Amy Coney Barrett's America

[Papageorgio]

"So that’s that then. The confirmation hearings are over and it is almost inevitable that Amy Coney Barrett will be confirmed as a supreme court justice before the November election. Barrett will shift the supreme court from a 5-4 conservative majority to a 6-3 super-majority, a move that could fundamentally reshape America. Goodbye civil rights, hello Gilead.

You’ve got to hand it to the Republicans really; they get things done. They don’t care about being called hypocrites. They don’t care about ignoring Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish that she not be replaced until after the election. They don’t care about common decency. They don’t care about democracy. They just care about power – and they will do whatever it takes to get it."

Goodbye civil rights: Amy Coney Barrett's America is a terrifying place | Arwa Mahdawi

With her confirmation all but inevitable, how bad will Barrett be? It’s hard to say for sure – but it doesn’t look good

www.theguardian.com

No, Republicans and conservatives don’t care about any of that.

let's pack the court later....ya didn't wanna listen and wait till the new president is elected. Don't cry later.

FDR, with the House and Senate being Democratic, tried to pack the court to gain an advantage and public opinion, strongly Democrats, stopped him. Lots of things you can think of doing but lots of things may fail to happen because public opinion is against packing the court. Everything has a reaction, good or bad.

Pffft. It's not like Democrats give a shit about the public.

They are when it comes to votes and getting and maintaining power.

 

[fncceo]

Goodbye civil rights, hello Gilead.

Can't wait!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"So that’s that then. The confirmation hearings are over and it is almost inevitable that Amy Coney Barrett will be confirmed as a supreme court justice before the November election. Barrett will shift the supreme court from a 5-4 conservative majority to a 6-3 super-majority, a move that could fundamentally reshape America. Goodbye civil rights, hello Gilead.

You’ve got to hand it to the Republicans really; they get things done. They don’t care about being called hypocrites. They don’t care about ignoring Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish that she not be replaced until after the election. They don’t care about common decency. They don’t care about democracy. They just care about power – and they will do whatever it takes to get it."

Goodbye civil rights: Amy Coney Barrett's America is a terrifying place | Arwa Mahdawi

With her confirmation all but inevitable, how bad will Barrett be? It’s hard to say for sure – but it doesn’t look good

www.theguardian.com

No, Republicans and conservatives don’t care about any of that.

poor guy forget's a republic actually protects individual rights that the majority would trample on. What you fear is the judicial activism that has happened for decades will be shut down.

 

[RealDave]

Actually, civil rights will still be intact. This is the old fear mongering scenario to muck up reality.
She's a Constitutionalist, probably won't be legislating law, but interpreting the law. Unlike,
the liberal justices Kagen and Sotomayor.

If she gave a shit about the Constitution, she would refuse to be considered citing the Republicans' actions on Garland.

What the Republicans did to Garland was within the rules of the Constitution, maybe not the intent of the Constitution, so Congress needs to see what can be done to patch the hole. What is going on is the same exact thing the Democratic Party would do if the situation was reversed, Biden as admitted so.

Like McConnell & most Republicans, you piss on the Constitution when it suits you. Fuck you. Fuck Republicans Fuck Trump.

Thanks for the offer, but no thanks. I'm same-species oriented.

I did not know dumbass was a species.

 

[fncceo]

They don’t care about ignoring Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish

Actually, I care a lot. I think it's frakking hilarious!

 

[daveman]

Actually, civil rights will still be intact. This is the old fear mongering scenario to muck up reality.
She's a Constitutionalist, probably won't be legislating law, but interpreting the law. Unlike,
the liberal justices Kagen and Sotomayor.

If she gave a shit about the Constitution, she would refuse to be considered citing the Republicans' actions on Garland.

What the Republicans did to Garland was within the rules of the Constitution, maybe not the intent of the Constitution, so Congress needs to see what can be done to patch the hole. What is going on is the same exact thing the Democratic Party would do if the situation was reversed, Biden as admitted so.

Like McConnell & most Republicans, you piss on the Constitution when it suits you. Fuck you. Fuck Republicans Fuck Trump.

Thanks for the offer, but no thanks. I'm same-species oriented.

I did not know dumbass was a species.

There are petabytes of information you don't know. That's why you're a leftist.

 

[daveman]

They don’t care about ignoring Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish

Actually, I care a lot. I think it's frakking hilarious!

What's hilarious is morons thinking her dying wish has the force of law. What idiot children.

 

[fncceo]

They don’t care about ignoring Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish

Actually, I care a lot. I think it's frakking hilarious!

What's hilarious is morons thinking her dying wish has the force of law. What idiot children.

Yes, that's the funny part.

 

[Zorro!]

"So that’s that then. The confirmation hearings are over and it is almost inevitable that Amy Coney Barrett will be confirmed as a supreme court justice before the November election. Barrett will shift the supreme court from a 5-4 conservative majority to a 6-3 super-majority, a move that could fundamentally reshape America. Goodbye civil rights, hello Gilead.

