All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[rylah]

Syria's Missile Strike on Israel's Nuclear Facility - Interview with Syriangirl

Seems the Dimonah textile fabrique
is attacked by the Syrians on a daily basis now...

But what will happen to poor Syriangirl once her countrymen understand
and start calling her names in the upcoming weeks?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Any Border Delineated by a Security Barrier can be mistaken for an Apartheid Demarcation. You have to be knowledgeable to tell the difference.

You believe too many Israeli talking points.

Palestine is east of the green line?
When did that happen?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Any Border Delineated by a Security Barrier can be mistaken for an Apartheid Demarcation. You have to be knowledgeable to tell the difference.

You believe too many Israeli talking points.

Palestine is west of the green line?
When did that happen?

It has always been that way. The green line is not a border.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It has always been that way.

Really? So when did Palestine become a country east of the green line? Link?

The green line is not a border.

Why would it be? Palestine is not a country.

 

[P F Tinmore]

It has always been that way.

Really? So when did Palestine become a country east of the green line? Link?

The green line is not a border.

Why would it be? Palestine is not a country.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It has always been that way.

Really? So when did Palestine become a country east of the green line? Link?

The green line is not a border.

Why would it be? Palestine is not a country.

I know, claiming Palestine is a country is lame......but it's all you've got.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: The Green Line
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: The "Green Line" was a 1949 "Armistice Line" that, in the case of the West Bank and Jerusalem, NEVER applied to the Arab Palestinians; but, rather was an agreed upon separation of Israeli Forces and Jordanian Forces.

Palestine is west of the green line?
When did that happen?

It has always been that way. The green line is not a border.

(COMMENT)

In April 1950, the Jordanians, used the "Green Line" and traced-over the "Green Line" to establish the updated border. This new border delineated the extended Jordanian sovereign territory across the Jordan River. As an Armistice Line, the demarcation related to the cease-fire in the (still open) 1949 War of Independence between the Arab League and Israel.

Again, the Arab Palestinians were only involved as it relates to membership in the 1950 Jordanian Parliament that voted to incorporate the West Bank and Jerusalem into sovereign Jordanian Territory. The legality of this unilateral move by the Jordanian Parliament is still questionable. But the question, although declared illegal by the UN, was never acted upon by the UN. And so it remained Jordanian Sovereign Territory until 1988, when the Jordanians cut all ties the territorial holdings west of the Jordan River and the center of the Dead Sea. This territory, while politically abandon by the Jordanians, was under the effective control of the Israelis and had been so since the 1967 Conflict → a reopening of the 1949 War of Independence.

The "Green Line" officially dissolved in 1994 with the signing of the Israeli-Jordanian Peace Treaty. Article 3 - International Boundary - outlined in the boundary. The demarcation of the boundary was set forth in Appendix (I) to Annex I to the Treaty; the "Green Line" being no longer relevant. The "Green Line" was in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties was achieved.

"This line is the administrative boundary between Jordan and the territory which came​

under Israeli military government control in 1967. Any treatment of this line shall be ​

without prejudice to the status of that territory.”​

Since 1994, Israel has made several changes to the status of portions to this territory which the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) (sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people in any Palestinian territory that is liberated) PLO disputes in the media; but not in the Permanent Status of Negotiations. or any other form of mediation. While Israel maintains a consistent policy for peace and refrains from the threat or use of force as a means of solving the long-time territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of Israel, the Arab Palestinians do NOT maintain a comparable policy.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

BLUF: The "Green Line" was a 1949 "Armistice Line" that, in the case of the West Bank and Jerusalem, NEVER applied to the Arab Palestinians; but, rather was an agreed upon separation of Israeli Forces and Jordanian Forces.

That is absolutely correct. The "green line" was specifically not to be a political or territorial boundary. There was no Israel on one side and Jordan on the other. It was still Palestine on both sides.

