All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss 2

[Sixties Fan]

"Resistance by any means necessary" is a slightly sanitized way of saying "we support murdering random Jewish civilians." And this is well understood by both Palestinians and their antisemitic supporters.

This is not a one-off. This is a theme of supporting the murders of Israelis that we have been seeing lately in Israel.

"By Any Means Necessary" was the theme of an "Al Aqsa" rally in April in New York. Since there was no pushback from allies, the Palestinian antisemites are doubling down on calls to continue axe murders in Israel.

The Nakba Day rally in Portland supports the newest terror wave by saying, "All power to the Palestinian people defending their homelands by any means from zionism and imperialism!"

Similarly, the Toronto "Nakba Day" rally advertises "On May 15, we will honour the resistance of our people by any means necessary against settler colonial violence and ethnic cleansing."

Samidoun, which pretends to be a rights organization, uses #ByAnyMeansNecessary as a hashtag.

And an Arab Etsy seller is getting in on the message, creating earrings with the title "By Any Means Necessary" that makes it clear that it means murder: a rifle in a map of "Palestine," a motif that became popular among Palestinians when the current terror spree started.




During the second intifada, suicide bombs and the most horrific crimes were justified in the West by Palestinian supporters. For the past 15 years, since the intifada petered out, open support for terrorism in the West has been out of fashion. But now, fueled by the latest terror wave against Israelis which is hugely popular among Palestinians, proud support for terror is back.

And the Western, ostensibly liberal supporters of the Palestinian cause are silent. Their silence is tacit support for the message that it is okay to murder Jews.

Nakba Day rallies inciting murdering Israelis

Blogging about Israel and the Arab world since, oh, forever.

elderofziyon.blogspot.com

 

[Sixties Fan]

Iraq’s parliament, the Council of Representatives, advanced draft legislation to criminalize the normalization of ties with Israel on Wednesday. It carries the potential punishment of life imprisonment or execution, The New Arab reported.

According to the London-based news site, the bill specifically targets recent Kurdish efforts to promote relations with Israel in the government, business and media sectors. The legislation is also seen as an Iraqi rejection of the Abraham accords, which normalized Israeli ties with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco.

Sudan, which also signed the accords, has not moved to openly maintain ties. However, Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, who seized power in a January coup, has confirmed maintaining quiet security cooperation with Israel.

(full article online)

Death Penalty for Normalization With Israel Advances in Iraqi Parliament | United with Israel

Bill targets Kurdish efforts to promote relations with Israel in the government, business and media sectors, rejects Abraham accords.

unitedwithisrael.org

 

[Sixties Fan]

This morning, Sgt. Maj. Noam Raz, a father of six, was killed during a firefight in Jenin.

We've seen lots of videos of Palestinians firing rifles in Jenin (and elsewhere). Clearly they are not mere stone-throwers.

The Jenin Brigades - a group of men with weapons - sometimes issue statements.




Here they are from another recent photo:



Their Telegram channel logo indicates that they are a linked to Islamic Jihad:


So why does the Palestinian Authority tolerate an armed terror group in their territory?

They have certainly fought against and arrested Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists in the past. Now, they seem to be OK with this group.

Either the PA has decided that Islamic Jihad is an ally, or they quietly hope that Israel will uproot them from Jenin and while they publicly protest Zionist incursions and quietly celebrate.

But either way, the Palestinian Authority is not indicating any opposition to having a mini-army in their midst. Tolerating it now allows it to grow, especially with the current propaganda blitz around Abu Akleh's death and the boasting about the death of Noam Raz that is starting to spread in Palestinian media.

Of course, no Western media is even asking the basic question of how a heavily armed group could spring up in Jenin while the well-funded Palestinian Authority security forces do nothing.

The PA is allowing an independent army to flourish in Jenin, and no one is talking about it

Blogging about Israel and the Arab world since, oh, forever.

elderofziyon.blogspot.com

 

[Sixties Fan]

A debate is raging over whether Israeli soldiers or Palestinian Arab terrorists were responsible for the shooting death of an Al Jazeera reporter in Jenin. But nobody seems to be asking one important question: Why were Israeli soldiers in Jenin, anyway?

After all, way back in 1995, as part of the Oslo II agreement, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin withdrew all Israeli troops from the areas in Judea-Samaria where 98% of the Palestinian Arabs live, including all major cities such as Jenin.

So, the Israeli troops who were in Jenin last week were not there as part of the old occupying force. They were not there to establish a Jewish settlement. And they were not there to govern the city. Even Raja Abdulrahim, the pro-Palestinian reporter who was recently hired by the Jerusalem bureau of the New York Times, acknowledged in an article last month that “40% of the region is governed by the Palestinian Authority.”

So, if those Israeli soldiers were not in Jenin to govern, or to occupy, or to settle, then what in the world were they doing there? Why don’t they just stay within the Israeli-governed parts of the region? Why venture into PA territory, even for a few hours?

The answer is that the PA’s refusal to fight the terrorists forced the Israelis to go into Jenin and do the job themselves.

The Oslo accords require the PA to disband all terrorist groups, seize their weapons, and outlaw them—that is, to put them out of business.

One can understand the logic behind Prime Minister Rabin’s decision to out-source the fight against terrorism to the PA. After all, the PA security forces know the terrain. They know where the weapons depots and safe houses and training sites are located. And the PA certainly has the ability to do the job—it has one of the largest per-capita security forces in the world.

In short, they could smash the terrorist groups if they wanted to. But they just don’t want to. The PA never outlawed the terrorist groups. It has never made a serious effort to capture its members or seize its weapons, in Jenin or anywhere else. The PA treats the terrorists in Jenin and the other areas under its control like brothers, and allows them to operate freely.

That’s why here we are, 27 years after the PA became the sole ruler in Jenin, and the city is still filled with active terrorist cells from Hamas, Fatah, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (the gang which murdered my daughter Alisa).

Even the New York Times occasionally admits that terrorists roam free in PA cities. On March 23, 2014, for example, the Times reported that Israeli troops were forced to enter the Jenin refugee camp in pursuit of terrorists because although Jenin is under the “full control” of the PA, “the Palestinian [security forces] did not generally operate in refugee camps.”

(full article online)

Why Were Israeli Soldiers in Jenin, Anyway?

The PA, by its deliberate inaction, has forced the Israeli army to occasionally enter Jenin in pursuit of terrorists.

jewishjournal.com

 

[Sixties Fan]

Clearly BBC editors were quite happy to promote a very serious allegation that they had not confirmed themselves, even though it came from a sourcewith a long history of anti-Israel and anti-Jewish activity and ‘reporting’.

It was, after all, Al Jazeera which in 2008 threw a birthday party for the convicted terrorist Samir Kuntar. It was Al Jazeera which published the ‘Palestine Papers’ in 2011 and promoted the notion (copiously amplified by the BBC) that Yasser Arafat had been poisoned by Israel in 2012. In 2017 Al Jazeera turned its sights on ‘the Israel lobby’ in Britain and in 2019 it had to suspend two of its journalists over a Holocaust video. Just last year, the BBC uncritically amplified Al Jazeera statements relating to the targeting of a multi-storey building housing Hamas in the Gaza Strip while failing to report the award presented by Hamas to the head of Al Jazeera’s bureau there.

Nevertheless, Al Jazeera’s long record as an unreliable and ideologically conscripted source (along with supposed BBC standards of accuracy and impartiality) was obviously not enough to make BBC editors pause and demand any sort of independent investigation of their own before uncritically publishing the outlet’s latest unverified anti-Israel claims.



(full article online)

BBC News website uncritically promotes Al Jazeera claims once again

The day after the death of Palestinian journalist Shireen Abu Akleh on May 11th in Jenin three items on that story appeared on the BBC News website's 'Middle Ea

camera-uk.org

 

[P F Tinmore]

A debate is raging over whether Israeli soldiers or Palestinian Arab terrorists were responsible for the shooting death of an Al Jazeera reporter in Jenin. But nobody seems to be asking one important question: Why were Israeli soldiers in Jenin, anyway?

After all, way back in 1995, as part of the Oslo II agreement, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin withdrew all Israeli troops from the areas in Judea-Samaria where 98% of the Palestinian Arabs live, including all major cities such as Jenin.

So, the Israeli troops who were in Jenin last week were not there as part of the old occupying force. They were not there to establish a Jewish settlement. And they were not there to govern the city. Even Raja Abdulrahim, the pro-Palestinian reporter who was recently hired by the Jerusalem bureau of the New York Times, acknowledged in an article last month that “40% of the region is governed by the Palestinian Authority.”

So, if those Israeli soldiers were not in Jenin to govern, or to occupy, or to settle, then what in the world were they doing there? Why don’t they just stay within the Israeli-governed parts of the region? Why venture into PA territory, even for a few hours?

The answer is that the PA’s refusal to fight the terrorists forced the Israelis to go into Jenin and do the job themselves.

The Oslo accords require the PA to disband all terrorist groups, seize their weapons, and outlaw them—that is, to put them out of business.

One can understand the logic behind Prime Minister Rabin’s decision to out-source the fight against terrorism to the PA. After all, the PA security forces know the terrain. They know where the weapons depots and safe houses and training sites are located. And the PA certainly has the ability to do the job—it has one of the largest per-capita security forces in the world.

