America Loses Last-Minute Bid to Stop Federal Internet Transition

Vigilante

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2014
51,327
18,077
2,290
Waiting on the Cowardly Dante!!
The traitorous Obomoid has done America in again...

Texas Tribune ^ | September 30, 2016 | Patrick Svitek

Attorney General Ken Paxton on Friday lost his last-minute bid for a court injunction to prevent the federal government from transferring its oversight of internet registrations to an international body.

Hours before the transition was set to take effect, a federal judge in Galveston ruled against Paxton and three other state attorneys general who had asked him to temporarily halt the transfer while they pursue a lawsuit challenging it. The four sued the federal government late Wednesday after Republicans in Congress, led by U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, failed to halt the transfer.

At midnight Friday, the United States is set to cede control of the internet's domain system — essentially its address book — to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. Critics say the move could open up the internet to censorship by unfriendly countries, while administration officials and many tech industry heavyweights say such concerns are misinformed.

Among other things, Paxton's lawsuit argues the move violates the property clause of the U.S. Constitution by giving away government property without congressional authorization. In a response to the lawsuit earlier Friday, the federal government criticized it as a last-ditch effort to stop something that has been years in the making — with everyone involved "fully aware" of it.

The ruling by Judge George C. Hanks Jr. came after a hearing in Galveston that lasted more than an hour. His reasoning was not immediately known.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
We need our own dark web.
We need a SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION if Trump doesn't win, FLUSH 40% of this countries subversives down the drain!

quote-what-signify-a-few-lives-lost-in-a-century-or-two-the-tree-of-liberty-must-be-refreshed-from-time-thomas-jefferson-345158.jpg
 
Among other things, Paxton's lawsuit argues the move violates the property clause of the U.S. Constitution by giving away government property without congressional authorization.
well, see, there's the problem. going to the judicial branch to make them do something they are unable to do because the legislative branch failed to do the thing the law requires. that's like getting your checks confused with your balances, no? i mean, if you want to argue this before the court, the property clause, yeah, never mind anything in the constitution about standards of weights and measures, go for the property clause, that'll convince the courts to legislate.
 
Still no one can tell me why Obama wanted this....no one seems to know.
Part of the OWG scheme. Next he wants to give the UN gun control in the US and every other country in the world. Liberals have never heard of Hitler, Stalin and Sol Alinsky so they'll go along with Ol' Barry.
 

Forum List

Back
Top