 

[Hollie]

BLUF: The "Green Line" was a 1949 "Armistice Line" that, in the case of the West Bank and Jerusalem, NEVER applied to the Arab Palestinians; but, rather was an agreed upon separation of Israeli Forces and Jordanian Forces.

That is absolutely correct. The "green line" was specifically not to be a political or territorial boundary. There was no Israel on one side and Jordan on the other. It was still Palestine on both sides.

What you can't fathom is that "it was the geographic area referred to as Palestine", (not your invented Magic Kingdom of Pal'istan"). You have this quaint, but false, notion that your imagined "country of Pal'istan" existed as something more than it was.

You cling to many excuses to deny that Israel exists, that "peoples" other than Arabs-Moslems are allowed to exist in your imagined Arab-Moslem waqf.

The promise made to you by an Arab warlord 1,400 years ago has been broken. Send an email to your Emir expressing your complaints.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You cling to many excuses to deny that Israel exists,

Exists where? Israel is always defined by armistice lines that are specifically not to be political or territorial borders. Why don't they use real borders? And, BTW, those lines dissolved in subsequent peace agreements.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You cling to many excuses to deny that Israel exists,

Exists where? Israel is always defined by armistice lines that are specifically not to be political or territorial borders. Why don't they use real borders? And, BTW, those lines dissolved in subsequent peace agreements.

Israel is always defined by armistice lines that are specifically not to be political or territorial borders.

Israel has treaties with Egypt and Jordan specifically concerning their borders.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You cling to many excuses to deny that Israel exists,

Exists where? Israel is always defined by armistice lines that are specifically not to be political or territorial borders. Why don't they use real borders? And, BTW, those lines dissolved in subsequent peace agreements.

Israel is always defined by armistice lines that are specifically not to be political or territorial borders.

Israel has treaties with Egypt and Jordan specifically concerning their borders.

None of them have any authority over Palestine's borders.

 

[Hollie]

You cling to many excuses to deny that Israel exists,

Exists where? Israel is always defined by armistice lines that are specifically not to be political or territorial borders. Why don't they use real borders? And, BTW, those lines dissolved in subsequent peace agreements.

It has been explained to you multiple times. Isreal has borders with adjoining states memorialized by treaty.

Do you need links to the multiple posts that identify those treaties? Your habit of denying the above is concerning.

 

[Hollie]

You cling to many excuses to deny that Israel exists,

Exists where? Israel is always defined by armistice lines that are specifically not to be political or territorial borders. Why don't they use real borders? And, BTW, those lines dissolved in subsequent peace agreements.

Israel is always defined by armistice lines that are specifically not to be political or territorial borders.

Israel has treaties with Egypt and Jordan specifically concerning their borders.

None of them have any authority over Palestine's borders.

Does your Magical Kingdom of Pal'istan (a "new state" invented by the Treaty of Lausanne), share borders with the other "new states" invented by that Treaty?

What are those "new states" invented by the Treaty of Lausanne? You refuse to identify them.

Link?

Why not provide a link to the Treaty of Lausanne so we can confirm the identify of those "new states"?

(Preemptively).... Nice duck, deflection, Link?

 

[P F Tinmore]

What are those "new states" invented by the Treaty of Lausanne? You refuse to identify them.

They are all listed in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements that I have previously posted.

 

[Hollie]

What are those "new states" invented by the Treaty of Lausanne? You refuse to identify them.

They are all listed in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements that I have previously posted.

Nice duck..

Deflection. The Treaty of Lausanne was a 1924 era document.

What "new states" were invented by your claimed 1949 armistice agreement?

Are you the poster who claimed armistice lines were never meant to be borders? I believe you wrote that in post 2991. Did you forget? Did someone else write it?

Link?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

None of them have any authority over Palestine's borders.

None has authority over the imaginary borders you're whining about.
They do have the authority to set borders with Israel.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[rylah]

Well, quiet an original way to demand Jiziyyah...

Q. Are they expecting the pope
to pay their rent now?

 

[P F Tinmore]