And Now For Something Entirely Different

[jc456]

You are right, it will take time.

Right now it looks like Obama since Tulsi Gabbard left no doubt when she testified to Congress about Iran’s nuclear program earlier this year. The country was not building a nuclear weapon, the national intelligence director told lawmakers, and its supreme leader had not reauthorized the dormant program even though it had enriched uranium to higher levels. Early US intelligence report suggests US strikes only set back Iran’s nuclear program by months so Trump's dangerous actions may have done little.

so why did they have 60% enriched Uranium. Every official has stated that there is no other use for 60% enriched Uranium other than building a weapon. So please, why else did they have 60% through your experts that are far more up to speed on the facts. LOL

 

[Moonglow]

what war is that?

The one that is currently at play.

 

[jc456]

Where are these nuclear weapons? Same place as Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction?

no one said they had weapons. what they had was 60% enriched uranium. and, the only reason to have that is to make a weapon. And the experts say it takes only three months to enrich to 90% for a weapon. Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, Can't have nukes. Can't have nukes, what part of that confused you?

 

[jc456]

The one that is currently at play.

there are only two military actions in play and both of those were started under xiden. so Which one?

 

[alang1216]

1. So post Trump's bombing of Iran's nuclear activity centers, all I hear from the media and the Democrats- or am I repeating myself- that it was unconstiutional for Trump sans congressional agreement, and he should be impeached.



2. Anyone recall this?
After accepting the Nobel Peace Prize, Obama bombed more countries than any President since WWII
“U.S. Bombed Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia in 2016”
The U.S. dropped an average of 3 bombs per hour last year


3. Flashback: Pelosi Said Obama Did Not Need Authorization to Attack Libya
Flashback: Pelosi Said Obama Did Not Need Authorization to Attack Libya




4. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.”

Then he guaranteed Iran nuclear weapons, guaranteed no inspections, sent them a pallet with $400 million in cash, and released another $900 million to them.....and his puppet, Biden, removed sanctions that forbid them selling oil to China.

Democrats lie about everything.



5. Did Hussein know about this?
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia

We are signatories to that treaty: it forbids his guaranteeing nukes to Iran. It's a law.

AI Overview
A war criminal is an individual who has committed a serious violation of the laws and customs of war, also known as war crimes, during an armed conflict.

Hussein Obama.....war criminal.

Strawman: A straw man is a fallacy where someone distorts, misrepresents, or exaggerates an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack. Instead of addressing the actual argument, they create a weaker, fabricated version (the "straw man") and then refute that, creating the illusion of defeating the original claim.

I never questioned Trump authority to do what he did. He SHOULD have been required to go through Congress but other presidents didn't bother and both parties in Congress just folded up long ago on the issue.

 

[MagicMike]

Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.”

Then he guaranteed Iran nuclear weapons, guaranteed no inspections,

Prove it
I'll wait.

sent them a pallet with $400 million in cash, and released another $900 million to them

Prove it with a credible link
i'll wait

.....and his puppet, Biden, removed sanctions that forbid them selling oil to China.

So what?

Democrats lie about everything.

You spelled Trump wrong.

Sooooo.......who was more "effective" in seeing that Iran never gets nuclear weapons, Hussein Obama, or Trump?

We dom't know that yet. So far we are still assessing whether Sunday's airstrikes actually achieved the objective. There are estimates that up to 900 lbs. of uranium may have been transferred from the bomb site before the attack.
Also, since the attack Moscow has indicated that Russia might now be willing to supply Iran with nukes in the future.
Given this information you should be able to answer your above question on your own PoliChica.

Take your time.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Strawman: A straw man is a fallacy where someone distorts, misrepresents, or exaggerates an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack. Instead of addressing the actual argument, they create a weaker, fabricated version (the "straw man") and then refute that, creating the illusion of defeating the original claim.

I never questioned Trump authority to do what he did. He SHOULD have been required to go through Congress but other presidents didn't bother and both parties in Congress just folded up long ago on the issue.

What is not factual here?


. Did Hussein know about this?
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia

We are signatories to that treaty: it forbids his guaranteeing nukes to Iran. It's a law.

