All Charges Against Pres. Trump Dismissed.

The majority are MAGA, you would be as well if you were of higher intelligence. The fact is, you watch too much CNN.
Sure..................you follow and worship , this retard?

1731072970397.png





 
Sure..................you follow and worship , this retard
"Retard," which is the epithet derived from people with Down Syndrome. Why do you use such an ugly word, a word that is no different than calling someone the "N" word.

I am not a Democrat, I love people with Down Syndrome. I never use derogatory insults bigoted democrats use to besmirch those who are born different than other people.

You, nothing fancy, are a scumbag.

Retard? Democrats have no place in society, they can't say the "N" word but the democrats always have a replacement word.

Down Syndrome people, how ugly to call them retards then to use the term as one used to use the "N" word, to denigrate groups of people.
 
This is going to take some time to sink and settle in.

For instance--

The libs really thought they would destroy him with impeachments and convictions. It just made him stronger. It made many of us hate their lawfare.

They threw EVERYTHING at him. Everything, wielding all their levers of power--and they have a lot of levers.

And he still won decisively.

Still sinking in
Quibble.... I checked and the kitchen sink is still intact! 🙄
 
"Retard," which is the epithet derived from people with Down Syndrome.
NO , it isn't..........DUMB ASS.
Why do you use such an ugly word, a word that is no different than calling someone the "N" word.

I am not a Democrat, I love people with Down Syndrome. I never use derogatory insults bigoted democrats use to besmirch those who are born different than other people.

You, nothing fancy, are a scumbag.
You worship one.
Retard? Democrats have no place in society, they can't say the "N" word but the democrats always have a replacement word.

Down Syndrome people, how ugly to call them retards then to use the term as one used to use the "N" word, to denigrate groups of people.
 
Allow me to explain. A full exoneration would require an acquittal by a jury following a fair trial. What we have here is justice denied.
Except that, due to the principle of innocent until proven guilty, he can claim to be innocent.
 
Poor Joy Reid and the leftist media. They may be unburdened of the "convicted felon" slogan if the phony conviction is overturned.
But, it wasn't phony.
 
Except that, due to the principle of innocent until proven guilty, he can claim to be innocent.
Absolutely. But the evidence of his guilt is publicly available in Smith's indictments. It's overwhelming.
 
Technically, the judge can throw out the case before a sentence is passed. Another trial is not required.
The upper chambers of the New York State legislature will give them the 3:00 a.m. phone call trust me .
 
Except that, due to the principle of innocent until proven guilty, he can claim to be innocent.
Sure Trump can CLAIM to be innocent, that doesn't make it true.

WHAT is Trump appealing?
WHY is Trump appealing, when he is innocent?
 
Absolutely. But the evidence of his guilt is publicly available in Smith's indictments. It's overwhelming.
They will set a precedent that they cannot survive themselves. This isn't about guilt It's about everyone being as guilty.
 
15th post
Absolutely. But the evidence of his guilt is publicly available in Smith's indictments. It's overwhelming.
Trump has the right to act like the Progressives do. He most likely will not. He has every right though. We will see how pure and chaste they are if he pursued the same polices Prog Socialist Communists do. Joe and Kamala sounded in the direction of professional for the first time in 4 years the last two days. We will see if the love of bipartisanship will appear the next two months in Prog Socialist directives that makes it more difficult for Trump.
 
Absolutely. But the evidence of his guilt is publicly available in Smith's indictments. It's overwhelming.
That's your conclusion, but the "evidence" hasn't been challenged in court, and the principle still applies.
 
Sure Trump can CLAIM to be innocent, that doesn't make it true.
The New York Democrats can charge anyone they want, even when they are innocent.

Democrats had to change the statuate of limitations in order to charge Trump.

Democrats had to turn a federal crime (that Trump was innocent of) into a state crime.

Democrats had to change an existing fraud law from a misdemeanor into a felony.

Democrats then ignored all the rights of the defendant, denying Trump a fair trial.

Democrats can claim they are not corrupt tyrants, that does not make Democrats innocent.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom