WOW! and all of those other exclamations of delight. I never thought I would live long enough to see American traitors sweating.
The answer to the question is obvious: THE UNITED NATIONS. To be more precise Democrats fear that their protection is running out of gas. Let me clarify by repeating something Ive said countless times.
In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UNs behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.
UN-loving traitors now have to be thinking there is a good chance that treason committed for United Nations can be prosecuted because of:
This next question is an easy one:
Answer: Every American official that puts the United Nations ahead of their own country.
NOTE: John Kerry was not a government official when he committed treason in Paris in 1971, but maybe there is a chance to nail him for his activities on behalf of the United Nations after he became a government official. What the hell, it really doesnt matter what he gets hanged for so long as hes guilty.
Treason never prospered more than it does in the United Nations.
Ovid obviously never dreamed of anything like the United Nations; so allow me bring his observation up to date with a suggestion.
Wouldnt it be sweet if larceny itself became a hanging offense when it is connected to treason. My heart is pounding at the prospect of hanging all of those damn charity hustlers. Its just a crying shame those foreign UN charity hustlers living on American tax dollars cant be hanged right alongside Americas traitors.
Incidentally, I never understood why the UNs phoney judicial system does not have a death penalty. I always wondered what the punishment is for UN officials who betray the UN? I dont think there is one. There will be the minute the UN becomes a global government. Id like to see how they handle it. Betraying an organization is much different than is betraying ones country.
Presidents, popes, & treason
Presidents can and should be hanged for treason. As far as I know the Roman Catholic Church does not hang popes for the little indiscretions. Maybe thats why presidents want to be spiritual leaders. After all, how can you hang a guy for his morality. Thats why Americans better stop thinking about their presidents the same way Roman Catholics think about their popes; i.e., they should be loved by one and all.
In fact, a vast majority of the people in the world do not give a flying f--- for popes or presidents. Yet somehow sycophantic religious fanatics are certain that their leader being universally loved will have everyone else rushing to convert to whatever ideology is being promoted.
And have you noticed that only living Roman Catholic popes and living American presidents run the universal love con. You can stretch it a bit and include Boos guy, the Dalai Lama, but you sure as hell dont see Communists, or Muslims, putting up one of their guys for universal adoration. Hell, I dont think they have a candidate! At least not a living one. Generally speaking their guys are dead; Karl Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mohammad.
Parenthetically, conquerors never expected to be loved. They settled for executing anyone who criticized them. Coerced love worked pretty well because there were not too many people running around calling Genghis Kahn or Julius Caesar douche bags. Adolf Hitler was a 20th century conqueror who might have combined loving him voluntarily with the chopping block. Of course, everything except the chopping block would have fallen apart after he died.
And when was it decided that the American president had to be a spiritual leader rather than simply being a straightforward political leader? And who made that decision? Speaking for myself, when I feel the need to kiss a ring Ill go see a local Bible-thumper, or hop on a plane to Rome.
Now dont get me wrong here, a president being a decent man with a spiritual nature isnt a bad thing even if he engages in a bit of preaching from the bully pulpit whenever the mood moves him; so long as he doesnt dip into the public purse to payoff pious Socialist frauds. Thats exactly what is happening with HillaryCare II. Our Chicago sewer rat cum universal-spiritual-leader is going to throw as much money at his pals as he can before the ACA is repealed.
The answer to the question is obvious: THE UNITED NATIONS. To be more precise Democrats fear that their protection is running out of gas. Let me clarify by repeating something Ive said countless times.
In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UNs behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.
UN-loving traitors now have to be thinking there is a good chance that treason committed for United Nations can be prosecuted because of:
This next question is an easy one:
Answer: Every American official that puts the United Nations ahead of their own country.
NOTE: John Kerry was not a government official when he committed treason in Paris in 1971, but maybe there is a chance to nail him for his activities on behalf of the United Nations after he became a government official. What the hell, it really doesnt matter what he gets hanged for so long as hes guilty.
Treason never prospered more than it does in the United Nations.
Ovid obviously never dreamed of anything like the United Nations; so allow me bring his observation up to date with a suggestion.
Wouldnt it be sweet if larceny itself became a hanging offense when it is connected to treason. My heart is pounding at the prospect of hanging all of those damn charity hustlers. Its just a crying shame those foreign UN charity hustlers living on American tax dollars cant be hanged right alongside Americas traitors.
Incidentally, I never understood why the UNs phoney judicial system does not have a death penalty. I always wondered what the punishment is for UN officials who betray the UN? I dont think there is one. There will be the minute the UN becomes a global government. Id like to see how they handle it. Betraying an organization is much different than is betraying ones country.
Presidents, popes, & treason
Presidents can and should be hanged for treason. As far as I know the Roman Catholic Church does not hang popes for the little indiscretions. Maybe thats why presidents want to be spiritual leaders. After all, how can you hang a guy for his morality. Thats why Americans better stop thinking about their presidents the same way Roman Catholics think about their popes; i.e., they should be loved by one and all.
In fact, a vast majority of the people in the world do not give a flying f--- for popes or presidents. Yet somehow sycophantic religious fanatics are certain that their leader being universally loved will have everyone else rushing to convert to whatever ideology is being promoted.
And have you noticed that only living Roman Catholic popes and living American presidents run the universal love con. You can stretch it a bit and include Boos guy, the Dalai Lama, but you sure as hell dont see Communists, or Muslims, putting up one of their guys for universal adoration. Hell, I dont think they have a candidate! At least not a living one. Generally speaking their guys are dead; Karl Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mohammad.
Parenthetically, conquerors never expected to be loved. They settled for executing anyone who criticized them. Coerced love worked pretty well because there were not too many people running around calling Genghis Kahn or Julius Caesar douche bags. Adolf Hitler was a 20th century conqueror who might have combined loving him voluntarily with the chopping block. Of course, everything except the chopping block would have fallen apart after he died.
And when was it decided that the American president had to be a spiritual leader rather than simply being a straightforward political leader? And who made that decision? Speaking for myself, when I feel the need to kiss a ring Ill go see a local Bible-thumper, or hop on a plane to Rome.
Now dont get me wrong here, a president being a decent man with a spiritual nature isnt a bad thing even if he engages in a bit of preaching from the bully pulpit whenever the mood moves him; so long as he doesnt dip into the public purse to payoff pious Socialist frauds. Thats exactly what is happening with HillaryCare II. Our Chicago sewer rat cum universal-spiritual-leader is going to throw as much money at his pals as he can before the ACA is repealed.