AI Overview
A war criminal is an individual who has committed a serious violation of the laws and customs of war, also known as war crimes, during an armed conflict.

Hussein Obama.....war criminal.

The law the war criminal broke has been a law since 1970

 

[PoliticalChic]

Strawman: A straw man is a fallacy where someone distorts, misrepresents, or exaggerates an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack. Instead of addressing the actual argument, they create a weaker, fabricated version (the "straw man") and then refute that, creating the illusion of defeating the original claim.

I never questioned Trump authority to do what he did. He SHOULD have been required to go through Congress but other presidents didn't bother and both parties in Congress just folded up long ago on the issue.

is the non-proliferation treaty considered a law for signatories?
Search instead for is the non-proliferation treaty considered a law for signatoriees?

AI Overview​

AI Overview

Yes, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is considered a legally binding international treaty for the countries that have ratified it. It aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and promote cooperation on the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.


Did you voter for the international war criminal, Obama?

Do you still vote for the party he leads?

Have you no scruples?

 

[Edgetho]

It's time for you to grow up.....if that's possible, and make your party relevant once again: be pro-America and follow the Judeo-Christian values of Western Civilization.

There is no value in simply parotting the mistakes that lost you the election.

We need two parties in this Country. But the mistake too many have always made is, in assuming one of them has to be the dimocrap party.

The dimocrap party is no longer the opposition, it is The Enemy -- Of America.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Obama did better

He got Iran to surrender their enriched uranium without firing a shot

No he didn't

 

[Edgetho]

is the non-proliferation treaty considered a law for signatories?
Search instead for is the non-proliferation treaty considered a law for signatoriees?

AI Overview​

AI Overview

Yes, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is considered a legally binding international treaty for the countries that have ratified it. It aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and promote cooperation on the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.


Did you voter for the international war criminal, Obama?

Yes, it did.

Do you still vote for the party he leads?

Yes, it does

Have you no scruples?

No, it is a dimocrap

 

[PoliticalChic]

We need two parties in this Country. But the mistake too many have always made is, in assuming one of them has to be the dimocrap party.

The dimocrap party is no longer the opposition, it is The Enemy -- Of America.

You certainly are correct about the current Bolshevik....er, Democrat Party.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yes, it did.

Yes, it does

No, it is a dimocrap

Yes, "it" does and did and will.

 

[MagicMike]

What is not factual here?

Well for starters the name you assign to Barack Obama.
Sure, Hussein is his middle name but it is not the name he uses.
You are only using it here because it is part of your spurious and fact-free claim that Obama is a Muslim therefore cannot be a "good" American.
And THAT Princess is the crux of your STRAWMAN argument.
Anymore dumb questions?

. Did Hussein know about this?
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia

You are quoting freaking Wiki now?

We are signatories to that treaty: it forbids his guaranteeing nukes to Iran. It's a law.

Obama never guaranteed nukes to Iran. More of your STRAWMAN BS.

AI Overview
A war criminal is an individual who has committed a serious violation of the laws and customs of war, also known as war crimes, during an armed conflict.

Hussein Obama.....war criminal.

The law the war criminal broke has been a law since 1970

FAKE NEWS!
Why don't you try dealing with facts for a change PoliChica?
You are dismissed.

 

[jc456]

Prove it
I'll wait.

Well here are some facts,

Fact Check: Did the US under Obama give Iran $150 Billion?

U.S. is said to have handed $150 billion to Iran eight years ago, as tensions between the two nations worsen.

www.newsweek.com

The former official said that there were $29 billion of unlockable assets: $23 billion in foreign exchange that belonged to the bank and $6 billion of the Tehran government's money, The Times of Israel and Arabic news channel Al Arabiya reported in July 2015. The $29 billion Seif quoted was also reported by The New York Times.

Prove it with a credible link
i'll wait

for what? more shit you'll simply post is invalid because it came from xyz? hilarious. you never accept shit as evidence. you're a troll

So what?

You spelled Trump wrong.

We dom't know that yet. So far we are still assessing whether Sunday's airstrikes actually achieved the objective. There are estimates that up to 900 lbs. of uranium may have been transferred from the bomb site before the attack.
Also, since the attack Moscow has indicated that Russia might now be willing to supply Iran with nukes in the future.
Given this information you should be able to answer your above question on your own PoliChica.

Take your time.

TDS is bad in you!

 

[Edgetho]

Well here are some facts,

Fact Check: Did the US under Obama give Iran $150 Billion?

U.S. is said to have handed $150 billion to Iran eight years ago, as tensions between the two nations worsen.

www.newsweek.com

The former official said that there were $29 billion of unlockable assets: $23 billion in foreign exchange that belonged to the bank and $6 billion of the Tehran government's money, The Times of Israel and Arabic news channel Al Arabiya reported in July 2015. The $29 billion Seif quoted was also reported by The New York Times.

Iran violated Treaties, broke international law and thumbed its nose at civilization.

If you decide you want to break the law and defy society by Transporting drugs in your car and you get caught, we impound your car.

It may be titled in your name but it's ours now.

Same with money. If you get caught buying drugs, any money you have on you is impounded. Trust me on that. They arrest the money. They take it.

Whose is it after that? Well, guess what -- It ain't yours.

Iran was being assholes and we impounded their money. Money they were using to buy Centrifuges and other equipment to use in the illegal manufacture and refinement of Uranium. Uranium they wanted to use in a Bomb to Strike America.

The Lying ********** in Chief, aka; The Bastard Son of Frank Marshall Davis, aka, the biggest piece of ******* shit to have ever polluted the WHITE House (yes, far worse than Biden) GAVE that money back to Iran. They then used it to buy more equipment with which to refine Uranium and try to make a bomb. They also funded Hamas with that money. And Hezbollah. And the Houthis. And Protests here in America

YES, the Lying ********** in Chief, aka; The Bastard Son of Frank Marshall Davis GAVE that money to Iran as a PAYOFF to sign his bullshit deal.

dimocraps are the scum of the earth. ALL of them

 

[alang1216]

is the non-proliferation treaty considered a law for signatories?
Search instead for is the non-proliferation treaty considered a law for signatoriees?

AI Overview​

AI Overview

Yes, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is considered a legally binding international treaty for the countries that have ratified it. It aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and promote cooperation on the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.


Did you voter for the international war criminal, Obama?

Do you still vote for the party he leads?

Have you no scruples?

You wouldn't know the truth if it ran you over. You can repeat the lie that Obama 'guaranteed' nukes to Iran but it will always be a lie. The treaty that Obama and other Western countries negotiated prevented Iran from getting nuclear weapons. In fact, even though Trump pulled out of it, Tulsi recently confirmed that it is still working and Iran is not building a bomb. At least until it was attacked by Israel and the US. Who knows, they may feel they now have no choice but to build the bomb. If that happens it will have been Trump that 'guaranteed' nukes to Iran.

 

[jc456]

You wouldn't know the truth if it ran you over. You can repeat the lie that Obama 'guaranteed' nukes to Iran but it will always be a lie.

how do you know any truths with this? what information you got?

The treaty that Obama and other Western countries negotiated prevented Iran from getting nuclear weapons. In fact, even though Trump pulled out of it, Tulsi recently confirmed that it is still working and Iran is not building a bomb. At least until it was attacked by Israel and the US. Who knows, they may feel they now have no choice but to build the bomb. If that happens it will have been Trump that 'guaranteed' nukes to Iran.

dropped 150 billion on the airport guaranteed pandemonium in the region.

 

[playtime]

Trump certainly acted boldly

bigley boldley?

and, at least for now, it looks like his gamble has paid off, and I'm very happy it did.

However, I'm not sure I'm comfortable being a partner in his gambling. He may win the next gamble and the one after that, but, if he keeps gambling he will eventually lose. I don't care that a number of his business ventures ended in bankruptcy since I had no skin in that game, but this is different, he is gambling with things that would directly affect me and/or my family.

i see a lightbulb flickering....

I wish him luck but I hope he knows when to quit and walk away from the table a winner.

he hasn't so far. & i am talking 45+ years.

 

[playtime]

Will he dismiss the reports (like he did Noem), declare total victory, and move on, or will he double down?

yes. or they will be dismissed. look at the turn over in his 1st admin... gotta give it to bullshit barbie - donny easily blew thru a few press secretaries at the same time then.