From your link:
Yet the report also rejects Trump’s claims that the FBI went easy on Clinton. Investigators found no evidence that the FBI avoided charges because of political bias—ultimately concluding the decisions made during the investigation were reasonable.
What part of that do you not fucking get?
Your bringing up that Comey ursurped Lynch's power is a total self-refutation since DOJ position on bringing charges was ultimately same as Comey's - not enough evidence for criminal indictment.
Bwuhahahaha......
Please explain what the US IG ruling no bias was shown by Comey when he chose to violate FBI rules and protocols, when he took it upon himself to make the decision that Hillary would not be indicted - which was never his job or within his power to make - and when he chose to spew personal opinion about her behavior for which she was not charged / indicted and the US IG rebuking / slamming him for doing those things?
I never made the argument that Comey's actions were based on bias - I said the US IG rebuked Comey for 'usurping the power / role / responsibility of the DOJ / US IG by making his public declaration that Hillary would not be indicted, which the article clearly states and which YOU just helped support. (Thank you.)
Attempting to change the entire discussion by making false accusations that I argued something I did not is pathetic. I could care less why Comey did what he did. I pointed out that he was condemned by the US IG for violating FBI SOP, rules, regulations, and for 'usrpig the authority of the US AG'.
AND, by the way, your final claim is a flat-out debunked
LIE, as the article states, which I posted a little earlier:
"Your bringing up that Comey ursurped Lynch's power is a total self-refutation since DOJ position on bringing charges was ultimately same as Comey's - not enough evidence for criminal indictment."
The article clearly states - quotes the US IG report - the US IG made a point to declare it did NOT investigate whether Hillary had committed crimes or not, that it's focus on their investigation was to determine if Comey's actions were effected by bias, not to investigate Hillary, not te 2nd-guess Comey's decision.
It's all in the article - it's all in the report - it's all in the post I made earlier. AGAIN, you deliberately LIE, in the face of evidence posted earlier. AGAIN, your credibility is SHOT! There is simply no reason to read anything else you post as you have been proven to be intentionally lying TWICE and attempting to claim I was arguing some point I did not and could not care less about.
As you asked earlier - right back at you, 'What the F* is wrong with YOU", snowflake?!
