All You Need to Know About Lt Col Vindman

[RetiredGySgt]

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

opinions are punishable by imprisonment?

When one violates his oath as an officer YES.

the oath doesn’t allow you to have an opinion?

No, not about a phone call the PRESIDENT had with a FOREIGN LEADER. You keep your stinkin' OPINION to YOURSELF, or tell your WIFE at night in private during pillow talk.

The PRESIDENT is the COMMANDER IN CHIEF, he is your BOSS, and you do NOT have ANY PLACE WHAT SO EVER to QUESTION him or SQUEAL on him for NOTHING. That's a VIOLATION of the MILITARY OATH, and this Vindman ass clown should be COURT MARTIALED, BUSTED DOWN TO A BUCK PRIVATE and JAILED.

Military personnel are NOT required to carry out illegal orders. And if they see something illegal they are required to report it...which he did.

Report through their chain of command not to another politician. As for Illegal orders he received NO orders. He chose to violate his sworn oath as an officer because of POLITICS. Remind me again DUMBASS, WHICH Branch of Government deals with foreign Affairs? Per the Constitution? Congress or the President? By the way cite for us the ILLEGAL action he saw or heard, be very specific now and cite what law it breaks.

 

[westwall]

Newsflash...he was RIGHT to be alarmed by that call.

Just about everyone is

Any intelligent person who knows right from wrong (leaves out the trumpanzees)

 

[candycorn]

opinions are punishable by imprisonment?

When one violates his oath as an officer YES.

the oath doesn’t allow you to have an opinion?

No, not about a phone call the PRESIDENT had with a FOREIGN LEADER. You keep your stinkin' OPINION to YOURSELF, or tell your WIFE at night in private during pillow talk.

The PRESIDENT is the COMMANDER IN CHIEF, he is your BOSS, and you do NOT have ANY PLACE WHAT SO EVER to QUESTION him or SQUEAL on him for NOTHING. That's a VIOLATION of the MILITARY OATH, and this Vindman ass clown should be COURT MARTIALED, BUSTED DOWN TO A BUCK PRIVATE and JAILED.

Military personnel are NOT required to carry out illegal orders. And if they see something illegal they are required to report it...which he did.

Report through their chain of command not to another politician. As for Illegal orders he received NO orders. He chose to violate his sworn oath as an officer because of POLITICS. Remind me again DUMBASS, WHICH Branch of Government deals with foreign Affairs? Per the Constitution? Congress or the President? By the way cite for us the ILLEGAL action he saw or heard, be very specific now and cite what law it breaks.

he was subpoenaed. Don’t you think you should testify if you’re subpoenaed?

 

[Nosmo King]

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

No, he does not deserve prison for stating his opinion on the matter... let the House do their impeachment inquiry, and hold their impeachment vote and let the Sentae do their trial to see if Trump is guilty but let stop wanting to silence the opinions of those we disagree with...

It’s my understanding he was talking to Ukraine officials trying to subvert the President.

Let this all come out in the Impeachment and Semate trial...

Dems will keep him from being questioned.

Don't bet on it.

 

[Nosmo King]

Fear and smear. Page three of the Big Book of Politics and Me by Donald Trump

 

[RetiredGySgt]

When one violates his oath as an officer YES.

the oath doesn’t allow you to have an opinion?

No, not about a phone call the PRESIDENT had with a FOREIGN LEADER. You keep your stinkin' OPINION to YOURSELF, or tell your WIFE at night in private during pillow talk.

The PRESIDENT is the COMMANDER IN CHIEF, he is your BOSS, and you do NOT have ANY PLACE WHAT SO EVER to QUESTION him or SQUEAL on him for NOTHING. That's a VIOLATION of the MILITARY OATH, and this Vindman ass clown should be COURT MARTIALED, BUSTED DOWN TO A BUCK PRIVATE and JAILED.

Military personnel are NOT required to carry out illegal orders. And if they see something illegal they are required to report it...which he did.

Report through their chain of command not to another politician. As for Illegal orders he received NO orders. He chose to violate his sworn oath as an officer because of POLITICS. Remind me again DUMBASS, WHICH Branch of Government deals with foreign Affairs? Per the Constitution? Congress or the President? By the way cite for us the ILLEGAL action he saw or heard, be very specific now and cite what law it breaks.

he was subpoenaed. Don’t you think you should testify if you’re subpoenaed?

So another lefty that can NOT support their bullshit I asked for some specific things and you can not deliver.

 

[candycorn]

the oath doesn’t allow you to have an opinion?

No, not about a phone call the PRESIDENT had with a FOREIGN LEADER. You keep your stinkin' OPINION to YOURSELF, or tell your WIFE at night in private during pillow talk.

The PRESIDENT is the COMMANDER IN CHIEF, he is your BOSS, and you do NOT have ANY PLACE WHAT SO EVER to QUESTION him or SQUEAL on him for NOTHING. That's a VIOLATION of the MILITARY OATH, and this Vindman ass clown should be COURT MARTIALED, BUSTED DOWN TO A BUCK PRIVATE and JAILED.

Military personnel are NOT required to carry out illegal orders. And if they see something illegal they are required to report it...which he did.

Report through their chain of command not to another politician. As for Illegal orders he received NO orders. He chose to violate his sworn oath as an officer because of POLITICS. Remind me again DUMBASS, WHICH Branch of Government deals with foreign Affairs? Per the Constitution? Congress or the President? By the way cite for us the ILLEGAL action he saw or heard, be very specific now and cite what law it breaks.

he was subpoenaed. Don’t you think you should testify if you’re subpoenaed?

So another lefty that can NOT support their bullshit I asked for some specific things and you can not deliver.

I also asked you a question...where is your answer?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

No, he does not deserve prison for stating his opinion on the matter... let the House do their impeachment inquiry, and hold their impeachment vote and let the Sentae do their trial to see if Trump is guilty but let stop wanting to silence the opinions of those we disagree with...

Yes. Let’s allow the senate to “see if Trump is guilty”. That’s the ticket. Yeah!

 

[LoneLaugher]

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

No, he does not deserve prison for stating his opinion on the matter... let the House do their impeachment inquiry, and hold their impeachment vote and let the Sentae do their trial to see if Trump is guilty but let stop wanting to silence the opinions of those we disagree with...

It’s my understanding he was talking to Ukraine officials trying to subvert the President.

You misunderstand.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Newsflash...he was RIGHT to be alarmed by that call.

Just about everyone is

Then give me the quote that is so troubling, I don’t see it.
I’ve asked for weeks, every Leftard runs away.

Mob Boss: It would be a shame if your house burned down.

Weatherman2020: Awww! Gee, thanks!

 

[eagle1462010]

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

No, he does not deserve prison for stating his opinion on the matter... let the House do their impeachment inquiry, and hold their impeachment vote and let the Sentae do their trial to see if Trump is guilty but let stop wanting to silence the opinions of those we disagree with...

Yes. Let’s allow the senate to “see if Trump is guilty”. That’s the ticket. Yeah!

Where is the evidence to allow a Grand Jury hearing.........ooops.......Mickey Mouse Club hearing.........hmmm

phone conversation released......

Ukraine the ones who are being pressured...........said it didn't happen..........

The so called VICTIMS of the abuse................DON'T AGREE WITH YOU.........Oh yeah........this is righteous then.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

No, he does not deserve prison for stating his opinion on the matter... let the House do their impeachment inquiry, and hold their impeachment vote and let the Sentae do their trial to see if Trump is guilty but let stop wanting to silence the opinions of those we disagree with...

~~~~~~
Hmm..., In July 2013 during Atlas Vision 13, the then Major Alex Vindman was disciplined for inappropriate and partisan behavior.
"He was apologetic of American culture, laughed about Americans not being educated or worldly, & really talked up Obama & globalism to the point of uncomfortable. He would speak w/the Russian Soldiers & laugh as if at the expense of the US personnel. It was so uncomfortable & unprofessional, one of the GS employees came & told me everything above. I walked over & sat w/in earshot of Vindman, & sure enough, all was confirmed. One comment truly struck me as odd, & it was w/respect to American’s falsely thinking they’re exceptional, when he said, “He [Obama] is working on that now.” And he said it w/a snide ‘I know a secret’ look on his face"
"The bottom-line is LTC Vindman was a partisan Democrat at least as far back as 2012. So much so, junior officers & soldiers felt uncomfortable around him. This is not your professional, field-grade officer, who has the character & integrity to do the right thing. Do not let the uniform fool you…he is a political activist in uniform".

Is this from his Official File (in the Marines it called an OQR, not sure what the Army calls it) or is this just hearsay?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

opinions are punishable by imprisonment?

When one violates his oath as an officer YES.

The Oath of an Officer is to the Constitution of the United States, not to any person.

 

[August West]

Deplorables endorse spitting on our POWs so why would they stop there when there are so many other military people they can attack? These are the Putin/Trump cretins targeted by Russian troll farms.

 

[eagle1462010]

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

opinions are punishable by imprisonment?

When one violates his oath as an officer YES.

The Oath of an Officer is to the Constitution of the United States, not to any person.

Contempt Toward Officials in the US Military – Only the Commander-In-Chief Can Get Away With Using Twitter

Law for Commissioned Officers

There are primarily two (2) provisions of the UCMJ that relate to contemptuous statements against leaders, the first, 10 U.S.C. Section 888, Article 88, titled “Contempt Toward Officials” applies only to Commissioned Officers. The second, 10 U.S.C. Section 934, Article 134 is a General Article that will apply to enlisted personnel.

Article 88 provides:

Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

The elements of this Article are as follows:

(1) That the accused was a commissioned officer of the United States armed forces;

(2) That the accused used certain words against an official or legislature named in the article;

(3) That by an act of the accused these words came to the knowledge of a person other than the accused; and

(4) That the words used were contemptuous, either in themselves or by virtue of the circumstances under which they were used. Note: If the words were against a Governor or legislature, add the following element

(5) That the accused was then present in the State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession of the Governor or legislature concerned.

 

[gipper]

Newsflash...he was RIGHT to be alarmed by that call.

Just about everyone is

If that call concerns you then naturally you must be greatly concerned about the huge sums of money Bill and a Hill got from the Russians for selling US uranium and one speech given. Right?

 

[eagle1462010]

His concerns are not valid in regards to Ukraine. Where is the evidence of a potential crime that he came forward with on Trump.

The Ukraine President and officials have denied that they were pressured by Trump ..........The Victims as referred to by the Dems SAY IT DIDN'T HAPPEN......

The phone conversation has been released.............where is the crime there...........

The military isn't a Democracy.............it is an implementation of policy.........being concerned about a policy of higher ranks including the CIC isn't for them to decide.............

This is a fishing operation, that didn't go through the Judiciary for Legal status of possible crimes before a vote. It is a sham and nothing more.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[eagle1462010]

https://www.dni.gov/files/ICIG/Docu...on Processing of Whistleblower Complaints.pdf

At the time the Complainant filed the Disclosure of Urgent Concern form with the ICIG on August 12, 2019, the ICIG followed its routine practice and provided the Complainant information, including “Background Information on ICWPA Process,” which included the following language: In order to find an urgent concern “credible,” the IC IG must be in possession of reliable, first-hand information. The IC IG cannot transmit information via the ICWPA based on an employee’s second-hand knowledge of wrongdoing. This includes information received from another person, such as when a fellow employee informs you that he/she witnessed some type of wrongdoing. (Anyone with first-hand knowledge of the allegations may file a disclosure in writing directly with the IC IG.) Similarly, speculation about the existence of wrongdoing does not provide sufficient basis to meet the statutory requirements of the ICWPA. If you think wrongdoing took place, but can provide nothing more than secondhand or unsubstantiated assertions, IC IG will not be able to process the complaint or information for submission as an ICWPA.


And in the filing of this complaint they passed it on.......but this was clearly second hand knowledge.

Again, where is the pressure Dems claim when the very people being pressured say it didn't happen.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Newsflash...he was RIGHT to be alarmed by that call.

Just about everyone is

If that call concerns you then naturally you must be greatly concerned about the huge sums of money Bill and a Hill got from the Russians for selling US uranium and one speech given. Right?

Deflection alone is lame. When it is coupled with a debunked conspiracy theory it is just sad.

Try harder.