Alina Habba Accidentally Admits Donald Trump Could Be Totally Bought

That's not a statutory requirement, they only need to show xiden or his family profited. And there's no denying they did. And so far no one has shown what goods or services were provided for all those millions.

.
McDonnell v United States.

9-0 SCOTUS ruling that to be illegal, the money must be attached to an official act.


the statute in question 18 USC 201.

(b)Whoever—
(1)directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises anypublic official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—
(A)
to influence any official act; or
 
And you keep ignoring the physical meetings, I wonder why that is?

.
You mean LUNCHES with his son where no bussiness discussions were witnessed?

If you think you have serious evidence of something...then why do you need to keep posting this bullshit and distoring facts?
 
I talk about him all the time. He's ding very well on most things, although I admit I'm not all that happy with his stance on Israel.

What does any of this have to do with tRump's lawyers admitting he's for sale?
I just keep seeing you crying over Trump, you need to get out and get healthy
 
Conduct of discussing travel and weather with Hunter in the presense of his associates?

What the hell are you talking about?
They don’t know. When they run out of bullshit to throw at the wall, these posters run away.
 
McDonnell v United States.

9-0 SCOTUS ruling that to be illegal, the money must be attached to an official act.


the statute in question 18 USC 201.

(b)Whoever—
(1)directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises anypublic official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—
(A)
to influence any official act; or


As many as 80 visits from the crackhead associates to the WH, were they all talking about the fucking weather. Now we're back to you propagandist being just plain pathetic.

.
 
They rig a gigantic fine that nobody could pay and then they engage in pure speculation about how Trump can come up with the money. What a cheap gang of hustlers. It beats talking about Biden though.
 
As many as 80 visits from the crackhead associates to the WH, were they all talking about the fucking weather. Now we're back to you propagandist being just plain pathetic.

.
Keep inflating the number. Pretend it is 1000.

It doesn’t matter unless you can attach it to an official act. Which is, despite your attempt to claim otherwise, a statutory requirement.
 
Prove it bitch.
Dummy, thats not how it works.

You claimed Biden held bussiness meetings with Hunter's associates - YOU prove it.

The only thing that Hunter associate's testimony to Congress established was that Joe sometimes had calls and lunches with Hunter where his associates were present. There is ZERO testimony of anyone witnessing any bussiness ever being discussed with Joe Biden.

How fucking dumb do you have to be to think that someone could be prosecuted or impeached for having casual calls and lunches with his son?
 
Last edited:
Keep inflating the number. Pretend it is 1000.

It doesn’t matter unless you can attach it to an official act. Which is, despite your attempt to claim otherwise, a statutory requirement.
Act???

They can't even show evidence of Joe discussing any bussiness with Hunter, never mind following through with any acts.
 
Keep inflating the number. Pretend it is 1000.

It doesn’t matter unless you can attach it to an official act. Which is, despite your attempt to claim otherwise, a statutory requirement.


WH visitor logs show as many as 80 visits to the WH by the crackheads associates. One made 27 visits.


.
 
WH visitor logs show as many as 80 visits to the WH by the crackheads associates. One made 27 visits.


.
None of this amounts to a hill of beans until you find that connection to an official act.

You can stop beating around the bush. We both know there is no such evidence.
 
Dummy, thats not how it works.

You claimed Biden held bussiness meetings with Hunter's associates - YOU prove it.

The only thing that Hunter associate's testimony to Congress established was that Joe sometimes had calls and lunches with Hunter where his associates were present. There is ZERO testimony of anyone witnessing any bussiness ever being discussed with Joe Biden.

How fucking dumb do you have to be to think that someone could be prosecuted or impeached for having casual calls and lunches with his son?


FOAD commie, this shit has been posted on this board tons of times. Run along an play with yourself. Once again you commies have no intelligence if you can't see what the rest of the fucking world is seeing.

.
 
FOAD commie, this shit has been posted on this board tons of times. Run along an play with yourself. Once again you commies have no intelligence if you can't see what the rest of the fucking world is seeing.

Yep, you've got nothing and are just down to silly name calling. :itsok:
 

Forum List

Back
Top