All three identities of Kyle Rittenhouse's Valor now known: A Convicted Pedophile, an Open Communist and a Wife Beater.

No. Not like pedophile. More like a minor chile of a broken home, not restrained and guided, but humored and given ungoverned access to firearms with not control over his associations or actions. Sounds like what many think is wrong in the inner city.
You can complain about how this kid was allowed to leave his home to attend a riot fully armed.
You cannot deny that the trio of deviants, criminals and the radical who drew a pistol on Rittenhouse
were all shot in self defense. Joseph Rosenbaum Kenosha shooting victim shot in self defense?

A trial will establish this. The blame the victim sickness simply must end.
It does not justify the mindless lack of control that allowed the kid to go in the first place. I don't know where his father is, hopefully he didn't provide the weapon. The mother ought to be in jail for failing to exercise control of a minor living in her home.
Joseph D Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile on the sex registry. Joseph as setting fire to a car dealership when confronted by Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse. Previous footage shows Joseph daring the armed militias to shoot him.


Anthony Huber was convicted of strangling, kidnapping, raping and torturing his ex-girlfriend. Anthony Huber chased and smashed Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse over the head with a skateboard.


Gaige Grosskreutz, 26, is the leader of the People's Revolution Movement n his region's chapter. Gaige hastily drew a pistol and attempted to murder Kyle Rittenhouse, but the well trained Patriot shot off Gaige's entire forearm.
This 17 year old kid should be joined behind bars with his parents that allowed their kid out of the house, armed to cross state lines with a weapon to attend a riot.


Failure of the authorities to put down the riots as they should have done months ago has compelled regular citizens to feel like they need to defend their own communities.
This is exactly why this shit should have been stopped a long time ago. Unfortunately yes, by law the kid now bears responsibility for the life he took, but charging him with 1st degree murder is a crock. He was chased down and knocked down.
The mayor and governor need to look themselves in the mirror and place the blame on the first face they look at. None of this should have happened except for fear of maintaining law and order and giving into rioters as if they were actually some civil rights movement.
many of these "peaceful protestors" are criminals with records.
This is Kenosha, not portland. It is not that police failed to put down rioter for months. The cop only shot the guy last week.
You got any kids? If living in the home, would you let them go to a riot, especially taking a weapon out of the house to go to a riot? Would you let your kid go to a riot armed in another state? What would have been your answer to your kid if they even spoke of going?


yes, It is the same problem that has been going on for months. The rioters in Kenosha are empowered because they know that nothing is going to happen to them. They don't live in a bubble and can see what has been going on in Portland, Minnesota and elsewhere. Rioters everywhere have gotten the message that nothing much is going to happen to them and they feel justified in that the message from the Democrat half of Congress is that they have a good excuse for rioting.

Fact is, by their actions, one can see that they believe the Streets of America belong to them. They can burn businesses and smash their windows with impunity, I suppose because they feel they hold the superior ideology. They feel justified but the fact is, our streets DO NOT belong to them. They can go F' themselves as far as I'm concerned. Our streets, businesses and neighborhoods belong to the American people who go to work every day and have been paying their dues.
Most of these JACKASSES are unemployed. They contribute SHIT and are taking away from other citizens who are the silent majority.
If they werent out rioting, the kid would not have been out there with an assault rifle feeling he needed to do something. He wouldnt have been out there otherwise.
The "authorities" are Fkd in the head, many living in gated communities, no where near the rioting.
The have not lived up to their responsibility to the community, but some mis-shapen, poorly analyzed view of freedom of assembly and right to protest and have their grievances heard as being more important handling their responsibility to protect the populous, and should be run out of office at the earliest opportunity and should not be standing with their hand out to the federal government for money to cover the damage created by shirking their duty. Again, like parents, duty and responsibility first, freewheeling party environment open to spontaneous whim second or realistically never.
The kid is a dumb ass. His mother is an irresponsible dumb ass. The kid will probably do some time, but nobody recognizes his actions as those of a thinking adult, to I do not expect the direct penalty to him to be severe. He has definitely changed his life path. Not many colleges would be clamoring for his attendance, nor would somebody like me, who has interview, evaluated and hired be supportive as getting out of the house with weapon, crossing state lines in some ill conceived vigilante action gone awry, when they have people who did not, to choose from. His mother will skate. This isn't the mid 1900s or before, parents rarely have to pay a price for failing to exercise their responsibility, allowing their kids the freedom to get into all manor of mischief.
 
What a hero! We need more like him.
He's gonna go to prison for life.

You could all just volunteer, Instead of murdering people first. It might be quicker.
So far self defense is still legal.
He left his house looking for someone to shoot. Murder 1. No self defense involved.

Sorry for your luck.
He left his house and went to work. He got stuck behind enemy lines and had to shoot his way out. The prosecutors are looking for a way to save face right now.
 
No. Not like pedophile. More like a minor chile of a broken home, not restrained and guided, but humored and given ungoverned access to firearms with not control over his associations or actions. Sounds like what many think is wrong in the inner city.
You can complain about how this kid was allowed to leave his home to attend a riot fully armed.
You cannot deny that the trio of deviants, criminals and the radical who drew a pistol on Rittenhouse
were all shot in self defense. Joseph Rosenbaum Kenosha shooting victim shot in self defense?

A trial will establish this. The blame the victim sickness simply must end.
It does not justify the mindless lack of control that allowed the kid to go in the first place. I don't know where his father is, hopefully he didn't provide the weapon. The mother ought to be in jail for failing to exercise control of a minor living in her home.
Joseph D Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile on the sex registry. Joseph as setting fire to a car dealership when confronted by Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse. Previous footage shows Joseph daring the armed militias to shoot him.


Anthony Huber was convicted of strangling, kidnapping, raping and torturing his ex-girlfriend. Anthony Huber chased and smashed Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse over the head with a skateboard.


Gaige Grosskreutz, 26, is the leader of the People's Revolution Movement n his region's chapter. Gaige hastily drew a pistol and attempted to murder Kyle Rittenhouse, but the well trained Patriot shot off Gaige's entire forearm.
This 17 year old kid should be joined behind bars with his parents that allowed their kid out of the house, armed to cross state lines with a weapon to attend a riot.


Failure of the authorities to put down the riots as they should have done months ago has compelled regular citizens to feel like they need to defend their own communities.
This is exactly why this shit should have been stopped a long time ago. Unfortunately yes, by law the kid now bears responsibility for the life he took, but charging him with 1st degree murder is a crock. He was chased down and knocked down.
The mayor and governor need to look themselves in the mirror and place the blame on the first face they look at. None of this should have happened except for fear of maintaining law and order and giving into rioters as if they were actually some civil rights movement.
many of these "peaceful protestors" are criminals with records.
This is Kenosha, not portland. It is not that police failed to put down rioter for months. The cop only shot the guy last week.
You got any kids? If living in the home, would you let them go to a riot, especially taking a weapon out of the house to go to a riot? Would you let your kid go to a riot armed in another state? What would have been your answer to your kid if they even spoke of going?
how do you know his parents let him go???
If they live under your roof and are a minor child, you should be exercising control or you are not doing your job as a parent.

