So I take that as you cannot or will not support your argument. Do have a lovely evening though.Ok, good for you, remain taf.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So I take that as you cannot or will not support your argument. Do have a lovely evening though.Ok, good for you, remain taf.
You can use them to travel.Who is it that grants the 'privilege' to drive to 233 million people. The public pays for the roads, we should have the right to use them. And if driving is an absolute necessity for most how can it not be a right?
Since when does anything the government does make logical sense?Interesting, because most drunk drivers, including most who kill others while driving drunk, are well over 21. Worse is that most have multiple DUI's on their record.
Rights with conditions. No problem with that.You can use them to travel.
But you have to agree that driving is not a right to the same degree as other things we call rights because the state can bar you from driving on public roads if you don't have insurance or a license to drive.
Rights with conditions. No problem with that.
Some rights have administrative costs.If you have to pay the state to do it then it's not a right
If there is an administrative cost, then you have lost that Right.Some rights have administrative costs.
Then we have to redefine what rights are, and we must stop politicians from using the term. Even "civil rights" have a cost. And what about compulsory rights such as public education? It comes with costs and fees. Is education therefore a 'privilege' and not a right? And if just a privilege why truancy laws? What about "everyone has a right to healthcare". Is it only a right if there are no costs involved? Who will pay the doctors if healthcare is a right?If there is an administrative cost, then you have lost that Right.
Full stop.
Then we have to redefine what rights are, and we must stop politicians from using the term. Even "civil rights" have a cost. And what about compulsory rights such as public education? It comes with costs and fees. Is education therefore a 'privilege' and not a right? And if just a privilege why truancy laws? What about "everyone has a right to healthcare". Is it only a right if there are no costs involved? Who will pay the doctors if healthcare is a right?
Rights are lost if not exercised. Not taken by government, just...lost.No, we don't. Rights aren't given, thus they can't be regulated. You are born with Rights. Governments work their damndest to steal them from you.
Not according to SCOTUSSome rights have administrative costs.