After Elon Musk Ends Govt-Influenced Censorship of Twitter Liberal Democrats Demand Heavy Democrat Regulaion Of The Privately-Owned Company

[JGalt]

You aren't controlling jack shit.

Doofus can't even control his own habit. One I might say, that could even cause him to forfeit his gun rights.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Elon Musk has taken a wrecking ball to Democrat's / Proggressive's / Liberal's Censorship and Fake Accounts, their attemp to use the platform to control Anericans through Censorship and disinformation.

Leftist agents of disimformation and Censorship have been stripped of using Twitter as their anti-1st Amendment, language-controlling / partisan political propagandapolitical tool, through a chane of ownership...

...and they are pissed.

Since Twitter is now owned by a pro-free speech owner, Democrats are demanding the Democrats / government step in and impose their will, enforcing political censorship on a privately-owned company.

View attachment 734625

Mark Ruffalo's call for Twitter to be 'heavily regulated' ripped by critics: 'Hulk smash free speech'

Actor Mark Ruffalo was lambasted by Twitter users for suggesting the platform under Elon Musk needs to be heavily regulated for misinformation.

www.foxnews.com

But no crime.

 

[Coyote]

Elon Musk has taken a wrecking ball to Democrat's / Proggressive's / Liberal's Censorship and Fake Accounts, their attemp to use the platform to control Anericans through Censorship and disinformation.

Leftist agents of disimformation and Censorship have been stripped of using Twitter as their anti-1st Amendment, language-controlling / partisan political propagandapolitical tool, through a chane of ownership...

...and they are pissed.

Since Twitter is now owned by a pro-free speech owner, Democrats are demanding the Democrats / government step in and impose their will, enforcing political censorship on a privately-owned company.

View attachment 734625

Mark Ruffalo's call for Twitter to be 'heavily regulated' ripped by critics: 'Hulk smash free speech'

Actor Mark Ruffalo was lambasted by Twitter users for suggesting the platform under Elon Musk needs to be heavily regulated for misinformation.

www.foxnews.com

You have been calling for heavy regulation for some years now, what changed (besides your underwear)?

 

[scruffy]

But no crime.

Therefore no censorship.

Right, leftard?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Therefore no censorship.

Right, leftard?

No crime.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

give an example ... the right doesnt censure anyone ... and no.... parents not wanting sexually explicit books and material being taught to their children in school is not book banning or censorship ... the left however bans cancels, doxes , and censures anyone they dont agree with the party of the left [your party] is using nazi tactics on its political rivals . the democrat party is set on destroying a private citizen for political reasons ... thats a fact ... and leftists like you condone it .

Are you talking censure or censor? They are two different acts.

 

[scruffy]

No crime.

Therefore no censorship.

Say it, jackass.

Or are you a fucking Nazi?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Therefore no censorship.

Say it, jackass.

Or are you a fucking Nazi?

So what are you whining about if there is no crime?

 

[scruffy]

So what are you whining about if there is no crime?

Say it, Nazi pig.

Say it or be exposed as an un-American democommie sack of Nazi shit.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

And? All Musk is doing is restoring actual free speech for all. That shouldn't be a problem for honest people.

The left has never wanted an honest discussion. An honest discussion would reveal that many of their beliefs and ideas are failures.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

give an example ... the right doesnt censure anyone ...

The RNC censured Cheney and Kinzinger.

 

[scruffy]

The RNC censured Cheney and Kinzinger.

Censure is not the same as censorship.

Duh?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Censure is not the same as censorship.

Duh?

Can't put anything past you, huh.....

 

[JoeB131]

Elon Musk has taken a wrecking ball to Democrat's / Proggressive's / Liberal's Censorship and Fake Accounts, their attemp to use the platform to control Anericans through Censorship and disinformation.

Leftist agents of disimformation and Censorship have been stripped of using Twitter as their anti-1st Amendment, language-controlling / partisan political propagandapolitical tool, through a chane of ownership...

...and they are pissed.

Since Twitter is now owned by a pro-free speech owner, Democrats are demanding the Democrats / government step in and impose their will, enforcing political censorship on a privately-owned company.

The problem is that Twitter is governed by certain regulations, and Musk in in violation of those regulations in his burning down the house.

 

[easyt65]

They still have google doing their bidding among others

Apple is doing their part.

 

[easyt65]

The problem is that Twitter is governed by certain regulations, and Musk in in violation of those regulations in his burning down the house.

Prove it - link...

I am pretty sure the US govt, FBI, collaborating with Twitter to Censor Free Speech, hide information, impede / obstruct an investigation, attempt to affect a US election, and spread lies and propaganda were violations of multiple rules, regs, laws, etc...

 

[JoeB131]

Prove it - link...

I am pretty sure the US govt, FBI, collaborating with Twitter to Censor Free Speech, hide information, impede / obstruct an investigation, attempt to affect a US election, and spread lies and propaganda were violations of multiple rules, regs, laws, etc...

Here, let me help you out.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/11/tech/musk-twitter-ftc/index.html

Just two weeks into Elon Musk’s ownership of Twitter, the company may have already violated its consent agreement with the Federal Trade Commission, legal experts said.

If proven, a violation could ultimately lead to significant personal liability for Musk, escalating the risks he faces as he stumbles through a morass of business and content moderation headaches, most of which have been self-inflicted.

The potential violation stems from a reporting obligation Twitter must fulfill whenever the company experiences a change in structure, including mergers and sales.

Under Twitter’s latest FTC consent order, which was implemented this year, Twitter must submit a sworn compliance notice to the regulator within 14 days of any such change. The compliance notice is intended both to advise the FTC of major changes at the company as well as a commitment that it will continue to comply with the order, according to David Vladeck, a former senior FTC official and a law professor at Georgetown University.

Musk’s Twitter deal closed on Thursday, Oct. 27, prompting some legal experts to question Thursday whether Twitter had made the proper filings in light of the company’s mass layoffs and an exodus of senior executives. Among those resigning were its chief privacy officer and chief information security officer, who would be expected to be involved in the company’s compliance reporting.

So if the government REALLY wanted to fuck Musk and Twitter, they already have grounds to, legally.

Now, your wank fantasies about Twitter blocking stories about the fake laptop. Legally, they pretty much had every right to do that, and it might even have been prudent.

Let's not forget, at the time, you had considerable evidence that the laptop was Russian disinformation. (It actually probably is, but never mind.) The contents of the laptop were illegally obtained. Some of the things being purported to be from that laptop were pornographic (like the fake pictures of Hunter snorting coke off a Chinese hooker's ass.) That would open Twitter up to all sorts of legal liability. And, yes, they were a little sick of Trump and his nonsense, to be sure.

 

[bripat9643]

The problem is that Twitter is governed by certain regulations, and Musk in in violation of those regulations in his burning down the house.

What regulations is he violating?

 

[ozro]

What regulations is he violating?

I'm curious as well, what regulations IS he violating.
It seems that if there has been regulations violated by Twitter, it was by the previous owners.

 

[bripat9643]

And now the right does the same, congrats.

No it's not, you fucking dumbass.