Anger at Israeli brutality grows

I don't see the utility of using "Zionist" in this sentence. Zionist Israelis believe they are threatened by (a defined group), but non-Zionist Israelis don't believe they are threatened by (group)? If you want to limit the discussion to those directly impacted by the conflict, why not use "Israeli"? Unless you are just using "Zionist" as code for "bad", as in: Good Israelis don't perceive a threat from (group); bad Israelis perceive a threat from (group). Or you might mean, some Israelis or Israeli extremists weaponize the perceived threat (ignoring for the moment the very real threat).

I think the use of the term "Arab" is incorrect. I don't see Israelis or Jews expressing the perception of threat from the collective of "Arabs" (meaning those peoples and cultures which originated in the Arabian peninsula and speak Arabic languages). I will concede, though, that some Israeli speakers will refrain from using the term "Palestinian" and will substitute "Arab" as code for non-recognition, even though they really mean Palestinian Arabs. Most Israelis, when discussing threat, will use terminology either calling out specific terrorist organizations, or will generalize with terminology such as "Islamic extremists" or "Palestinian nationalistic extremists". Sometimes, though more rarely, they will articulate a more generalized "Palestinians".

If you had written, "Israelis believe that Islamic extremists and Palestinian nationalistic extremists pose a dire threat to Israelis and Jews", I would agree with you.
Yes, but that's what any rational person would expect when huge numbers of foreigners carve out territiory in already occupied land and subjugate the indigenous people.
If you had written, "Some Israelis or Israeli extremists weaponize the perceived threat from Islamic extremists and Palestinian nationalistic extremists", I would agree with you. (Again ignoring the very real threat).

If you had written, "Israelis believe that Palestinians are a dire threat to Israelis and Jews", I'd agree with you that many do, but most would quibble with "not all Palestinians!"
Any group of foreign immigrants which sets up a colony on already occupied territory, a colony that subjugates the majority who are not members of the colonizing group, and expects a peaceful quiet life, is a fool.
 
Any group which sets up a colony on already occupied territory, a colony that subjugates the majority who are not members of the colonizing group, and expects a peaceful quiet life, is a fool.

You're right, all the muslims need to go back to Arabia.
 
Yes, but that's what any rational person would expect when huge numbers of foreigners carve out territiory in already occupied land and subjugate the indigenous people.

Any group of foreign immigrants which sets up a colony on already occupied territory, a colony that subjugates the majority who are not members of the colonizing group, and expects a peaceful quiet life, is a fool.
Out of curiosity, what country do you live in?
 
Yes, but that's what any rational person would expect when huge numbers of foreigners carve out territiory in already occupied land and subjugate the indigenous people.

Any group of foreign immigrants which sets up a colony on already occupied territory, a colony that subjugates the majority who are not members of the colonizing group, and expects a peaceful quiet life, is a fool.
There it is. Scratch the skin of anyone using terminology like "Zionist" (let alone Nazi Zionist) and you will find they really mean: foreigners, occupiers, subjugators, colonizers. All libels (false statements).

Jewish erasure and indigenous inversion. With a little dose of violence justification at the end.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom