All roads lead to Clinton's Perkins Coie - OMG

[AZGAL]

Byron York‏Verified account @ByronYork 30 Dec 2017

When did officials brief Congress about Papadopoulos? They briefed Congress about Carter Page in late summer 2016.
Byron York‏Verified account @ByronYork 30 Dec 2017

Did officials seek a surveillance warrant on Papadopoulos? They reportedly got one on Carter Page in summer 2016. Did they try to get one on Papadopoulos? If not, why not?

9:48 AM - 30 Dec 2017

 

[AZGAL]

64 Hours In October: How One Weekend Blew Up The Rules Of ...
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/.../yahoo-64-hours-october-american-politics_us_59d7...
Oct 6, 2017 - Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were each holed up with their aides on Friday, Oct. 7, 2016, preparing for the second presidential debate, scheduled for Sunday night. ... And WikiLeaks dumped its trove of emails from the Clinton campaign, hacked from the account of campaign head John Podesta.

 

[AZGAL]

In DNC Fraud Case, Focus Shifts to Video Featuring Process Server Who Mysteriously Died
by Rachel Stockman | 4:40 pm, August 30th, 2016

There is a very strange twist in the class action fraud lawsuit filed against the Democratic National Committee and former Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The recent developments haven’t gotten much mainstream media attention, but they are all documented in federal court. So, we decided to dig into them. And yes, they involve a lawsuit process server — who “served” the DNC with the class action paperwork—and then suddenly died.

The lawsuit, which was actually filed before the Wikileaks document dump, claims that the DNC “actively concealed its bias” from its donors and supporters backing Bernie Sanders. Hundreds of Sanders supporters have reportedly signed up to be part of the class. They have even started a very active Facebook page. The plaintiffs say the recent Wikileaks emails only give them more evidence that the Democratic National Committee was on board with Hillary Clinton from the very start.

 

[Old Rocks]

And, in the meantime;

MAGA

Mueller Ain't Goin' Away! LOL

 

[JakeStarkey]

Mueller Makes America Great Again

 

[AZGAL]

follow Real Progressives

Russian Attacks on John Podesta, DNC Leaks Are Fake

By Tatsu Ikeda
14 December 2016
Bottom line, the Russian conspiracy is a myth, for both Podesta Leaks and DNC Leaks. I will prove it.

A reconstruction of the email shows a google warning and the famous Bitly link. The domain of the server used to trick John into giving away his password was myaccount.google.com-securitysettingpage.tk. A simple host lookup show that is was an alias for om-securitysettingpage.tk. This server operated in the Netherlands, the register was Dot TK of the Netherlands. Today the whois lookup is refused, as part of the coverup. Adding a plus sign at the end of the bitly link shows that the link was clicked on twice, the same time the email phish was sent, March 19, 2016. The interesting thing going to home page http://com-securitysettingpage.tk, the server used to trick John, brought up his own wikipedia page by way of an "iframe", a very simple way to inject the real wikipedia page into the server's home page. This page was snapshotted twice by Wayback Machine at archive.org. The link is https://web.archive.org/web/20161028181521/http://com-securitysettingpage.tk.
So you tell me, is the simple email hack the work of Russian state professional hackers? Why use Bitly at all? Why troll John by leaving his wikipedia page on the server used to trick him, 6 whole months after the so-called "hack"? This is the attack of a 12 year old, Nigerian prince stuff. It's not sophisticated in the least.

 

[Moonglow]

View attachment 179591





WikiLeaks‏Verified account @wikileaks 23 Jul 2016

Clinton campaign pushing a lot of 'Russia' spin to divert from #DNCLeak. We have not revealed our sources & no one disputes veracity.

5:02 PM - 23 Jul 2016


View attachment 179590 View attachment 179592 View attachment 179593


American Digital News
When Did Framing of Trump Collusion Narrative Begin
Feb 19, 2018 | ADN News, Clinton, Crime, Media, Obama, Politics, Special Investigations | 0 |

The media began framing a Trump collusion narrative BEFORE the alleged “hacking” occurred and immediately after General Flynn, an outspoken critic of Obama policies, began advising Trump.

The Guccifer 2.0 moniker and the DNC opposition research “leak” coincide suspiciously with payments to Perkins Coie and FusionGPS. I think there is ample evidence to question whether this leak was intentional.
The DNC/DCCC leak and the Podesta emails leak are two separate “incidents” that have been conflated into one by the DNC and Crowdstrike.

Here are the *reported* dates of the “hacking”:

March 10, 2016—
Reported date of Attack on DNC servers according to AP. The data allegedly exfiltrated was opposition research on Trump.

March 16, 2016—
Reported date of attack on John Podesta.



Also March 2016: Papadopoulos: 6 times effort to make meetings between Trump campaign and Russians, his efforts fail to arrange his meeting.
May 3: A witness admits lying and gets immunity
Clinton IT man Paul Combetta lies to the FBI about using BleachBit to erase Clinton emails

If only the president, no, the country had an AG to prosecute..But alas they be none...

 

[AZGAL]

WikiLeaks

Bernie narrative
From:markpaustenbach@gmail.com To: mirandal@dnc.org Date: 2016-05-21 22:23 Subject: Bernie narrative

Wondering if there's a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess. Specifically, DWS had to call Bernie directly in order to get the campaign to do things because they'd either ignored or forgotten to something critical. She had to call Bernie after the data breach to make his staff to respond to our concerns. Even then they didn't get back to us, which is why we had to shut off their access in order to get them to finally let us know exactly how they snooped around HFA's data. Same was true with the standing committee appointments. They never got back to us with their names (HFA and even O'Malley got there's in six weeks earlier) for the committees. So, again, the chair had to call Bernie personally for his staff to finally get us critical information. So, they gave us an awful list just a few days before we had to make the announcements. It's not a DNC conspiracy, it's because they never had their act together.

Sat, 21 May 2016 17:23:37 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Bernie narrative
From: Mark Paustenbach <markpaustenbach@gmail.com>
To: Luis Miranda <mirandal@dnc.org>

 

[AZGAL]

Campaign money and negative ads....
From:brentbbi@webtv.net To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2015-07-01 23:11 Subject: Campaign money and negative ads....

John, one thought worth considering would be for HRC to offer leadership for a better kind of politics by suggesting Democratic candidates agree to not run negative ads against each other during the primaries. A modern version of Reagan's 11 commandment of Republicans not attacking each other. She would get credit with voters for trying, Bernie would almost certainly agree and O'Malley doesn't matter at this point and probably won't.... HRC could then spend money running positive ads about herself, juxtaposed against Republicans, which helps her favorable and trust numbers, draws a nice contrast between her and Republicans, and when she has to go negative when Republicans do, she has a strong foundation of having campaigned for a higher standard of politics which voters want.... Frankly I thought it was dumb for McCaskill and Gutierrez to be attacking Bernie. We are going to need his voters to turn out in November for HRC, he won't be nominated. I am doing the opposite, repeatedly writing friendly and positive pieces about Bernie as an HRC supporter, and when the time is right I will have money in the bank with him and his people as a liberal to urge them to come out in force to vote for HRC.....which is not a given, and we won't have much margin for error in a close election.....Brent Sent from my iPad

 

[AZGAL]

Donald Trump and Top Adviser Roger Stone Split As Campaign Turmoil Intensifies
August 8, 2015
By Greg Cwik

The fallout from Donald Trump’s toxic war of words with Fox News host Megyn Kelly continues: Less than 48 hours after the first GOP debate, top adviser Roger Stone has either been fired (Trump’s version) or quit (Stone’s). “Top adviser” is a relative term on the Trump campaign: As Gabriel Sherman reported earlier this week, the staff consists of only three or four people at any one time — the number fluctuates as people leave or are fired — and this latest development is a continuation of infighting that’s been going on for some time.

 

[JakeStarkey]

follow Real Progressives

Russian Attacks on John Podesta, DNC Leaks Are Fake

By Tatsu Ikeda
14 December 2016
Bottom line, the Russian conspiracy is a myth, for both Podesta Leaks and DNC Leaks. I will prove it.

