AG Pam Bondi Absolutely Cooked Senate Dems...and Even Lib Reporters Couldn't Deny It

[Lesh]

The was BJ Bondie.

She either lied, didn't answer, attacked the questioner or referred to her cock-eyed director of the FBI.

I would have locked the corrupt bimbo up.

There’s nothing “gotcha”about asking what happened to the $50K

 

[berg80]

On the issue of transparency, the blonde sock puppet answered a question about Dotard's since deleted social media post demanding that she prosecute people on his enemies list by saying he's the most transparent prez in history.

It was, among many, a shining example of gaslighting. Where's the transparency on the Homan tape, the Epstein file, the proof for assassinating people in international waters, the legal justification for sending troops to US cities?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

There’s nothing “gotcha”about asking what happened to the $50K

Or immediately closing the investigation, as soon as Trump's regime took office.

The Mafia is like WTF?

 

[Lesh]

I didn't claim there was.

No. I was just making a point

 

[berg80]

No. I was just making a point

Are you seeing this thread on the Politics forum? I can't.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

No. I was just making a point

I know, I corrected my response.

 

[berg80]

No. I was just making a point

Are you seeing this thread on the Politics forum? I can't.

Never mind, I just figured out why. I have the OP on ignore.

 

[Mac1958]

On the issue of transparency, the blonde sock puppet answered a question about Dotard's since deleted social media post demanding that she prosecute people on his enemies list by saying he's the most transparent prez in history.

It was, among many, a shining example of gaslighting. Where's the transparency on the Homan tape, the Epstein file, the proof for assassinating people in international waters, the legal justification for sending troops to US cities?

She was very good at avoiding direct questions and insulting people. That's what she was there to do, that's what she did.

Imagine the freedom of having no accountability to worry about.

 

[berg80]

She was very good at avoiding direct questions and insulting people. That's what she was there to do, that's what she did.

Imagine the freedom of having no accountability to worry about.

Sen. Durbin made a comment to her after she refused to answer one of his questions. Suggesting that she may get away with refusing to answer now, but eventually she'll have to.

It's as though members of the regime have not considered the consequences of their actions in the future. As though their disgraceful, unlawful, traitorous behavior will be forgotten once out of office. There's a surreal quality to it.

 

[Mac1958]

Sen. Durbin made a comment to her after she refused to answer one of his questions. Suggesting that she may get away with refusing to answer now, but eventually she'll have to.

It's as though members of the regime have not considered the consequences of their actions in the future. As though their disgraceful, unlawful, traitorous behavior will be forgotten once out of office. There's a surreal quality to it.

I can't help but wonder if they are willing to do this, to go this far, because they don't expect to have to give up power.

And I don't mean winning elections.

 

[Delldude]

The was BJ Bondie.

She either lied, didn't answer, attacked the questioner or referred to her cock-eyed director of the FBI.

I would have locked the corrupt bimbo up.

LoL..... for what?

Not replying to personal attacks?....

 

[22lcidw]

She was keeping in line with Trump's administration, which is to show utter contempt towards not only the rule of law but democracy itself.

Every congressional hearing must be as she and others respond to these fraud cretins. And the next State of the Union Trump may have to go totally Prog in his remarks. If Progs take over the year after, he needs to double down.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

LoL..... for what?

Contempt.

Not replying to personal attacks?....

Of course, just like her daddy.

"How dare you ask me that question"?

 

[berg80]

I can't help but wonder if they are willing to do this, to go this far, because they don't expect to have to give up power.

And I don't mean winning elections.

The same thing has crossed my mind. I don't know how else to rationalize it.

Perhaps the reason they think there will be no consequence for them is Dem's desire, like Obama's with the Bush admin, to put this all behind us. Which I think was a mistake. Members of the Bush admin should have been held accountable for the torture of detainees. Members of this regime need to be held accountable for numerous illegal acts. And things like Bondi's contempt of Congress.

But under the current construct the narrative from the Right will be to accuse Dem's of weaponizing government to exact revenge against Repubs. Rhetoric which will be both ludicrous and effective.

 

[Delldude]

Contempt

Not usually.

 

[Billiejeens]

There’s nothing “gotcha”about asking what happened to the $50K

There is no $50,000.00

You've been scammed by your echo chamber again.

 

[Mac1958]

The same thing has crossed my mind. I don't know how else to rationalize it.

I can only think of two rationalizations -- (a) thinking that they don't have to worry about elections, or (b) assuming that everything is going to go so well, so completely, and so quickly, that the electorate will gladly vote the GQP into additional power.

 

[Moonglow]

Bondi is just another DEI hire by the ever horny Trump..

 

[Moonglow]

I can only think of two rationalizations -- (a) thinking that they don't have to worry about elections, or (b) assuming that everything is going to go so well, so completely, and so quickly, that the electorate will gladly vote the GQP into additional power.

They are delusional about the grandeur of the limits of power.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

You understand her role as AG is to respectfully answer appropriate questions asked by elected officials, right?

Respectfully to serious questions. Democrat theatre to gaslight their useful idiots is not serious.