Agrivoltaics, saving farms

[ding]

At least I can back up my statement

No, you can't, because you didn't show where the energy goes.

Says the guy who said the planet is warming because of fossil fuels.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Keep pimping for solar.

Solar can kiss my big white butt.

Have you submitted your paper yet? Refuting conservation of energy is even bigger than smart photons.

You'll be famous!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You tell me. You're the idiot that believes the planet is warming because of fossil fuels.

You're the idiot that believes solar panels destroy energy.

 

[ding]

Using zero fossil fuel will cool the planet.

Dumbest statement ever.

Using solar will not cool the planet.

2nd dumbest statement ever.

 

[ding]

Solar can kiss my big white butt.

Have you submitted your paper yet? Refuting conservation of energy is even bigger than smart photons.

You'll be famous!

If solar had a dick, you'd be sucking it.

Tell me again how if we stopped burning fossil fuels the planet would cool but it wouldn't be your precious solar power's fault?

Using zero fossil fuel will cool the planet.

Using solar will not cool the planet.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

In the context or replacing fossil fuels with solar... The waste heat from generating electricity from fossil fuels goes away and there is no change in waste heat from electricity usage.

The waste heat from fossil fuels is an issue?

DURR

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I calculated if we cover 1% of the planet's land surface with solar panels that will be enough to take the planet from 0.6 w/m^2 net warming to -0.1 w/m^2 net cooling.

Post your calculations.

 

[ding]

You're the idiot that believes solar panels destroy energy.

Incorrect. I believe solar power converts photons into electricity creates a localizing cooling effect.

You're the moron who believes if we would only stop burning fossil fuels the planet would cool down and avert catastrophe.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Incorrect. I believe solar power converts photons into electricity creates a localizing cooling effect.

You're the moron who believes if we would only stop burning fossil fuels the planet would cool down and avert catastrophe.

I believe solar power converts photons into electricity creates a localizing cooling effect.

But no net cooling.

 

[ding]

Post your calculations.

Whats wrong you don't know how to calculate it? Surely someone who is intelligent enough to know that if we stop burning fossil fuels the planet will cool should be able to calculate that. After all, you had to perform calculations to know that not burning fossil fuels would cool the planet, right?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Whats wrong you don't know how to calculate it? Surely someone who is intelligent enough to know that if we stop burning fossil fuels the planet will cool should be able to calculate that. After all, you had to perform calculations to know that not burning fossil fuels would cool the planet, right?

You already did them, so post them.

 

[ding]

I believe solar power converts photons into electricity creates a localizing cooling effect.

But no net cooling.

Localized cooling is the net cooling, dummy. It's net of every variable at the site. It literally cools the site down to a lower temperature than would exist if the site wasn't there.

 

[ding]

You already did them, so post them.

Post your work that show the planet would cool if fossil fuels were no longer burned.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Localized cooling is the net cooling, dummy. It's net of every variable at the site. It literally cools the site down to a lower temperature than would exist if the site wasn't there.

Localized cooling is the net cooling, dummy.

Warming at point of use shows your idiocy. Again.

It literally cools the site down to a lower temperature than would exist if the site wasn't there.

Magic energy destroying solar panels or ding is an idiot who can't balance an equation?

Tough call.

 

[ding]

The waste heat from fossil fuels is an issue?

DURR

Apparently you believe it is.

Using zero fossil fuel will cool the planet.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Post your work that show the planet would cool if fossil fuels were no longer burned.

Show you that no waste heat makes it cooler?

You're actually becoming more retarded.

 

[ding]

Warming at point of use shows your idiocy. Again.
Magic energy destroying solar panels or ding is an idiot who can't balance an equation?
Tough call.

Says the guy whoring for solar power.

 

[ding]

Show you that no waste heat makes it cooler?

You're actually becoming more retarded.

Says the guy who made this statement:

Using zero fossil fuel will cool the planet.

 

[Muhammed]

I find it hard to believe that they get much yield from plants constantly in shadow. Last I knew plants needed sunlight for photosynthesis. But then again I still believe men are men and women are women

FYI: Some plants do fine in the shade. I plant lettuce and carrots on the north side of of the house because they are shade tolerant.

 

[ReinyDays]

Whats wrong you don't know how to calculate it? Surely someone who is intelligent enough to know that if we stop burning fossil fuels the planet will cool should be able to calculate that. After all, you had to perform calculations to know that not burning fossil fuels would cool the planet, right?

I did ... and the numbers say you're wrong ... I get 5ºC cooling on the panel itself under a zenith sun and a high pressure dome, extremely low RH ... i.e. under the full 1,360 W/m^2 ... so don't forget to multiply by the cosine of your latitude ...

If by local you mean ten feet ... maybe you're right ... but only under completely calm conditions, any wind at all ruins your claim ... and any water vapor in the atmosphere will heavily moderate air temperatures ...

I don't believe you know how to calculate this ... you've only used weasel words ... is that because you're a weasel? ... look at what I quoted ... talk about total weasel ... T'Patriot never claimed to have done the math ... you did claim that ...

... so let's see your math ... or admit you don't know how to calculate it ... this is more about your poor understanding of Atmospheric Science ...