You’ve got to hand it to the Republicans really; they get things done. They don’t care about being called hypocrites. They don’t care about ignoring Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish that she not be replaced until after the election. They don’t care about common decency. They don’t care about democracy. They just care about power – and they will do whatever it takes to get it."

Goodbye civil rights: Amy Coney Barrett's America is a terrifying place | Arwa Mahdawi

With her confirmation all but inevitable, how bad will Barrett be? It’s hard to say for sure – but it doesn’t look good

www.theguardian.com

No, Republicans and conservatives don’t care about any of that.

You sound like a sore loser. The Notorious ACB with be a fabulous Justice.

 

[Oldestyle]

"So that’s that then. The confirmation hearings are over and it is almost inevitable that Amy Coney Barrett will be confirmed as a supreme court justice before the November election. Barrett will shift the supreme court from a 5-4 conservative majority to a 6-3 super-majority, a move that could fundamentally reshape America. Goodbye civil rights, hello Gilead.

You’ve got to hand it to the Republicans really; they get things done. They don’t care about being called hypocrites. They don’t care about ignoring Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish that she not be replaced until after the election. They don’t care about common decency. They don’t care about democracy. They just care about power – and they will do whatever it takes to get it."

Goodbye civil rights: Amy Coney Barrett's America is a terrifying place | Arwa Mahdawi

With her confirmation all but inevitable, how bad will Barrett be? It’s hard to say for sure – but it doesn’t look good

www.theguardian.com

No, Republicans and conservatives don’t care about any of that.

Don't get your panties in a bunch, Clayton! Unlike Democrats...the GOP tends to nominate moderate Justices! Your predictions of gloom and doom most likely will never take place! Now if Democrats had a 6-3 majority...you better believe that it would get ugly for the country because your side NEVER nominates moderates! You nominate far left ideologues.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Yes, that's the funny part.

It's very funny indeed! Assuming ACLU Ruth did have a dying wish that wanted the American political
process to freeze in place so the democrats could get their way it's hilarious to imagine we owe her that wish.

Can you imagine Schumer and Pelosi giving a rat's ass about such a thing? What adult child believes
we owe Ginsburg her wish.

 

[toobfreak]

"So that’s that then. The confirmation hearings are over and it is almost inevitable that Amy Coney Barrett will be confirmed as a supreme court justice before the November election. Barrett will shift the supreme court from a 5-4 conservative majority to a 6-3 super-majority, a move that could fundamentally reshape America. Goodbye civil rights, hello Gilead.
You’ve got to hand it to the Republicans really; they get things done. They don’t care about being called hypocrites. They don’t care about ignoring Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish that she not be replaced until after the election. They don’t care about common decency. They don’t care about democracy. They just care about power – and they will do whatever it takes to get it."

Goodbye civil rights: Amy Coney Barrett's America is a terrifying place | Arwa Mahdawi

With her confirmation all but inevitable, how bad will Barrett be? It’s hard to say for sure – but it doesn’t look good

www.theguardian.com

No, Republicans and conservatives don’t care about any of that.

THE END OF CIVIL RIGHTS!

GOP PLANS TO ROLL SENIORS OFF CLIFF!

NO MORE HEALTHCARE FOR THE POOR!

GOP WANTS TO CUT WAGES TO GIVE MORE TO THE RICH!

REPUBLICANS TO BRING BACK SLAVERY!

Every four years, we have to put up with the same idiot tripe from you knuckleheads. End of the world if republcans get in office, yet none of it ever happens.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

In Amy Coney Barrett's America, Americans with disabilities and pre-existing conditions live in fear.

Judge Barrett's view of Obamacare stirs fear among disabled Americans | CNN

Rebecca Cokley writes that Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court has struck fear in the hearts of families like hers -- with parents and children whose disabilities make them heavily reliant on the Affordable Care Act. She says with Barrett on the Court, everything and everyone...

www.cnn.com

 

[Norman]

"So that’s that then. The confirmation hearings are over and it is almost inevitable that Amy Coney Barrett will be confirmed as a supreme court justice before the November election. Barrett will shift the supreme court from a 5-4 conservative majority to a 6-3 super-majority, a move that could fundamentally reshape America. Goodbye civil rights, hello Gilead.

You’ve got to hand it to the Republicans really; they get things done. They don’t care about being called hypocrites. They don’t care about ignoring Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish that she not be replaced until after the election. They don’t care about common decency. They don’t care about democracy. They just care about power – and they will do whatever it takes to get it."

Goodbye civil rights: Amy Coney Barrett's America is a terrifying place | Arwa Mahdawi

With her confirmation all but inevitable, how bad will Barrett be? It’s hard to say for sure – but it doesn’t look good

www.theguardian.com

No, Republicans and conservatives don’t care about any of that.

It's an America where democrats will have to say good bye to rigging elections.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If she gave a shit about the Constitution, she would refuse to be considered citing the Republicans' actions on Garland.

Republican actions were perfectly consistent with the Constitution.

In 2020 not 2016. Where in the Constitution does it say that the Senate majority leader gets to decide if the nominee gets consideration?

Where in the Constitution does it say that the Senate majority leader gets to decide if the nominee gets consideration?