but how do you know they let him do it???
Our kids were the talkative types, secure in our nuclear family. Kid's parent knew or should have known the kid was hanging with militia. Definitely knew he had the AR-15. Should have known he was interested in getting involved to do his (misguided) part, as he would have been talking about it. Knowing this a normal parent wouldn't have said "NO" they would have said "Hell No", and told him to stay home. If the kid didn't respect that judgement, they raised him wrong already. Moral responsibility is theirs or more accurately, responsibility to control the actions and activities of the child living under the roof was hers, as we are talking about a broken home situation, reason unknown.
but how do you know they let him do it???
Because he was there. Ever run an accident investigation? Somebody is always responsible whether the take or accept responsibility or not.
but that doesnt mean they let him go,,,

you might think that if you were a soyboy still tied to his mothers apron stings at 17,,,but not everybody's that pathetic,,,
1. Who is "they" and who did they let go?
2. Kid definitely not tied to apron string, but should have respected her on a major thing like whether it is alright to take is AR-15 and ammo out of the house to go play cop wannabe in the streets in another state. Does no mean no, under your roof for your kids, or did you raise yours wrong and figure everybody else did too, so it's OK?
You are stating as fact things you have no way of knowing.
Sorry, but if she didn't know, she should have known, as she is responsible for knowing and controlling. I have been held responsible for what people under my command did that I was unaware of until I was pointedly informed by somebody that was pretty damn sure I should have known and there was no room for shirking. No fun, but you are responsible for your people and you are dang sure responsible for your kids. On the organizational side though, it flows down hill and if you do it right the next level or two down do not forget your wrath and better handle their responsibilities to assist you in better handling yours. At the family level, the buck stops with the parents to be responsible and exercise control because kids do not.
Funny how you can't seem to work up the same level of outrage over rioters.
Not outraged, just stating fact. If parents exercised their responsibility in properly raising their kids there would be less crime, less rioters and you and I would not be having this conversation. But they do not. Slum area crime, violence, rioting are real. There are a lot of irresponsible asshole of both sexes of all races out there and they have screwed up everything, along with those that enabled them in government. Knowing the cause and responsibility does not solve the problem and I do not know what does. I will be outraged when and if comes to my community and I will take my stand then. Last time I took a stand in domestic unrest event I was in uniform, following orders, while armed to the teeth, but part of a cohesive military unit. Lots more out there with empty weapons or no weapon. They only called us when shooting started. Whenever we arrived, it stopped. We were lucky. They were lucky. I wasn't even outraged then, just following orders under good discipline. Amazing what a effect a disciplined responsible approach often achieves in all things. Parenting is and should be like that, or they are doing it wrong.
If only one of our political parties hadn't monetarily incentivized bad parenting.

And we're paying the price for it now.
 
No. Not like pedophile. More like a minor chile of a broken home, not restrained and guided, but humored and given ungoverned access to firearms with not control over his associations or actions. Sounds like what many think is wrong in the inner city.
You can complain about how this kid was allowed to leave his home to attend a riot fully armed.
You cannot deny that the trio of deviants, criminals and the radical who drew a pistol on Rittenhouse
were all shot in self defense. Joseph Rosenbaum Kenosha shooting victim shot in self defense?

A trial will establish this. The blame the victim sickness simply must end.
It does not justify the mindless lack of control that allowed the kid to go in the first place. I don't know where his father is, hopefully he didn't provide the weapon. The mother ought to be in jail for failing to exercise control of a minor living in her home.
Joseph D Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile on the sex registry. Joseph as setting fire to a car dealership when confronted by Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse. Previous footage shows Joseph daring the armed militias to shoot him.


Anthony Huber was convicted of strangling, kidnapping, raping and torturing his ex-girlfriend. Anthony Huber chased and smashed Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse over the head with a skateboard.


Gaige Grosskreutz, 26, is the leader of the People's Revolution Movement n his region's chapter. Gaige hastily drew a pistol and attempted to murder Kyle Rittenhouse, but the well trained Patriot shot off Gaige's entire forearm.
This 17 year old kid should be joined behind bars with his parents that allowed their kid out of the house, armed to cross state lines with a weapon to attend a riot.


Failure of the authorities to put down the riots as they should have done months ago has compelled regular citizens to feel like they need to defend their own communities.
This is exactly why this shit should have been stopped a long time ago. Unfortunately yes, by law the kid now bears responsibility for the life he took, but charging him with 1st degree murder is a crock. He was chased down and knocked down.
The mayor and governor need to look themselves in the mirror and place the blame on the first face they look at. None of this should have happened except for fear of maintaining law and order and giving into rioters as if they were actually some civil rights movement.
many of these "peaceful protestors" are criminals with records.
This is Kenosha, not portland. It is not that police failed to put down rioter for months. The cop only shot the guy last week.
You got any kids? If living in the home, would you let them go to a riot, especially taking a weapon out of the house to go to a riot? Would you let your kid go to a riot armed in another state? What would have been your answer to your kid if they even spoke of going?


yes, It is the same problem that has been going on for months. The rioters in Kenosha are empowered because they know that nothing is going to happen to them. They don't live in a bubble and can see what has been going on in Portland, Minnesota and elsewhere. Rioters everywhere have gotten the message that nothing much is going to happen to them and they feel justified in that the message from the Democrat half of Congress is that they have a good excuse for rioting.

Fact is, by their actions, one can see that they believe the Streets of America belong to them. They can burn businesses and smash their windows with impunity, I suppose because they feel they hold the superior ideology. They feel justified but the fact is, our streets DO NOT belong to them. They can go F' themselves as far as I'm concerned. Our streets, businesses and neighborhoods belong to the American people who go to work every day and have been paying their dues.
Most of these JACKASSES are unemployed. They contribute SHIT and are taking away from other citizens who are the silent majority.
If they werent out rioting, the kid would not have been out there with an assault rifle feeling he needed to do something. He wouldnt have been out there otherwise.
In Wisconsin, the state government has done far more than just turn a blind eye to the domestic terrorists.

They funded them.

Wisconsin state rep: Gov. Evers, AG Kaul funneled $1.6 million to radical group
 
No. Not like pedophile. More like a minor chile of a broken home, not restrained and guided, but humored and given ungoverned access to firearms with not control over his associations or actions. Sounds like what many think is wrong in the inner city.
You can complain about how this kid was allowed to leave his home to attend a riot fully armed.
You cannot deny that the trio of deviants, criminals and the radical who drew a pistol on Rittenhouse
were all shot in self defense. Joseph Rosenbaum Kenosha shooting victim shot in self defense?

A trial will establish this. The blame the victim sickness simply must end.
It does not justify the mindless lack of control that allowed the kid to go in the first place. I don't know where his father is, hopefully he didn't provide the weapon. The mother ought to be in jail for failing to exercise control of a minor living in her home.
Joseph D Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile on the sex registry. Joseph as setting fire to a car dealership when confronted by Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse. Previous footage shows Joseph daring the armed militias to shoot him.


Anthony Huber was convicted of strangling, kidnapping, raping and torturing his ex-girlfriend. Anthony Huber chased and smashed Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse over the head with a skateboard.


Gaige Grosskreutz, 26, is the leader of the People's Revolution Movement n his region's chapter. Gaige hastily drew a pistol and attempted to murder Kyle Rittenhouse, but the well trained Patriot shot off Gaige's entire forearm.
This 17 year old kid should be joined behind bars with his parents that allowed their kid out of the house, armed to cross state lines with a weapon to attend a riot.


Failure of the authorities to put down the riots as they should have done months ago has compelled regular citizens to feel like they need to defend their own communities.
This is exactly why this shit should have been stopped a long time ago. Unfortunately yes, by law the kid now bears responsibility for the life he took, but charging him with 1st degree murder is a crock. He was chased down and knocked down.
The mayor and governor need to look themselves in the mirror and place the blame on the first face they look at. None of this should have happened except for fear of maintaining law and order and giving into rioters as if they were actually some civil rights movement.
many of these "peaceful protestors" are criminals with records.
This is Kenosha, not portland. It is not that police failed to put down rioter for months. The cop only shot the guy last week.
You got any kids? If living in the home, would you let them go to a riot, especially taking a weapon out of the house to go to a riot? Would you let your kid go to a riot armed in another state? What would have been your answer to your kid if they even spoke of going?
how do you know his parents let him go???
If they live under your roof and are a minor child, you should be exercising control or you are not doing your job as a parent.

but how do you know they let him do it???
Our kids were the talkative types, secure in our nuclear family. Kid's parent knew or should have known the kid was hanging with militia. Definitely knew he had the AR-15. Should have known he was interested in getting involved to do his (misguided) part, as he would have been talking about it. Knowing this a normal parent wouldn't have said "NO" they would have said "Hell No", and told him to stay home. If the kid didn't respect that judgement, they raised him wrong already. Moral responsibility is theirs or more accurately, responsibility to control the actions and activities of the child living under the roof was hers, as we are talking about a broken home situation, reason unknown.
but how do you know they let him do it???
Because he was there. Ever run an accident investigation? Somebody is always responsible whether the take or accept responsibility or not.
but that doesnt mean they let him go,,,

you might think that if you were a soyboy still tied to his mothers apron stings at 17,,,but not everybody's that pathetic,,,
1. Who is "they" and who did they let go?
2. Kid definitely not tied to apron string, but should have respected her on a major thing like whether it is alright to take is AR-15 and ammo out of the house to go play cop wannabe in the streets in another state. Does no mean no, under your roof for your kids, or did you raise yours wrong and figure everybody else did too, so it's OK?
You are stating as fact things you have no way of knowing.
Sorry, but if she didn't know, she should have known, as she is responsible for knowing and controlling. I have been held responsible for what people under my command did that I was unaware of until I was pointedly informed by somebody that was pretty damn sure I should have known and there was no room for shirking. No fun, but you are responsible for your people and you are dang sure responsible for your kids. On the organizational side though, it flows down hill and if you do it right the next level or two down do not forget your wrath and better handle their responsibilities to assist you in better handling yours. At the family level, the buck stops with the parents to be responsible and exercise control because kids do not.
Funny how you can't seem to work up the same level of outrage over rioters.
Not outraged, just stating fact. If parents exercised their responsibility in properly raising their kids there would be less crime, less rioters and you and I would not be having this conversation. But they do not. Slum area crime, violence, rioting are real. There are a lot of irresponsible asshole of both sexes of all races out there and they have screwed up everything, along with those that enabled them in government. Knowing the cause and responsibility does not solve the problem and I do not know what does. I will be outraged when and if comes to my community and I will take my stand then. Last time I took a stand in domestic unrest event I was in uniform, following orders, while armed to the teeth, but part of a cohesive military unit. Lots more out there with empty weapons or no weapon. They only called us when shooting started. Whenever we arrived, it stopped. We were lucky. They were lucky. I wasn't even outraged then, just following orders under good discipline. Amazing what a effect a disciplined responsible approach often achieves in all things. Parenting is and should be like that, or they are doing it wrong.
If only one of our political parties hadn't monetarily incentivized bad parenting.

And we're paying the price for it now.
There is some truth to that. Some of that, is regulations written in, with the intent to make sure able bodied men were not living on assistance, instead of working, and yes, it had the effect of paying to kick fathers out of the home. What do you make of white yuppy like protesters/rioters. Youth always seems to have false dreams of building utopia. To me, looks like just more young, willing to adopt violence to achieve goals. They and much of the right wing counter protester/rioter or riot provocateurs do not strike me (generally) as the fatherless, broken home types, but I could be wrong almost as easily as I could be right on that one. Legislation to help the needy or disadvantaged is a sticky wicket, often well intention ed, yet often adding more long term problems and at great expense. We are no better that at it than we are at nation building (or is it empire building, I get confused) at the point of guns.
 
No. Not like pedophile. More like a minor chile of a broken home, not restrained and guided, but humored and given ungoverned access to firearms with not control over his associations or actions. Sounds like what many think is wrong in the inner city.
You can complain about how this kid was allowed to leave his home to attend a riot fully armed.
You cannot deny that the trio of deviants, criminals and the radical who drew a pistol on Rittenhouse
were all shot in self defense. Joseph Rosenbaum Kenosha shooting victim shot in self defense?

A trial will establish this. The blame the victim sickness simply must end.
It does not justify the mindless lack of control that allowed the kid to go in the first place. I don't know where his father is, hopefully he didn't provide the weapon. The mother ought to be in jail for failing to exercise control of a minor living in her home.
Joseph D Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile on the sex registry. Joseph as setting fire to a car dealership when confronted by Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse. Previous footage shows Joseph daring the armed militias to shoot him.


Anthony Huber was convicted of strangling, kidnapping, raping and torturing his ex-girlfriend. Anthony Huber chased and smashed Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse over the head with a skateboard.


Gaige Grosskreutz, 26, is the leader of the People's Revolution Movement n his region's chapter. Gaige hastily drew a pistol and attempted to murder Kyle Rittenhouse, but the well trained Patriot shot off Gaige's entire forearm.
This 17 year old kid should be joined behind bars with his parents that allowed their kid out of the house, armed to cross state lines with a weapon to attend a riot.


Failure of the authorities to put down the riots as they should have done months ago has compelled regular citizens to feel like they need to defend their own communities.
This is exactly why this shit should have been stopped a long time ago. Unfortunately yes, by law the kid now bears responsibility for the life he took, but charging him with 1st degree murder is a crock. He was chased down and knocked down.
The mayor and governor need to look themselves in the mirror and place the blame on the first face they look at. None of this should have happened except for fear of maintaining law and order and giving into rioters as if they were actually some civil rights movement.
many of these "peaceful protestors" are criminals with records.
This is Kenosha, not portland. It is not that police failed to put down rioter for months. The cop only shot the guy last week.
You got any kids? If living in the home, would you let them go to a riot, especially taking a weapon out of the house to go to a riot? Would you let your kid go to a riot armed in another state? What would have been your answer to your kid if they even spoke of going?
how do you know his parents let him go???
If they live under your roof and are a minor child, you should be exercising control or you are not doing your job as a parent.

but how do you know they let him do it???
Our kids were the talkative types, secure in our nuclear family. Kid's parent knew or should have known the kid was hanging with militia. Definitely knew he had the AR-15. Should have known he was interested in getting involved to do his (misguided) part, as he would have been talking about it. Knowing this a normal parent wouldn't have said "NO" they would have said "Hell No", and told him to stay home. If the kid didn't respect that judgement, they raised him wrong already. Moral responsibility is theirs or more accurately, responsibility to control the actions and activities of the child living under the roof was hers, as we are talking about a broken home situation, reason unknown.
but how do you know they let him do it???
Because he was there. Ever run an accident investigation? Somebody is always responsible whether the take or accept responsibility or not.
but that doesnt mean they let him go,,,

you might think that if you were a soyboy still tied to his mothers apron stings at 17,,,but not everybody's that pathetic,,,
1. Who is "they" and who did they let go?
2. Kid definitely not tied to apron string, but should have respected her on a major thing like whether it is alright to take is AR-15 and ammo out of the house to go play cop wannabe in the streets in another state. Does no mean no, under your roof for your kids, or did you raise yours wrong and figure everybody else did too, so it's OK?
You are stating as fact things you have no way of knowing.
Sorry, but if she didn't know, she should have known, as she is responsible for knowing and controlling. I have been held responsible for what people under my command did that I was unaware of until I was pointedly informed by somebody that was pretty damn sure I should have known and there was no room for shirking. No fun, but you are responsible for your people and you are dang sure responsible for your kids. On the organizational side though, it flows down hill and if you do it right the next level or two down do not forget your wrath and better handle their responsibilities to assist you in better handling yours. At the family level, the buck stops with the parents to be responsible and exercise control because kids do not.
Funny how you can't seem to work up the same level of outrage over rioters.
Not outraged, just stating fact. If parents exercised their responsibility in properly raising their kids there would be less crime, less rioters and you and I would not be having this conversation. But they do not. Slum area crime, violence, rioting are real. There are a lot of irresponsible asshole of both sexes of all races out there and they have screwed up everything, along with those that enabled them in government. Knowing the cause and responsibility does not solve the problem and I do not know what does. I will be outraged when and if comes to my community and I will take my stand then. Last time I took a stand in domestic unrest event I was in uniform, following orders, while armed to the teeth, but part of a cohesive military unit. Lots more out there with empty weapons or no weapon. They only called us when shooting started. Whenever we arrived, it stopped. We were lucky. They were lucky. I wasn't even outraged then, just following orders under good discipline. Amazing what a effect a disciplined responsible approach often achieves in all things. Parenting is and should be like that, or they are doing it wrong.
If only one of our political parties hadn't monetarily incentivized bad parenting.

