America Doesn't Have The Moral Justification To Enter Into the Israel/Iran War!

Article from the Chicago Tribune, August 19th, 1945, details that the Japanese made many overtures to negotiate a surrender. Edited to remove racist language.

You're really starting to counter-spin America's propaganda lately Joe! my biggest attraction to what you have to say, is in the challenge of figuring out what makes you tick?

Do you think that Trump could have been conned into an offensive hit on Iran, to open the doors for a Russia and/ore China hit on the Zionists?
 
Israel doesn't have a future, guy.

Demographics are not their friend. Arab birth rates are higher than Israeli birth rates.

And more and more young Israelis are wondering if is really a smart idea to live next to people who are willing to strap bombs onto themselves to try to kill you.

You're a fckn idiot
 
The libs wringing their hands and wailing because the biggest Islamic terrorist in the world has been prevented from getting a nuclear weapon reminds me how the Dems cried that Trump took out an “honored general” when he killed Solemeni (a vicious terrorist murderer).

The way the Left worships Islamic terrorists is scary.
 
Well, you might be the ass since nuclear fission was used to make the atomic bomb. Better do some more research on both.
The Nagasaki bomb was a fusion device. Better do some more research so you don't continue to announce your idiocy.
 
The Nagasaki bomb was a fusion device. Better do some more research so you don't continue to announce your idiocy.

It wasn't.

Hiroshima was hit with a plutonium bomb, Nagasaki with a uranium bomb.

Both used fission.

The first fusion bomb was tested in 1952.
 
Israel doesn't have a future, guy.

Demographics are not their friend. Arab birth rates are higher than Israeli birth rates.

And more and more young Israelis are wondering if is really a smart idea to live next to people who are willing to strap bombs onto themselves to try to kill you.

Doesn't matter. The future is the Jew, not the Arab.
 
It wasn't.

Hiroshima was hit with a plutonium bomb, Nagasaki with a uranium bomb.

Both used fission.

The first fusion bomb was tested in 1952.

You have those mixed up. Fat Man was a Uranium bomb used on Hiroshima.
Little Boy was the Plutonium Bomb used on Nagasaki.

So why are we claiming the moral high ground on nukes again?
 
You have those mixed up. Fat Man was a Uranium bomb used on Hiroshima.
Little Boy was the Plutonium Bomb used on Nagasaki.

So why are we claiming the moral high ground on nukes again?

You have those mixed up. Fat Man was a Uranium bomb used on Hiroshima.
Little Boy was the Plutonium Bomb used on Nagasaki.


You're right.

So why are we claiming the moral high ground on nukes again?

Where did I claim the moral high ground?

The mullahs suck.
 
15th post
No, they just hate the fact that they oppress the Palestinian people.

So would you if you had any ethical consistency.

You can't condemn White Supremacy in the rest of the world and then pretend it's okay in Palestine.

The Arabs attacked the Jews in 1948. And lost. And lost every war since.

See the consistency here, JoeB?
 
I'd suppose nations, just like individuals, don't appreciate the attitude of 'do as I say and not as I do'.
 
Wow, man, I used to think you had liberal sensibilities... but you are going complete MAGA, aren't you?

(For the record, I attended parochial Catholic Schools in Chicago 45-55 years ago. My HS graduated no less than FOUR Chicago Mayors- the good ones, not the fools we've had in since the last one retired.)

Leaving aside your open Islamophobia (We'd be scewed if you think that 1.5 billion Muslims are as evil as you think they are), the Ayatollahs would have the same problem everyone else who ever got a nuke has had. Anyone they might want to use that nuke on either has nukes of their own or is allied to someone who does.

The real problem is this, and try to follow along.

Saddam gave up his nukes, and we killed him.
Qadaffi gave up his nukes, and we killed him.
Kim Jong Il (father of the current nut, Kim Jong Un) kept his nukes, and the world bent over backwards to appease him, even sending him food when communism didn't work in keeping people fed.

So it would seem the real incentive for the Ayatollahs is to keep building a nuke, because the West certainly can't be trusted to keep their agreements or stand up to the Zionists even when they commit genocide.


Aren't these dim-witted Ziono-Bots and chicken hearted war mongers too much?

No number of loyal American G.I.s or amount of valuable weaponry and welfare is enough for these dim Witten genocidal Zionist shills who pretend to be "American" to sacrifice for the Mad Dog of the Middle East.

"Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Moshe Dayan

Thanks to these traitorous Zionist shills and the Israeli lobbies that control US Middle East Policy, loyal Americans at home and abroad are much less safe than before our cowardly Trumpster (Mr. "No-New-Wars") decided to cower to Netanyahu's demands that he make America complicit in additional Zionist criminality, genocide and expansionism.

Not only Iran, but most of the world's 1.8 Billion Muslims had no real motive to acquire or deploy real W.M.D.s (i.e nukes) until now that AIPAC etc has manipulated US Policy makers to join Israel's aspirations to an "Arabrein" Greater Israel.

So, when the retaliations begin to claim American lives at home and abroad, we can thank our traitorous Zionist shills, parasitic Israeli lobbies and world's most treacherous "ally" in recorded history.


Thanks,


FUN FACT:
Did you know that ALL "aid" to Israel is illegal since it refused to sign the NPT?

Who says that Israeli lobbies don't control US Policy making?


"Lawsuit Claims Aid to Nuclear Israel Illegal Under Symington Glenn Amendments"
Lawsuit Claims Aid to Nuclear Israel Illegal Under Symington Glenn Amendments - Corporate Crime Reporter

EXCERPT "A lawsuit filed in federal court in Washington, D.C. claims that United States aid to Israel is illegal under a law passed in the 1970s that prohibits aid to nuclear powers that don’t sign the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

Such aid violates longstanding bans on foreign aid to non-signatories to the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) with nuclear weapons programs, the lawsuit alleges."CONTINUED
 
Back
Top Bottom