All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Who ordered who to do what?
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

(OPENING)

Sometimes you just astonished me at what you claim.
.

Notice that South Africa is not listed as a colonial power.

.
(COMMENT)

The Earth will (in all probability) be burnt into a flaming cinder before South Africa is registered as a colonial power.

Just what territorial adventure has South Africa launched in the past that extended its hold over the territory and population?

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) its judgment of 10 October 2002, the Court held (14 to 2) that the land boundary between the two countries had been fixed by treaties entered into during the colonial period and upheld the validity of those treaties. Boundary Case (Cameroon v. Nigeria) 2002 I.C.J. Rep. 303 .​

I can see no example of Israeli Colonial Adventures in the last Century (+).

The Arab Palestinians use the Theory of Historic Consolidation Territory or rights of a territorial nature acquired through consolidation by historical titles have been explained thus: ‘Proven long use, which is its foundation, merely represents a complex of interests and relations which in themselves have the effect of attaching a territory or an expanse of sea to a given State. It is these interests and relations, varying from one case to another, and not the passage of a fixed term, unknown in any event to international law, that are taken into direct account by the judge in concrete on the existence or non-existence of consolidation by historic titles’: de Visscher, Theory and Reality in Public International Law ( 1968 ), 209. See historic bay(s) ; historic rights (or title). ​

See I Oppenheim 709 and 710.​

.

The UN says something quite different than you do.

Do you have any links to your assertions?

.
(COMMENT)
.
Again, astonished... This is a "nonsense" question." The fundament under the UN Charter is the "suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law." This is much different from the charters of the most hostile people representing Arab Palestinians.

Article 9 PLO Charter: Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine.​

​

Article 25 HAMAS Policy: Resisting the occupation with all means and methods is a legitimate right guaranteed by divine laws and by international norms and laws. At the heart of these lies armed resistance, which is regarded as the strategic choice for protecting the principles and the rights of the Palestinian people.​

The combined Hostile Arab Palestinians (HAMAS) cannot point to an Israeli Campaign or Action that, as part of its purpose, installing measures to restore, and ensure, public order and safety, while respecting, And this includes the processes necessary to:

Protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others. To bring to justice before the beach, and prosecute those that commit an offense that is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (Israelis).
.

So then, what does this mean?

There has always been a lot of chicanery when it comes to Palestine.

.
(COMMENT)

Chicanery! Who? --- How many years has Mahmoud Abbas been in office?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[rylah]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Who ordered who to do what?
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

(OPENING)

Sometimes you just astonished me at what you claim.
.

.
(COMMENT)

The Earth will (in all probability) be burnt into a flaming cinder before South Africa is registered as a colonial power.

Just what territorial adventure has South Africa launched in the past that extended its hold over the territory and population?

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) its judgment of 10 October 2002, the Court held (14 to 2) that the land boundary between the two countries had been fixed by treaties entered into during the colonial period and upheld the validity of those treaties. Boundary Case (Cameroon v. Nigeria) 2002 I.C.J. Rep. 303 .​

I can see no example of Israeli Colonial Adventures in the last Century (+).

The Arab Palestinians use the Theory of Historic Consolidation Territory or rights of a territorial nature acquired through consolidation by historical titles have been explained thus: ‘Proven long use, which is its foundation, merely represents a complex of interests and relations which in themselves have the effect of attaching a territory or an expanse of sea to a given State. It is these interests and relations, varying from one case to another, and not the passage of a fixed term, unknown in any event to international law, that are taken into direct account by the judge in concrete on the existence or non-existence of consolidation by historic titles’: de Visscher, Theory and Reality in Public International Law ( 1968 ), 209. See historic bay(s) ; historic rights (or title). ​

See I Oppenheim 709 and 710.​

.

.
(COMMENT)
.
Again, astonished... This is a "nonsense" question." The fundament under the UN Charter is the "suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law." This is much different from the charters of the most hostile people representing Arab Palestinians.

Article 9 PLO Charter: Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine.​

​

Article 25 HAMAS Policy: Resisting the occupation with all means and methods is a legitimate right guaranteed by divine laws and by international norms and laws. At the heart of these lies armed resistance, which is regarded as the strategic choice for protecting the principles and the rights of the Palestinian people.​

The combined Hostile Arab Palestinians (HAMAS) cannot point to an Israeli Campaign or Action that, as part of its purpose, installing measures to restore, and ensure, public order and safety, while respecting, And this includes the processes necessary to:

Protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others. To bring to justice before the beach, and prosecute those that commit an offense that is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (Israelis).
.

.
(COMMENT)

Chicanery! Who? --- How many years has Mahmoud Abbas been in office?

Most Respectfully,
R

What great posting RoccoR, only one thing missing,
reminds there was once an 'informative' button.

Thank You for keeping the mark high in the forum,
the contribution, and the opportunity to learn.