And we're paying the price for it now.
There is some truth to that. Some of that, is regulations written in, with the intent to make sure able bodied men were not living on assistance, instead of working, and yes, it had the effect of paying to kick fathers out of the home. What do you make of white yuppy like protesters/rioters. Youth always seems to have false dreams of building utopia. To me, looks like just more young, willing to adopt violence to achieve goals. They and much of the right wing counter protester/rioter or riot provocateurs do not strike me (generally) as the fatherless, broken home types, but I could be wrong almost as easily as I could be right on that one. Legislation to help the needy or disadvantaged is a sticky wicket, often well intention ed, yet often adding more long term problems and at great expense. We are no better that at it than we are at nation building (or is it empire building, I get confused) at the point of guns.
The white kids in BLM and antifa are mostly misguided idiots, easily manipulated by the left. Some of them mean well, but their actions and goals are based on lies. They're the Useful Idiots described by Vladimir Illyich and used to great effectiveness by his ideological heirs.

Some of every race in BLM and antifa just want to hurt people and burn shit. The media and Democratic mayors and governors are giving them top cover.
 
No. Not like pedophile. More like a minor chile of a broken home, not restrained and guided, but humored and given ungoverned access to firearms with not control over his associations or actions. Sounds like what many think is wrong in the inner city.
You can complain about how this kid was allowed to leave his home to attend a riot fully armed.
You cannot deny that the trio of deviants, criminals and the radical who drew a pistol on Rittenhouse
were all shot in self defense. Joseph Rosenbaum Kenosha shooting victim shot in self defense?

A trial will establish this. The blame the victim sickness simply must end.
It does not justify the mindless lack of control that allowed the kid to go in the first place. I don't know where his father is, hopefully he didn't provide the weapon. The mother ought to be in jail for failing to exercise control of a minor living in her home.
Joseph D Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile on the sex registry. Joseph as setting fire to a car dealership when confronted by Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse. Previous footage shows Joseph daring the armed militias to shoot him.


Anthony Huber was convicted of strangling, kidnapping, raping and torturing his ex-girlfriend. Anthony Huber chased and smashed Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse over the head with a skateboard.


Gaige Grosskreutz, 26, is the leader of the People's Revolution Movement n his region's chapter. Gaige hastily drew a pistol and attempted to murder Kyle Rittenhouse, but the well trained Patriot shot off Gaige's entire forearm.
This 17 year old kid should be joined behind bars with his parents that allowed their kid out of the house, armed to cross state lines with a weapon to attend a riot.


Failure of the authorities to put down the riots as they should have done months ago has compelled regular citizens to feel like they need to defend their own communities.
This is exactly why this shit should have been stopped a long time ago. Unfortunately yes, by law the kid now bears responsibility for the life he took, but charging him with 1st degree murder is a crock. He was chased down and knocked down.
The mayor and governor need to look themselves in the mirror and place the blame on the first face they look at. None of this should have happened except for fear of maintaining law and order and giving into rioters as if they were actually some civil rights movement.
many of these "peaceful protestors" are criminals with records.
This is Kenosha, not portland. It is not that police failed to put down rioter for months. The cop only shot the guy last week.
You got any kids? If living in the home, would you let them go to a riot, especially taking a weapon out of the house to go to a riot? Would you let your kid go to a riot armed in another state? What would have been your answer to your kid if they even spoke of going?
how do you know his parents let him go???
If they live under your roof and are a minor child, you should be exercising control or you are not doing your job as a parent.

but how do you know they let him do it???
Our kids were the talkative types, secure in our nuclear family. Kid's parent knew or should have known the kid was hanging with militia. Definitely knew he had the AR-15. Should have known he was interested in getting involved to do his (misguided) part, as he would have been talking about it. Knowing this a normal parent wouldn't have said "NO" they would have said "Hell No", and told him to stay home. If the kid didn't respect that judgement, they raised him wrong already. Moral responsibility is theirs or more accurately, responsibility to control the actions and activities of the child living under the roof was hers, as we are talking about a broken home situation, reason unknown.
but how do you know they let him do it???
Because he was there. Ever run an accident investigation? Somebody is always responsible whether the take or accept responsibility or not.
but that doesnt mean they let him go,,,

you might think that if you were a soyboy still tied to his mothers apron stings at 17,,,but not everybody's that pathetic,,,
1. Who is "they" and who did they let go?
2. Kid definitely not tied to apron string, but should have respected her on a major thing like whether it is alright to take is AR-15 and ammo out of the house to go play cop wannabe in the streets in another state. Does no mean no, under your roof for your kids, or did you raise yours wrong and figure everybody else did too, so it's OK?
You are stating as fact things you have no way of knowing.
Sorry, but if she didn't know, she should have known, as she is responsible for knowing and controlling. I have been held responsible for what people under my command did that I was unaware of until I was pointedly informed by somebody that was pretty damn sure I should have known and there was no room for shirking. No fun, but you are responsible for your people and you are dang sure responsible for your kids. On the organizational side though, it flows down hill and if you do it right the next level or two down do not forget your wrath and better handle their responsibilities to assist you in better handling yours. At the family level, the buck stops with the parents to be responsible and exercise control because kids do not.
Funny how you can't seem to work up the same level of outrage over rioters.
Not outraged, just stating fact. If parents exercised their responsibility in properly raising their kids there would be less crime, less rioters and you and I would not be having this conversation. But they do not. Slum area crime, violence, rioting are real. There are a lot of irresponsible asshole of both sexes of all races out there and they have screwed up everything, along with those that enabled them in government. Knowing the cause and responsibility does not solve the problem and I do not know what does. I will be outraged when and if comes to my community and I will take my stand then. Last time I took a stand in domestic unrest event I was in uniform, following orders, while armed to the teeth, but part of a cohesive military unit. Lots more out there with empty weapons or no weapon. They only called us when shooting started. Whenever we arrived, it stopped. We were lucky. They were lucky. I wasn't even outraged then, just following orders under good discipline. Amazing what a effect a disciplined responsible approach often achieves in all things. Parenting is and should be like that, or they are doing it wrong.
If only one of our political parties hadn't monetarily incentivized bad parenting.

And we're paying the price for it now.
There is some truth to that. Some of that, is regulations written in, with the intent to make sure able bodied men were not living on assistance, instead of working, and yes, it had the effect of paying to kick fathers out of the home. What do you make of white yuppy like protesters/rioters. Youth always seems to have false dreams of building utopia. To me, looks like just more young, willing to adopt violence to achieve goals. They and much of the right wing counter protester/rioter or riot provocateurs do not strike me (generally) as the fatherless, broken home types, but I could be wrong almost as easily as I could be right on that one. Legislation to help the needy or disadvantaged is a sticky wicket, often well intention ed, yet often adding more long term problems and at great expense. We are no better that at it than we are at nation building (or is it empire building, I get confused) at the point of guns.
The white kids in BLM and antifa are mostly misguided idiots, easily manipulated by the left. Some of them mean well, but their actions and goals are based on lies. They're the Useful Idiots described by Vladimir Illyich and used to great effectiveness by his ideological heirs.

Some of every race in BLM and antifa just want to hurt people and burn shit. The media and Democratic mayors and governors are giving them top cover.
Everyone should denounce blm, as a hollow slogan, more closely related to Bring License to Malcontents. You will not see me capitalize, that which I have no respect for again on this board, with the exception of within quotes of someone misguided to continue their false advertising.
Possible some local politicians are actually in league and that is reprehensible, indeed.
I suspect governors do not use their guard forces because they do not know how. This is shown by the number they choose to use and how they use them, such as putting a hundred, announced unarmed to protect(?) government buildings when they have actual riots near by. Not saying they should be used to kick the shit out of protesters, but shear numbers with equipment can close areas off, defining the operational area and put enough disciplined uniformed personnel in the area that only the foolish would gamble on what they might do. Shear numbers of combat troops gives the uncommitted pause for thought. They absolutely do not necessarily have to all possess ammunition (and should not), although a well discipline, tightly controlled contingent, should and that includes vehicle mounted including crew served weapons with clearly belt fed full auto ammunition hanging out. Only a fool announces the troops you put out are unarmed. Anyone in the operational area gets arrested, left wing, right wing and casually curious, to be searched, sorted out and released out slowly over the next 45 days from Sheriff Joe type camps guarded by MPs. Sounds like martial law? Yep (though they should never use the term), but state/local controlled, not Fed as nobody trusts the Feds or should. Like a first lady once said, "Just say no.", and like my father said, "No means No".
 