In short, they could smash the terrorist groups if they wanted to. But they just don’t want to. The PA never outlawed the terrorist groups. It has never made a serious effort to capture its members or seize its weapons, in Jenin or anywhere else. The PA treats the terrorists in Jenin and the other areas under its control like brothers, and allows them to operate freely.

That’s why here we are, 27 years after the PA became the sole ruler in Jenin, and the city is still filled with active terrorist cells from Hamas, Fatah, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (the gang which murdered my daughter Alisa).

Even the New York Times occasionally admits that terrorists roam free in PA cities. On March 23, 2014, for example, the Times reported that Israeli troops were forced to enter the Jenin refugee camp in pursuit of terrorists because although Jenin is under the “full control” of the PA, “the Palestinian [security forces] did not generally operate in refugee camps.”

(full article online)

Why Were Israeli Soldiers in Jenin, Anyway?

The PA, by its deliberate inaction, has forced the Israeli army to occasionally enter Jenin in pursuit of terrorists.

jewishjournal.com

They are not terrorists in Palestine. They are only terrorists to foreign name callers.

In Palestine they are constitutionally protected political parties.

 

[Sixties Fan]

They are not terrorists in Palestine. They are only terrorists to foreign name callers.

In Palestine they are constitutionally protected political parties.

Taking your BS on the road? Looks like it.

There is no Palestine. There are Arabs who want all the land "conquered " by Muslims to be only in the hands of Muslims.

Prime example !!!!!!

TranJordan was given to Hashemite Arab Muslims out of the Mandate for Palestine. Nobody cried, or shot a bullet.

Egypt and Jordan had Gaza and Judea and Samaria for 19 years. Not a cry, not a bullet.


There are Arabs who are peaceful people. There are Arabs who are terrorists.


You always cheer for the terrorists who love to kill Jews.

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[rylah]

The President of Ecuador Guillermo Lasso has now announced, during a visit to the Start Up Nation Central, as part of his historic visit to Israel, that he has changed his country's voting policy at the UN and that Ecuador will now vote with Israel.

After more than 15 years of extreme left-wing governments in the country -
a significant change of direction.

Ecuador to move toward Israel at UN, opens Jerusalem innovation office

Jerusalem and Quito have had formal diplomatic ties since 1949, but Lasso's arrival here on Monday marks the first time that the country's president has visited Israel.

www.jpost.com

 

[rylah]

 

[rylah]

Beit El - Footage of preventing a terrorist attack

 

[rylah]

The Friday of agricultural terrorism:

Fires set to wheat fields at Yishay jnct.,
Tzipori, the Golan Heights,
and Kiryat Shmonah

Fires set to fields in Had Nes,
and the mountain Jordan region.

during Friday, around 12:20 the whet field near te Ramat Yishay jnct. was set to fire.
In the eyewitness report, there's seen a person setting fire in several places and running away.

The volunteers of Sdeh Ya'akov and the Rabbi of the village arrived at the scene,
returning control of the situation with the help of farmers and a contractor bassing by.

 

[Mindful]

(May 12, 2022 / JNS) A Palestinian Arab journalist with Al Jazeera, Shireen Abu Akleh, was shot dead this week in a firefight between Hamas and the Israelis in the West Bank city of Jenin.

Western news outlets initially reported uncritically the Hamas claim that the Israelis had shot her, eagerly regurgitating Al Jazeera’s assertion that the Israelis had “assassinated” her “in cold blood.”

When the Israelis said Abu Akleh might have been killed instead by Palestinian gunfire, journalists grudgingly incorporated this into their reporting while continuing to repeat extensively the incendiary but unsupported Palestinian accusation.

At this point, we still don’t know who killed Abu Akleh. But any fair-minded person would say the Israelis are more likely to be telling the truth.

They said that, having gone into Jenin to root out terrorists responsible for a recent wave of murderous attacks, their forces had come under “substantial fire.” After studying what evidence they had, it looked as if Abu Akleh had been felled by a Palestinian bullet.

How Western dupes help propagate murderous Palestinian lies

The mainstream media generally choose to believe the Palestinians, even though they routinely lie about Israel. These lies are weapons of war, deployed to incite violence and mass murder.

www.jns.org

 

[rylah]

Beit El - Footage of preventing a terrorist attack

On the eve of Shabat - terrorist attack prevented | Footage of the arrest

Attack on Saturday evening: A 19-year-old terrorist was caught
with a knife and a letter intending to carry out an attack.

 

[rylah]

Fireworks shot at Jewish homes in Beit Orot at the Mt. of Olives

Update - in response to rocks and fireworks,
Police are further applying anti-riot measures.

