**After this week, can President Biden serve out this YEAR?

After this week, can President Biden serve out this YEAR?

It is no longer a question of IF Joe Biden will serve out his term, now it is a question of whether he can serve out this year.

Unheard of is the fact that seldom if ever do top officials contradict the Commander in Chief. Today, an hour after President Biden addressed the nation on the nightmare called the surrender of the US in Afghanistan.

An hour after Biden's address, the Top Pentagon officials went on TV and had to retract most of what had been said and replace it with what was actually happening. Biden was 100% wrong about al-Qaeda, the violence against American citizens, how many citizens are in the country, what the atmosphere was around the Kabul airport, what was happening to Americans trying to get to the airport, (they were being beaten), or what was happening to Afghans who had cooperated with Americans. Biden said everything was going smoothly. We know for a fact that the Taliban are going door to door to find them, and hanging them.

What happens next?
Trump is not getting reinstated. LOL
 
/——-/ “The Former Guy lied when he claimed to have it "under control!" and insisted that "everyone's getting better!"”
President Trump’s mistake was listening to that quack Fauci.
I realize that the Cry Baby Sore Loser is far too feeble to ever admit hie was wrong, He always needs to blame someone else, and his fawning lickspittles will invarioably parrot his desperate vilifications.

The Loser had been whining about Dr Fauci incessantly, but Americans have not fallen for his pathetic ploy:


Public trust in Anthony Fauci and the nation's federal health officials is high more than a year into the coronavirus pandemic, according to a new poll.
A survey released this week by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania found 76 percent of respondents said they were "somewhat or very confident" in the veracity of information about the coronavirus coming from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and its leaders.
At the same time, 68 percent said they believed Fauci, a member of former President Trump's coronavirus task force and a top adviser to President Biden on the pandemic, has provided trustworthy advice.
A total of 77 percent also expressed confidence in the information being put forth by the Food and Drug Administration about vaccines and vaccine science.

There is no sign that Americans are turning away from healthcare professionals to failed casino operators and faded shlock-tv performers for sound healthcare advice.

High trust in doctors, nurses in US, AP-NORC poll finds
 
By making my point clear, you interpret that as being ignorant. Ignorant to what?
Ignorant to the hypocrisy you republicans are showing after cheering after killing over 200k of them? Ignorant to recognising Your pathetic justifications for hating Biden?
Don't try to be clever son. You don't have the smarts.
You're to far in the weeds to understand why Afghanistan has importance to us.

You prove again your ignorance. I have no hate, whatsoever, for President Biden. In fact I have a great deal of sympathy for him. If he was your father or grandfather, and under your care, you'd be guilty of elder abuse.

Would anyone who cares about him convince him to dress up like the President of the United States, go out in front of a microphone and try to squint to see what are supposed to be his words from a teleprompter.

Come on man, what other explanation can there be for the chaos at the border, economy, and now the tragedy in Afghanistan
 
A survey released this week by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania found 76 percent of respondents said they were "somewhat or very confident" in the veracity of information about the coronavirus coming from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and its leaders.At the same time, 68 percent said they believed Fauci, a member of former President Trump's coronavirus task force and a top adviser to President Biden on the pandemic, has provided trustworthy advice.

I wish they had side by side polls. For instance after they ask that question, also ask them if they know Fauci helped fund the gain of function research that created this virus that we are all suffering with now.
 
I realize that the Cry Baby Sore Loser is far too feeble to ever admit hie was wrong, He always needs to blame someone else, and his fawning lickspittles will invarioably parrot his desperate vilifications.

The Loser had been whining about Dr Fauci incessantly, but Americans have not fallen for his pathetic ploy:


Public trust in Anthony Fauci and the nation's federal health officials is high more than a year into the coronavirus pandemic, according to a new poll.
A survey released this week by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania found 76 percent of respondents said they were "somewhat or very confident" in the veracity of information about the coronavirus coming from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and its leaders.
At the same time, 68 percent said they believed Fauci, a member of former President Trump's coronavirus task force and a top adviser to President Biden on the pandemic, has provided trustworthy advice.
A total of 77 percent also expressed confidence in the information being put forth by the Food and Drug Administration about vaccines and vaccine science.

There is no sign that Americans are turning away from healthcare professionals to failed casino operators and faded shlock-tv performers for sound healthcare advice.

High trust in doctors, nurses in US, AP-NORC poll finds
The topic is President Joe Biden's mental acuity. No one else.

As for the far-left Annenberg Foundation.

August 21, 2008

Obama's Lost Annenberg Years Coming to Light

By Thomas Lifson

The cloak of media invisibility is slowly beginning to lift from Barack Obama's most important administrative leadership experience, helming an expensive educational reform effort in Chicago that failed to produce any measurable academic gains, according to the project's own final report.

Add in the fact that former Weatherman and admitted terrorist William Ayers (whom Obama described in the Philadelphia debate as merely a "neighbor") was head of the operating arm of the CAC, working with Obama on distributing scores of millions of dollars to grantees in the wards of the city, and you have a topic that the Obama campaign wishes to avoid at all costs.

###

Now, back to Joe, thank you!
 
Fauci helped fund the gain of function research that created this virus that we are all suffering with now.
That's a lie that only Trump bum kissers are parroting, yet another self-serving, paranoidal notion without substance. A common concomitant delusion is that their God/Emperor won the 2020 election "in a landslide!" despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Another such nutty notion is that China made up climate change to hurt U.S. manufacturing.

The claim that Fauci is "responsible" for the COVID-19 pandemic is based, in turn, on speculation that NIH-funded gain of function research resulted in a manipulated form of the coronavirus "spilling over" from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and infecting the human population. To date, none of these claims have been substantiated and Fauci has explicitly denied that NIH funded of gain of function research on the coronavirus.
On May 19, Dr. Francis Collins with the NIH issued the below statement, which the agency forwarded to Snopes:

... neither NIH nor NIAID have ever approved any grant that would have supported “gain-of-function” research on coronaviruses that would have increased their transmissibility or lethality for humans. NIH strongly supports the need for further investigation by the World Health Organization (WHO) into the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus.
 
After this week, can President Biden serve out this YEAR?

It is no longer a question of IF Joe Biden will serve out his term, now it is a question of whether he can serve out this year.

Unheard of is the fact that seldom if ever do top officials contradict the Commander in Chief. Today, an hour after President Biden addressed the nation on the nightmare called the surrender of the US in Afghanistan.

An hour after Biden's address, the Top Pentagon officials went on TV and had to retract most of what had been said and replace it with what was actually happening. Biden was 100% wrong about al-Qaeda, the violence against American citizens, how many citizens are in the country, what the atmosphere was around the Kabul airport, what was happening to Americans trying to get to the airport, (they were being beaten), or what was happening to Afghans who had cooperated with Americans. Biden said everything was going smoothly. We know for a fact that the Taliban are going door to door to find them, and hanging them.

What happens next?
bds-2.jpg
 
The claim that Fauci is "responsible" for the COVID-19 pandemic is based, in turn, on speculation that NIH-funded gain of function research resulted in a manipulated form of the coronavirus "spilling over" from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and infecting the human population. To date, none of these claims have been substantiated and Fauci has explicitly denied that NIH funded of gain of function research on the coronavirus.

Of course he is denying it. What do you think would happen if he admitted it in this environment? It's why the Republicans in Congress are looking into it.

Fauci is a politician now. Why do you suppose he never once gave an opinion about covid and our open borders?
 
Of course he is denying it. What do you think would happen if he admitted it in this environment? It's why the Republicans in Congress are looking into it.

Fauci is a politician now. Why do you suppose he never once gave an opinion about covid and our open borders?
Of course the crackpots are denying that they have no credible evidence for their conspiracy.

Hyper-partisan ideologues spewing their hyperbolic, paranoid delusions need to find some reputable authority in public health, virology, or epidemiology that might lend them a modicum of credibility.

Thus far, they seem to just parrot whatever their wacky media entertainers tell them.
 
Of course the crackpots are denying that they have no credible evidence for their conspiracy.

