All You Need to Know About Lt Col Vindman

how about having some loyalty to your commander in chief instead of going screaming and crying to Shifty Schiff?
 
Vindman being "concerned" about a phone call the president had isn't evidence of JACK SHIT. Secondly, it's not his place to be CONCERNED. Third, making shit up about it is criminal, and he should be investigated because his motivation is highly suspect.

Vindman is just ONE MORE TDS LEFTIST in a LONG LINE of them that is a SET UP in the democrats THREE YEAR LONG COUP to REMOVE TRUMP.

The vast majority of Americans know this by now. They've watched the heads exploding, the frothing at the mouth hysteria, the vile insults, attacks and lies being told by breathless, unhinged, TDS bubble heads on the DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDA WING for THREE YEARS, so it's painfully obvious what they're up to.

WE'VE GOT HIM THIS TIME, NO REALLY... WE GOT HIM THIS TIME... THE WALLS ARE CLOSING IN, BOMBSHELL, BLAH, BLAH, FUCKING BLAH... we've heard it ALL from these CORRUPT SHIT STAINS.

Democrats are the party of trash.
 
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

No, he does not deserve prison for stating his opinion on the matter... let the House do their impeachment inquiry, and hold their impeachment vote and let the Sentae do their trial to see if Trump is guilty but let stop wanting to silence the opinions of those we disagree with...


You do know opinions aren't evidence, right?

.
But actions of a Lt Col can be punishable by death.


I wouldn't go that far, but he definitely got out of his lane and there should repercussions.

.
He’s a Lt Col thinking he’s above the President. Shoot him and let everyone else know what happens to such morons.
 
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

No, he does not deserve prison for stating his opinion on the matter... let the House do their impeachment inquiry, and hold their impeachment vote and let the Sentae do their trial to see if Trump is guilty but let stop wanting to silence the opinions of those we disagree with...
As a serving Officer he HAS NO OFFICIAL opinion on Foreign affairs. What are you morons not aware of which branch of Government handles foreign affairs. Here let me REMIND YOU, the President and the Executive Branch.
 