 

[P F Tinmore]

“Horrifying”: Gaza Assault Kills 44 Palestinians, 15 Children. Will Ceasefire End Bloodshed?​

 

[rylah]

“Horrifying”: Gaza Assault Kills 44 Palestinians, 15 Children. Will Ceasefire End Bloodshed?​

Makes you proud for the results of Islamic Jihad?

The Day After: 15 Gazans Killed by Failed Terrorist Rockets, 35 by IDF Fire​

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

“Horrifying”: Gaza Assault Kills 44 Palestinians, 15 Children. Will Ceasefire End Bloodshed?​

Palestinians are good at using children as shields.

 

[Hollie]

“Horrifying”: Gaza Assault Kills 44 Palestinians, 15 Children. Will Ceasefire End Bloodshed?​

How many pallys will PIJ and Hamas kill next time?

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

The big ride with a dozen people and a stolen Jordanian flag?

 

[P F Tinmore]

To Silence Critics of Israel, The Term “Anti-Semitism” Is Being Trivialized​

To Silence Critics of Israel, The Term “Anti-Semitism” Is Being Trivialized

For more than 40 years, the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs has been essential reading for the nation’s most sophisticated populace. Our readers rely on us for the most comprehensive, analytical coverage of news from the Middle East, Muslim countries, Europe, and the United States.

www.wrmea.org

THERE’S A GROWING campaign to label critics of Israel as being guilty of “anti-Semitism.” Among those who have been characterized in this way are such respected organizations as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, as well as the Harvard Crimson. This tactic is not a new one and, sadly, tends to trivialize the real examples of anti-Semitism.

Some Israelis openly admit that this is precisely what they are doing. Shulamit Aloni, a former leader of the Meretz Party and former minister of education who received the Israel Prize for her “struggle to right injustices and for raising the standard of equality,” described how this works: “It’s a trick. We always use it. When from Europe, somebody criticizes Israel, we bring up the Holocaust. When, in the United States, people are critical of Israel, then they are anti-Semitic.”

 

[P F Tinmore]

More phony terrorist name calling crap.

Dem lawmakers condemn Israeli raids

“The silence by our country is enabling more death and violence”: Democratic lawmakers call on Biden administration to defend Palestine rights groups

mondoweiss.net

On August 18 Israeli forces raided the offices of seven Palestinian civil society organizations in the West Bank. Soldiers confiscated items, damaged property, and welded the doors shut. Six of the seven groups targeted (Al-Haq, prisoners rights group Addameer, Defense for Children International – Palestine, the Union of Agricultural Work Committees, The Bisan Center for Research and Development, and the Union of Palestinian Women’s Committees) have previously been accused of terrorism by the Israeli government, but no public evidence has been provided to back up these allegations and investigations have proved the suggestion dubious.

 

[P F Tinmore]

JS: New Yorkers took to the streets of New York City to commemorate Land Day. FREE PALESTINE!​

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

The U.S. Media Has A Palestine Problem​

 

[P F Tinmore]

No representative of any governmental authority calling itself the State of Palestine participated in any negotiation armistice.

Straw man. That has never been the issue.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The 1949 Armistice Demarcation Lines were never intended to establish a political or territorial boundary,

Indeed, that is why there is no border around Gaza.

The Palestinians do not cross borders. You can't say "into Israel" and never cross a border.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Border Disputes
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
.
The common frontier between the Palestinians in Gaza and the State of Israel does not seem to be disputed either. The fact that the Hostile Arab Palestinians have put the Israelis on notice that they have a claim that extends beyond the frontier is the issue.
.

Indeed, that is why there is no border around Gaza.

The Palestinians do not cross borders. You can't say "into Israel" and never cross a border.

(COMMENT)
.
There is a Demarcation Line in common between the two partiers to the conflict. This notion that the Hostile Arab Palestinians and the Israelis. That border is disputed by Arab Palestinians. Your notion is completely wrong.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Indeed, that is why there is no border around Gaza.

The Palestinians do not cross borders. You can't say "into Israel" and never cross a border.

The 1949 Armistice Demarcation Lines were never intended to establish a political or territorial boundary,

Who were the parties to the agreements?

 

[Hollie]

Indeed, that is why there is no border around Gaza.

The Palestinians do not cross borders. You can't say "into Israel" and never cross a border.

Indeed, Hamas knows where the Israeli border is. The pallys send their children to the Israeli border to provoke a confrontation.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Border Disputes
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
.
The common frontier between the Palestinians in Gaza and the State of Israel does not seem to be disputed either. The fact that the Hostile Arab Palestinians have put the Israelis on notice that they have a claim that extends beyond the frontier is the issue.
.

(COMMENT)
.
There is a Demarcation Line in common between the two partiers to the conflict. This notion that the Hostile Arab Palestinians and the Israelis. That border is disputed by Arab Palestinians. Your notion is completely wrong.

Most Respectfully,
R

Where is that border agreement?

 

[Hollie]

Where is that border agreement?

The Israelis didn't need a border agreement with any of the Islamic terrorist franchises to establish sovereign control of territory extending to, you know, a border.

Here's your homework. What nations did Israel sign border agreements with?