No. Not like pedophile. More like a minor chile of a broken home, not restrained and guided, but humored and given ungoverned access to firearms with not control over his associations or actions. Sounds like what many think is wrong in the inner city.
You can complain about how this kid was allowed to leave his home to attend a riot fully armed.
You cannot deny that the trio of deviants, criminals and the radical who drew a pistol on Rittenhouse
were all shot in self defense. Joseph Rosenbaum Kenosha shooting victim shot in self defense?

A trial will establish this. The blame the victim sickness simply must end.
It does not justify the mindless lack of control that allowed the kid to go in the first place. I don't know where his father is, hopefully he didn't provide the weapon. The mother ought to be in jail for failing to exercise control of a minor living in her home.
Joseph D Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile on the sex registry. Joseph as setting fire to a car dealership when confronted by Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse. Previous footage shows Joseph daring the armed militias to shoot him.


Anthony Huber was convicted of strangling, kidnapping, raping and torturing his ex-girlfriend. Anthony Huber chased and smashed Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse over the head with a skateboard.


Gaige Grosskreutz, 26, is the leader of the People's Revolution Movement n his region's chapter. Gaige hastily drew a pistol and attempted to murder Kyle Rittenhouse, but the well trained Patriot shot off Gaige's entire forearm.
This 17 year old kid should be joined behind bars with his parents that allowed their kid out of the house, armed to cross state lines with a weapon to attend a riot.


Failure of the authorities to put down the riots as they should have done months ago has compelled regular citizens to feel like they need to defend their own communities.
This is exactly why this shit should have been stopped a long time ago. Unfortunately yes, by law the kid now bears responsibility for the life he took, but charging him with 1st degree murder is a crock. He was chased down and knocked down.
The mayor and governor need to look themselves in the mirror and place the blame on the first face they look at. None of this should have happened except for fear of maintaining law and order and giving into rioters as if they were actually some civil rights movement.
many of these "peaceful protestors" are criminals with records.
This is Kenosha, not portland. It is not that police failed to put down rioter for months. The cop only shot the guy last week.
You got any kids? If living in the home, would you let them go to a riot, especially taking a weapon out of the house to go to a riot? Would you let your kid go to a riot armed in another state? What would have been your answer to your kid if they even spoke of going?
how do you know his parents let him go???
If they live under your roof and are a minor child, you should be exercising control or you are not doing your job as a parent.

but how do you know they let him do it???
Our kids were the talkative types, secure in our nuclear family. Kid's parent knew or should have known the kid was hanging with militia. Definitely knew he had the AR-15. Should have known he was interested in getting involved to do his (misguided) part, as he would have been talking about it. Knowing this a normal parent wouldn't have said "NO" they would have said "Hell No", and told him to stay home. If the kid didn't respect that judgement, they raised him wrong already. Moral responsibility is theirs or more accurately, responsibility to control the actions and activities of the child living under the roof was hers, as we are talking about a broken home situation, reason unknown.
but how do you know they let him do it???
Because he was there. Ever run an accident investigation? Somebody is always responsible whether the take or accept responsibility or not.
but that doesnt mean they let him go,,,

you might think that if you were a soyboy still tied to his mothers apron stings at 17,,,but not everybody's that pathetic,,,
1. Who is "they" and who did they let go?
2. Kid definitely not tied to apron string, but should have respected her on a major thing like whether it is alright to take is AR-15 and ammo out of the house to go play cop wannabe in the streets in another state. Does no mean no, under your roof for your kids, or did you raise yours wrong and figure everybody else did too, so it's OK?
You are stating as fact things you have no way of knowing.
Sorry, but if she didn't know, she should have known, as she is responsible for knowing and controlling. I have been held responsible for what people under my command did that I was unaware of until I was pointedly informed by somebody that was pretty damn sure I should have known and there was no room for shirking. No fun, but you are responsible for your people and you are dang sure responsible for your kids. On the organizational side though, it flows down hill and if you do it right the next level or two down do not forget your wrath and better handle their responsibilities to assist you in better handling yours. At the family level, the buck stops with the parents to be responsible and exercise control because kids do not.
Funny how you can't seem to work up the same level of outrage over rioters.
Not outraged, just stating fact. If parents exercised their responsibility in properly raising their kids there would be less crime, less rioters and you and I would not be having this conversation. But they do not. Slum area crime, violence, rioting are real. There are a lot of irresponsible asshole of both sexes of all races out there and they have screwed up everything, along with those that enabled them in government. Knowing the cause and responsibility does not solve the problem and I do not know what does. I will be outraged when and if comes to my community and I will take my stand then. Last time I took a stand in domestic unrest event I was in uniform, following orders, while armed to the teeth, but part of a cohesive military unit. Lots more out there with empty weapons or no weapon. They only called us when shooting started. Whenever we arrived, it stopped. We were lucky. They were lucky. I wasn't even outraged then, just following orders under good discipline. Amazing what a effect a disciplined responsible approach often achieves in all things. Parenting is and should be like that, or they are doing it wrong.
If only one of our political parties hadn't monetarily incentivized bad parenting.

And we're paying the price for it now.
There is some truth to that. Some of that, is regulations written in, with the intent to make sure able bodied men were not living on assistance, instead of working, and yes, it had the effect of paying to kick fathers out of the home. What do you make of white yuppy like protesters/rioters. Youth always seems to have false dreams of building utopia. To me, looks like just more young, willing to adopt violence to achieve goals. They and much of the right wing counter protester/rioter or riot provocateurs do not strike me (generally) as the fatherless, broken home types, but I could be wrong almost as easily as I could be right on that one. Legislation to help the needy or disadvantaged is a sticky wicket, often well intention ed, yet often adding more long term problems and at great expense. We are no better that at it than we are at nation building (or is it empire building, I get confused) at the point of guns.
The white kids in BLM and antifa are mostly misguided idiots, easily manipulated by the left. Some of them mean well, but their actions and goals are based on lies. They're the Useful Idiots described by Vladimir Illyich and used to great effectiveness by his ideological heirs.

Some of every race in BLM and antifa just want to hurt people and burn shit. The media and Democratic mayors and governors are giving them top cover.
Everyone should denounce blm, as a hollow slogan, more closely related to Bring License to Malcontents. You will not see me capitalize, that which I have no respect for again on this board, with the exception of within quotes of someone misguided to continue their false advertising.
Possible some local politicians are actually in league and that is reprehensible, indeed.
I suspect governors do not use their guard forces because they do not know how. This is shown by the number they choose to use and how they use them, such as putting a hundred, announced unarmed to protect(?) government buildings when they have actual riots near by. Not saying they should be used to kick the shit out of protesters, but shear numbers with equipment can close areas off, defining the operational area and put enough disciplined uniformed personnel in the area that only the foolish would gamble on what they might do. Shear numbers of combat troops gives the uncommitted pause for thought. They absolutely do not necessarily have to all possess ammunition (and should not), although a well discipline, tightly controlled contingent, should and that includes vehicle mounted including crew served weapons with clearly belt fed full auto ammunition hanging out. Only a fool announces the troops you put out are unarmed. Anyone in the operational area gets arrested, left wing, right wing and casually curious, to be searched, sorted out and released out slowly over the next 45 days from Sheriff Joe type camps guarded by MPs. Sounds like martial law? Yep (though they should never use the term), but state/local controlled, not Fed as nobody trusts the Feds or should. Like a first lady once said, "Just say no.", and like my father said, "No means No".
I'm perfectly fine with that, though it's not going to happen. The mayors and governors of the rioting cities don't want it to stop and will not deploy Guard troops effectively.
 