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

No, he does not deserve prison for stating his opinion on the matter... let the House do their impeachment inquiry, and hold their impeachment vote and let the Sentae do their trial to see if Trump is guilty but let stop wanting to silence the opinions of those we disagree with...


~~~~~~
Hmm..., In July 2013 during Atlas Vision 13, the then Major Alex Vindman was disciplined for inappropriate and partisan behavior.
"He was apologetic of American culture, laughed about Americans not being educated or worldly, & really talked up Obama & globalism to the point of uncomfortable. He would speak w/the Russian Soldiers & laugh as if at the expense of the US personnel. It was so uncomfortable & unprofessional, one of the GS employees came & told me everything above. I walked over & sat w/in earshot of Vindman, & sure enough, all was confirmed. One comment truly struck me as odd, & it was w/respect to American’s falsely thinking they’re exceptional, when he said, “He [Obama] is working on that now.” And he said it w/a snide ‘I know a secret’ look on his face"
"The bottom-line is LTC Vindman was a partisan Democrat at least as far back as 2012. So much so, junior officers & soldiers felt uncomfortable around him. This is not your professional, field-grade officer, who has the character & integrity to do the right thing. Do not let the uniform fool you…he is a political activist in uniform".
 
.
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

No, he does not deserve prison for stating his opinion on the matter... let the House do their impeachment inquiry, and hold their impeachment vote and let the Sentae do their trial to see if Trump is guilty but let stop wanting to silence the opinions of those we disagree with...


You do know opinions aren't evidence, right?

.
But actions of a Lt Col can be punishable by death.


I wouldn't go that far, but he definitely got out of his lane and there should repercussions.

.


Rules restrict political activity by DOD personnel

Military members, for example, may attend political meetings or rallies only as spectators and not in uniform. They're not permitted to make public political speeches, serve in any official capacity in partisan groups or participate in partisan political campaigns or conventions.


Rules restrict political activity by DOD personnel
 
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

opinions are punishable by imprisonment?
When one violates his oath as an officer YES.
 
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

opinions are punishable by imprisonment?
When one violates his oath as an officer YES.

the oath doesn’t allow you to have an opinion?
 
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

opinions are punishable by imprisonment?
When one violates his oath as an officer YES.

the oath doesn’t allow you to have an opinion?
He illegally reported a non event of a classified conversation and LIED about what was said. It is NOT an active duty Officer's place to have an opinion on foreign affairs when it regards what the PRESIDENT does. The President IS the decider of all Foreign Affairs as outlined clearly by the Constitution. Not some Lt Col that has a political axe to grind.
 
His concern is nothing. He is not the commander in chief. He doesn't set policy.........He executes it.

Somewhere along the line the intel community came to the wrong conclusion that they were the authority of Foreign policy and NOT the elected officials voted in by the people. He is out of line and his opinion means nothing.
 
Article 134 - Disloyal Statements | Military Defense Lawyer
The elements of crime that should hold true, for the accused to be guilty, are as follows:


  • The accused person should have actually made the alleged statement
  • The statement should have been made in public
  • The statement made was disloyal to the United States
  • The statement promotes or encourages the troops or the civilian populace to be disloyal, hostile or both towards the United States
  • The statement impairs and/or interferes with the morale, the discipline or loyalty towards the United States, of a member or multiple members of the US armed forces.
  • The nature of the statement was such that it brings upon discredit to the US armed forces or it disrupts the discipline and the good order of the armed forces.
 
You would think the Ukrainian-born general would be more pissed that Barry & Biden withheld military aid and prevented the sale of weapons to Ukraine the country could have used to defend itself from Putin's invasion & annexing of Crimea than military aid actually making it to Ukraine under Trump....
 
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

opinions are punishable by imprisonment?
When one violates his oath as an officer YES.

the oath doesn’t allow you to have an opinion?
No, not about a phone call the PRESIDENT had with a FOREIGN LEADER. You keep your stinkin' OPINION to YOURSELF, or tell your WIFE at night in private during pillow talk.

The PRESIDENT is the COMMANDER IN CHIEF, he is your BOSS, and you do NOT have ANY PLACE WHAT SO EVER to QUESTION him or SQUEAL on him for NOTHING. That's a VIOLATION of the MILITARY OATH, and this Vindman ass clown should be COURT MARTIALED, BUSTED DOWN TO A BUCK PRIVATE and JAILED.
 
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

opinions are punishable by imprisonment?
When one violates his oath as an officer YES.

the oath doesn’t allow you to have an opinion?
He can think thoughts, shitforbrains.
 
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

No, he does not deserve prison for stating his opinion on the matter... let the House do their impeachment inquiry, and hold their impeachment vote and let the Sentae do their trial to see if Trump is guilty but let stop wanting to silence the opinions of those we disagree with...


If he tried to manipulate the transcript of the call and if he discussed the call with the whistleblower yes he should be held criminally accountable.
 
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

No, he does not deserve prison for stating his opinion on the matter... let the House do their impeachment inquiry, and hold their impeachment vote and let the Sentae do their trial to see if Trump is guilty but let stop wanting to silence the opinions of those we disagree with...
It’s my understanding he was talking to Ukraine officials trying to subvert the President.

Let this all come out in the Impeachment and Semate trial...

Let WHAT come out?

The Stalinist party vowed to undo the 2016 election from the day Trump won. That is all this is - the Nazi Democrats refusing to accept the outcome of the election, and every last person in America knows it.
 
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’
False premise.

Vindman was not setting foreign policy nor even judging it.

Rather, he was reporting (through proper channels) his concerns about wrongdoing while the President was executing said policy.

It wasn't the politics... it was the tactics and mechanisms by which it was to be carried out.

Huge difference.

Legitimate concerns.

Legitimate reporting through legitimate channels.

Case dismissed.
 
Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy.

Who sets foreign policy, the President or every individual in the military?

Time to arrest him and toss him in Leavenworth to rot.

Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’

opinions are punishable by imprisonment?
When one violates his oath as an officer YES.

the oath doesn’t allow you to have an opinion?
No, not about a phone call the PRESIDENT had with a FOREIGN LEADER. You keep your stinkin' OPINION to YOURSELF, or tell your WIFE at night in private during pillow talk.

The PRESIDENT is the COMMANDER IN CHIEF, he is your BOSS, and you do NOT have ANY PLACE WHAT SO EVER to QUESTION him or SQUEAL on him for NOTHING. That's a VIOLATION of the MILITARY OATH, and this Vindman ass clown should be COURT MARTIALED, BUSTED DOWN TO A BUCK PRIVATE and JAILED.
Military personnel are NOT required to carry out illegal orders. And if they see something illegal they are required to report it...which he did.
 

Forum List

Back
Top