Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
NO WAIT THAT DOESNT MATTER AN INTERNET LEFTIST WHO WASNT THERE AND WHO WAS FED A CAREFULLY CRAFTED VISION SAYS ITS IMPOSSIBLE THE BOY WAS DEFENDING HIMSELF
Rioting is essential when government murders people.
If you do not riot after a government murder, then you are a traitor.
Kyle was a traitor for bringing the rifle.
Are you getting paid for this horseshit?
Or are you just really, really butthurt that the person with the scary black rifle wasn't murdered by your leftist heroes?
...because once a person aims a weapon at someone else and doesn't fire, they absolutely never, ever, ever again aim their weapon at that person again.The fact Grosskreutz aimed before Kyle pulled the trigger, does not at all imply Grosskreutz was aiming at Kyle while Kyle pulled the trigger.
It is obvious from the images that Grosskreutz was NOT aiming at Kyle when Kyle recycled the rifle and pulled the trigger.
That's not how we do things in America, Comrade.
"Deliberately scary"?The rifle was deliberately scary, which is why it was illegal and allowed anyone to attack Kyle to end the obvious threat he represented.
Oddly, there are absolutely no laws to back up what you claim.Yes it is.
Normally you do not bring an open firearm to a demonstration unless you want to get shot.
A demonstration is a violent confrontation, and a rifle is an illegal escalation intended to intimidate with a lethal threat.
That is a sufficient provocation for anyone to kill you.
...because once a person aims a weapon at someone else and doesn't fire, they absolutely never, ever, ever again aim their weapon at that person again.
You're retarded.
Do you even know that many of the filthy ass Negroes and Communists doing the rioting that night were armed? According to the police that testified many of them. Including the shithead that fired the first shots that night. Including the asshole that pointed an illegal Glock at Kyle.Anyone bringing a rifle to a riot should be shot or disarmed, instantly.
"Deliberately scary"?
Maybe he should have been carrying this rifle:
It's all nice and friendly and pretty. And it wouldn't make you shit your pants in terror.
Oddly, there are absolutely no laws to back up what you claim.
So, when you say you have a CC permit and know all about guns, you're lying.
Do you even know that many of the filthy ass Negroes and Communists doing the rioting that night were armed? According to the police that testified many of them. Including the shithead that fired the first shots that night. Including the asshole that pointed an illegal Glock at Kyle.
Wrong.
The gun did fall to the ground, just as Grosskreutz said.
And the poor responses that night were due to the pain and pain medication, not deliberate deception.
He never lied about anything, and was the most credible person in the entire courtroom.
{...
Gaige Grosskreutz admits that several details from initial questioning contained errors
In a lengthy cross-examination Monday, defense attorney Corey Chirafisi made a broad attempt at discrediting Gaige Grosskreutz, who was shot in the arm by Kyle Rittenhouse.
Over the course of an hour, Chirafisi got Grosskreutz to admit that several of his statements made to police shortly after the shooting included either incorrect details or omitted others — most notably that Grosskreutz pointed a gun at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse fired on him.
Grosskreutz initially told police that he dropped his gun at some point during the incident and didn’t mention that he pointed it at Rittenhouse.
He said it was not an intentional omission, noting that his interview with police occurred after surgery, while he was still on pain medication and coming down from the traumatic events of the shooting.
But, after questioning from Chirafisi, Grosskreutz did acknowledge it was the only detail he failed to mention, having been able to even describe the clothing Rittenhouse wore the night of the shooting.
...}
The fact Grosskreutz initially aimed at Kyle does NOT mean Kyle was at risk when he later pulled the trigger.
Since Kyle had a misfire and had to recycle the action, it should have been clear to Kyle that Grosskreutz was not going to shoot and was not a threat.
You really believe your butthurt should have been entered as evidence.Grosskreutz was reasonable in at first aiming his pistol at Kyle.
He assumed Kyle was an active shooter, targeting innocent people.
Once Grosskreutz saw Kyle more clearly, and noticed he was young, afraid, and attempting to retreat, then Grosskreutz decided not to fire and aimed away.
So then there no longer was any excuse at all for Kyle to pull the trigger.
Grosskreutz had plenty of time to shoot if he had wanted to.
So then it should have been obvious to Kyle, that the MedTech was his means of safety, not a threat.
Name them.There was no need for anyone to be armed at all, but if one is going to armed, one that can be concealed is far less offensive, provocative, intimidating, etc.
I have never heard of anyone being allowed to bring a rifle to a demonstration before.
The only exception being the Korean grocers on the roof of their private property, in the LA riots.
Kyle was way out of line and in violation of dozens of public safety ordnances.
You know nothing of firearms. You're dismissed.It is CCW, for "Concealed Carry Weapons" permit, or CWP for "Concealed Weapons Permit".
The actual statues are state dependent, are long and boring, and are not easily searched.
There also always are lots of exceptions and special conditions, that make arguing statures boring.
The general principles are better to discuss because they are based on logical principles and not confusing detail.
Like the judge throwing the charge for the juvenile in possession of a firearm.
Obviously the judge had to be deliberately lying when he said there was a problem with the statute.
It is very clear in intent and application in this case, and Kyle was absolutely guilty.
Wrong.
All I have read or seen said that only a few property defenders were armed, and they all stayed on private property, EXCEPT Kyle.
He was the only one in violation of the law.
Kyle fired the first shots, and the Glock Grosskreutz had was not illegal.
He had the gun out, and stopped,......then pointed it at kyle, and that is when kyle fired....
Wrong.
The image is incontrovertible the pistol was not aimed at Kyle when the Kyle pulled the trigger.
Kyle had plenty of time to see the MedTech uniform and that Grosskreutz was not shooting or even pointing at him any more.
Wrong.
The image is incontrovertible the pistol was not aimed at Kyle when the Kyle pulled the trigger.
Kyle had plenty of time to see the MedTech uniform and that Grosskreutz was not shooting or even pointing at him any more.
