Aileen Cannon should be disbarred.

Status
Not open for further replies.
1. I wanted to leave AFG but without turning it over to the Taliban like Biden did. The generals wanted to keep 6,000 troops there at Bagram to be sure the AFGs had backup. Trump could have made that happen, Biden abandoned the AFGs and the Taliban won, a isaster losing $85b of modern military equipment.

2. Trump had an understanding with the Taliban, no US troops were injured during Trump's negotiation with them, 14 months or so.

3. The Brits hold Biden in CONTEMPT for his retreat from AFG.

Parliament holds Joe Biden in contempt over Afghanistan​


4. As for Trump releasing 5,000 prisoners, they were free as soon as the Taliban took control anyway.

I think you have rose tinted glasses.

Releasing 5,000 soldiers... what do you think was going to happen. By the time Biden pulled out, there wasn't much choice left because of what Trump had already done. Trump wouldn't have solved anything, as there wasn't a solution left.

Making a deal where no US troops get killed, but the Taliban take over the whole country is.... quite frankly, fucking ridiculous. I

The Telegraph might as well be called the Trump Times. It's a very pro-right wing paper that pumps out shit on a daily basis. They've attacked Starmer for many things that Conservative government did, because they're a mouthpiece for the rich.

The Taliban 5,000 that were released ended up fighting the Afghan forces who Trump sold their country out from under their feet. Trump didn't give a shit about the people of Afghanistan.

So, Trump essentially handed the country over to the Taliban and didn't give the Afghan govt a chance. That's not a good deal, that's the shittest deal possible.
 
Trump had an understanding with the Taliban
That understanding was that if the Taliban chilled out, we’d leave and then they can take over the country.
 
1. Biden committed a crime, he stole classified documents. Not only that, he and his Crime Family made about $20,000,000 selling influence. You whine about us calling democrats criminals, yet you democrats keep calling Trump a "felon", so what? They either go to prison or they don't. That is the only thing that matters. The rest in "name-calling".

2. Trump was a victim of LAWFARE. His "felonies" will be overturned on appeal. But that will take some time.

3. Trump was president, he had every right to those documents. There is no case, it was dismissed, there is no "that", duh.
1. You see Biden as a criminal but not Trump? Interesting
2.if Trump gets his conviction overturned by a non Trump appointed judge… get back to us.
3. Trump was NOT President when he had those docs. He had NO right to them
 
not when they are used in criminal prosecutions, when they dismiss the case
They’re releasing the report from the election interference case which was not under Cannon’s jurisdiction. This little tyrant thinks she’s on the Supreme Court and can do whatever she wants.
 
They’re releasing the report from the election interference case which was not under Cannon’s jurisdiction. This little tyrant thinks she’s on the Supreme Court and can do whatever she wants.
How was it out of her jurisdiction? The case was brought to her, the circuit court didn’t rule it was out of her jurisdiction…

What are you talking about??

Didn’t he already release a report before the election?
 
Possession is 90% of the law. I was actually told that by an A-1 lawyer.
What right did the DOJ have to demand documents from former president Trump?
Kidding, you're kidding, right? The documents in question belong to the US, not Dotard.
 
How was it out of her jurisdiction? The case was brought to her, the circuit court didn’t rule it was out of her jurisdiction…

What are you talking about??

Didn’t he already release a report before the election?
The election interference case was in DC, not Florida, dipshit.

The final report has not been released.
 
Never before in America had a sitting president demanded "Gimme your stuff."
The fact that the DoJ's demand was unprecedented is because never before had an ex-prez stolen classified docs and then refused to return them. Just as never before has an ex-prez been convicted of a felony. Or had two criminal indictments filed against him. Or tried to steal an election.
 
You will see. There are laws for what they did.
There are laws against upholding the law? Perhaps in trumpworld there are. Not so much in the real world.
 
All Garland has to do is drop the cases against those other two asshats & release Smith's report. Once that subhuman Trump takes office he's he's going to pardon them anyway.
Exactly. It would be idiotic for Garland to stand on principle knowing the future Felon-in-Chief is going to pardon the two MAGAists.
 
How was it out of her jurisdiction? The case was brought to her, the circuit court didn’t rule it was out of her jurisdiction…

What are you talking about??

Didn’t he already release a report before the election?

#1 She dismissed the FL case, meaning she has no case under her jurisdiction.

#2 Her dismissal is on appeal to the 11th Circuit. When an interlockery appeal is pending before the Appeals court jurisdiction is removed from the trail court (her) to the appeals court pending resolution of the appeal.

