Zone1 And On A Personal Note....

[Anomalism]

Again, you fall back to discussing her, not even waiting for her replies, you fall back to discussing her.

I just addressed every iota of the post they directed at me. I am predicting their nonresponse because we have done this before. This is not somebody that's here to debate.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I have addressed all of your fear tactics, but then you never deepen the debate by responding to what I actually said. You know that though. You are aware of your own dishonesty and refusal/inability to actually debate. That's the only part of your contributions that is actually interesting.

AI Overview

In the context of an essay, "substance" refers to the essential content and meaningfulness of the writing, rather than just its form or style. It implies that the essay has depth, is well-supported, and makes a significant contribution to the reader's understanding of the topic.


So you were simply lying because you couldn't find any way to disagree with the OP?



When will you be changing your name to "Lying Scum"?

 

[PoliticalChic]

She has left your rectum bleeding.

Ouch!

 

[Anomalism]

AI Overview

In the context of an essay, "substance" refers to the essential content and meaningfulness of the writing, rather than just its form or style. It implies that the essay has depth, is well-supported, and makes a significant contribution to the reader's understanding of the topic.


So you were simply lying because you couldn't find any way to disagree with the OP?



When will you be changing your name to "Lying Scum"?

I just responded to every detail of the post you directed at me. Please respond with actual content, rather than name calling and Cold War propaganda.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What about legacy admissions, how do you feel about those?

You haven't answered my question, which is the vast majority of the admissions in question.


As far as how the university uses it's admissions, other than DEI or racism, I can understand the need for a football player or trumpet player, or to gain more donations via legacy admissions


NOw:

How do you feel about this?


. " For Asian Americans, a changing landscape on college admissions

.... a Princeton University study that tried to measure how race and ethnicity affect admissions by using SAT scores as a benchmark. It uses the term “bonus” to describe how many extra SAT points an applicant's race is worth. She points to the first column.

African Americans received a “bonus” of 230 points, Lee says.

“Hispanics received a bonus of 185 points.”

The last column draws gasps.

Asian Americans, Lee says, are penalized by 50 points — in other words, they had to do that much better to win admission.

“Do Asians need higher test scores? Is it harder for Asians to get into college? The answer is yes,”....."
For Asian Americans a changing landscape on college admissions - LA Times

 

[MarcATL]

You haven't answered my question, which is the vast majority of the admissions in question.


As far as how the university uses it's admissions, other than DEI or racism, I can understand the need for a football player or trumpet player, or to gain more donations via legacy admissions


NOw:

How do you feel about this?


. " For Asian Americans, a changing landscape on college admissions

.... a Princeton University study that tried to measure how race and ethnicity affect admissions by using SAT scores as a benchmark. It uses the term “bonus” to describe how many extra SAT points an applicant's race is worth. She points to the first column.

African Americans received a “bonus” of 230 points, Lee says.

“Hispanics received a bonus of 185 points.”

The last column draws gasps.

Asian Americans, Lee says, are penalized by 50 points — in other words, they had to do that much better to win admission.

“Do Asians need higher test scores? Is it harder for Asians to get into college? The answer is yes,”....."
For Asian Americans a changing landscape on college admissions - LA Times

I understand that the Asians now regret being snookered by racist whites into going against their own best interests.

Their admissions have plummeted.

I almost feel sorry for them.

 

[Robert W]

1. “Most of us remember when Democrats denied being socialist/communist.”

Mainstream Democrats support mixed-market capitalism, not state ownership of all production. Words like “communist” are used here not as accurate descriptions, but as weapons, a way to paint your opponents as inherently un-American. That’s Cold War cosplay, not policy analysis.

She mentioned the past claims of Democrats. Democrats come very close to believing the stuff said by Socialists. Socialists don't all claim the same thing to begin with. Republicans flat out trust the public to manage markets and do not want the Government doing this.

 

[Anomalism]

She mentioned the past claims of Democrats. Democrats come very close to believing the stuff said by Socialists. Socialists don't all claim the same thing to begin with. Republicans flat out trust the public to manage markets and do not want the Government doing this.

I can debate you if you want. That wasn't the point though. I am demonstrating the OP doesn't debate, and you were going to be honest about it, remember?

 

[Robert W]

I understand that the Asians now regret being snookered by racist whites into going against their own best interests.

Their admissions have plummeted.

I almost feel sorry for them.

I wish democrats understood issues as well as Political chick does.

What proof do you have that Asians blame whites?

 

[Robert W]

I can debate you if you want. That wasn't the point though. I am demonstrating the OP doesn't debate, and you were going to be honest about it, remember?

She will now that I alert her. PoliticalChic

Your idea of debate is to constantly trash those replying to you.

 

[Anomalism]

She will now that I alert her. @Politicalchick

Your idea of debate is to constantly trash those replying to you.

I responded with a large post and respectfully addressed every detail of what they said to me. No, they won't actually respond to any of it. They will name call and deflect, but never actually engage the content of my post. That's because their rhetoric has no depth.

I'm getting the feeling you won't be honest about what will unfold though, so I'm quickly losing interest.

 

[alang1216]

I can debate you if you want. That wasn't the point though. I am demonstrating the OP doesn't debate, and you were going to be honest about it, remember?

I feel your pain. You can't win a debate with someone who will just change the rules and move the goalposts.

 

[Robert W]

I responded with a large post and respectfully addressed every detail of what they said to me. No, they won't actually respond to any of it. They will name call and deflect, but never actually engage the content of my post. This is because their rhetoric has no depth.

Pat your own back for the first part. But then you went right back to your standard attack mode. She is not sleeping on this topic. She will reply to your salient points.

 

[Robert W]

I can debate you if you want. That wasn't the point though. I am demonstrating the OP doesn't debate, and you were going to be honest about it, remember?

I am hoping you actually debate her. PoliticalChic

 

[Anomalism]

I feel your pain. You can't win a debate with someone who will just change the rules and move the goalposts.

They're not here to debate. The OPs strategy is to exhaust people with sludge while ignoring the content of their posts.

Name calling and deflection with fear propaganda is all they have beneath the surface.

 

[Robert W]

You can't win a debate with someone who will just change the rules and move the goalposts.

Oh, I believe Anomalism can be beat.

 

[Anomalism]

I am hoping you actually debate her. PoliticalChic

The OP is not going to actually respond to the content of my post. I'm thinking you won't be honest about it either, so meh.

 

[alang1216]

I am hoping you actually debate her. PoliticalChic

Debate is beyond her/it. If history is any guide, she will offer up a 'whataboutism', an off-topic, massive cut & past, crickets, or a childish insult.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I understand that the Asians now regret being snookered by racist whites into going against their own best interests.

Their admissions have plummeted.

I almost feel sorry for them.

Are you saying that points should be awarded based on skin color, that you are racist?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I can debate you if you want. That wasn't the point though. I am demonstrating the OP doesn't debate, and you were going to be honest about it, remember?

Did you say this?

“…you have no substance underneath your rhetoric.”

Well, Now It’s Out In The Open…. post #119