A reconstruction of the email shows a google warning and the famous Bitly link. The domain of the server used to trick John into giving away his password was myaccount.google.com-securitysettingpage.tk. A simple host lookup show that is was an alias for om-securitysettingpage.tk. This server operated in the Netherlands, the register was Dot TK of the Netherlands. Today the whois lookup is refused, as part of the coverup. Adding a plus sign at the end of the bitly link shows that the link was clicked on twice, the same time the email phish was sent, March 19, 2016. The interesting thing going to home page http://com-securitysettingpage.tk, the server used to trick John, brought up his own wikipedia page by way of an "iframe", a very simple way to inject the real wikipedia page into the server's home page. This page was snapshotted twice by Wayback Machine at archive.org. The link is https://web.archive.org/web/20161028181521/http://com-securitysettingpage.tk.
So you tell me, is the simple email hack the work of Russian state professional hackers? Why use Bitly at all? Why troll John by leaving his wikipedia page on the server used to trick him, 6 whole months after the so-called "hack"? This is the attack of a 12 year old, Nigerian prince stuff. It's not sophisticated in the least.

 

[AZGAL]

Who Is Sam Nunberg? Former Trump Aide Says Mueller Can Arrest Him for Refusing Subpoena, Will Rip It Up on TV
By Max Kutner On 3/5/18 at 3:16 PM NEWSWEEK

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, l'il sam will not. He will be informed that once the grand jury is concluded, he will be released from a series of contempt imprisonments to be arrested for obstruction of justice charges.

Sam will sing like a canary.

 

[AZGAL]

Google Safe Browsing
Google Safe Browsing is a part of the Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, and Apple Safari browsers.
Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is phishing?

1. 
   In some cases, URLs will be a bit more complex; be sure to check the name listed immediately to the left of the top level domain (.com, .net, .co.uk, etc.).
   For instance, http://www.google.com, http://news.google.com and http://www.google.com/firefox/ are all part of the same site. However, google.com.fraudulentdomain.com/login.html is NOT! Neither is www.g00gle.com (note that in this URL, the letter o is replaced by the number 0).
   
   Tip: Since a forged URL can look very similar to a genuine one, it's safer to use a bookmark you've created or to type the URL into the location bar by hand instead of following links from your email. This is important for any page where you're asked to log in or provider private information.

 

[AZGAL]

There is nothing for Sam to sing about and that's why he is angry.

 

[AZGAL]

Success of the phishing campaign
CTU researchers analyzed 4,396 phishing URLs sent to 1,881 Google Accounts between March and September, 2015. More than half (59%) of the URLs were accessed, suggesting that the recipients at least opened the phishing page. From the available data, it is not possible to determine how many of those Google Accounts were compromised. Most of the targeted accounts received multiple phishing attempts, which may indicate that previous attempts had been unsuccessful. However, 35% of accounts that accessed the malicious link were not subject to additional attempts, possibly indicating that the compromise was successful.
Of the accounts targeted once, CTU researchers determined that 60% of the recipients clicked the malicious Bitly. Of the accounts that were targeted more than once, 57% of the recipients clicked the malicious link in the repeated attempts. These results likely encourage threat actors to make additional attempts if the initial phishing email is unsuccessful.

 

[AZGAL]

The Grassley-Graham letter states that Steele admitted in a British court that included in the dossier is “unsolicited — and unverified — allegations.”

 

[AZGAL]

UNSEALED: Fusion GPS Bank Records Show Russia-Related Payments

 

[AZGAL]

The FBI Hand Behind Russia-gate

Special Report: In the Watergate era, liberals warned about U.S. intelligence agencies manipulating U.S. politics, but now Trump-hatred has blinded many of them to this danger becoming real, as ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern notes.

By Ray McGovern

..."So, on Jan. 6, 2017, President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper released an evidence-free report that he said was compiled by “hand-picked” analysts from the CIA, FBI and NSA, offering an “assessment” that Russia and President Putin were behind the release of the Democratic emails in a plot to help Trump win the presidency.

Despite the extraordinary gravity of the charge, even New York Times correspondent Scott Shane noted that proof was lacking. He wrote at the time: “What is missing from the [the Jan. 6] public report is what many Americans most eagerly anticipated: hard evidence to back up the agencies’ claims that the Russian government engineered the election attack. … Instead, the message from the agencies essentially amounts to ‘trust us.’”"...

 

[AZGAL]