AG Pam Bondi Absolutely Cooked Senate Dems...and Even Lib Reporters Couldn't Deny It

[berg80]

She remains unwaveringly devoted to Trump as the ruler of America; his loyal supporter! lol.

View attachment 1170936

Independent analyses of Attorney General Pam Bondi's October 7, 2025, Senate Judiciary Committee testimony highlight a contentious and combative hearing marked by partisan conflict.

Key points from various independent observers down below:

Bondi adopted a confrontational and evasive approach, frequently retaliating against Democratic questioning rather than providing substantive answers. This hearing was notably more aggressive than her prior testimony, with numerous clashes over politically charged issues such as dismissals of DOJ prosecutors and FBI officials involved in investigations related to Trump and his allies. nytimes+1

Democrats criticized Bondi for fundamentally altering the DOJ’s independence and accused her of enabling President Trump’s use of the Justice Department as a weapon against political adversaries. Senator Dick Durbin called her tenure a stain on American history, while other Democrats accused the DOJ of backtracking on investigations and politicizing justice. npr+2

Republicans praised Bondi for restoring a tough-on-crime stance and rectifying what they described as leniency under the Biden administration. They framed the hearing as exposing Democratic attempts to weaponize the DOJ themselves and protected Bondi’s efforts to investigate Trump critics while dismissing cases against Trump supporters. pbs+1

Bondi often dodged questions about sensitive topics, including an FBI investigation of White House border czar Tom Homan accepting cash bribes and the Biden administration’s handling of certain cases, causing frustration among senators, especially Democrats. nytimes+1

Commentators saw Bondi's tactic as focused on undermining Democrats rather than engaging with their concerns substantively, reflecting deep polarization in the Senate and the broader political environment. the-independent+1

Overall, independent analyses portray Bondi’s testimony as fiercely partisan, highlighting a Justice Department increasingly entwined with politics under her leadership, rather than a nonpartisan law enforcement agency. The hearing deepened divides between Democrats demanding accountability and Republicans defending the administration’s actions. the-independent+4

sources:

1. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/07/us/politics/bondi-hearing-takeaways.html
2. https://www.npr.org/2025/10/07/nx-s1-5563934/bondi-senate-judiciary-committee-testify
3. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/3-takeaways-from-bondis-combative-doj-oversight-hearing
4. https://www.the-independent.com/new...senate-hearing-attorney-general-b2841022.html
5. https://www.the-independent.com/new...trump-schiff-congress-testimony-b2841349.html
6. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cn4w50ld9net
7.
8.

Excellent summary.

 

[Lesh]

You hear what she said in response to Sheldon Whitehouse?

I bet you didn't.

She mentioned Reid Hoffman who was responsible for hooking Epstein up with donations to MIT and who also was a campaign contributor to Whitehouse.....

Deflection . She refused to respond to questions by attacking the questioner with non sequitors

The real question is WHY

Was she trying to protect herself from committing perjury?

Sure seems like it

If there are pictures of Trump with young half naked young girls, we should know about it.

If there aren’t she should say so

She refused to do that

 

[Billiejeens]

Asked about her possible conversations with the President, of course AG Bondi refuses to answer.

Where the Dims use any and all hearings as a platform to simply smear the President and his Administration, what purpose could possibly be served by treating the Dim Senators’ bullshit questioning as legitimate?

These idiot posters have no idea how oversight hearing work.

 

[Lesh]

These idiot posters have no idea how oversight hearing work.

Oh really? Explain then

Explain how witnesses can refuse to cooperate in those OVERSIGHT hearings

 

[ColonelAngus]

Wow. The misogynistic attacks on Bondi from the left is DISGUSTING.

YOU HATE WOMEN.

 

[Lesh]

Of course! I guess the Dem senators were all absent the day in law school when they taught about executive privilege.

Executive privilege means nothing in regards to illegal acts

 

[Delldude]

You understand her role as AG is to respectfully answer appropriate questions asked by elected officials, right?

Tell your democrats to quit acting like children. Respect is a two way street.

 

[kyzr]

Oh really? Explain then
Explain how witnesses can refuse to cooperate in those OVERSIGHT hearings

I can put up Mayorkas who swore the border was closed when he was letting millions of illegals into the US.

What he can do she can do better.

 

[Lesh]

Tell your democrats to quit acting like children. Respect is a two way street.

That’s your defense?

The questions weren’t POLITE enough??

 

[Delldude]

Deflection . She refused to respond to questions by attacking the questioner with non sequitors

The real question is WHY

Was she trying to protect herself from committing perjury?

Sure seems like it

If there are pictures of Trump with young half naked young girls, we should know about it.

If there aren’t she should say so

She refused to do that

If there was, why is the first time ever hearing about it come from the Senate floor?

You're so stupid not to realize that the media would have been all over that a long time before.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

That’s your defense?

The questions weren’t POLITE enough??

Trump's cult thinks just QUESTIONING Trump's regime, is disrespectful.

 

[Delldude]

Explain how witnesses can refuse to cooperate in those OVERSIGHT hearings

Cite the penalty for refusal.

 

[Delldude]

That’s your defense?

The questions weren’t POLITE enough??

Gotcha questions?

 

[Delldude]

Trump's cult thinks just QUESTIONING Trump's regime, is disrespectful.

Maybe your clown show could act like representatives instead of children.

They have long ago established that.

 

[Lesh]

Maybe your clown show could act like representatives instead of children.

They have long ago established that.

So she would have responded if they genuflected?

Bullshit

 

[Delldude]

Deflection
She refused to respond to questions by attacking the questioner with non sequitors

The real question is WHY

Was she trying to protect herself from committing perjury?

Sure seems like it

If there are pictures of Trump with young half naked young girls, we should know about it.

If there aren’t she should say so

She refused to do that

Fair exchange is no robbery.......

 

[JusticeHammer]

That's how it works in a democracy. Democracy is on pause until 2028.

This country is not a democracy

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Maybe your clown show could act like representatives instead of children.

The was BJ Bondie.

She either lied, didn't answer, attacked the questioner or referred to her cock-eyed director of the FBI.

They have long ago established that.

I would have locked the corrupt bimbo up.

 

[JusticeHammer]

You understand her role as AG is to respectfully answer appropriate questions asked by elected officials, right?

Dems don't deserve respect.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

(Here, Bondi interrupted, asking the senator, who worked for the justice department before his career in politics, “Do you have a law degree, Senator Schiff?”)

That's a NO