an organization, but due to its very nature, it's pretty hard to know the quality of their sources as they are, unsurprisingly, generally anonymous. The evidence that Donald raped a 13 year old is a hell of a lot more damning then the evidence that Bill Clinton did the same.

There is no video coming out soon. It was a hoax.

How do you know?

As it stands, Trump is the only one accused of raping a 13 year old.

It's patently obvious that Bill Clinton has also been accused of raping a 13 year old. I wouldn't be surprised if, as you claim, the accusation has no merit, but accusations don't have to have merit. On the other hand, for the [then] 13 year old accusing Trump of raping her to have gotten a court date to hear her claim, however, does require at least enough evidence to persuade a judge that it's warranted.

 

[ChrisL]

WTF is wrong with these guys? I really wouldn't doubt if both stories are true. Bill and Trump are both powerful and rich men who probably think they can just take whatever they want in this life. If someone dares to say no to these two spoiled overgrown brats, they probably throw temper tantrums.

 

[WheelieAddict]

WTF is wrong with these guys? I really wouldn't doubt if both stories are true. Bill and Trump are both powerful and rich men who probably think they can just take whatever they want in this life. If someone dares to say no to these two spoiled overgrown brats, they probably throw temper tantrums.

Innocent until proven guilty should be the course here, there is a lot of crazy accusations against both. It's obvious though that both are a couple of horn dogs that could care less about marriage vows at the very least. Bill went to counseling for an extended period and supposedly has changed his ways...

 

[Faun]

So what have we all learned from this? Nothing tinydancer posts on this forum should ever be taken seriously.

TD was simply stating what has been all over the web concerning Bill's propensity to "drop trou" and how the Mossad was holding the video because cameras were set up all over Epstein's palatial manor. Teh powers that be have shut down Julian Assange so why would you think that they wouldn't suppress a video of Bill "drop trou" mounting a 13 year old and for that matter, why would you even care if it was true or not????? After all, for liberals like yourself? Sex is just a natural thing and something to be celebrated...so "liberating" and if it's some 60 plus year old socialist POS like Bill "drop trou" that is giving a 13 year old her initiation into sex? That girl should be grateful for the experience and no worse for the wear....because that is how pervert leftards "roll"......

It was not all over the web. A couple of fringe websites talked about a video on YouTube, purported to be by Anonymous, making the claim of the video.

At any rate, the only one among them actually accused of raping a 13 year old is Crazy Donald.

No, Bill Clinton is clearly being accused of the same. That being said, Bill Clinton has no upcoming court date with his [then] 13 year old accuser, unlike Donald Trump. Also unlike this alleged video of Bill raping a 13 year old that will come out "soon", Donald Trump has a date set for his trial with his accuser: December 16, 2016:
Lawsuit accusing Trump of raping girl, 13, gets December hearing

Don't get me wrong, I like Anonymous as an organization, but due to its very nature, it's pretty hard to know the quality of their sources as they are, unsurprisingly, generally anonymous. The evidence that Donald raped a 13 year old is a hell of a lot more damning then the evidence that Bill Clinton did the same.

There is no video coming out soon. It was a hoax.

How do you know?

As it stands, Trump is the only one accused of raping a 13 year old.

It's patently obvious that Bill Clinton has also been accused of raping a 13 year old. I wouldn't be surprised if, as you claim, the accusation has no merit, but accusations don't have to have merit. On the other hand, for the [then] 13 year old accusing Trump of raping her to have gotten a court date to hear her claim, however, does require at least enough evidence to persuade a judge that it's warranted.

Sadly, you can't point to anyone who's accused Clinton of raping a 13 year old. Crazy Donald, however, is going to court to defend himself from such an accusation.