No. Not like pedophile. More like a minor chile of a broken home, not restrained and guided, but humored and given ungoverned access to firearms with not control over his associations or actions. Sounds like what many think is wrong in the inner city.
You can complain about how this kid was allowed to leave his home to attend a riot fully armed.
You cannot deny that the trio of deviants, criminals and the radical who drew a pistol on Rittenhouse
were all shot in self defense. Joseph Rosenbaum Kenosha shooting victim shot in self defense?

A trial will establish this. The blame the victim sickness simply must end.
It does not justify the mindless lack of control that allowed the kid to go in the first place. I don't know where his father is, hopefully he didn't provide the weapon. The mother ought to be in jail for failing to exercise control of a minor living in her home.
Joseph D Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile on the sex registry. Joseph as setting fire to a car dealership when confronted by Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse. Previous footage shows Joseph daring the armed militias to shoot him.


Anthony Huber was convicted of strangling, kidnapping, raping and torturing his ex-girlfriend. Anthony Huber chased and smashed Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse over the head with a skateboard.


Gaige Grosskreutz, 26, is the leader of the People's Revolution Movement n his region's chapter. Gaige hastily drew a pistol and attempted to murder Kyle Rittenhouse, but the well trained Patriot shot off Gaige's entire forearm.
This 17 year old kid should be joined behind bars with his parents that allowed their kid out of the house, armed to cross state lines with a weapon to attend a riot.


Failure of the authorities to put down the riots as they should have done months ago has compelled regular citizens to feel like they need to defend their own communities.
This is exactly why this shit should have been stopped a long time ago. Unfortunately yes, by law the kid now bears responsibility for the life he took, but charging him with 1st degree murder is a crock. He was chased down and knocked down.
The mayor and governor need to look themselves in the mirror and place the blame on the first face they look at. None of this should have happened except for fear of maintaining law and order and giving into rioters as if they were actually some civil rights movement.
many of these "peaceful protestors" are criminals with records.
This is Kenosha, not portland. It is not that police failed to put down rioter for months. The cop only shot the guy last week.
You got any kids? If living in the home, would you let them go to a riot, especially taking a weapon out of the house to go to a riot? Would you let your kid go to a riot armed in another state? What would have been your answer to your kid if they even spoke of going?
how do you know his parents let him go???
If they live under your roof and are a minor child, you should be exercising control or you are not doing your job as a parent.

but how do you know they let him do it???
Our kids were the talkative types, secure in our nuclear family. Kid's parent knew or should have known the kid was hanging with militia. Definitely knew he had the AR-15. Should have known he was interested in getting involved to do his (misguided) part, as he would have been talking about it. Knowing this a normal parent wouldn't have said "NO" they would have said "Hell No", and told him to stay home. If the kid didn't respect that judgement, they raised him wrong already. Moral responsibility is theirs or more accurately, responsibility to control the actions and activities of the child living under the roof was hers, as we are talking about a broken home situation, reason unknown.
but how do you know they let him do it???
Because he was there. Ever run an accident investigation? Somebody is always responsible whether the take or accept responsibility or not.
but that doesnt mean they let him go,,,

you might think that if you were a soyboy still tied to his mothers apron stings at 17,,,but not everybody's that pathetic,,,
1. Who is "they" and who did they let go?
2. Kid definitely not tied to apron string, but should have respected her on a major thing like whether it is alright to take is AR-15 and ammo out of the house to go play cop wannabe in the streets in another state. Does no mean no, under your roof for your kids, or did you raise yours wrong and figure everybody else did too, so it's OK?
You are stating as fact things you have no way of knowing.
Sorry, but if she didn't know, she should have known, as she is responsible for knowing and controlling. I have been held responsible for what people under my command did that I was unaware of until I was pointedly informed by somebody that was pretty damn sure I should have known and there was no room for shirking. No fun, but you are responsible for your people and you are dang sure responsible for your kids. On the organizational side though, it flows down hill and if you do it right the next level or two down do not forget your wrath and better handle their responsibilities to assist you in better handling yours. At the family level, the buck stops with the parents to be responsible and exercise control because kids do not.
Funny how you can't seem to work up the same level of outrage over rioters.
Not outraged, just stating fact. If parents exercised their responsibility in properly raising their kids there would be less crime, less rioters and you and I would not be having this conversation. But they do not. Slum area crime, violence, rioting are real. There are a lot of irresponsible asshole of both sexes of all races out there and they have screwed up everything, along with those that enabled them in government. Knowing the cause and responsibility does not solve the problem and I do not know what does. I will be outraged when and if comes to my community and I will take my stand then. Last time I took a stand in domestic unrest event I was in uniform, following orders, while armed to the teeth, but part of a cohesive military unit. Lots more out there with empty weapons or no weapon. They only called us when shooting started. Whenever we arrived, it stopped. We were lucky. They were lucky. I wasn't even outraged then, just following orders under good discipline. Amazing what a effect a disciplined responsible approach often achieves in all things. Parenting is and should be like that, or they are doing it wrong.
If only one of our political parties hadn't monetarily incentivized bad parenting.

And we're paying the price for it now.
There is some truth to that. Some of that, is regulations written in, with the intent to make sure able bodied men were not living on assistance, instead of working, and yes, it had the effect of paying to kick fathers out of the home. What do you make of white yuppy like protesters/rioters. Youth always seems to have false dreams of building utopia. To me, looks like just more young, willing to adopt violence to achieve goals. They and much of the right wing counter protester/rioter or riot provocateurs do not strike me (generally) as the fatherless, broken home types, but I could be wrong almost as easily as I could be right on that one. Legislation to help the needy or disadvantaged is a sticky wicket, often well intention ed, yet often adding more long term problems and at great expense. We are no better that at it than we are at nation building (or is it empire building, I get confused) at the point of guns.
The white kids in BLM and antifa are mostly misguided idiots, easily manipulated by the left. Some of them mean well, but their actions and goals are based on lies. They're the Useful Idiots described by Vladimir Illyich and used to great effectiveness by his ideological heirs.

Some of every race in BLM and antifa just want to hurt people and burn shit. The media and Democratic mayors and governors are giving them top cover.
Everyone should denounce blm, as a hollow slogan, more closely related to Bring License to Malcontents. You will not see me capitalize, that which I have no respect for again on this board, with the exception of within quotes of someone misguided to continue their false advertising.
Possible some local politicians are actually in league and that is reprehensible, indeed.
I suspect governors do not use their guard forces because they do not know how. This is shown by the number they choose to use and how they use them, such as putting a hundred, announced unarmed to protect(?) government buildings when they have actual riots near by. Not saying they should be used to kick the shit out of protesters, but shear numbers with equipment can close areas off, defining the operational area and put enough disciplined uniformed personnel in the area that only the foolish would gamble on what they might do. Shear numbers of combat troops gives the uncommitted pause for thought. They absolutely do not necessarily have to all possess ammunition (and should not), although a well discipline, tightly controlled contingent, should and that includes vehicle mounted including crew served weapons with clearly belt fed full auto ammunition hanging out. Only a fool announces the troops you put out are unarmed. Anyone in the operational area gets arrested, left wing, right wing and casually curious, to be searched, sorted out and released out slowly over the next 45 days from Sheriff Joe type camps guarded by MPs. Sounds like martial law? Yep (though they should never use the term), but state/local controlled, not Fed as nobody trusts the Feds or should. Like a first lady once said, "Just say no.", and like my father said, "No means No".
I'm perfectly fine with that, though it's not going to happen. The mayors and governors of the rioting cities don't want it to stop and will not deploy Guard troops effectively.
Mayors like Ted Wheeler would rather see endless violence, mayhem and arson then give Donald Trump
any credence by deploying National Guard troops.

Classic cases of putting political ideology before the saftey and well being of their cities. What scum!
 
No. Not like pedophile. More like a minor chile of a broken home, not restrained and guided, but humored and given ungoverned access to firearms with not control over his associations or actions. Sounds like what many think is wrong in the inner city.
You can complain about how this kid was allowed to leave his home to attend a riot fully armed.
You cannot deny that the trio of deviants, criminals and the radical who drew a pistol on Rittenhouse
were all shot in self defense. Joseph Rosenbaum Kenosha shooting victim shot in self defense?

A trial will establish this. The blame the victim sickness simply must end.
It does not justify the mindless lack of control that allowed the kid to go in the first place. I don't know where his father is, hopefully he didn't provide the weapon. The mother ought to be in jail for failing to exercise control of a minor living in her home.
Joseph D Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile on the sex registry. Joseph as setting fire to a car dealership when confronted by Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse. Previous footage shows Joseph daring the armed militias to shoot him.


Anthony Huber was convicted of strangling, kidnapping, raping and torturing his ex-girlfriend. Anthony Huber chased and smashed Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse over the head with a skateboard.


Gaige Grosskreutz, 26, is the leader of the People's Revolution Movement n his region's chapter. Gaige hastily drew a pistol and attempted to murder Kyle Rittenhouse, but the well trained Patriot shot off Gaige's entire forearm.
This 17 year old kid should be joined behind bars with his parents that allowed their kid out of the house, armed to cross state lines with a weapon to attend a riot.


Failure of the authorities to put down the riots as they should have done months ago has compelled regular citizens to feel like they need to defend their own communities.
This is exactly why this shit should have been stopped a long time ago. Unfortunately yes, by law the kid now bears responsibility for the life he took, but charging him with 1st degree murder is a crock. He was chased down and knocked down.
The mayor and governor need to look themselves in the mirror and place the blame on the first face they look at. None of this should have happened except for fear of maintaining law and order and giving into rioters as if they were actually some civil rights movement.
many of these "peaceful protestors" are criminals with records.
This is Kenosha, not portland. It is not that police failed to put down rioter for months. The cop only shot the guy last week.
You got any kids? If living in the home, would you let them go to a riot, especially taking a weapon out of the house to go to a riot? Would you let your kid go to a riot armed in another state? What would have been your answer to your kid if they even spoke of going?
how do you know his parents let him go???
If they live under your roof and are a minor child, you should be exercising control or you are not doing your job as a parent.

but how do you know they let him do it???
Our kids were the talkative types, secure in our nuclear family. Kid's parent knew or should have known the kid was hanging with militia. Definitely knew he had the AR-15. Should have known he was interested in getting involved to do his (misguided) part, as he would have been talking about it. Knowing this a normal parent wouldn't have said "NO" they would have said "Hell No", and told him to stay home. If the kid didn't respect that judgement, they raised him wrong already. Moral responsibility is theirs or more accurately, responsibility to control the actions and activities of the child living under the roof was hers, as we are talking about a broken home situation, reason unknown.
but how do you know they let him do it???
Because he was there. Ever run an accident investigation? Somebody is always responsible whether the take or accept responsibility or not.
but that doesnt mean they let him go,,,

you might think that if you were a soyboy still tied to his mothers apron stings at 17,,,but not everybody's that pathetic,,,
1. Who is "they" and who did they let go?
2. Kid definitely not tied to apron string, but should have respected her on a major thing like whether it is alright to take is AR-15 and ammo out of the house to go play cop wannabe in the streets in another state. Does no mean no, under your roof for your kids, or did you raise yours wrong and figure everybody else did too, so it's OK?
You are stating as fact things you have no way of knowing.
Sorry, but if she didn't know, she should have known, as she is responsible for knowing and controlling. I have been held responsible for what people under my command did that I was unaware of until I was pointedly informed by somebody that was pretty damn sure I should have known and there was no room for shirking. No fun, but you are responsible for your people and you are dang sure responsible for your kids. On the organizational side though, it flows down hill and if you do it right the next level or two down do not forget your wrath and better handle their responsibilities to assist you in better handling yours. At the family level, the buck stops with the parents to be responsible and exercise control because kids do not.
Funny how you can't seem to work up the same level of outrage over rioters.
Not outraged, just stating fact. If parents exercised their responsibility in properly raising their kids there would be less crime, less rioters and you and I would not be having this conversation. But they do not. Slum area crime, violence, rioting are real. There are a lot of irresponsible asshole of both sexes of all races out there and they have screwed up everything, along with those that enabled them in government. Knowing the cause and responsibility does not solve the problem and I do not know what does. I will be outraged when and if comes to my community and I will take my stand then. Last time I took a stand in domestic unrest event I was in uniform, following orders, while armed to the teeth, but part of a cohesive military unit. Lots more out there with empty weapons or no weapon. They only called us when shooting started. Whenever we arrived, it stopped. We were lucky. They were lucky. I wasn't even outraged then, just following orders under good discipline. Amazing what a effect a disciplined responsible approach often achieves in all things. Parenting is and should be like that, or they are doing it wrong.
If only one of our political parties hadn't monetarily incentivized bad parenting.

And we're paying the price for it now.
There is some truth to that. Some of that, is regulations written in, with the intent to make sure able bodied men were not living on assistance, instead of working, and yes, it had the effect of paying to kick fathers out of the home. What do you make of white yuppy like protesters/rioters. Youth always seems to have false dreams of building utopia. To me, looks like just more young, willing to adopt violence to achieve goals. They and much of the right wing counter protester/rioter or riot provocateurs do not strike me (generally) as the fatherless, broken home types, but I could be wrong almost as easily as I could be right on that one. Legislation to help the needy or disadvantaged is a sticky wicket, often well intention ed, yet often adding more long term problems and at great expense. We are no better that at it than we are at nation building (or is it empire building, I get confused) at the point of guns.
The white kids in BLM and antifa are mostly misguided idiots, easily manipulated by the left. Some of them mean well, but their actions and goals are based on lies. They're the Useful Idiots described by Vladimir Illyich and used to great effectiveness by his ideological heirs.

Some of every race in BLM and antifa just want to hurt people and burn shit. The media and Democratic mayors and governors are giving them top cover.
Everyone should denounce blm, as a hollow slogan, more closely related to Bring License to Malcontents. You will not see me capitalize, that which I have no respect for again on this board, with the exception of within quotes of someone misguided to continue their false advertising.
Possible some local politicians are actually in league and that is reprehensible, indeed.
I suspect governors do not use their guard forces because they do not know how. This is shown by the number they choose to use and how they use them, such as putting a hundred, announced unarmed to protect(?) government buildings when they have actual riots near by. Not saying they should be used to kick the shit out of protesters, but shear numbers with equipment can close areas off, defining the operational area and put enough disciplined uniformed personnel in the area that only the foolish would gamble on what they might do. Shear numbers of combat troops gives the uncommitted pause for thought. They absolutely do not necessarily have to all possess ammunition (and should not), although a well discipline, tightly controlled contingent, should and that includes vehicle mounted including crew served weapons with clearly belt fed full auto ammunition hanging out. Only a fool announces the troops you put out are unarmed. Anyone in the operational area gets arrested, left wing, right wing and casually curious, to be searched, sorted out and released out slowly over the next 45 days from Sheriff Joe type camps guarded by MPs. Sounds like martial law? Yep (though they should never use the term), but state/local controlled, not Fed as nobody trusts the Feds or should. Like a first lady once said, "Just say no.", and like my father said, "No means No".
I'm perfectly fine with that, though it's not going to happen. The mayors and governors of the rioting cities don't want it to stop and will not deploy Guard troops effectively.
More concerned with image than properly utilizing assets. Saw it work first hand, though. At least the effect of machine gun mounted vehicles with 200 round belts hanging from manned crew served weapons scanning windows downtown. Crap gets quiet, real quick, though every guardsman there before had M-16s with magazines in place.
 
No. Not like pedophile. More like a minor chile of a broken home, not restrained and guided, but humored and given ungoverned access to firearms with not control over his associations or actions. Sounds like what many think is wrong in the inner city.
You can complain about how this kid was allowed to leave his home to attend a riot fully armed.
You cannot deny that the trio of deviants, criminals and the radical who drew a pistol on Rittenhouse
were all shot in self defense. Joseph Rosenbaum Kenosha shooting victim shot in self defense?

