An "Epstein Client List" from those who would KNOW

[Nostra]

What list? There never was a list.

I misspoke when I said the list was on his desk.

Sorry about that.

Bondi is a “his”?

Typical confused libtard.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Mac1958 has the list on his desk?

Bondi is a “his”?

Typical confused libtard.

 

[Nostra]

There’s a list on his desk.

Oh wait. It disappeared.

Sorry about that.

Mac and Pam Bondi are the same people?

Who knew…

Moron.

 

[tahuyaman]

Not true.

WTF?

For molesting children?
Sure you would.
Trump's cult were out for blood, when they thought it was democrats, who were the people in Epstein's list.

Yes, once an accusation of this nature is made, many people will always believe the accused was guilty.

Yes, I’d rather see guilty people go free versus innocent people being judged to be guilty.

 

[Lesh]

Yes, once an accusation of this nature is made, many people will always believe the accused was guilty.

Yes, I’d rather see guilty people go free versus innocent people being judged to be guilty.

When has that ever stopped right wingers from making accusations before?

Lame excuse

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Yes, once an accusation of this nature is made, many people will always believe the accused was guilty.

Yes, I’d rather see guilty people go free versus innocent people being judged to be guilty.

See above.

 

[tahuyaman]

When has that ever stopped right wingers from making accusations before?

Lame excuse

That’s a non responsive response.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Still dodging, I see. Anything to keep from making your own point.

Keep not answering questions and you get what I gave you.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

WTF?

So, the democrats should have released the Epstein files?

But since they didn't, Trump and his cult shouldn't either?

Why didn’t they release this damning evidence against Trump?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Why didn’t they release this damning evidence against Trump?

Perhaps no one asked?
I don't know.
They didn't refuse to release the Epstein files.

Why are Trump and his cult refusing to release the Epstein files?

 

[g5000]

Yes, once an accusation of this nature is made, many people will always believe the accused was guilty.

Yes, I’d rather see guilty people go free versus innocent people being judged to be guilty.

.
May I interest you in a coupon for Comet Pizza? I hear Crooked Hillary is a regular patron! But you'll have to go down to the basement to spot her.

.

 

[tahuyaman]

.
May I interest you in a coupon for Comet Pizza? I hear Crooked Hillary is a regular patron! But you'll have to go down to the basement to spot her.

.

WTF are you talking about? Do you want to see innocent people smeared with a false accusation?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

WTF are you talking about? Do you want to see innocent people smeared with a false accusation?

You didn't have any problem, when you thought democrats were the culprits.
Now your dear leader is involved, you're worried about "innocent" people being accused?

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Perhaps no one asked?
I don't know.
They didn't refuse to release the Epstein files.

Why are Trump and his cult refusing to release the Epstein files?

Maybe or most likely because the previous administration shredded them.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Maybe or most likely because the previous administration shredded them.

Not according to BJ Bondi.

Bondi says Epstein client list 'sitting on my desk right now ...​

Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com › politics › bondi-says-epstei...
Feb 21, 2025 — US Attorney General Pam Bondi on Friday said the Jeffrey Epstein client list is "sitting on my desk right now" and she is reviewing the JFK and MLK files.

 

[tahuyaman]

You didn't have any problem, when you thought democrats were the culprits.
Now your dear leader is involved, you're worried about "innocent" people being accused?

Prove that stupid comment. You ******* hack

 

[Mac1958]

You didn't have any problem, when you thought democrats were the culprits.
Now your dear leader is involved, you're worried about "innocent" people being accused?

The funny thing is, the rubes don't know if Trump was involved. No one does. He could be completely innocent.

But they're so freaking scared that he was -- and at some level, they know what he is -- that they're terrified this stuff will get out.

This is what happens when people tie their feeble hopes and dreams to a ******* con man.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

The funny thing is, the rubes don't know if Trump was involved. No one does. He could be completely innocent.

He could but would an innocent man be acting the way he is?

But they're so freaking scared that he was -- and at some level, they know what he is -- that they're terrified this stuff will get out.

This is what happens when people tie their feeble hopes and dreams to a ******* con man.

DOJ told Trump he's named in Epstein files, WSJ reports​

LiveNOW from FOX
https://www.livenowfox.com › news › bondi-trump-na...
Jul 23, 2025 — President Trump was reportedly told in May that his name is mentioned multiple times in the Jeffrey Epstein case files.

 

[Mac1958]

He could but would an innocent man be acting the way he is?

Well, no.

But (a) I'm certainly fine with the "innocent until proven guilty" thing, and (b) I'm just proceeding under the assumption that he will never be held accountable for anything, ever. Anything to the contrary would just be a nice surprise.

 

[elektra]

When has that ever stopped right wingers from making accusations before?

Lame excuse

Your reply is an accusation, lush you are a dumb hypocrite