#3 She attempted to block not only Volume 2 (Espionage Case) but also Volume 1 (J6) case. The J6 case is in another Federal District and under a different Federal Judge (Judge Chutkan) and a different appeals court (DC Circuit).

Those are 3 reasons off the top of my head as to why she didn't have jurisdiction to attempt to block BOTH Volumes of the Special Prosecutors report.

Oh - and the AG had already indicted that Volume 2 (Espionage Case) would NOT be released to the public because there is current litigation before the 11th Circuit.

Hope this helps

WW
 
Exactly. It would be idiotic for Garland to stand on principle knowing the future Felon-in-Chief is going to pardon the two MAGAists.
Garland..principle..:auiqs.jpg:
You're a loon. Wait til the 22nd. You'll see what's up.
Trumpy Bear did his homework this time. He has a great team, too.
 
Just for the record.

The 11th Circuit reversed Judge Cannon's order (3rd time this has happened in her Trump) case and cleared the release to Congress and the public on Volume 1 (J6) case. Volume 2 will be turned over to the Majority/Minority Leaders of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees.

What is beautiful about this is if the report were delayed until Trump Administration was in place, he could kill the report from ever seeing the light of day outside his DOJ. However because it will be turned over to Congress (with copies to the Minority Leaders of the Judiciary) he won't be able to bury it.

WW
 
I think you have rose tinted glasses.

Releasing 5,000 soldiers... what do you think was going to happen. By the time Biden pulled out, there wasn't much choice left because of what Trump had already done. Trump wouldn't have solved anything, as there wasn't a solution left.

Making a deal where no US troops get killed, but the Taliban take over the whole country is.... quite frankly, fucking ridiculous. I

The Telegraph might as well be called the Trump Times. It's a very pro-right wing paper that pumps out shit on a daily basis. They've attacked Starmer for many things that Conservative government did, because they're a mouthpiece for the rich.

The Taliban 5,000 that were released ended up fighting the Afghan forces who Trump sold their country out from under their feet. Trump didn't give a shit about the people of Afghanistan. So, Trump essentially handed the country over to the Taliban and didn't give the Afghan govt a chance. That's not a good deal, that's the shittest deal possible.
1. You have too many talking points and not enough recollection of the facts.

2. According to Joint Chief Milley the AFG army of 700,0000 should have easily defeated 30,000 poorly armed and poorly trained Taliban. What actually happened? The 700,000 man army melted into the population. The 5,000 prisoner release was NOT an issue according to Milley. Most of them were not "soldiers", there was even an American among them (google the American Taliban, John Walker Lindh) . Biden could have kept 2,500 troops at Bagram very easily, but chose to pull everyone out ASAP. A disaster. Trump would have listened to his generals, BIDEN OVERRULED THEM.
"But Milley added later that the "fundamental flaw" of the US exit had been the timing of the Biden administration's decision to order a civilian evacuation in Afghanistan. He said it had come "too slow and too late".
He also emphasized that he had advised top American officials that the US "needed to maintain a minimum force of 2,500 troops on the ground" in order to prevent the Taliban from seizing control.
"Without this support, it was my view at the time, that it was a matter of 'when, not if' the Afghan government would collapse and the Taliban would take control," said Mr Milley.

3. Trump's deal worked dumbass. Biden fucked things up, as Obama says "never underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up".

4. The FACT is that PARLIAMENT HOLDS BIDEN IN CONTEMPT. You can't dance around that.

5. Trump handed off AFG as a stable situation, with only 2,500 US troops there and none getting killed.
BIDEN FUCKED IT UP, NOT TRUMP.
 
1. Biden committed a crime, he stole classified documents.
The SC named to investigate his case, a Repub, recommended no charges be filed based on the facts. Get over it.
 
That understanding was that if the Taliban chilled out, we’d leave and then they can take over the country.
The US stood up the AFG army of about 700,000 men with $85b of modern US military equipment.
Biden fucked up the withdrawal and is held in CONTEMPT by British Parliament for his stupid withdrawal, against the advice of his generals. Milley recommended keeping 2,500 US troops in Bagram to support the AFG military, Biden pulled the rug out from the AFGs.
 
Garland..principle..:auiqs.jpg:
You're a loon. Wait til the 22nd. You'll see what's up.
Trumpy Bear did his homework this time. He has a great team, too.
That little bit of idiocy doesn't change the fact that pursuing trump's co-defendants is folly given Dotard's track record of protecting his associates from being held accountable for their criminal acts if it benefits him.
 
The SC named to investigate his case, a Repub, recommended no charges be filed based on the facts. Get over it.
...Hur's decision not to prosecute is based on the "fact" that Biden is too old and senile to stand trial, not that he didn't commit a crime.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom