According to M-EOOW every Chemical engineer or Ph.D would have to turn in his diploma because he did not take a course in "water chemistry"
Nah. But you couldn't run a reactor without learning it. Check out this handy DoE guide to Reactor Water Chemistry.
http://www.cedengineering.com/upload/Reactor Water Chemistry.pdf
Take note of the words
"Water Chemistry" in the title.
And thus the kooks all fail hard again. When will they understand that reflexively calling me a liar always leaves them looking like crybaby retards? They try so hard to catch me at something, and always end up doing a face plant into a cow patty. But they just get up, wipe the cowshit off their faces, and try again.
That`s why "boiler chemists" unlike "mamooth water chemistry" graduates would use Hydrazin instead of "Ammonia" like the M-EOOw idiot said he used...because Hydrazine is also an Oxgen scavenger.
So is ammonia, in a reactor. Radiation breaks some ammonia down into N and H, and the H scavenges oxygen. That's reactor chemistry, understanding the additional radiation effects on the chemistry. You don't have a clue about it.
And don't nitpick. Ammonia in solution is ammonium hydroxide, but nobody calls the bottle of ammonia in the kitchen cabinet "ammonium hydroxide". It's just ammonia. It's assumed it will be dissolved, as handling ammonia gas is way more difficult. In the Navy case, we used 30% aqueous ammonia.
There's also no problem with Siede Verzug -- boiling delay -- because there's no boiling in a Navy reactor. Yet another basic concept you fail to understand.
(NH4)+ ions corrode the Copper alloys by dissolving Cu and rapidly pitting the tubing used in the super heaters, the pre- heaters and the condensers.
Which would be why ammonia isn't used on the secondary side. On the primary side, no copper alloys. Just stainless steel.
pH control is the least of the problems because the ion exchange resins which are used to control the TDS contribute NaOH to the make up water anyway and the pH stays alkaline.
No such resin on the secondary side, and the primary side resin is for filtering, not pH control. You're just not very good at this. You inexplicably keep incorrectly assuming your experience applies to Navy nuclear power plants.
Nothing pertaining to the operation of a boiler would change the boiler water to go acidic...
That's nice. Why are you rambling about such nonsense? As, is usually the case, did your voices tell you I said such a thing? Please, point out where I said it.
There is no change in pH when the ion exchanger has trapped as much Calcium as it could and exchanged the Ca++ with Na+ ions.
You just don't get it. There was no ion exchanger on the secondary loop. Wouldn't work when your water is treated with phosphates. The phosphates are what pulls out the calcium and magnesium to prevent scaling. The soft sludge falls to the bottom of the steam generator, and you do regular blowdowns to flush it out.
What I'm talking about is the demineralizer that the feed water gets run through to purify it before injecting it into the secondary loop. When you see the chloride concentration creeping up there, you know the resin is failing.
When that happens the TDS sensor on that particular cartridge would shut it down automatically anyway and all makeup water would come from one of the other regenerated cartridges.
No TDS sensors. Makes no sense in a phosphate chemistry system, since by design they have a huge crapload of TDS.
This is how you always screw it up hard. You always stupidly assume that your own experience _must_ apply to every other single thing in the world, and then you brainlessly scream that anyone with a different experience is a liar.
Boiler water can be treated either with hydrazine, or with phosphates. Your system used hydrazine. The Navy used phosphates, as dissolved oxygen in the water wasn't an issue, since the water came from an evaporator. Thus, the rest of your crank rambling is meaningless, as it only applies to a hydrazine chemistry system.
But I already knew that when you were lecturing Westwall with Steam tables...you would not even know what that is...I was fricking trained on these
Liar. I said I could get the steam tables. Future tense. You know that, but you _still_ choose to lie about it.
And quoted it in calories per gram.
Yep, because it was the simplest way to explain it. Good engineering. Compared to your suckass engineering, where no one can ever understand what you're babbling about. Good engineers communicate clearly, briefly, and to the point, and you can't do that.