Hyper-partisan ideologues spewing their hyperbolic, paranoid delusions need to find some reputable authority in public health, virology, or epidemiology that might lend them a modicum of credibility.

Thus far, they seem to just parrot whatever their wacky media entertainers tell them.
Hyper-partisan ideologues spewing their hyperbolic, paranoid delusions....

Thus far, they seem to just parrot whatever their wacky media entertainers tell them.


 
That's a lie that only Trump bum kissers are parroting, yet another self-serving, paranoidal notion without substance. A common concomitant delusion is that their God/Emperor won the 2020 election "in a landslide!" despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Another such nutty notion is that China made up climate change to hurt U.S. manufacturing.

The claim that Fauci is "responsible" for the COVID-19 pandemic is based, in turn, on speculation that NIH-funded gain of function research resulted in a manipulated form of the coronavirus "spilling over" from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and infecting the human population. To date, none of these claims have been substantiated and Fauci has explicitly denied that NIH funded of gain of function research on the coronavirus.
On May 19, Dr. Francis Collins with the NIH issued the below statement, which the agency forwarded to Snopes:
What does the word FUNGIBLE mean to you?

Fauci admits ‘modest’ NIH funding of Wuhan lab but denies ‘gain of function’

By
Samuel Chamberlain
May 25, 2021

The National Institutes of Health earmarked $600,000 for the Wuhan Institute of Virology over a five-year period to study whether bat coronaviruses could be transmitted to humans, White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci told lawmakers Tuesday.

Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), told a House Appropriations subcommittee that the money was funneled to the Chinese lab through the non-profit EcoHealth Alliance to fund “a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who were world experts on coronavirus.”

But Fauci emphatically denied that the money went toward so-called “gain of function” research, which he described as “taking a virus that could infect humans and making it either more transmissible and/or pathogenic for humans.”

“That categorically was not done,” he insisted.

 
What does the word FUNGIBLE mean to you?

Fauci admits ‘modest’ NIH funding of Wuhan lab but denies ‘gain of function’

By
Samuel Chamberlain
May 25, 2021

The National Institutes of Health earmarked $600,000 for the Wuhan Institute of Virology over a five-year period to study whether bat coronaviruses could be transmitted to humans, White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci told lawmakers Tuesday.

Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), told a House Appropriations subcommittee that the money was funneled to the Chinese lab through the non-profit EcoHealth Alliance to fund “a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who were world experts on coronavirus.”

But Fauci emphatically denied that the money went toward so-called “gain of function” research, which he described as “taking a virus that could infect humans and making it either more transmissible and/or pathogenic for humans.”

“That categorically was not done,” he insisted.

He lied.
 
What does the word FUNGIBLE mean to you?

Fauci admits ‘modest’ NIH funding of Wuhan lab but denies ‘gain of function’

By
Samuel Chamberlain
May 25, 2021

The National Institutes of Health earmarked $600,000 for the Wuhan Institute of Virology over a five-year period to study whether bat coronaviruses could be transmitted to humans, White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci told lawmakers Tuesday.

Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), told a House Appropriations subcommittee that the money was funneled to the Chinese lab through the non-profit EcoHealth Alliance to fund “a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who were world experts on coronavirus.”

But Fauci emphatically denied that the money went toward so-called “gain of function” research, which he described as “taking a virus that could infect humans and making it either more transmissible and/or pathogenic for humans.”

“That categorically was not done,” he insisted.

No credible source contradicts Fauci's denial of "gain of function" research, nor does any identify he lab as other than a possible place of origin.

It appears to be a case diehard trumpers in desperate need of a scapegoat.
 
After this week, can President Biden serve out this YEAR?

It is no longer a question of IF Joe Biden will serve out his term, now it is a question of whether he can serve out this year.

Unheard of is the fact that seldom if ever do top officials contradict the Commander in Chief. Today, an hour after President Biden addressed the nation on the nightmare called the surrender of the US in Afghanistan.

