Everyone already know you like to use fraudulent charts, so there's not need to tell us again.
You mean you aren't aware that the IPCC is aware that the models are running too hot?
Again, no need to double down on the fraud. You credentials as a fraud have been proven.
A quick glance shows that it's incorrect. It says it uses ERSSTv5, which is an ocean temperature database, but then it compares that to models for global temperature, both sea and land. Apples vs. oranges. The land is warming faster than the oceans, so of course ocean temperatures rise slower than the combined ocean/land models.
Post what you believe is the correct graph. Until then you are full of shit.
As is the case every time, no problem. I can always back up what I say. That's why I trigger you so badly.
www.realclimate.org
And zero scientific institutions that don't believe.
Do you have any idea how ironic your statement is? This coming from the person disagreeing with every scientific institution on Earth.
I refuse to have a science debate with Popeye. Neither of us is even qualified. We're all ignorant compared to actual climate scientists. We might as well have a debate about neuroscience.
You know the best part of this clown show? Most of the information they try to distort for their ends was collected by scientists that believe AGW is happening. They take work done by scientists and then distort it to contradict them on what it means. The arrogance is boundless.
Let's look at all the models instead of just the cherry picked ones. And instead of your apples to oranges comparison, let's actually look at CMIP6 models instead of your CMIP5 models which are out of date. Which by the way CMIP5 still shows models running hot. And I noticed you didn't provide a link either.As is the case every time, no problem. I can always back up what I say. That's why I trigger you so badly.
RealClimate: Model-Observation Comparisons
RealClimate: Since we have been periodically posting updates since 2009 of climate model output comparisons to observations across a range of variables, we have now set up this page as a permanent placeholder for the most up-to-date comparisons. We include surface temperature projections from...
Note how the models seem to be running hot ... by about 10%. That is, they've been very, very good. If someone told you otherwise, they lied to your face.
What you do about that is up to you. You could ask those people why they lied to you. Or you could drop to your knees, lick their boots, and beg for more lies.
We all know you'll choose the latter option.
"..These coordinated efforts are part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects (CMIP). The 2013 IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5) featured climate models from CMIP5, while the upcoming 2021 IPCC sixth assessment report (AR6) will feature new state-of-the-art CMIP6 models..."
www.carbonbrief.org
Laughable. Progressives think the # impressive. Nobody else does.
