America Doesn't Have The Moral Justification To Enter Into the Israel/Iran War!

[struth]

The report found nothing of the sort. They also shot down Bush's claim that Iraq was involved.

Holy shit, I just posted a link that said Iran was in fact involved, showing in detail the parts of the report finding that.

I agree with you on Iraq.

Not to mention a Federal Court heard evidence, and found Iran liable

Iran ordered to pay billions to relatives of 9/11 victims

The judgment is largely symbolic.

abcnews.go.com

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

So the Jew boy stole JoeB's girl.

Too bad.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Well, not really true.

The Jews keep getting us to bail them out when they bite off more than they can chew.

They did that in 1973, when Kissinger had to bail out Golda Meier.

They did that in 1982, when Ronnie Ray-Gun had to bail out Began in Lebanon

They did that here, when they realized they can't bomb Iran into submission and begged us to do it.

Seriously, what are you defending here, a bunch of white people from Europe oppressing a non-white people in Palestine?

Actually, very true. Show one war the Arabs have won.

Uh, guy, they have not.

 

[JoeB131]

The priority is that Iran doesn’t get a nuke. Trump made the right call, and you can thank Gd (literally) that we had the right president at the right time to ensure that they don’t.

Actually, he's made it more likely they'll get a nuke.

Thank Gd that Iran doesn’t have a nuke then, huh?

well, for now. They'll get one eventually.

 

[JoeB131]

Actually, very true. Show one war the Arabs have won.

Uh, guy, they have not.

Well, they chased us out of Iraq.
And out of Lebanon
And out of Libya.

Now, if we can just stop letting the Zionists get us into wars.

 

[JoeB131]

Holy shit, I just posted a link that said Iran was in fact involved, showing in detail the parts of the report finding that.

I agree with you on Iraq.

Not to mention a Federal Court heard evidence, and found Iran liable

Iran ordered to pay billions to relatives of 9/11 victims

The judgment is largely symbolic.

abcnews.go.com

So no evidence, really, just a lot of supposition.

 

[struth]

So no evidence, really, just a lot of supposition.

Well not according to the 9/11 report, which you seem to want to ignore

Not surprised, Iran has really become the country the demafacist seem to defend and admire now

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Uh, guy, are you drinking or trolling or both. We are in Iraq and Lebanon. And we can go into Libya anytime we want.

Well, they chased us out of Iraq.
And out of Lebanon
And out of Libya.

Now, if we can just stop letting the Zionists get us into wars.

 

[Grau]

Mac, should Iran have been able to have nukes? Yes or no.

Why not?
They are a signatory of the NPT while Israel is not.

They have attacked no one in 300 years while Israel has launched numerous unprovoked attacks on its neighbors.

Israel's "Sampson Option" has repeatedly been used to blackmail the US and extort US "aid" and weaponry.

For decades Zionists have claimed that Iran has been "... within days of having the bomb" as an excuse to manipulate the US into war with Iran.

Now every country in the world sees the need to have a nuclear arsenal to deter unprovoked Zionist aggression.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Grau needs a history course on Israel from 1948.

 

[eagle1462010]

Just for the heck of it.

Boy Trump was wrong. No one could have forseen Obama handing them over BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.

 

[JoeB131]

Well not according to the 9/11 report, which you seem to want to ignore

Not surprised, Iran has really become the country the demafacist seem to defend and admire now

9/11 report found nothing of the sort.

IF it had, Bush and Dick would have had no problem trying for regime change in Iran then.

 

[JoeB131]

Boy Trump was wrong. No one could have forseen Obama handing them over BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.

Why wouldn't they have.

The courts have repeatedly ruled that money rightfully belongs to Iran and should be returned.

 

[struth]

9/11 report found nothing of the sort.

IF it had, Bush and Dick would have had no problem trying for regime change in Iran then.

Well the link to it, shows they did. I get it's an inconvient truth for you pro-Supreme Leader Demafacscit.

Iran's Link to Al-Qaeda: The 9-11 Commission's Evidence

While the State Department's Patterns of Global Terrorism—2003 report [1] labeled Iran "the most active state sponsor of terrorism in 2003," the Bush administration has yet to agree on a national security presidential directive to define U.S. policy

www.meforum.org

Bush certainly supported regime change there. I recall dems in congress first started coming to the leading state sponsor of terrori's defense during his admin and threatened to impeach him if he did anything to Iran

 

[JoeB131]

Well the link to it, shows they did. I get it's an inconvient truth for you pro-Supreme Leader Demafacscit.

Iran's Link to Al-Qaeda: The 9-11 Commission's Evidence

While the State Department's Patterns of Global Terrorism—2003 report [1] labeled Iran "the most active state sponsor of terrorism in 2003," the Bush administration has yet to agree on a national security presidential directive to define U.S. policy

www.meforum.org

Bush certainly supported regime change there. I recall dems in congress first started coming to the leading state sponsor of terrori's defense during his admin and threatened to impeach him if he did anything to Iran

I don't click on links from wingnuts.

The 9/11 commission found nothing of the sort.

The reason Congress had to threaten Bush was because they found he lied his ass off about Iraq.

 

[struth]

I don't click on links from wingnuts.

The 9/11 commission found nothing of the sort.

The reason Congress had to threaten Bush was because they found he lied his ass off about Iraq.

Well, I provided a link from the 9/11 Commission, I suppose you don't want to be educated, that's fine, remain uninformed and stupid.

Not my problem.

 

[JoeB131]

Well, I provided a link from the 9/11 Commission, I suppose you don't want to be educated, that's fine, remain uninformed and stupid.

Not my problem.

No, you provided a link to something called "Meforums". WHich I ignored because it was stupid.

Here's a clue for you.

Iran are Shi'ites.

Bin Laden was Sunni.

Totally different brands of Islam.

 

[struth]

No, you provided a link to something called "Meforums". WHich I ignored because it was stupid.

Here's a clue for you.

Iran are Shi'ites.

Bin Laden was Sunni.

Totally different brands of Islam.

Yes, Middle East Forums. Which is one of the leading journals on Middle East topics, I did it for you, because it broke down the parts in the 9/11 Reform, addressing Iran.....but here's the entire report: National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States

The branches don't matter, their goals aren't religious, it's terror and the destruction of the West.

 

[Delldude]

wrong. Iran could have produced nuclear weapons 30 years ago, but obvious did not.

Crock, they didn't have centrifuges.

 

[JoeB131]

Yes, Middle East Forums. Which is one of the leading journals

A hack journal promoting Zionist propaganda.

because it broke down the parts in the 9/11 Reform, addressing Iran.....but here's the entire report:

Again, the problem with the 9/11 commission is that it was a smear job on Bush. And while Bush did a lot of things wrong, he was kind of blameless in 9/11. (Other than not taking the CIA breifing seriously enough.)