 

[rylah]

בס"ד​

Israel ranked 9th happiest country in the world - annual report

Overall, the Nordic countries once again dominated the top slots, with Finland coming in as the world's happiest country for the fifth year in a row.

www.jpost.com

 

[Sixties Fan]

Part 1


Israel-haters have a large toolbox of brainwashing and persuasion techniques to convince the world of what are effectively lies.

One that we have seen a lot in recent days is how they refer to the death of Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh. It is a variant of a sales technique called “thinking past the sale.”

From Levers of Persuasion:

“Thinking past the sale” is a persuasion tool where you get someone to think about what happens after they’ve made a decision or action. By doing so, you increase the odds that person actually makes that decision or takes that action.
There’s mounds of research showing that thinking about something increases the chances it happens. For example, there’s the Pygmalion Effect, where positive expectations empirically lead to positive performance. Similarly, there’s the Golem Effect, where negative expectations lead to poorer performance.
In everyday life, you hear people talk about these effects with phrases like “self-fulfilling prophecies” or “I thought it into reality”.
Thinking past the sale works because:

• The more you think about an idea, the stronger the neural pathways to that idea become in your brain (like in the Tetris Effect). The neural path of least resistance in your brain leads to that idea, and because your brain is lazy, you end up thinking about it more.
• By thinking about the idea more, you’re more likely to see opportunities to make it a reality. And thanks to the representativeness heuristic, you will think it’s more likely to happen the more you think about it.
• You also will consider the idea more significant, because you think things are more important than they actually are while you’re thinking about them.
• On top of this, your focus on an idea makes you functionally blind to alternatives; this is called inattentional blindness. By thinking past the sale, your brain will ignore alternatives.

Getting someone to think about an outcome makes that outcome more probable.
All of this increases the odds that thinking past the sale becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Importantly, these mechanisms affect you whether you’re aware of them working or not.
The more potent the “sale”, the more likely its effects will be. And one of the most potent ways to get someone to think past the sale is by using visualizations.
You can do this by using images that force the person to see the outcome you want. But you can also do this by describing, in words, what the outcome will look like.

The “sale,” so to speak, is the idea that Abu Akleh was deliberately targeted by Israel last Wednesday– assassinated in order to silence her because her reporting was critical of Israel.

The idea is absurd. Murdering a journalist is the worst way to distract people from what the journalist says. It gets massive amounts of bad publicity. Also, the idea that in the middle of a firefight with heavily armed terrorists in Jenin, Israeli forces decide that this is a great time to kill a prominent journalist is ridiculous.

But immediately after Abu Akleh’s death, the narrative from Al Jazeera and other Israel haters was that her murder wasn’t merely a fact – it was a given. They didn’t say, “Israel murdered her.” They said, “The world needs to punish Israel for murdering her.” They would say, “I am so upset that Israel murdered her.” Or that this was part of a pattern, as Columbia professor Rashid Khalidi said, "Palestinian journalists have been systematically targeted. It's really important to Israel that nobody see what's going on in the occupied territories."

"Thinking past the sale" - how anti-Israel propagandists work

Blogging about Israel and the Arab world since, oh, forever.

elderofziyon.blogspot.com

 

[Sixties Fan]

Part 2




This is all making the listeners are readers think past the sale – they think that Israel murdered Abu Akleh as a given, that it is a fact known by everyone, and now they should react to this information – to be angry or sad or upset at this fake murder.

It is a deliberate lie. There is no pattern of Israel murdering journalists, and Khalidi knows it. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, 19 journalists have been killed in the Palestinian territories since 1992, and only one was deliberately murdered – by Palestinians.

This is a form of brainwashing that, as the description above notes, is highly effective. And in this version of the trick, the inattentional blindness is a huge factor – because by making people think and visualize Israel deliberately murdering her, it restricts people’s brains from thinking about alternative theories of what actually happened – whether it was an accidental shooting from Israel or one from the Jenin terrorists who were shooting constantly.

A variant of inattentional blindness that we see often is the use of a photo taken in Syria or elsewhere of a crying child in front of ruins, with a false caption saying that this was an orphan in Gaza. Once one’s brain makes that connection, that is now the most likely path one’s thoughts will continue to go on in the future, and when the technique is used repeatedly, it strengthens the ties in one’s mind between Israel and deliberate murder of innocents.

This is how propaganda works, and it is insidious because even if you know you are being manipulated, you are still picturing what they are saying – you can’t help it – and it tunes your brain to believe that this is how the IDF does things, even when you know it is not true.

"Thinking past the sale" - how anti-Israel propagandists work

Blogging about Israel and the Arab world since, oh, forever.

elderofziyon.blogspot.com

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Sixties Fan]