An hour after Biden's address, the Top Pentagon officials went on TV and had to retract most of what had been said and replace it with what was actually happening. Biden was 100% wrong about al-Qaeda, the violence against American citizens, how many citizens are in the country, what the atmosphere was around the Kabul airport, what was happening to Americans trying to get to the airport, (they were being beaten), or what was happening to Afghans who had cooperated with Americans. Biden said everything was going smoothly. We know for a fact that the Taliban are going door to door to find them, and hanging them.

What happens next?
What happens next? Biden stays president until at least 2024.
 
Hyper-partisan ideologues spewing their hyperbolic, paranoid delusions....

Thus far, they seem to just parrot whatever their wacky media entertainers tell them.
Here you go:

I served in Afghanistan as a US Marine, twice. Here’s the truth in two sentences

Lucas Kunce​
Mon, August 23, 2021​

What we are seeing in Afghanistan right now shouldn’t shock you. It only seems that way because our institutions are steeped in systematic dishonesty. It doesn’t require a dissertation to explain what you’re seeing. Just two sentences.
One: For 20 years, politicians, elites and D.C. military leaders lied to us about Afghanistan.
Two: What happened last week was inevitable, and anyone saying differently is still lying to you.
I know because I was there. Twice. On special operations task forces. I learned Pashto as a U.S. Marine captain and spoke to everyone I could there: everyday people, elites, allies and yes, even the Taliban.
The truth is that the Afghan National Security Forces was a jobs program for Afghans, propped up by U.S. taxpayer dollars — a military jobs program populated by nonmilitary people or “paper” forces (that didn’t really exist) and a bevy of elites grabbing what they could when they could...
So when people ask me if we made the right call getting out of Afghanistan in 2021, I answer truthfully: Absolutely not. The right call was getting out in 2002. 2003. Every year we didn’t get out was another year the Taliban used to refine their skills and tactics against us — the best fighting force in the world. After two decades, $2 trillion and nearly 2,500 American lives lost, 2021 was way too late to make the right call...
It's entirely understandable why the Cry Baby Loser failed to do what he long insisted had to be done in the four years he could have done so. Like Obama, he was afraid that he'd be blamed for the inevitable.
 
Of course the crackpots are denying that they have no credible evidence for their conspiracy.

Hyper-partisan ideologues spewing their hyperbolic, paranoid delusions need to find some reputable authority in public health, virology, or epidemiology that might lend them a modicum of credibility.

Thus far, they seem to just parrot whatever their wacky media entertainers tell them.

Maybe they are parroting your hero Fauci. Back in 2017, he predicted a major pandemic. Now gee, HTF did he know that? Almost sounds like he had.......well.......inside information or something. He didn't say sometime this decade, sometime in the next 15 years. He said almost conclusively during this administration.

You don't have to believe me. Just listen to Dr. Fauci for yourself and join us hyper-partisan, hyperbolic, paranoid delusional people on the right.

 
No credible source contradicts Fauci's denial of "gain of function" research, nor does any identify he lab as other than a possible place of origin.

It appears to be a case diehard trumpers in desperate need of a scapegoat.
namingcalling-is-way-S.jpg


You seem to be intelligent but you are also anxious to accept at face value what you are anxious to believe. Fungible is a word I'm sure you are familiar with due to your affinity for the far-left.

Another example I am sure you are familiar with and the Democrats.

The Hyde Amendment prohibits the Fed. Govt. paying for most abortions. However, the Fed. Govt. CAN make payments to Planned Parenthood. Say the government gives PP $100 million BUT they can not use it for abortions. PP, do you promise? Oh, we promise says PP. And they are serious. Say the rent on ten of their facilities is $10 million a year. So they use the $100 million to pay that rent. Oh gosh, we (PP) have a surplus over here of $100 million we expected to use for rent, but NOW we can use it for ?

What does the word FUNGIBLE mean to you?
ADJECTIVE
law
fungible (adjective)

  1. (of goods contracted for without an individual specimen being specified) able to replace or be replaced by another identical item; mutually interchangeable.
    "it is by no means the world's only fungible commodity" · "money is fungible—money that is raised for one purpose can easily be used for another"
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top