All the House GOP and the President - what an unfair advantage!!!

So Rab, are Agnaposte or Contumacious really your close friends? Son, you can't hurt me because your words have no power.
 
So Rab, are Agnaposte or Contumacious really your close friends? Son, you can't hurt me because your words have no power.

By no later than St Pattys Day you'll be posting here under a new identity
 
Rab, you are describing yourself when you fall back on what you are doing. You have become the laughing stock of the board. That will make Liability feel better.
 
Rab, you are describing yourself when you fall back on what you are doing. You have become the laughing stock of the board. That will make Liability feel better.

No, sorry. Jake, being a plant is an ugly thing. It's like being a spy or informer. But now we know the truth. Go back to your masters at NAMBLA and tell them the jig is up.
I knew when you started claiming to be a Republican that it was over-reach.
 
I wonder if your butt buddies, Rab, Contumacious or Agnaposte, put you up to this because I have made sure that they have had to tred around here very, very carefully. They are afraid of me, as are all supporters of pedophilia, and you are the same kind as they are. That means you fear me on this issue. Wise.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if your butt buddies, Rab, Contumacious or Agnaposte put you up to this because I have made sure that they have to tred around here very, very carefully.

Jake, you can stop pretending, you keep making mistakes and slipping up and outing yourself anyway, why not be a man and fess up
 
There was a poster at the other board I posted at and he used to do the same thing until he finally admitted his obvious, true nature and he's a happy blogger over on your side.
 
After watching the 'teleprompter'-less Commander in Chief take on a room full of House Republicans at their retreat, it's clear their was an unfair advantage....

They needed a lot more Republicans!

Point, set, match...Obama


You're obviously a bonafide member of the Obamalong sheep herd.

This admininstation & democrat congress & senate NEVER needed bi-partisen support --because they have a LOADED majority in all houses. They shut Republicans out from the get-go.

Once this congress & Obama got their asse's kicked in N.J, MASS & Virginia they are now just giving "lip" service to get Republicans on board--because in reality it's now democrats who are stopping Obama's liberal--big spending agenda---as Obama stated "democrat politicians are running to the hills"--:lol::lol:

$smallpromoobama_s_promises.webp



This President is already a lame duck.
 
Last edited:
Lieberman is not a Democrat. He defeated a Democrat to get re-elected. He got 70% of the Republican vote in CT to get re-elected. He endorsed John McCain for president.

How many times do you suppose I'll have to knock you on the head with that before it gets through?

I've never understood how anyone could call Lieberman a Democrat!!! During the 2008 campaign he was sitting like an extra nose on McCain's face the entire time. And I also remember that McCain's first choice for VP was Lieberman.

But the far right didn't want Lieberman and threatened to sink the ticket at the convention. I remember reading that McCain wanted Lieberman because they had so much in common on the issues of the day.

So I think Lieberman was about as much a Democrat as Rush Limbaugh is.

That guy who ran with Al Gore in 2000 for VP. What was his name again??

That was then, this is now. Try and keep up, will you??? :rolleyes:
 
Rab, you are describing yourself when you fall back on what you are doing. You have become the laughing stock of the board. That will make Liability feel better.

Your comments about other members of the USMB are unable to make me happy or unhappy since I have long since exposed you as the dishonest worthless troll fraud you are.

A guy with the name of Jokey, like you, merits no credibility.

You have none.
 
Rab, you are describing yourself when you fall back on what you are doing. You have become the laughing stock of the board. That will make Liability feel better.

No, sorry. Jake, being a plant is an ugly thing. It's like being a spy or informer. But now we know the truth. Go back to your masters at NAMBLA and tell them the jig is up.
I knew when you started claiming to be a Republican that it was over-reach.

Ironically it's the same guys around here insisting that Jake isn't really a Republican that also insist that Lieberman HAS to be considered a Democrat.
 
Lieberman is not a Democrat. He defeated a Democrat to get re-elected. He got 70% of the Republican vote in CT to get re-elected. He endorsed John McCain for president.

How many times do you suppose I'll have to knock you on the head with that before it gets through?

I've never understood how anyone could call Lieberman a Democrat!!! During the 2008 campaign he was sitting like an extra nose on McCain's face the entire time. And I also remember that McCain's first choice for VP was Lieberman.

But the far right didn't want Lieberman and threatened to sink the ticket at the convention. I remember reading that McCain wanted Lieberman because they had so much in common on the issues of the day.

So I think Lieberman was about as much a Democrat as Rush Limbaugh is.


On one ******* issue, the war, Lieberman was something other than a very left wing Democratic. ONE issue and one issue alone.

If you liberoidal Democratics were not so totally intolerant of dissent, you'd love that guy.

He's STILL just a liberal Democrat but-for that one issue.

One issue? On only one issue he has opposed liberals?

How about endorsing John McCain for president? You'd have us believe that wasn't an issue?

How about opposing the Medicare expansion (after once being for it) and saying he opposed it because liberals liked it too much. You'd have us believe that wasn't an issue?

How about opposing the public option in the healthcare bills? You'd have us believe that wasn't an issue?

One issue?
 
15th post
OK, let's start with this leftwing zealot ...

