American Traitors Are Sweating

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
743
Points
205
WOW! and all of those other exclamations of delight. I never thought I would live long enough to see American traitors sweating.

According to a report by Breitbart’s Elizabeth Sheld, eight Democrat lawmakers have proposed a bill that would eliminate the death penalty as a consequence for individuals convicted of numerous federal crimes, among them espionage and treason. Nothing happens in Washington without a reason, so The Federal Death Penalty Abolition Act (HR 3741) gives rise to a bevy of questions and suspicions.

What motivation would congressional Democrats have for wishing to neutralize the death penalty option for such serious crimes?
The answer to the question is obvious: THE UNITED NATIONS. To be more precise Democrats fear that their protection is running out of gas. Let me clarify by repeating something I’ve said countless times.

In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.

UN-loving traitors now have to be thinking there is a good chance that treason committed for United Nations can be prosecuted because of:


Article II, Section 4

The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
This next question is an easy one:

So, who do these lawmakers suppose might be tried for treason, espionage, or the host of other federal crimes now punishable by death in the not-so-distant future?

Do Democrat lawmakers anticipate treason trials?
By Erik Rush Saturday, December 21, 2013

Do Democrat lawmakers anticipate treason trials?
Answer: Every American official that puts the United Nations ahead of their own country.

NOTE: John Kerry was not a government official when he committed treason in Paris in 1971, but maybe there is a chance to nail him for his activities on behalf of the United Nations after he became a government official. What the hell, it really doesn’t matter what he gets hanged for so long as he’s guilty.


Treason never prospered more than it does in the United Nations.

Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason. Ovid (47 B.C. - A.D. -17)
Ovid obviously never dreamed of anything like the United Nations; so allow me bring his observation up to date with a suggestion.

Wouldn’t it be sweet if larceny itself became a hanging offense when it is connected to treason. My heart is pounding at the prospect of hanging all of those damn charity hustlers. It’s just a crying shame those foreign UN charity hustlers living on American tax dollars can’t be hanged right alongside America’s traitors.

Incidentally, I never understood why the UN’s phoney judicial system does not have a death penalty. I always wondered what the punishment is for UN officials who betray the UN? I don’t think there is one. There will be the minute the UN becomes a global government. I’d like to see how they handle it. Betraying an organization is much different than is betraying one’s country.

Presidents, popes, & treason

Presidents can and should be hanged for treason. As far as I know the Roman Catholic Church does not hang popes for the little indiscretions. Maybe that’s why presidents want to be spiritual leaders. After all, how can you hang a guy for his morality. That’s why Americans better stop thinking about their presidents the same way Roman Catholics think about their popes; i.e., they should be loved by one and all.

In fact, a vast majority of the people in the world do not give a flying f--- for popes or presidents. Yet somehow sycophantic religious fanatics are certain that their leader being universally loved will have everyone else rushing to convert to whatever ideology is being promoted.

And have you noticed that only living Roman Catholic popes and living American presidents run the universal love con. You can stretch it a bit and include Boo’s guy, the Dalai Lama, but you sure as hell don’t see Communists, or Muslims, putting up one of their guys for universal adoration. Hell, I don’t think they have a candidate! At least not a living one. Generally speaking their guys are dead; Karl Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mohammad.

Parenthetically, conquerors never expected to be loved. They settled for executing anyone who criticized them. Coerced love worked pretty well because there were not too many people running around calling Genghis Kahn or Julius Caesar douche bags. Adolf Hitler was a 20th century conqueror who might have combined loving him voluntarily with the chopping block. Of course, everything except the chopping block would have fallen apart after he died.

And when was it decided that the American president had to be a spiritual leader rather than simply being a straightforward political leader? And who made that decision? Speaking for myself, when I feel the need to kiss a ring I’ll go see a local Bible-thumper, or hop on a plane to Rome.

Now don’t get me wrong here, a president being a decent man with a spiritual nature isn’t a bad thing even if he engages in a bit of preaching from the bully pulpit whenever the mood moves him; so long as he doesn’t dip into the public purse to payoff pious Socialist frauds. That’s exactly what is happening with HillaryCare II. Our Chicago sewer rat cum universal-spiritual-leader is going to throw as much money at his pals as he can before the ACA is repealed.
 

JWBooth

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
10,216
Reaction score
2,365
Points
255
Location
Fredonia Republic
After much effort to place myself on the far fringes of political viewpoints, somebody always finds a way to outdistance me and my puny efforts.

Congrats dude.
 
OP
F

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
743
Points
205
After much effort to place myself on the far fringes of political viewpoints, somebody always finds a way to outdistance me and my puny efforts.

Congrats dude.
To JWBooth: No so far out on the fringes as some might think. Doug Hagmann’s great piece about the DHS offers another reason Democrats want to eliminate the death penalty for treason. This one excerpt should whet your appetite:

“According to every internal document I’ve seen and read, and from the few people I’ve spoken with who understand what’s going on, preparations have been finalized to respond to a crisis of unprecedented magnitude within the United States. The response will include the use of lethal force against U.S. citizens under the instructions of Barack Obama.” But why?

DHS insider gives final warning
By Doug Hagmann Friday, December 27, 2013

DHS insider gives final warning
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top