I know one I didn't make....................You have made a series of horrible choices
In your life, haven't you?
Voting for Trump and Musk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know one I didn't make....................You have made a series of horrible choices
In your life, haven't you?
President In Name OnlyBiden is President. Trump is the President Elect. There is only one President at a time.
Just say'n.
WW
1. I wanted to leave AFG but without turning it over to the Taliban like Biden did. The generals wanted to keep 6,000 troops there at Bagram to be sure the AFGs had backup. Trump could have made that happen, Biden abandoned the AFGs and the Taliban won, a isaster losing $85b of modern military equipment.
2. Trump had an understanding with the Taliban, no US troops were injured during Trump's negotiation with them, 14 months or so.
3. The Brits hold Biden in CONTEMPT for his retreat from AFG.
![]()
Parliament holds Joe Biden in contempt over Afghanistan
MPs and peers unite to condemn ‘dishonour’ of US president’s withdrawal and his criticism of Afghan troops left behind to face Talibanwww.telegraph.co.uk
Parliament holds Joe Biden in contempt over Afghanistan
4. As for Trump releasing 5,000 prisoners, they were free as soon as the Taliban took control anyway.
That understanding was that if the Taliban chilled out, we’d leave and then they can take over the country.Trump had an understanding with the Taliban
1. You see Biden as a criminal but not Trump? Interesting1. Biden committed a crime, he stole classified documents. Not only that, he and his Crime Family made about $20,000,000 selling influence. You whine about us calling democrats criminals, yet you democrats keep calling Trump a "felon", so what? They either go to prison or they don't. That is the only thing that matters. The rest in "name-calling".
2. Trump was a victim of LAWFARE. His "felonies" will be overturned on appeal. But that will take some time.
3. Trump was president, he had every right to those documents. There is no case, it was dismissed, there is no "that", duh.
They’re releasing the report from the election interference case which was not under Cannon’s jurisdiction. This little tyrant thinks she’s on the Supreme Court and can do whatever she wants.not when they are used in criminal prosecutions, when they dismiss the case
How was it out of her jurisdiction? The case was brought to her, the circuit court didn’t rule it was out of her jurisdiction…They’re releasing the report from the election interference case which was not under Cannon’s jurisdiction. This little tyrant thinks she’s on the Supreme Court and can do whatever she wants.
Kidding, you're kidding, right? The documents in question belong to the US, not Dotard.Possession is 90% of the law. I was actually told that by an A-1 lawyer.
What right did the DOJ have to demand documents from former president Trump?
The election interference case was in DC, not Florida, dipshit.How was it out of her jurisdiction? The case was brought to her, the circuit court didn’t rule it was out of her jurisdiction…
What are you talking about??
Didn’t he already release a report before the election?
The fact that the DoJ's demand was unprecedented is because never before had an ex-prez stolen classified docs and then refused to return them. Just as never before has an ex-prez been convicted of a felony. Or had two criminal indictments filed against him. Or tried to steal an election.Never before in America had a sitting president demanded "Gimme your stuff."
Exactly. It would be idiotic for Garland to stand on principle knowing the future Felon-in-Chief is going to pardon the two MAGAists.All Garland has to do is drop the cases against those other two asshats & release Smith's report. Once that subhuman Trump takes office he's he's going to pardon them anyway.
How was it out of her jurisdiction? The case was brought to her, the circuit court didn’t rule it was out of her jurisdiction…
What are you talking about??
Didn’t he already release a report before the election?
Garland..principle..Exactly. It would be idiotic for Garland to stand on principle knowing the future Felon-in-Chief is going to pardon the two MAGAists.
1. You have too many talking points and not enough recollection of the facts.I think you have rose tinted glasses.
Releasing 5,000 soldiers... what do you think was going to happen. By the time Biden pulled out, there wasn't much choice left because of what Trump had already done. Trump wouldn't have solved anything, as there wasn't a solution left.
Making a deal where no US troops get killed, but the Taliban take over the whole country is.... quite frankly, fucking ridiculous. I
The Telegraph might as well be called the Trump Times. It's a very pro-right wing paper that pumps out shit on a daily basis. They've attacked Starmer for many things that Conservative government did, because they're a mouthpiece for the rich.
The Taliban 5,000 that were released ended up fighting the Afghan forces who Trump sold their country out from under their feet. Trump didn't give a shit about the people of Afghanistan. So, Trump essentially handed the country over to the Taliban and didn't give the Afghan govt a chance. That's not a good deal, that's the shittest deal possible.
The US stood up the AFG army of about 700,000 men with $85b of modern US military equipment.That understanding was that if the Taliban chilled out, we’d leave and then they can take over the country.
That little bit of idiocy doesn't change the fact that pursuing trump's co-defendants is folly given Dotard's track record of protecting his associates from being held accountable for their criminal acts if it benefits him.Garland..principle..
You're a loon. Wait til the 22nd. You'll see what's up.
Trumpy Bear did his homework this time. He has a great team, too.
...Hur's decision not to prosecute is based on the "fact" that Biden is too old and senile to stand trial, not that he didn't commit a crime.The SC named to investigate his case, a Repub, recommended no charges be filed based on the facts. Get over it.