AG Pam Bondi Absolutely Cooked Senate Dems...and Even Lib Reporters Couldn't Deny It

[Missouri_Mike]

Why didn’t she deny it then?

No need to deny shit you just make up.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

$50K Homan took in a paper bag was given to him by undercover FBI agents.

Why was Biden's FBI giving money to people who might be in Trump's
new administration? Didn't they have any real crime to investigate?

And apparently he didn’t take it. The democrats are fucked.

 

[Lesh]

Bondi and Patel are two of the very best hiring by Trump. I love how they always tell Democrats to take your shit and shove it up your ass.

You love that they’re trolls.

Competence is not a “thing “

 

[Missouri_Mike]

You love that they’re trolls.

Competence is not a “thing “

They’re doing everything I voted for.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Bondi and Patel are two of the very best hiring by Trump. I love how they always tell Democrats to take your shit and shove it up your ass.

I love how Bondi and Patel go into these hearings fully loaded and looking for blood.

 

[MarathonMike]

She was keeping in line with Trump's administration, which is to show utter contempt towards not only the rule of law but democracy itself.

Wrong forum, should be in Humor. Democrats? Rule of Law? BAHAHAHAHAHA Good one!!!

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I love how Bondi and Patel go into these hearings fully loaded and looking for blood.

They just slap the **** out of the democrats, it’s hilarious to watch.

 

[Delldude]

Why didn’t she deny it then?

You hear what she said in response to Sheldon Whitehouse?

I bet you didn't.

She mentioned Reid Hoffman who was responsible for hooking Epstein up with donations to MIT and who also was a campaign contributor to Whitehouse.....

 

[CowboyTed]

If those existed, they would have been published years ago.

The Biden regime had a standing order at the DOJ to leak anything harmful to Trump or Republicans to the media.

Evidence of your claim...

The opposite was actually true... Because the Maxwell appeal was going on, no files were released...

 

[CowboyTed]

Well to MAGA she could have done a shit on the desk and they would have called it chocolate...

She was an embarrassment... She didn't act in a professional manner, but MAGA don't care...

They don't give a **** that the President has broken every norm and a few laws...

In other times, directing the AG to go after your political enemies is impeachable... MAGA don't give a ****, they don't have a clue at the norms they set...

 

[Delldude]

Evidence of your claim...

The opposite was actually true... Because the Maxwell appeal was going on, no files were released...

Releasing them at that point wasn't the issue......

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

 

[berg80]

Of course! I guess the Dem senators were all absent the day in law school when they taught about executive privilege.

In order to exempt yourself from answering questions under the guise of executive privilege it must first be asserted. The blonde sock puppet didn't do that.

 

[excalibur]

Asked about her possible conversations with the President, of course AG Bondi refuses to answer.

Where the Dims use any and all hearings as a platform to simply smear the President and his Administration, what purpose could possibly be served by treating the Dim Senators’ bullshit questioning as legitimate?

Privileged information.

 

[berg80]

I'm curious, Berg. How would you rate Pam Bondi's responses to questions as compared to Merrick Garland's?

What's the context?

 

[berg80]

She'll probably never answer a question again under oath because she knows they are going to be charging her for lying to Congress the day she leaves office.

All with the backdrop of the regime prosecuting Comey for allegedly lying to Congress.

 

[excalibur]

The Senate Democrats have played Lawfare Cheerleaders the past 8 years, and contributed to the effort with the corrupted Senate Intel Committee report on the Russia Hoax.

The are entitled to nothing in the form of courtesy or comity for the next four years. Every Oversight hearing is simply a platform for creating soundbites.

If they want answers to legitimate oversight questions, submit them in writing. Getting useful video because they think they control the process is a relic of days gone by.​

 

[Nobody911]

She remains unwaveringly devoted to Trump as the ruler of America; his loyal supporter! lol.

Independent analyses of Attorney General Pam Bondi's October 7, 2025, Senate Judiciary Committee testimony highlight a contentious and combative hearing marked by partisan conflict.

Key points from various independent observers down below:

Bondi adopted a confrontational and evasive approach, frequently retaliating against Democratic questioning rather than providing substantive answers. This hearing was notably more aggressive than her prior testimony, with numerous clashes over politically charged issues such as dismissals of DOJ prosecutors and FBI officials involved in investigations related to Trump and his allies. nytimes+1

Democrats criticized Bondi for fundamentally altering the DOJ’s independence and accused her of enabling President Trump’s use of the Justice Department as a weapon against political adversaries. Senator Dick Durbin called her tenure a stain on American history, while other Democrats accused the DOJ of backtracking on investigations and politicizing justice. npr+2

Republicans praised Bondi for restoring a tough-on-crime stance and rectifying what they described as leniency under the Biden administration. They framed the hearing as exposing Democratic attempts to weaponize the DOJ themselves and protected Bondi’s efforts to investigate Trump critics while dismissing cases against Trump supporters. pbs+1

Bondi often dodged questions about sensitive topics, including an FBI investigation of White House border czar Tom Homan accepting cash bribes and the Biden administration’s handling of certain cases, causing frustration among senators, especially Democrats. nytimes+1

Commentators saw Bondi's tactic as focused on undermining Democrats rather than engaging with their concerns substantively, reflecting deep polarization in the Senate and the broader political environment. the-independent+1

Overall, independent analyses portray Bondi’s testimony as fiercely partisan, highlighting a Justice Department increasingly entwined with politics under her leadership, rather than a nonpartisan law enforcement agency. The hearing deepened divides between Democrats demanding accountability and Republicans defending the administration’s actions. the-independent+4

sources:

1. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/07/us/politics/bondi-hearing-takeaways.html
2. https://www.npr.org/2025/10/07/nx-s1-5563934/bondi-senate-judiciary-committee-testify
3. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/3-takeaways-from-bondis-combative-doj-oversight-hearing
4. https://www.the-independent.com/new...senate-hearing-attorney-general-b2841022.html
5. https://www.the-independent.com/new...trump-schiff-congress-testimony-b2841349.html
6. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cn4w50ld9net
7.
8.

 

[odanny]

Wrong forum, should be in Humor. Democrats? Rule of Law? BAHAHAHAHAHA Good one!!!

It's above your pay grade.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Attorney General Pam Bondi came out swinging today during her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The Democrats' plan was clear from the start: to distract and divert from their government shutdown, lawlessness in cities, rogue judges, and the death and destruction Joe Biden's open border policies unleashed.

Pam Bondi was having none of it and continuously brought the conversation back to what Democrats tried to avoid.

It’s one of those things: Democrats need to shift the focus on who’s to blame to mask their incompetence.

She came prepared, bringing a gun to the Democrats’ knife fight. When liberal media reporters admit that she was cooking Democrats, you know it’s bad.

​

Ken Dilanian
@DilanianMSNBC

Senate Democrats seem completely unprepared for the personal attacks
@AGPamBondi
came prepared to launch at each one of them today, and they are failing to rebut them.


11:36 AM · Oct 7, 2025

AG Pam Bondi Absolutely Cooked Senate Dems...and Even Lib Reporters Couldn't Deny It

Pam Bondi dominates Senate Judiciary Committee, challenging Democrats on key issues.

townhall.com

BJ -
Spectacular today.
Not every day.
Some days less -, but not today.
·

It's funny to hear liberals tell us how wonderfully educated and sophisticated they are. Meanwhile, Republican leaders > Democrats all day everyday.