I don't view "being on the dole" as you state as a group, however, I DO know that within Romneys statement about the 47%, he did also state something to the effect of "these people see themselves as victims".
{"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what...These are people who pay no income tax."}
His statement is irrefutable. And it has nothing to do with putting people into groups - unless you consider producers to be one group, and takers to be another.
His statement IRREFUTABLY put 47% of the population into a "group" he referred to them as "victims who feel the are entitled to benefits".
Insensitive.
If one speaks of "47%" of the population, that most certainly is a "group"...to be exact, based on my calculations it is almost half of the population of this country.
Social Security is also a "Government" sponsored program, and I know many elderly folks who are not "victims", however they rely on their Social Security to make ends meet.
Despite leftist attempts to turn SS into an entitlement, people pay for their SS.
Yes they do. And in spite of the fact that people pay into SS, Romneys running mate wanted to privatize it and make it fair game for Wall Street, while of course playing down the fact that HE benefitted from the program when his father died when he was 13.
Insensitive.
Decent, hardworking people who spent years in the trenches, who deserve better than to be categorized as self appointed "victims", dismissed and cast aside like old used up Tinker Toys.
SS isn't part of the 47%
Romney did not EXCLUDE SS when he referred to "government assistance" Assuming that he did not include SS, was he saying that 47% of the population is on welfare? That would be an outright lie.
Which IMHO is probably one of the insensitive statements that cost Romney the election.
Anyway, thanks for your thoughts, now I would like to see what the OP has to say.
The way the DNC media spun it, it did have a great deal to do with his loss. The statement remains 100% true and correct.