"The legitimate object of Government is to do for a community of people whatever they need to have done but cannot do at all, or cannot so well do, for themselves in their separate and individual capacities. But in all that people can individually do as well for themselves, Government ought not to interfere."
President Abraham Lincoln

And this one...

"In all those things which deal with people, be liberal, be human. In all those things which deal with people's money, or their economy, or their form of government, be conservative."
President Dwight D. Eisenhower

Hey, we can do quotations all day long. I doubt I'm going to be willing to chuck my values on the pile though. A man who'll stick his own child's head into the yoke of government debt... is no man. That's a quote from ME. ;)

"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor and bread it has earned -- this is the sum of good government."
--Thomas Jefferson

"The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. "
--James Madison

"Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. "
--George Washington

""I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it."
--Benjamin Franklin

"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office."
--Aesop



I'm not going to bother with your info on Republican positions. I only agree with them about half the time anyway, and since you've been kind to point out that my own analysis has no discussion value... I'm not going to waste my time reading it.

Murf76...You have the right to choose active ignorance, but if THAT is choice; to bury your head in the sand because it would challenge dogma, just don't accuse me of being far leftist when my positions are in line with moderate Republicans and Americans WITH a conscience.

Again you force us to move backwards. I asked you before:
Here's a thought for you to ponder... what did our founding fathers create? What entity was their instrument and mechanism to address the general welfare of We, the people? Corporations?

You really need to answer that question.

The current health insurance situation is not a case of overbearing government or people looking to government for a handout. This is a situation of abuse; obvious abuse and it is not by the government or by the people, it's abuse by corporations.

This American Journal of Medicine study provides a snapshot of that abuse.

Elsevier

Sixty-two percent of all bankruptcies filed in 2007 were linked to medical expenses, according to a nationwide study released today by the American Journal of Medicine. That's nearly 20 percentage points higher than that pool of respondents reported were connected to medical costs in 2001.

Of those who filed for bankruptcy in 2007, nearly 80 percent had health insurance. Respondents who reported having insurance indicated average expenses of just under $18,000. Respondents who filed and lacked insurance had average medical bills of nearly $27,000.

Since 2007, the number of Americans without insurance has increased and filing for bankruptcy has become more difficult due to more stringent laws, according to the report.

The authors of the study, David Himmelstein, Deborah Thorne, Elizabeth Warren and Steffie Woolhandler, say their findings "reflect the U.S. health care financing system is broken." Middle class families, they conclude, "frequently collapse under the strain of the health care system that treats physical wounds, but inflicts fiscal ones."


President Obama correctly framed this as a moral issue.

The tea party crowd's anger is misguided. They are being led through the nose by agents OF the abusers; lobbyists whose interests nest with the perpetrators, NOT with the interests of We, the people. The tea party crowd should be protesting outside the insurance corporate offices, not the government that is trying to end the abuse. If you don't believe government is the instrument and mechanism our founding fathers created to address the general welfare of We, the people, then you need to provide your model that is superior. So far what you forward is close to Benito Mussolini's model.

Thomas Jefferson wrote: “Liberty is to the collective body, what health is to every individual body. Without health no pleasure can be tasted by man; without liberty, no happiness can be enjoyed by society.”

Why don't you take a few minutes and listen to Wendell Potter, formerly Vice President of Corporate Communications for the CIGNA corporation. With almost 20 years inside the health insurance industry, Wendell Potter saw for-profit insurers hijack our health care system and put profits before patients.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QwX_soZ1GI]YouTube - BILL MOYERS JOURNAL | Wendell Potter | PBS[/ame]
 
Lieberman is not a Democrat. He defeated a Democrat to get re-elected. He got 70% of the Republican vote in CT to get re-elected. He endorsed John McCain for president.

How many times do you suppose I'll have to knock you on the head with that before it gets through?

I've never understood how anyone could call Lieberman a Democrat!!! During the 2008 campaign he was sitting like an extra nose on McCain's face the entire time. And I also remember that McCain's first choice for VP was Lieberman.

But the far right didn't want Lieberman and threatened to sink the ticket at the convention. I remember reading that McCain wanted Lieberman because they had so much in common on the issues of the day.

So I think Lieberman was about as much a Democrat as Rush Limbaugh is.


On one ******* issue, the war, Lieberman was something other than a very left wing Democratic. ONE issue and one issue alone.

If you liberoidal Democratics were not so totally intolerant of dissent, you'd love that guy.

He's STILL just a liberal Democrat but-for that one issue.

One issue? Lieberman is the biggest opportunist in the senate. Whatever gets his creepy looking mugg on the air is his issue du jour.
 
I hope the Dems learn from the MA fiasco and move further Leftward

In Ma. a man who NEVER said he is republican, who is for Abortion rights and gay rights, beat a horrible candidate.

Oh yeah, Ma. is fine with us. Go Brown, you damn dem. :clap2:
 
One issue? Lieberman is the biggest opportunist in the senate. Whatever gets his creepy looking mugg on the air is his issue du jour.

Hmm, biggest opportunist in the Senate. Bigger than Arlen Spector?? Bigger than Harry Reid? Bigger than Ben Nelson? BIgger than Mary Landrieu?
I'm not hearing it.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom