Groan. Civilians.
"Officer of the Deck" is not a rank, but there is a position called "Officer of the Deck", and you have to pass the OOD certification to hold it.
"Engineering Officer of the Watch" (ee-ow) is not a rank, but there is watch position called "Engineering Officer of the Watch", and you have to pass the Reactor Watch Officer certification to hold it.
This should be where you apologize for accusing me of lying just because you were such a dumbfuck.
Then, you might want to look back at the results of all your other idiot vendettas. Is the endless humiliation that it gets you worth it?
Officer of the Deck is a well known temporary job description for LINE OFFICERS, and there are even optical devices created for them bearing that name. What you described is an enlisted position (as verified by a check to the list of jobs on the US Navy's website) where you watch gauges and other powerplant management systems.
The person in charge of that engineering section would of course be an engineering officer.
So, what was your rating?
And for the record it would be you getting humiliated...but you have no consience or shame, so humiliating you is just fun.
Absolutely correct !
And on his cap would be his call name (stitched on). Ask him what it was and he`ll try and find one with Google.I have not been in the Navy but I volunteered helping some who were to prepare for their engineering exams. So I have a very good idea what`s on their exams and what it takes to pass one.
This person behind the Siamese cat is an insult to all "Engineering Officers"
Never mind that liar..
The ISS Cmdr. Chris Hadfield up-loaded some more fascinating pictures:
Here is Newfoundlands natural ice breaker (Belle Isle) at work:
It`s got nothing to do with melting.
That process is driven by water currents and winds....and not just around Newfoundland but also for the Lincoln Sea
Here is an amazing picture of a "Karman Vortex Street":
Here is what the St.Lawrence Strait (Quebec) looks like right now:
They caught some spectacular "sprites" on camera.
These ones went up over 100 km:
Don Pettit who is the current ISS photographer had to ask NASA`s permission to remove the IR filters from the cameras
and shot some amazing pictures, like this coral reef :
Or the Ganges Delta agriculture fields:
The violet regions on the left are bare fields.
Here is the Pico do Fogo volcano and it`s Siamese cat in the hat "Chinese aerosol":
And by the way
This is the digital finger print for these photos:
FF D8 FF E0 00 10 4A 46 ÿØÿà JF
49 46 00 01 02 00 00 01 IF
00 01 00 00 FF ED 00 9B ÿà ›
50 68 6F 74 6F 73 68 6F Photosho
70 20 33 2E 30 00 38 42 p 3.0 8B
49 4D 04 04 07 43 61 70 IM Cap
74 69 6F 6E 00 00 00 79 tion y
1C 02 78 00 40 42 69 6C x @Bil
64 65 72 20 61 75 73 20 der aus
64 65 6D 20 41 6C 6C 20 dem All
2D 20 46 6F 74 6F 74 69 - Fototi
70 70 73 20 76 6F 6E 20 pps von
44 6F 6E 20 50 65 74 74 Don Pett
69 74 2E 56 6F 6E 20 4B it.Von K
61 72 6D 6F 6E 20 63 6C armon cl
6F 75 64 73 2E 1C 02 69 ouds.i
00 26 4E 41 53 41 20 2F &NASA /
20 50 65 74 74 69 74 20 Pettit
2F 20 49 53 53 20 46 6F / ISS Fo
74 6F 73 20 61 75 73 20 tos aus
64 65 6D 20 41 6C 6C 20 dem All
From that I can tell that the German News Magaizne "Der Spiegel" has reformatted Pettit, NASA`s photographer`s pictures.
But all they did is change the size and renamed them for their archives
So don`t try bullshit me again with photo- or any other image-shop reworked forecast anomaly pictures from one of these idiotic blogs you keep pasting in here, where Greenland looks like molten lava and pass them off as "Satellite pictures".
We are still waiting for you to scan in a document or a picture that shows that you "used to run nuclear power plants".
Here is a digital fingerprint of a picture my brother took with his camera when he visited me in Canada
45 78 69 66 00 00 49 49 Exif II
2A 00 08 00 00 00 01 00 *
69 87 04 00 01 00 00 00 i‡
1A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
01 00 86 92 02 00 1E 00 †’
00 00 2C 00 00 00 00 00 ,
00 00 4C 45 41 44 20 54 LEAD T
65 63 68 6E 6F 6C 6F 67 echnolog
69 65 73 20 49 6E 63 2E ies Inc.
20 56 31 2E 30 31 00 00 V1.01
FF FE 00 1F 4C 45 41 44 ÿþ LEAD
20 54 65 63 68 6E 6F 6C Technol
6F 67 69 65 73 20 49 6E ogies In
63 2E 20 56 31 2E 30 31 c. V1.01
00 FF FE 00 1F 4C 45 41 ÿþ LEA
44 20 54 65 63 68 6E 6F D Techno
6C 6F 67 69 65 73 20 49 logies I
6E 63 2E 20 56 31 2E 30 nc. V1.0
31 00 FF DB 00 43 00 02 1 ÿÛ C
For this photo print I scanned in and uploaded:
You are stuck...because you don`t know how to do digital forgery that would go right by me...just like "Saigon, the Journalist in Finland" who can`t run his finger across "QWERTYUIOP" and generate the ASCII sequence a Finnish key board would generate.
Almost all of you AGW forum trolls are complete frauds
69% Say ItÂ’s Likely Scientists Have Falsified Global Warming Research
What are standard IQ scale rates
70% of IQ scores fall between 85 and 115
remaining are those with an IQ range from 50-70 (- Mild mental retardation )
There is a pretty good correlation I would say.
You guys delude yourselves that you are "winning" never realizing you`all are on the wrong track: