Any reasonable person need only look at his mental abilities when he passed on running in 2016, then when he was running from his basement in 2020, and today, when even hardcore Democrats are backing away from Biden. As sadly happens frequently, now that he has begun his decline, it does nothing but speed up.
Disgruntled trump bum kissers have been very pissy since the American People elected the President in 2020, some pathologically so, incapable of confronting the reality.
No, any reasonable person would see that Biden is in office until at least 2024. It is the unreasonable who think that just because Biden fucked up Afghanistan along with several other things, that that will somehow translate into him leaving office shortly. Now, I admit that you might have a slight chance in 2023 after a Republican House gets sworn in but, even then, you've got the very same Clinton/Trump/Biden problem in the Senate. You're not going to find 67 votes to remove Biden from office. You are repeating the very same nonsense the left repeated for four years. Do you really want to be on the same level as the TDS'rs?
I have seen no credible, legitimate public health source anywhere on earth accusing Dr Fauci of being in any way complicit in funding gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology or anywhere else, nor that the Wuhan Institute was ever engaged in gain of function research. Nevertheless, Dr Fauci supports continuing investigation of the matter.
www.factcheck.org
That is more wishful thinking than reality. The other side thought the very same thing for four years and even with two impeachments (well, maybe one), Trump still remained in office until voted out.
I have seen no credible, legitimate public health source anywhere on earth accusing Dr Fauci of being in any way complicit in funding gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology or anywhere else, nor that the Wuhan Institute was ever engaged in gain of function research. Nevertheless, Dr Fauci supports continuing investigation of the matter.
... Experts have suspected the SARS-CoV-2 virus similarly originated in bats. Researchers in China — including at the Wuhan Institute of Virology — have said the virus shares 96% of its genome with a bat virus collected by researchers in 2013 in Yunnan Province, China. (While that’s quite similar, Dr. Stanley Perlman, a professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Iowa who studies coronaviruses and a pediatric infectious disease physician, told us it would be “impossible” to take such a virus and make the kind of changes required to turn it into SARS-CoV-2 in a lab. One would need a virus that’s 99.9% similar, and “in theory it might work.”) An article published in Nature Medicine in March 2020 said that the virus likely originated through “natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer,” or “natural selection in humans following zoonotic transfer.” The researchers, who analyzed genomic data, said SARS-CoV-2 “is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.” While they said an accidental laboratory release of the naturally occurring virus can’t be ruled out, they said they “do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.”In an April 2020 statement, University of Sydney professor Edward Holmes, who was involved in mapping the genome of SARS-CoV-2, responded to “unfounded speculation” that the bat virus with 96% similarity was the origin of SARS-CoV-2. He said: “In summary, the abundance, diversity and evolution of coronaviruses in wildlife strongly suggests that this virus is of natural origin. However, a greater sampling of animal species in nature, including bats from Hubei province, is needed to resolve the exact origins of SARS-CoV-2.”The U.S. Intelligence Community said in an April 30, 2020, statement that it “concurs with the wide scientific consensus that the COVID-19 virus was not manmade or genetically modified,” and that it “will continue to rigorously examine emerging information and intelligence to determine whether the outbreak began through contact with infected animals or if it was the result of an accident at a laboratory in Wuhan.”...... the U.S. government, along with 13 other countries, also had called for more inquiry into the origins in a March statement this year.“It is critical for independent experts to have full access to all pertinent human, animal, and environmental data, research, and personnel involved in the early stages of the outbreak relevant to determining how this pandemic emerged,” the statement said. “With all data in hand, the international community may independently assess COVID-19 origins, learn valuable lessons from this pandemic, and prevent future devastating consequences from outbreaks of disease.”...Fauci said he wasn’t convinced that the coronavirus developed naturally. “I think that we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we find out to the best of our ability exactly what happened.”The Wuhan Lab and the Gain-of-Function Disagreement - FactCheck.org
A disagreement between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci has put $600,000 of U.S. grant money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology back into the spotlight, while making "gain-of-function" research a household term -- all amid calls for more investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
www.theaustralian.com.au
www.technologyreview.com
Watch it go to Pelosi......the grand scheme no doubt!
I agree with Dr Fauci when he states, “I think that we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we find out to the best of our ability exactly what happened.”And yet a Chinese virologist fled the country because of her findings claims just the opposite. The Chinese Communist Party instructed her to only report on viruses related to animals and not necessarily that actual Covid itself whcih she found some strange patterns and makup.
NoCookies | The Australian
Now if this virus came from some animal somewhere, why can't they find this animal or breed?
No one can find the animal that gave people covid-19
Here’s your guide to the WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus.
That is your opinion. Like him or not, bumbling or not, bad for the country or not, he ain't goin anywhere, just as how hard the left tried Trump wasn't goin anywhere until voted out. The same will be for Biden.
That is how a conspiracy kook might interpret Fauci's unambiguous call that the investigation into the origin of the virus be pursued. Some, with no expertise in the matter, have contrived whatever answers fit their ideological agenda, but the truth is that no conclusion has yet been reached by folks far more qualified than they.
Major difference. President Biden is mentally incapable. We are in far more danger today than we were yesterday.
Here I thought the topic was President Biden. Who knew?
