As usual you have no idea what you are talking about. The One China policy is about which country will be the soul representative of the Chinese people, but that does not exclude the US having relations with the Taiwan. No one publicly accepted calls from the Taiwanese government but the US has had extensive economic dealings with the Taiwanese government, including significant arms sales that were strongly objected to by mainland China for many years. If we weren't supporting the independence of Taiwan, we wouldn't have sold them weapons over the objections of Beijing. What President Trump has done is bring some rationality to this crazy policy.
You seem to be the one confused about American policy with Taiwan. We have no diplomatic relationship at all period. We have a business relationship and that relationship is one dedicated to Taiwan's ability to prosper, including the sale of arms but anything else is never spoken about to the Chinese. Trump has brought nothing to this relationship and now it is even more obvious that he caved to the one China policy, leaving Taiwan in the lurch.
Not at all, the weapons we sell them are to defend themselves against aggression from mainland China and all weapons sales require action by Congress and the President. Since 1979, the US does have de facto diplomatic relations with Taiwan.
De facto diplomatic relations[edit]
The [Taiwan Relations] act authorizes
de facto diplomatic relations with the governing authorities by giving special powers to the AIT to the level that it is the
de facto embassy, and states that any international agreements made between the ROC and U.S. before 1979 are still valid unless otherwise terminated. One agreement that was
unilaterally terminated by President
Jimmy Carter upon the establishment of relations with the PRC was the
Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty.
The act provides for Taiwan to be treated under U.S. laws the same as "foreign countries, nations, states, governments, or similar entities". The act provides that for most practical purposes of the U.S. government, the absence of diplomatic relations and
recognition will have no effect.
[5]
Military provisions[edit]
The Taiwan Relations Act potentially requires the U.S. to intervene militarily if the PRC attacks or invades Taiwan. The act states that "the United States will make available to Taiwan such defense articles and defense services in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capabilities". However, the decision about the nature and quantity of defense services that America will provide to Taiwan is to be determined by the President and Congress. America's policy has been called "
strategic ambiguity" and it is designed to dissuade Taiwan from a unilateral declaration of independence, and to dissuade the PRC from unilaterally unifying Taiwan with the PRC.
The act further stipulates that the United States will "consider any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by
boycotts or
embargoes, a threat to the
peace and
security of the
Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States".
This act also requires the United States "to provide Taiwan with
arms of a
defensive character", and "to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of
coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan." Successive U.S. administrations have sold arms to
Taiwan in compliance with the Taiwan Relations Act despite demands from the PRC that the U.S. follow the legally non-binding
Three Joint Communiques and the U.S. government's proclaimed
One-China policy (which differs from the PRC's so-called one-China principle).
Taiwan Relations Act - Wikipedia
Receiving a phone call from the Taiwanese government is perfectly consistent with existing US policy as defined by the Taiwan Relations Act, and with the US one China policy.