A trial will establish this. The blame the victim sickness simply must end.
It does not justify the mindless lack of control that allowed the kid to go in the first place. I don't know where his father is, hopefully he didn't provide the weapon. The mother ought to be in jail for failing to exercise control of a minor living in her home.
Joseph D Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile on the sex registry. Joseph as setting fire to a car dealership when confronted by Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse. Previous footage shows Joseph daring the armed militias to shoot him.


Anthony Huber was convicted of strangling, kidnapping, raping and torturing his ex-girlfriend. Anthony Huber chased and smashed Patriot Kyle Rittenhouse over the head with a skateboard.


Gaige Grosskreutz, 26, is the leader of the People's Revolution Movement n his region's chapter. Gaige hastily drew a pistol and attempted to murder Kyle Rittenhouse, but the well trained Patriot shot off Gaige's entire forearm.
This 17 year old kid should be joined behind bars with his parents that allowed their kid out of the house, armed to cross state lines with a weapon to attend a riot.


Failure of the authorities to put down the riots as they should have done months ago has compelled regular citizens to feel like they need to defend their own communities.
This is exactly why this shit should have been stopped a long time ago. Unfortunately yes, by law the kid now bears responsibility for the life he took, but charging him with 1st degree murder is a crock. He was chased down and knocked down.
The mayor and governor need to look themselves in the mirror and place the blame on the first face they look at. None of this should have happened except for fear of maintaining law and order and giving into rioters as if they were actually some civil rights movement.
many of these "peaceful protestors" are criminals with records.
This is Kenosha, not portland. It is not that police failed to put down rioter for months. The cop only shot the guy last week.
You got any kids? If living in the home, would you let them go to a riot, especially taking a weapon out of the house to go to a riot? Would you let your kid go to a riot armed in another state? What would have been your answer to your kid if they even spoke of going?
how do you know his parents let him go???
If they live under your roof and are a minor child, you should be exercising control or you are not doing your job as a parent.

but how do you know they let him do it???
Our kids were the talkative types, secure in our nuclear family. Kid's parent knew or should have known the kid was hanging with militia. Definitely knew he had the AR-15. Should have known he was interested in getting involved to do his (misguided) part, as he would have been talking about it. Knowing this a normal parent wouldn't have said "NO" they would have said "Hell No", and told him to stay home. If the kid didn't respect that judgement, they raised him wrong already. Moral responsibility is theirs or more accurately, responsibility to control the actions and activities of the child living under the roof was hers, as we are talking about a broken home situation, reason unknown.
but how do you know they let him do it???
Because he was there. Ever run an accident investigation? Somebody is always responsible whether the take or accept responsibility or not.
but that doesnt mean they let him go,,,

you might think that if you were a soyboy still tied to his mothers apron stings at 17,,,but not everybody's that pathetic,,,
1. Who is "they" and who did they let go?
2. Kid definitely not tied to apron string, but should have respected her on a major thing like whether it is alright to take is AR-15 and ammo out of the house to go play cop wannabe in the streets in another state. Does no mean no, under your roof for your kids, or did you raise yours wrong and figure everybody else did too, so it's OK?
You are stating as fact things you have no way of knowing.
Sorry, but if she didn't know, she should have known, as she is responsible for knowing and controlling. I have been held responsible for what people under my command did that I was unaware of until I was pointedly informed by somebody that was pretty damn sure I should have known and there was no room for shirking. No fun, but you are responsible for your people and you are dang sure responsible for your kids. On the organizational side though, it flows down hill and if you do it right the next level or two down do not forget your wrath and better handle their responsibilities to assist you in better handling yours. At the family level, the buck stops with the parents to be responsible and exercise control because kids do not.
Funny how you can't seem to work up the same level of outrage over rioters.
Not outraged, just stating fact. If parents exercised their responsibility in properly raising their kids there would be less crime, less rioters and you and I would not be having this conversation. But they do not. Slum area crime, violence, rioting are real. There are a lot of irresponsible asshole of both sexes of all races out there and they have screwed up everything, along with those that enabled them in government. Knowing the cause and responsibility does not solve the problem and I do not know what does. I will be outraged when and if comes to my community and I will take my stand then. Last time I took a stand in domestic unrest event I was in uniform, following orders, while armed to the teeth, but part of a cohesive military unit. Lots more out there with empty weapons or no weapon. They only called us when shooting started. Whenever we arrived, it stopped. We were lucky. They were lucky. I wasn't even outraged then, just following orders under good discipline. Amazing what a effect a disciplined responsible approach often achieves in all things. Parenting is and should be like that, or they are doing it wrong.
If only one of our political parties hadn't monetarily incentivized bad parenting.

And we're paying the price for it now.
There is some truth to that. Some of that, is regulations written in, with the intent to make sure able bodied men were not living on assistance, instead of working, and yes, it had the effect of paying to kick fathers out of the home. What do you make of white yuppy like protesters/rioters. Youth always seems to have false dreams of building utopia. To me, looks like just more young, willing to adopt violence to achieve goals. They and much of the right wing counter protester/rioter or riot provocateurs do not strike me (generally) as the fatherless, broken home types, but I could be wrong almost as easily as I could be right on that one. Legislation to help the needy or disadvantaged is a sticky wicket, often well intention ed, yet often adding more long term problems and at great expense. We are no better that at it than we are at nation building (or is it empire building, I get confused) at the point of guns.
The white kids in BLM and antifa are mostly misguided idiots, easily manipulated by the left. Some of them mean well, but their actions and goals are based on lies. They're the Useful Idiots described by Vladimir Illyich and used to great effectiveness by his ideological heirs.

Some of every race in BLM and antifa just want to hurt people and burn shit. The media and Democratic mayors and governors are giving them top cover.
Everyone should denounce blm, as a hollow slogan, more closely related to Bring License to Malcontents. You will not see me capitalize, that which I have no respect for again on this board, with the exception of within quotes of someone misguided to continue their false advertising.
Possible some local politicians are actually in league and that is reprehensible, indeed.
I suspect governors do not use their guard forces because they do not know how. This is shown by the number they choose to use and how they use them, such as putting a hundred, announced unarmed to protect(?) government buildings when they have actual riots near by. Not saying they should be used to kick the shit out of protesters, but shear numbers with equipment can close areas off, defining the operational area and put enough disciplined uniformed personnel in the area that only the foolish would gamble on what they might do. Shear numbers of combat troops gives the uncommitted pause for thought. They absolutely do not necessarily have to all possess ammunition (and should not), although a well discipline, tightly controlled contingent, should and that includes vehicle mounted including crew served weapons with clearly belt fed full auto ammunition hanging out. Only a fool announces the troops you put out are unarmed. Anyone in the operational area gets arrested, left wing, right wing and casually curious, to be searched, sorted out and released out slowly over the next 45 days from Sheriff Joe type camps guarded by MPs. Sounds like martial law? Yep (though they should never use the term), but state/local controlled, not Fed as nobody trusts the Feds or should. Like a first lady once said, "Just say no.", and like my father said, "No means No".
I'm perfectly fine with that, though it's not going to happen. The mayors and governors of the rioting cities don't want it to stop and will not deploy Guard troops effectively.
Mayors like Ted Wheeler would rather see endless violence, mayhem and arson then give Donald Trump
any credence by deploying National Guard troops.

Classic cases of putting political ideology before the saftey and well being of their cities. What scum!
He is right about trump deploying national guard. Just wrong about national guard being deployed, even by Governors. If the Fed put federal troops under Federal control (that is what it is if the President deploys them as they are under Big Army and Federal control just like any other active duty Army units) on the streets to control the cities, this experiment in representative republic and state rights is over. Kiss it all goodbye. That is why Joint Chiefs did not want to go along with it, and what prompted trump to have DHS constitute a Federal combat capable force not of Army troops. Same problem though, like a rose by any other name.
 

Forum List

Back
Top