View attachment 403891

Full Text of the U.S. Constitution | Constitution Center

Read and share the complete text of the United States Constitution.

constitutioncenter.org

Thanks for proving my point. It says Senate, not the Senate majority leader. The Senate never considered Garland, there was no vote, no committee hearing, no discussion.

Thanks for proving my point. It says Senate, not the Senate majority leader.

Ummmm.....just how do you think business gets done in the Senate?

The Senate never considered Garland, there was no vote, no committee hearing, no discussion.

Where in the Constitution does it say that the Senate has to hold a vote, a hearing, a discussion?

 

[Papageorgio]

In Amy Coney Barrett's America, Americans with disabilities and pre-existing conditions live in fear.

Judge Barrett's view of Obamacare stirs fear among disabled Americans | CNN

Rebecca Cokley writes that Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court has struck fear in the hearts of families like hers -- with parents and children whose disabilities make them heavily reliant on the Affordable Care Act. She says with Barrett on the Court, everything and everyone...

www.cnn.com

So if it is unconstitutional the way it is written, you still want to make it law instead of requiring Congress to rewrite it so it is constitutional?

 

[theHawk]

"So that’s that then. The confirmation hearings are over and it is almost inevitable that Amy Coney Barrett will be confirmed as a supreme court justice before the November election. Barrett will shift the supreme court from a 5-4 conservative majority to a 6-3 super-majority, a move that could fundamentally reshape America. Goodbye civil rights, hello Gilead.

You’ve got to hand it to the Republicans really; they get things done. They don’t care about being called hypocrites. They don’t care about ignoring Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish that she not be replaced until after the election. They don’t care about common decency. They don’t care about democracy. They just care about power – and they will do whatever it takes to get it."

Goodbye civil rights: Amy Coney Barrett's America is a terrifying place | Arwa Mahdawi

With her confirmation all but inevitable, how bad will Barrett be? It’s hard to say for sure – but it doesn’t look good

www.theguardian.com

No, Republicans and conservatives don’t care about any of that.

“Goodbye civil rights”?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

This Amy took the oath of a slave in her cult to obey and spread her legs for some guy. How can you respect someone who takes a slave's oath and then lies about it?

The stench of your desperation and hatred preceded you.

She has not sworn any such oath. If there are oaths to slavery, they are the ones your ilk demand of the unwashed masses.

It's fine for women to be free to rebel, but for women to act like ladies? Well hell, they don't have that freedom under Marxist feminist theory.

. . . talk about a cult.

No wonder population and birth rates are dwindling, it is no longer 'cool' to be a mom, the one thing most girls naturally want to be. That's the real source of Lysis' anger and unhappiness, unrequited love from 30 cats. . .

Act like ladies? What does this mean? To "rebel" from exactly what? ACB took an oath, supposedly, to be a sex slave. Her husband has proven what a scumbag he is by accepting it. Should she be on the Supreme Court? She has tried to hide that she is in this sex cult. Women are entitled to dignity and to be free from being used. She can allow this guy to abuse her and her body as she wishes, but she should not be in a position to force other women into her chosen lifestyle. What she does in her bedroom is her own business.

What is "Marxist feminist theory"? Liberty? I thought that we all are for this.

WTF are you talking about, "ACB took an oath to be a sex slave?" Do you live in a parallel universe? Who has been feeding you this bullshit? Or is that what you consider marriage vows? Oaths to be sex slaves?

Either give a link to the "sex slave" claim, or shut the fuck up about such non-sense.

What I am talking about, 'rebel,' is rebel from nature, the nature of being mothers. . . duh. Just as Lucifer rebelled from Jehovah's authority, Marxism pushes feminism as a way to rebel from natural law, the proper place of women in the family, and the family in civilized society.

In this way, government becomes the head of the family, not the husband.

.. . and thus, freedom and liberty are destroyed. I wouldn't expect you to understand this, you DON'T THINK, you only feel, and react. This is dangerous. You became a perfect tool. A useful idiot.

You cannot have liberty when government makes decisions for the individual.

If she leaves Roe v. Wade up to the voters of the individual states to decide, thus enforcing the 10th amendment, you are too dumb to understand how that is actually INCREASING liberty for the people, getting central government out of their lives, aren't you?

Lysis has a burning jealous hatred of young attractive women that have sex. It permeates everything she says.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

They don’t care about ignoring Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish

Actually, I care a lot. I think it's frakking hilarious!

What's hilarious is morons thinking her dying wish has the force of law. What idiot children.

What's really hilarious is morons thinking this was really Ginsberg's last words.

 

[MisterBeale]

They don’t care about ignoring Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish

Actually, I care a lot. I think it's frakking hilarious!

What's hilarious is morons thinking her dying wish has the force of law. What idiot children.

What's really hilarious is morons thinking this was really Ginsberg's last words.

Yeah, somehow I doubt that she was more concerned about the future of the nation than her family or the here after. . . I found it interesting that it wasn't one of her children, but a grandchild spreading such propaganda. . . .

. . . folks are really quite gullible.