They didn't explain, they said "your views are bullshit, shut up"
They did explain but were trained not to accept anything other than what Trump and his media allies say.
Take Antrim county. There was an investigation into exactly what happened which revealed a user error. The ballot design was changed by the machines were not updated with the new design. The state disseminated the result of the election and was reported in the media but to the Trump crowd, Antrim county proves that Dominion steals votes.
It was explained but you can’t make people listen.
You’ll deny facts to preserve your false comfortable reality.
All these errors, and all in the favor of Democrats.
You sure?
Or are those just the errors we heard about because it fit the Trump narrative?
How can I be sure? I haven't seen a report, or a hard investigation, or even someone calling for those.
It's just "shut up and trust us" from the very people we are accusing of gaming the system.
You can’t be sure but it didn’t stop you from believing it anyway.
It was “believe it because it’s convenient”, the type of shitty logic that pervades the Trump faithful and results in their anger.
You can trust the people who know what they’re talking about or you can trust Trump and his shitty lawyers. You’ll trust the shitty lawyers because they tell you what you want to hear, not because it’s actually true.
Why should I trust people who got what they wanted and could care less if they got it via cheating?
I want a report, a commission, and full blown investigation.
You don’t know the first thing about who these people are or what they want but it doesn’t stop you from acting like you do.
This is yet again another way to rationalize what you want to believe. It’s not factual. Not reality based. Just a mental trick to preserve your false sense of reality.
When the investigation doesn’t show what you want, you want another investigation. Oh and an investigation of the investigation. Like Benghazi. Like Crossfire Hurricane.
You ignore the questions because it suits you. Again, you got what you wanted.
I don’t ignore the question, I point out that it is based on a baseless assumption. That’s not an honest question.
Tell me that Raffensperger got what he wanted by electing Biden. Is that what you want me to believe?
The people in the local districts where people point out concerns sure as hell wanted Biden elected, and like a good lemming, Raffensperger wouldn't upset the apple cart.
Again, you don’t know anything about these “people” and just assign motive to them because that’s convenient. Same with Raffensperger.
When you allow yourself to base your reality on things that you want to be true rather than what is true, that’s when you become disconnected from reality. That’s exactly how Trump lives his life, his devout optimism about his own outcomes and that’s what happened here.
And look at how fast they turn on republicans or Fox News when they said Biden won.
Former political chief Chris Stirewalt reveals how Trump supporters reacted to election night news.
www.huffpost.com
Both Trump and his backers were livid when Fox News called Arizona for Democratic rival
Joe Biden, who would go on to win the election. Pro-Trump crowds even chanted “
Fox News sucks!” as election workers counted ballots.
“When I defended the call for Biden in the Arizona election, I became a target of murderous rage from consumers who were furious at not having their views confirmed,”
he wrote in a Los Angeles Times opinion piece.
The election denial that followed, he said, was “partly a cynical, knowing effort by political operators and their hype men in the media to steal an election or at least get rich trying.”
But it was also the result of cable news “indulging a consumer’s worst cravings” with the kind of content aired, especially the “self-affirming half-truths and even outright lies” that many viewers seek.